MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  issubgr2 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem issubgr2 29865
Description: The property of a set to be a subgraph of a set whose edge function is actually a function. (Contributed by AV, 20-Nov-2020.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
issubgr.v 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝑆)
issubgr.a 𝐴 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
issubgr.i 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝑆)
issubgr.b 𝐵 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
issubgr.e 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝑆)
Assertion
Ref Expression
issubgr2 ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ Fun 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑆 SubGraph 𝐺 ↔ (𝑉 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐸 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉)))

Proof of Theorem issubgr2
StepHypRef Expression
1 issubgr.v . . . 4 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝑆)
2 issubgr.a . . . 4 𝐴 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
3 issubgr.i . . . 4 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝑆)
4 issubgr.b . . . 4 𝐵 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
5 issubgr.e . . . 4 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝑆)
61, 2, 3, 4, 5issubgr 29864 . . 3 ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑆 SubGraph 𝐺 ↔ (𝑉 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐼 = (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼) ∧ 𝐸 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉)))
763adant2 1149 . 2 ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ Fun 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑆 SubGraph 𝐺 ↔ (𝑉 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐼 = (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼) ∧ 𝐸 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉)))
8 resss 5996 . . . . 5 (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼) ⊆ 𝐵
9 sseq1 3937 . . . . 5 (𝐼 = (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼) → (𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼) ⊆ 𝐵))
108, 9mpbiri 261 . . . 4 (𝐼 = (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼) → 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵)
11 funssres 6592 . . . . . . 7 ((Fun 𝐵 ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼) = 𝐼)
1211eqcomd 2769 . . . . . 6 ((Fun 𝐵 ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐼 = (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼))
1312ex 418 . . . . 5 (Fun 𝐵 → (𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐼 = (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼)))
14133ad2ant2 1152 . . . 4 ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ Fun 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐼 = (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼)))
1510, 14impbid2 229 . . 3 ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ Fun 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝐼 = (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼) ↔ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵))
16153anbi2d 1469 . 2 ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ Fun 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑈) → ((𝑉 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐼 = (𝐵 ↾ dom 𝐼) ∧ 𝐸 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉) ↔ (𝑉 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐸 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉)))
177, 16bitrd 282 1 ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ Fun 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑆 SubGraph 𝐺 ↔ (𝑉 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐸 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉)))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2146   ⊆ wss 3899  𝒫 cpw 4559   class class class wbr 5105  dom cdm 5654   ↾ cres 5656  Fun wfun 6540  ‘cfv 6546  Vtxcvtx 29586  iEdgciedg 29587  Edgcedg 29637   SubGraph csubgr 29860
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5251  ax-pr 5394
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2101  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3416  df-v 3455  df-ss 3900  df-dif 4049  df-in 4093  df-un 4153  df-nul 4281  df-if 4485  df-pw 4561  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4838  df-uni 4870  df-br 5106  df-opab 5170  df-id 5549  df-xp 5660  df-rel 5661  df-cnv 5662  df-co 5663  df-dm 5664  df-res 5666  df-iota 6500  df-fun 6548  df-fv 6554  df-subgr 29861
This theorem is used by:  uhgrspansubgr  29884
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator