MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  issubgr2 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem issubgr2 29853
Description: The property of a set to be a subgraph of a set whose edge function is actually a function. (Contributed by AV, 20-Nov-2020.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
issubgr.v 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝑆)
issubgr.a 𝐴 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
issubgr.i 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝑆)
issubgr.b 𝐵 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
issubgr.e 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝑆)
Assertion
Ref Expression
issubgr2 ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ Fun 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑆 SubGraph 𝐺 ↔ (𝑉 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐸 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉)))

Proof of Theorem issubgr2
StepHypRef Expression
1 issubgr.v . . . 4 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝑆)
2 issubgr.a . . . 4 𝐴 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
3 issubgr.i . . . 4 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝑆)
4 issubgr.b . . . 4 𝐵 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
5 issubgr.e . . . 4 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝑆)
61, 2, 3, 4, 5issubgr 29852 . . 3 ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑆 SubGraph 𝐺 ↔ (𝑉 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐼 = (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼) ∧ 𝐸 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉)))
763adant2 1149 . 2 ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ Fun 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑆 SubGraph 𝐺 ↔ (𝑉 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐼 = (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼) ∧ 𝐸 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉)))
8 resss 5992 . . . . 5 (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼) ⊆ 𝐵
9 sseq1 3956 . . . . 5 (𝐼 = (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼) → (𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼) ⊆ 𝐵))
108, 9mpbiri 261 . . . 4 (𝐼 = (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼) → 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵)
11 funssres 6584 . . . . . . 7 ((Fun 𝐵 ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼) = 𝐼)
1211eqcomd 2767 . . . . . 6 ((Fun 𝐵 ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐼 = (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼))
1312ex 418 . . . . 5 (Fun 𝐵 → (𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐼 = (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼)))
14133ad2ant2 1152 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ Fun 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐼 = (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼)))
1510, 14impbid2 229 . . 3 ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ Fun 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝐼 = (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼) ↔ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵))
16153anbi2d 1469 . 2 ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ Fun 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑈) → ((𝑉 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐼 = (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼) ∧ 𝐸 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉) ↔ (𝑉 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐸 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉)))
177, 16bitrd 282 1 ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ Fun 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑆 SubGraph 𝐺 ↔ (𝑉 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐸 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉)))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ⊆ wss 3899  𝒫 cpw 4557   class class class wbr 5103  dom cdm 5651   ↾ cres 5653  Fun wfun 6532  ‘cfv 6538  Vtxcvtx 29574  iEdgciedg 29575  Edgcedg 29625   SubGraph csubgr 29848
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-pr 5391
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-res 5663  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fv 6546  df-subgr 29849
This theorem is used by:  uhgrspansubgr  29872
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator