| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rabss2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Subclass law for restricted abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by TM, 1-Feb-2026.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabss2 | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ssel 3916 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
| 2 | 1 | anim1d 612 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 3 | 2 | ss2abdv 4006 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
| 4 | df-rab 3391 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 5 | df-rab 3391 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 6 | 3, 4, 5 | 3sstr4g 3976 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 395 ∈ wcel 2114 {cab 2715 {crab 3390 ⊆ wss 3890 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2010 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-ext 2709 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-ex 1782 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2812 df-rab 3391 df-ss 3907 |
| This theorem is referenced by: rabssrabd 4024 sess2 5591 hashbcss 16969 dprdss 20000 minveclem4 25412 prmdvdsfi 27087 mumul 27161 sqff1o 27162 rpvmasumlem 27467 disjxwwlkn 29999 clwwlknfi 30133 shatomistici 32450 rabfodom 32593 xpinpreima2 34070 ballotth 34701 bj-unrab 37252 icorempo 37684 lssats 39475 lpssat 39476 lssatle 39478 lssat 39479 atlatmstc 39782 dochspss 41841 unitscyglem4 42654 idomodle 43640 sssmf 47187 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |