P. 392 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 39101-39200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	disjALTVidres 39101	The class of identity relations restricted is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj ( I ↾ 𝐴)
Theorem	disjALTVinidres 39102	The intersection with restricted identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ Disj (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	disjALTVxrnidres 39103	The class of range Cartesian product with restricted identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	disjsuc 39104*	Disjoint range Cartesian product, special case. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ suc 𝐴)) ↔ ( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅))))
Theorem	qmapeldisjsim 39105	Injectivity of coset map from QMap being disjoint (implication form): under the Disjs condition on QMap 𝑅, the coset assignment is injective on dom 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ QMap 𝑅 ∈ Disjs ∧ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅)) → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	qmapeldisjsbi 39106	Injectivity of coset map from QMap being disjoint (biconditional form). Convenience version of qmapeldisjsim 39105. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ QMap 𝑅 ∈ Disjs ∧ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅)) → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	rnqmapeleldisjsim 39107	Element-disjointness of the quotient carrier forces coset disjointness. Supplies the "cosets don't overlap unless equal" direction, but expressed via ran QMap 𝑅 (the quotient carrier) and ElDisjs. This is the structural reason Disjs needs a "carrier disjointness" level distinct from the "unique representatives" level. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs ∧ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅)) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
21.26.20  Antisymmetry
Definition	df-antisymrel 39108	Define the antisymmetric relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is an antisymmetric relation.) (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ( AntisymRel 𝑅 ↔ ( CnvRefRel (𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfantisymrel4 39109	Alternate definition of the antisymmetric relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ( AntisymRel 𝑅 ↔ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) ⊆ I ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfantisymrel5 39110*	Alternate definition of the antisymmetric relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ( AntisymRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	antisymrelres 39111*	(Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ( AntisymRel (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	antisymrelressn 39112	(Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-Jun-2024.)
⊢ AntisymRel (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})
21.26.21  Partitions: disjoints on domain quotients
Definition	df-parts 39113	Define the class of all partitions, cf. the comment of df-disjs 39034. Partitions are disjoints on domain quotients (or: domain quotients restricted to disjoints). This is a more general meaning of partition than we we are familiar with: the conventional meaning of partition (e.g. partition 𝐴 of 𝑋, [Halmos] p. 28: "A partition of 𝑋 is a disjoint collection 𝐴 of non-empty subsets of 𝑋 whose union is 𝑋", or Definition 35, [Suppes] p. 83., cf. https://oeis.org/A000110 39034) is what we call membership partition here, cf. dfmembpart2 39118. The binary partitions relation and the partition predicate are the same, that is, (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 Part 𝐴) if 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets, cf. brpartspart 39121. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ Parts = ( DomainQss ↾ Disjs )
Definition	df-part 39114	Define the partition predicate (read: 𝐴 is a partition by 𝑅). Alternative definition is dfpart2 39117. The binary partition and the partition predicate are the same if 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets, cf. brpartspart 39121. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ ( Disj 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 DomainQs 𝐴))
Definition	df-membparts 39115	Define the class of member partition relations on their domain quotients. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ MembParts = {𝑎 ∣ (◡ E ↾ 𝑎) Parts 𝑎}
Definition	df-membpart 39116	Define the member partition predicate, or the disjoint restricted element relation on its domain quotient predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a member partition.) A alternative definition is dfmembpart2 39118. Member partition is the conventional meaning of partition (see the notes of df-parts 39113 and dfmembpart2 39118), we generalize the concept in df-parts 39113 and df-part 39114. Member partition and comember equivalence are the same by mpet 39198. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ( MembPart 𝐴 ↔ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) Part 𝐴)
Theorem	dfpart2 39117	Alternate definition of the partition predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ ( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	dfmembpart2 39118	Alternate definition of the conventional membership case of partition. Partition 𝐴 of 𝑋, [Halmos] p. 28: "A partition of 𝑋 is a disjoint collection 𝐴 of non-empty subsets of 𝑋 whose union is 𝑋", or Definition 35, [Suppes] p. 83., cf. https://oeis.org/A000110 . (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( MembPart 𝐴 ↔ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	brparts 39119	Binary partitions relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ∧ 𝑅 DomainQss 𝐴)))
Theorem	brparts2 39120	Binary partitions relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴)))
Theorem	brpartspart 39121	Binary partition and the partition predicate are the same if 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 Part 𝐴))
Theorem	parteq1 39122	Equality theorem for partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Part 𝐴))
Theorem	parteq2 39123	Equality theorem for partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 Part 𝐵))
Theorem	parteq12 39124	Equality theorem for partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Part 𝐵))
Theorem	parteq1i 39125	Equality theorem for partition, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑅 = 𝑆    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Part 𝐴)
Theorem	parteq1d 39126	Equality theorem for partition, deduction version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Part 𝐴))
Theorem	partsuc2 39127	Property of the partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})) ∖ (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})) Part ((𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}) ∖ {𝐴}) ↔ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) Part 𝐴)
Theorem	partsuc 39128	Property of the partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ↾ suc 𝐴) ∖ (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})) Part (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐴}) ↔ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) Part 𝐴)
21.26.22  Partition-Equivalence Theorems
Theorem	disjim 39129	The "Divide et Aequivalere" Theorem: every disjoint relation generates equivalent cosets by the relation: generalization of the former prter1 39249, cf. eldisjim 39132. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-May-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → EqvRel ≀ 𝑅)
Theorem	disjimi 39130	Every disjoint relation generates equivalent cosets by the relation, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ EqvRel ≀ 𝑅
Theorem	detlem 39131	If a relation is disjoint, then it is equivalent to the equivalent cosets of the relation, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ EqvRel ≀ 𝑅)
Theorem	eldisjim 39132	If the elements of 𝐴 are disjoint, then it has equivalent coelements (former prter1 39249). Special case of disjim 39129. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 13-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 8-Feb-2018.) ( Revised by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 → CoElEqvRel 𝐴)
Theorem	eldisjim2 39133	Alternate form of eldisjim 39132. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 → EqvRel ∼ 𝐴)
Theorem	eqvrel0 39134	The null class is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ EqvRel ∅
Theorem	det0 39135	The cosets by the null class are in equivalence relation if and only if the null class is disjoint (which it is, see disjALTV0 39099). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj ∅ ↔ EqvRel ≀ ∅)
Theorem	eqvrelcoss0 39136	The cosets by the null class are in equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2024.)
⊢ EqvRel ≀ ∅
Theorem	eqvrelid 39137	The identity relation is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Apr-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ EqvRel I
Theorem	eqvrel1cossidres 39138	The cosets by a restricted identity relation is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ EqvRel ≀ ( I ↾ 𝐴)
Theorem	eqvrel1cossinidres 39139	The cosets by an intersection with a restricted identity relation are in equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	eqvrel1cossxrnidres 39140	The cosets by a range Cartesian product with a restricted identity relation are in equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	detid 39141	The cosets by the identity relation are in equivalence relation if and only if the identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj I ↔ EqvRel ≀ I )
Theorem	eqvrelcossid 39142	The cosets by the identity class are in equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2024.)
