Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rabss2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Subclass law for restricted abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabss2 | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | pm3.45 625 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
2 | 1 | alimi 1819 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
3 | dfss2 3886 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
4 | ss2ab 3973 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
5 | 2, 3, 4 | 3imtr4i 295 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
6 | df-rab 3070 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
7 | df-rab 3070 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
8 | 5, 6, 7 | 3sstr4g 3946 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 399 ∀wal 1541 ∈ wcel 2110 {cab 2714 {crab 3065 ⊆ wss 3866 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1803 ax-4 1817 ax-5 1918 ax-6 1976 ax-7 2016 ax-8 2112 ax-9 2120 ax-10 2141 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2175 ax-ext 2708 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-or 848 df-tru 1546 df-ex 1788 df-nf 1792 df-sb 2071 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2816 df-nfc 2886 df-rab 3070 df-v 3410 df-in 3873 df-ss 3883 |
This theorem is referenced by: rabssrabd 3996 sess2 5520 hashbcss 16557 dprdss 19416 minveclem4 24329 prmdvdsfi 25989 mumul 26063 sqff1o 26064 rpvmasumlem 26368 disjxwwlkn 27997 clwwlknfi 28128 shatomistici 30442 rabfodom 30570 xpinpreima2 31571 ballotth 32216 bj-unrab 34851 icorempo 35259 lssats 36763 lpssat 36764 lssatle 36766 lssat 36767 atlatmstc 37070 dochspss 39129 rmxyelqirr 40435 idomodle 40724 sssmf 43946 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |