![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > indislem | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: A lemma to eliminate some sethood hypotheses when dealing with the indiscrete topology. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
indislem | ⊢ {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, 𝐴} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | fvi 6979 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → ( I ‘𝐴) = 𝐴) | |
2 | 1 | preq2d 4749 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, 𝐴}) |
3 | dfsn2 4645 | . . . 4 ⊢ {∅} = {∅, ∅} | |
4 | 3 | eqcomi 2737 | . . 3 ⊢ {∅, ∅} = {∅} |
5 | fvprc 6894 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ( I ‘𝐴) = ∅) | |
6 | 5 | preq2d 4749 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, ∅}) |
7 | prprc2 4775 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → {∅, 𝐴} = {∅}) | |
8 | 4, 6, 7 | 3eqtr4a 2794 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, 𝐴}) |
9 | 2, 8 | pm2.61i 182 | 1 ⊢ {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, 𝐴} |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 = wceq 1533 ∈ wcel 2098 Vcvv 3473 ∅c0 4326 {csn 4632 {cpr 4634 I cid 5579 ‘cfv 6553 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1789 ax-4 1803 ax-5 1905 ax-6 1963 ax-7 2003 ax-8 2100 ax-9 2108 ax-10 2129 ax-11 2146 ax-12 2166 ax-ext 2699 ax-sep 5303 ax-nul 5310 ax-pr 5433 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 395 df-or 846 df-3an 1086 df-tru 1536 df-fal 1546 df-ex 1774 df-nf 1778 df-sb 2060 df-mo 2529 df-eu 2558 df-clab 2706 df-cleq 2720 df-clel 2806 df-ral 3059 df-rex 3068 df-rab 3431 df-v 3475 df-dif 3952 df-un 3954 df-in 3956 df-ss 3966 df-nul 4327 df-if 4533 df-sn 4633 df-pr 4635 df-op 4639 df-uni 4913 df-br 5153 df-opab 5215 df-id 5580 df-xp 5688 df-rel 5689 df-cnv 5690 df-co 5691 df-dm 5692 df-iota 6505 df-fun 6555 df-fv 6561 |
This theorem is referenced by: indistop 22933 indisuni 22934 indiscld 23023 indisconn 23350 txindis 23566 hmphindis 23729 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |