Theorem dvdsrpropd 19853

Description: The divisibility relation depends only on the ring's base set and multiplication operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rngidpropd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))
rngidpropd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))
rngidpropd.3	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dvdsrpropd	⊢ (𝜑 → (∥r‘𝐾) = (∥r‘𝐿))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑥,𝐾,𝑦   𝑥,𝐿,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem dvdsrpropd

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rngidpropd.3	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦))
2	1	anassrs 467	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦))
3	2	eqeq1d 2740	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧))
4	3	an32s 648	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧))
5	4	rexbidva 3224	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧))
6	5	pm5.32da 578	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧)))
7		rngidpropd.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))
8	7	eleq2d 2824	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)))
9	7	rexeqdv 3340	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)(𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧))
10	8, 9	anbi12d 630	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)(𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧)))
11		rngidpropd.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))
12	11	eleq2d 2824	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐿)))
13	11	rexeqdv 3340	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐿)(𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧))
14	12, 13	anbi12d 630	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐿)(𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧)))
15	6, 10, 14	3bitr3d 308	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)(𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐿)(𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧)))
16	15	opabbidv 5136	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)(𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧)} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐿)(𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧)})
17		eqid 2738	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐾)
18		eqid 2738	. . 3 ⊢ (∥r‘𝐾) = (∥r‘𝐾)
19		eqid 2738	. . 3 ⊢ (.r‘𝐾) = (.r‘𝐾)
20	17, 18, 19	dvdsrval 19802	. 2 ⊢ (∥r‘𝐾) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐾)(𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = 𝑧)}
21		eqid 2738	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐿) = (Base‘𝐿)
22		eqid 2738	. . 3 ⊢ (∥r‘𝐿) = (∥r‘𝐿)
23		eqid 2738	. . 3 ⊢ (.r‘𝐿) = (.r‘𝐿)
24	21, 22, 23	dvdsrval 19802	. 2 ⊢ (∥r‘𝐿) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐿)(𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦) = 𝑧)}
25	16, 20, 24	3eqtr4g 2804	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∥r‘𝐾) = (∥r‘𝐿))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃wrex 3064  {copab 5132  ‘cfv 6418  (class class class)co 7255  Basecbs 16840  ._rcmulr 16889  ∥_rcdsr 19795

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5205  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pow 5283  ax-pr 5347  ax-un 7566

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-reu 3070  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-csb 3829  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-pw 4532  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-iun 4923  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fn 6421  df-f 6422  df-f1 6423  df-fo 6424  df-f1o 6425  df-fv 6426  df-ov 7258  df-dvdsr 19798

This theorem is referenced by:  unitpropd  19854