Theorem dvdsrpropd 19581

Description: The divisibility relation depends only on the ring's base set and multiplication operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rngidpropd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))
rngidpropd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))
rngidpropd.3	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dvdsrpropd	⊢ (𝜑 → (∥r‘𝐾) = (∥r‘𝐿))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑥,𝐾,𝑦   𝑥,𝐿,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem dvdsrpropd

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rngidpropd.3	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦))
2	1	anassrs 471	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦))
3	2	eqeq1d 2741	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧))
4	3	an32s 652	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧))
5	4	rexbidva 3207	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧))
6	5	pm5.32da 582	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧)))
7		rngidpropd.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))
8	7	eleq2d 2819	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)))
9	7	rexeqdv 3318	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)(𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧))
10	8, 9	anbi12d 634	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)(𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧)))
11		rngidpropd.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))
12	11	eleq2d 2819	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐿)))
13	11	rexeqdv 3318	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐿)(𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧))
14	12, 13	anbi12d 634	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐿)(𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧)))
15	6, 10, 14	3bitr3d 312	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)(𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐿)(𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧)))
16	15	opabbidv 5106	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)(𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧)} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐿)(𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧)})
17		eqid 2739	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐾)
18		eqid 2739	. . 3 ⊢ (∥r‘𝐾) = (∥r‘𝐾)
19		eqid 2739	. . 3 ⊢ (.r‘𝐾) = (.r‘𝐾)
20	17, 18, 19	dvdsrval 19530	. 2 ⊢ (∥r‘𝐾) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)(𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧)}
21		eqid 2739	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐿) = (Base‘𝐿)
22		eqid 2739	. . 3 ⊢ (∥r‘𝐿) = (∥r‘𝐿)
23		eqid 2739	. . 3 ⊢ (.r‘𝐿) = (.r‘𝐿)
24	21, 22, 23	dvdsrval 19530	. 2 ⊢ (∥r‘𝐿) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐿)(𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧)}
25	16, 20, 24	3eqtr4g 2799	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∥r‘𝐾) = (∥r‘𝐿))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  ∃wrex 3055  {copab 5102  ‘cfv 6350  (class class class)co 7183  Basecbs 16599  ._rcmulr 16682  ∥_rcdsr 19523

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2020  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2162  ax-12 2179  ax-ext 2711  ax-rep 5164  ax-sep 5177  ax-nul 5184  ax-pow 5242  ax-pr 5306  ax-un 7492

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 847  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2075  df-mo 2541  df-eu 2571  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2882  df-ne 2936  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3060  df-reu 3061  df-rab 3063  df-v 3402  df-sbc 3686  df-csb 3801  df-dif 3856  df-un 3858  df-in 3860  df-ss 3870  df-nul 4222  df-if 4425  df-pw 4500  df-sn 4527  df-pr 4529  df-op 4533  df-uni 4807  df-iun 4893  df-br 5041  df-opab 5103  df-mpt 5121  df-id 5439  df-xp 5541  df-rel 5542  df-cnv 5543  df-co 5544  df-dm 5545  df-rn 5546  df-res 5547  df-ima 5548  df-iota 6308  df-fun 6352  df-fn 6353  df-f 6354  df-f1 6355  df-fo 6356  df-f1o 6357  df-fv 6358  df-ov 7186  df-dvdsr 19526

This theorem is referenced by:  unitpropd  19582