⊢ EqvRel ≀ I
Theorem	detidres 39143	The cosets by the restricted identity relation are in equivalence relation if and only if the restricted identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj ( I ↾ 𝐴) ↔ EqvRel ≀ ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	detinidres 39144	The cosets by the intersection with the restricted identity relation are in equivalence relation if and only if the intersection with the restricted identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	detxrnidres 39145	The cosets by the range Cartesian product with the restricted identity relation are in equivalence relation if and only if the range Cartesian product with the restricted identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	disjlem14 39146*	Lemma for disjdmqseq 39153, partim2 39155 and petlem 39160 via disjlem17 39147, (general version of the former prtlem14 39244). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑅) → ((𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅) → [𝑥]𝑅 = [𝑦]𝑅)))
Theorem	disjlem17 39147*	Lemma for disjdmqseq 39153, partim2 39155 and petlem 39160 via disjlem18 39148, (general version of the former prtlem17 39246). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (∃𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅) → 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
Theorem	disjlem18 39148*	Lemma for disjdmqseq 39153, partim2 39155 and petlem 39160 via disjlem19 39149, (general version of the former prtlem18 39247). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵))))
Theorem	disjlem19 39149*	Lemma for disjdmqseq 39153, partim2 39155 and petlem 39160 via disjdmqs 39152, (general version of the former prtlem19 39248). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → [𝑥]𝑅 = [𝐴] ≀ 𝑅)))
Theorem	disjdmqsss 39150	Lemma for disjdmqseq 39153 via disjdmqs 39152. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ⊆ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅))
Theorem	disjdmqscossss 39151	Lemma for disjdmqseq 39153 via disjdmqs 39152. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅))
Theorem	disjdmqs 39152	If a relation is disjoint, its domain quotient is equal to the domain quotient of the cosets by it. Lemma for partim2 39155 and petlem 39160 via disjdmqseq 39153. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅))
Theorem	disjdmqseq 39153	If a relation is disjoint, its domain quotient is equal to a class if and only if the domain quotient of the cosets by it is equal to the class. General version of eldisjn0el 39154 (which is the closest theorem to the former prter2 39251). Lemma for partim2 39155 and petlem 39160. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ((dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴 ↔ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	eldisjn0el 39154	Special case of disjdmqseq 39153 (perhaps this is the closest theorem to the former prter2 39251). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 → (¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (∪ 𝐴 / ∼ 𝐴) = 𝐴))
Theorem	partim2 39155	Disjoint relation on its natural domain implies an equivalence relation on the cosets of the relation, on its natural domain, cf. partim 39156. Lemma for petlem 39160. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) → ( EqvRel ≀ 𝑅 ∧ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	partim 39156	Partition implies equivalence relation by the cosets of the relation on its natural domain, cf. partim2 39155. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 → ≀ 𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	partimeq 39157	Partition implies that the class of coelements on the natural domain is equal to the class of cosets of the relation, cf. erimeq 39009. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 → ∼ 𝐴 = ≀ 𝑅))
Theorem	eldisjlem19 39158*	Special case of disjlem19 39149 (together with membpartlem19 39159, this is former prtlem19 39248). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ( ElDisj 𝐴 → ((𝑢 ∈ dom (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑢) → 𝑢 = [𝐵] ∼ 𝐴)))
Theorem	membpartlem19 39159*	Together with disjlem19 39149, this is former prtlem19 39248. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 15-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ( MembPart 𝐴 → ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑢) → 𝑢 = [𝐵] ∼ 𝐴)))
Theorem	petlem 39160	If you can prove that the equivalence of cosets on their natural domain implies disjointness (e.g. eqvrelqseqdisj5 39192), or converse function (cf. dfdisjALTV 39043), then disjointness, and equivalence of cosets, both on their natural domain, are equivalent. Lemma for the Partition Equivalence Theorem pet2 39209. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( EqvRel ≀ 𝑅 ∧ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) = 𝐴) → Disj 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ 𝑅 ∧ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	petlemi 39161	If you can prove disjointness (e.g. disjALTV0 39099, disjALTVid 39100, disjALTVidres 39101, disjALTVxrnidres 39103, search for theorems containing the ' |- Disj ' string), or the same with converse function (cf. dfdisjALTV 39043), then disjointness, and equivalence of cosets, both on their natural domain, are equivalent. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ 𝑅 ∧ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	pet02 39162	Class 𝐴 is a partition by the null class if and only if the cosets by the null class are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj ∅ ∧ (dom ∅ / ∅) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ ∅ ∧ (dom ≀ ∅ / ≀ ∅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	pet0 39163	Class 𝐴 is a partition by the null class if and only if the cosets by the null class are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (∅ Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ ∅ ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	petid2 39164	Class 𝐴 is a partition by the identity class if and only if the cosets by the identity class are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj I ∧ (dom I / I ) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ I ∧ (dom ≀ I / ≀ I ) = 𝐴))
Theorem	petid 39165	A class is a partition by the identity class if and only if the cosets by the identity class are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( I Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ I ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	petidres2 39166	Class 𝐴 is a partition by the identity class restricted to it if and only if the cosets by the restricted identity class are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj ( I ↾ 𝐴) ∧ (dom ( I ↾ 𝐴) / ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ∧ (dom ≀ ( I ↾ 𝐴) / ≀ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = 𝐴))
Theorem	petidres 39167	A class is a partition by identity class restricted to it if and only if the cosets by the restricted identity class are in equivalence relation on it, cf. eqvrel1cossidres 39138. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐴) Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	petinidres2 39168	Class 𝐴 is a partition by an intersection with the identity class restricted to it if and only if the cosets by the intersection are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ (dom (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) / (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴))) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ (dom ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) / ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴))) = 𝐴))
Theorem	petinidres 39169	A class is a partition by an intersection with the identity class restricted to it if and only if the cosets by the intersection are in equivalence relation on it. Cf. br1cossinidres 38784, disjALTVinidres 39102 and eqvrel1cossinidres 39139. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	petxrnidres2 39170	Class 𝐴 is a partition by a range Cartesian product with the identity class restricted to it if and only if the cosets by the range Cartesian product are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ (dom (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) / (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴))) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ (dom ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) / ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴))) = 𝐴))
Theorem	petxrnidres 39171	A class is a partition by a range Cartesian product with the identity class restricted to it if and only if the cosets by the range Cartesian product are in equivalence relation on it. Cf. br1cossxrnidres 38786, disjALTVxrnidres 39103 and eqvrel1cossxrnidres 39140. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	eqvreldisj1 39172*	The elements of the quotient set of an equivalence relation are disjoint (cf. eqvreldisj2 39173, eqvreldisj3 39174). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Dec-2016.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 3-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅)∀𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅)(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
Theorem	eqvreldisj2 39173	The elements of the quotient set of an equivalence relation are disjoint (cf. eqvreldisj3 39174). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Dec-2016.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → ElDisj (𝐴 / 𝑅))
Theorem	eqvreldisj3 39174	The elements of the quotient set of an equivalence relation are disjoint (cf. qsdisj2 8744). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Dec-2016.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → Disj (◡ E ↾ (𝐴 / 𝑅)))
Theorem	eqvreldisj4 39175	Intersection with the converse epsilon relation restricted to the quotient set of an equivalence relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → Disj (𝑆 ∩ (◡ E ↾ (𝐵 / 𝑅))))
Theorem	eqvreldisj5 39176	Range Cartesian product with converse epsilon relation restricted to the quotient set of an equivalence relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → Disj (𝑆 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ (𝐵 / 𝑅))))
Theorem	eqvrelqseqdisj2 39177	Implication of eqvreldisj2 39173, lemma for The Main Theorem of Equivalences mainer 39193. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ (𝐵 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) → ElDisj 𝐴)
Theorem	disjimeldisjdmqs 39178	Disj implies element-disjoint quotient carrier. Supplies the carrier-disjointness half of the Disjs pattern: under Disj 𝑅, the coset family is element-disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ElDisj (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅))
Theorem	eldisjsim1 39179	An element of the class of disjoint relations is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs → Disj 𝑅)
Theorem	eldisjsim2 39180	An element of the class of disjoint relations is an element of the class of relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs → 𝑅 ∈ Rels )
Theorem	disjsssrels 39181	The class of disjoint relations is a subclass of the class of relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Feb-2026.)
⊢ Disjs ⊆ Rels
Theorem	eldisjsim3 39182	Disjs implies element-disjoint quotient carrier. Exports the carrier-disjointness property in the ElDisjs packaging. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs → (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∈ ElDisjs )
Theorem	eldisjsim4 39183	Disjs implies element-disjoint range of QMap. Same as eldisjsim3 39182 but expressed using the block-map range ran QMap 𝑅 (often the more modular expression). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs → ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs )
Theorem	eldisjsim5 39184	Disjs is closed under QMap. If a relation is "disjoint-structured" (Disjs), then its canonical block map is also "disjoint-structured". This is the second "structure level" in Disjs: it expresses that the property is stable under passing to the canonical block map, a theme that mirrors Pet-grade stability at a different axis. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs → QMap 𝑅 ∈ Disjs )
Theorem	eldisjs6 39185	Elementhood in the class of disjoints. A relation 𝑅 is in Disjs iff: it is relation-typed, and its quotient-map QMap 𝑅 is itself disjoint, and its quotient-carrier ran QMap 𝑅 = (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) lies in ElDisjs (element-disjoint carriers). This is the central "stability-by-decomposition" theorem for Disjs: it explains why Disjs is internally well-behaved without adding an external stability clause. It is the exact template that PetParts imitates: for pet 39210, the analogue of "map layer" is the disjointness of the lifted span, the analogue of "carrier layer" is the block-lift fixpoint (BlockLiftFix), and then adds external grade stability (SucMap ShiftStable) which Disjs does not need. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Rels ∧ (ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs ∧ QMap 𝑅 ∈ Disjs )))
Theorem	eldisjs7 39186*	Elementhood in the class of disjoints. 𝑅 ∈ Disjs iff: 𝑅 ∈ Rels, and every 𝑥 belongs to at most one block 𝑢 in the quotient-carrier (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) (element-disjointness at the carrier), and every block 𝑢 in the quotient-carrier has a unique representative 𝑡 ∈ dom 𝑅 such that 𝑢 = [𝑡]𝑅. Provides the "fully expanded" quantifier characterization of the same decomposition as eldisjs6 39185, but without explicitly mentioning QMap. This is the "E*/E!"" view that is closest in spirit to suc11reg 9540-style injectivity and to the "unique generator per block" narrative. It is also the right contrast-point to older one-line criteria like dfdisjs4 39041 (the "u R x" style), because it makes the carrier and representation discipline explicit and type-safe. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Rels ∧ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)𝑥 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)∃!𝑡 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑢 = [𝑡]𝑅)))
Theorem	dfdisjs6 39187	Alternate definition of the class of disjoints (via quotient-map stability). Disjs is the class of relations 𝑟 whose quotient-map QMap 𝑟 is again disjoint and whose induced quotient-carrier is element-disjoint. This is the definitional "stability-by-decomposition" packaging of disjointness: it builds Disjs from two internal layers (i) a carrier-layer constraint and (ii) a map-layer closure constraint. This is deliberately different from "u R x" style definitions: it makes the carrier of blocks and the uniqueness-of-representatives discipline first-class and reusable (via QMap) rather than implicit. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ Disjs = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (ran QMap 𝑟 ∈ ElDisjs ∧ QMap 𝑟 ∈ Disjs )}
Theorem	dfdisjs7 39188*	Alternate definition of the class of disjoints (via carrier disjointness + unique representatives). Ideology-free normal form of dfdisjs6 39187: "blocks cover their elements" (∃*) and "each block has a unique generator" (∃!), expressed entirely at the quotient-carrier level. Same class as dfdisjs6 39187, but presented in fully expanded ∃* / ∃! form over the quotient-carrier (dom 𝑟 / 𝑟). Makes explicit (a) element-disjointness of the quotient-carrier and (b) unique representative existence for each block. These are exactly the two conditions that rule out type-confusions (blocks vs witnesses) and ensure canonical decomposition. This is the form that best supports analogy arguments with df-petparts 39213 and with successor-style uniqueness patterns. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ Disjs = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ (dom 𝑟 / 𝑟)𝑥 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (dom 𝑟 / 𝑟)∃!𝑡 ∈ dom 𝑟 𝑢 = [𝑡]𝑟)}
Theorem	fences3 39189	Implication of eqvrelqseqdisj2 39177 and n0eldmqseq 38979, see comment of fences 39203. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) → ( ElDisj 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	eqvrelqseqdisj3 39190	Implication of eqvreldisj3 39174, lemma for the Member Partition Equivalence Theorem mpet3 39195. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Oct-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ (𝐵 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) → Disj (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	eqvrelqseqdisj4 39191	Lemma for petincnvepres2 39207. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ (𝐵 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) → Disj (𝑆 ∩ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	eqvrelqseqdisj5 39192	Lemma for the Partition-Equivalence Theorem pet2 39209. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Jul-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ (𝐵 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) → Disj (𝑆 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	mainer 39193	The Main Theorem of Equivalences: every equivalence relation implies equivalent comembers. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴 → CoMembEr 𝐴)
Theorem	partimcomember 39194	Partition with general 𝑅 (in addition to the member partition cf. mpet 39198 and mpet2 39199) implies equivalent comembers. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 → CoMembEr 𝐴)
Theorem	mpet3 39195	Member Partition-Equivalence Theorem. Together with mpet 39198 mpet2 39199, mostly in its conventional cpet 39197 and cpet2 39196 form, this is what we used to think of as the partition equivalence theorem (but cf. pet2 39209 with general 𝑅). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-May-2018.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( ElDisj 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ( CoElEqvRel 𝐴 ∧ (∪ 𝐴 / ∼ 𝐴) = 𝐴))
Theorem	cpet2 39196	The conventional form of the Member Partition-Equivalence Theorem. In the conventional case there is no (general) disjoint and no (general) partition concept: mathematicians have called disjoint or partition what we call element disjoint or member partition, see also cpet 39197. Together with cpet 39197, mpet 39198 mpet2 39199, this is what we used to think of as the partition equivalence theorem (but cf. pet2 39209 with general 𝑅). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (( ElDisj 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ∼ 𝐴 ∧ (∪ 𝐴 / ∼ 𝐴) = 𝐴))
Theorem	cpet 39197	The conventional form of Member Partition-Equivalence Theorem. In the conventional case there is no (general) disjoint and no (general) partition concept: mathematicians have been calling disjoint or partition what we call element disjoint or member partition, see also cpet2 39196. Cf. mpet 39198, mpet2 39199 and mpet3 39195 for unconventional forms of Member Partition-Equivalence Theorem. Cf. pet 39210 and pet2 39209 for Partition-Equivalence Theorem with general 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ( MembPart 𝐴 ↔ ( EqvRel ∼ 𝐴 ∧ (∪ 𝐴 / ∼ 𝐴) = 𝐴))
Theorem	mpet 39198	Member Partition-Equivalence Theorem in almost its shortest possible form, cf. the 0-ary version mpets 39201. Member partition and comember equivalence relation are the same (or: each element of 𝐴 have equivalent comembers if and only if 𝐴 is a member partition). Together with mpet2 39199, mpet3 39195, and with the conventional cpet 39197 and cpet2 39196, this is what we used to think of as the partition equivalence theorem (but cf. pet2 39209 with general 𝑅). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( MembPart 𝐴 ↔ CoMembEr 𝐴)
Theorem	mpet2 39199	Member Partition-Equivalence Theorem in a shorter form. Together with mpet 39198 mpet3 39195, mostly in its conventional cpet 39197 and cpet2 39196 form, this is what we used to think of as the partition equivalence theorem (but cf. pet2 39209 with general 𝑅). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((◡ E ↾ 𝐴) Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	mpets2 39200	Member Partition-Equivalence Theorem with binary relations, cf. mpet2 39199. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((◡ E ↾ 𝐴) Parts 𝐴 ↔ ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) Ers 𝐴))