| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rabss2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Subclass law for restricted abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by TM, 1-Feb-2026.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabss2 | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ssel 3929 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
| 2 | 1 | anim1d 612 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 3 | 2 | ss2abdv 4019 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
| 4 | df-rab 3402 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 5 | df-rab 3402 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 6 | 3, 4, 5 | 3sstr4g 3989 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 395 ∈ wcel 2114 {cab 2715 {crab 3401 ⊆ wss 3903 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2010 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-ext 2709 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-ex 1782 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2812 df-rab 3402 df-ss 3920 |
| This theorem is referenced by: rabssrabd 4037 sess2 5598 hashbcss 16944 dprdss 19972 minveclem4 25400 prmdvdsfi 27085 mumul 27159 sqff1o 27160 rpvmasumlem 27466 disjxwwlkn 29998 clwwlknfi 30132 shatomistici 32449 rabfodom 32592 xpinpreima2 34085 ballotth 34716 bj-unrab 37174 icorempo 37606 lssats 39388 lpssat 39389 lssatle 39391 lssat 39392 atlatmstc 39695 dochspss 41754 unitscyglem4 42568 idomodle 43548 sssmf 47096 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |