Theorem dvdsrpropd 20307

Description: The divisibility relation depends only on the ring's base set and multiplication operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rngidpropd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))
rngidpropd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))
rngidpropd.3	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dvdsrpropd	⊢ (𝜑 → (∥r‘𝐾) = (∥r‘𝐿))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑥,𝐾,𝑦   𝑥,𝐿,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem dvdsrpropd

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rngidpropd.3	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦))
2	1	anassrs 466	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦))
3	2	eqeq1d 2732	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧))
4	3	an32s 648	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧))
5	4	rexbidva 3174	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧))
6	5	pm5.32da 577	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧)))
7		rngidpropd.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))
8	7	eleq2d 2817	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)))
9	7	rexeqdv 3324	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)(𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧))
10	8, 9	anbi12d 629	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)(𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧)))
11		rngidpropd.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))
12	11	eleq2d 2817	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐿)))
13	11	rexeqdv 3324	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐿)(𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧))
14	12, 13	anbi12d 629	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐿)(𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧)))
15	6, 10, 14	3bitr3d 308	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)(𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐿)(𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧)))
16	15	opabbidv 5213	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)(𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧)} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐿)(𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧)})
17		eqid 2730	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐾)
18		eqid 2730	. . 3 ⊢ (∥r‘𝐾) = (∥r‘𝐾)
19		eqid 2730	. . 3 ⊢ (.r‘𝐾) = (.r‘𝐾)
20	17, 18, 19	dvdsrval 20252	. 2 ⊢ (∥r‘𝐾) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)(𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧)}
21		eqid 2730	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐿) = (Base‘𝐿)
22		eqid 2730	. . 3 ⊢ (∥r‘𝐿) = (∥r‘𝐿)
23		eqid 2730	. . 3 ⊢ (.r‘𝐿) = (.r‘𝐿)
24	21, 22, 23	dvdsrval 20252	. 2 ⊢ (∥r‘𝐿) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐿)(𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧)}
25	16, 20, 24	3eqtr4g 2795	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∥r‘𝐾) = (∥r‘𝐿))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 394   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2104  ∃wrex 3068  {copab 5209  ‘cfv 6542  (class class class)co 7411  Basecbs 17148  ._rcmulr 17202  ∥_rcdsr 20245

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2106  ax-9 2114  ax-10 2135  ax-11 2152  ax-12 2169  ax-ext 2701  ax-rep 5284  ax-sep 5298  ax-nul 5305  ax-pow 5362  ax-pr 5426  ax-un 7727

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2532  df-eu 2561  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2808  df-nfc 2883  df-ne 2939  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3431  df-v 3474  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-nul 4322  df-if 4528  df-pw 4603  df-sn 4628  df-pr 4630  df-op 4634  df-uni 4908  df-iun 4998  df-br 5148  df-opab 5210  df-mpt 5231  df-id 5573  df-xp 5681  df-rel 5682  df-cnv 5683  df-co 5684  df-dm 5685  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6544  df-fv 6550  df-ov 7414  df-dvdsr 20248

This theorem is referenced by:  unitpropd  20308