![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > indislem | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: A lemma to eliminate some sethood hypotheses when dealing with the indiscrete topology. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
indislem | ⊢ {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, 𝐴} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | fvi 6715 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → ( I ‘𝐴) = 𝐴) | |
2 | 1 | preq2d 4636 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, 𝐴}) |
3 | dfsn2 4538 | . . . 4 ⊢ {∅} = {∅, ∅} | |
4 | 3 | eqcomi 2807 | . . 3 ⊢ {∅, ∅} = {∅} |
5 | fvprc 6638 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ( I ‘𝐴) = ∅) | |
6 | 5 | preq2d 4636 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, ∅}) |
7 | prprc2 4662 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → {∅, 𝐴} = {∅}) | |
8 | 4, 6, 7 | 3eqtr4a 2859 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, 𝐴}) |
9 | 2, 8 | pm2.61i 185 | 1 ⊢ {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, 𝐴} |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 = wceq 1538 ∈ wcel 2111 Vcvv 3441 ∅c0 4243 {csn 4525 {cpr 4527 I cid 5424 ‘cfv 6324 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2113 ax-9 2121 ax-10 2142 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2175 ax-ext 2770 ax-sep 5167 ax-nul 5174 ax-pow 5231 ax-pr 5295 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-or 845 df-3an 1086 df-tru 1541 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2070 df-mo 2598 df-eu 2629 df-clab 2777 df-cleq 2791 df-clel 2870 df-nfc 2938 df-ral 3111 df-rex 3112 df-v 3443 df-sbc 3721 df-dif 3884 df-un 3886 df-in 3888 df-ss 3898 df-nul 4244 df-if 4426 df-sn 4526 df-pr 4528 df-op 4532 df-uni 4801 df-br 5031 df-opab 5093 df-id 5425 df-xp 5525 df-rel 5526 df-cnv 5527 df-co 5528 df-dm 5529 df-iota 6283 df-fun 6326 df-fv 6332 |
This theorem is referenced by: indistop 21607 indisuni 21608 indiscld 21696 indisconn 22023 txindis 22239 hmphindis 22402 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |