Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rabss2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Subclass law for restricted abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabss2 | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | pm3.45 622 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
2 | 1 | alimi 1814 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
3 | dfss2 3908 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
4 | ss2ab 3994 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
5 | 2, 3, 4 | 3imtr4i 292 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
6 | df-rab 3074 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
7 | df-rab 3074 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
8 | 5, 6, 7 | 3sstr4g 3967 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 396 ∀wal 1537 ∈ wcel 2107 {cab 2716 {crab 3069 ⊆ wss 3888 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2109 ax-9 2117 ax-10 2138 ax-11 2155 ax-12 2172 ax-ext 2710 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-or 845 df-tru 1542 df-ex 1783 df-nf 1787 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2717 df-cleq 2731 df-clel 2817 df-nfc 2890 df-rab 3074 df-v 3435 df-in 3895 df-ss 3905 |
This theorem is referenced by: rabssrabd 4017 sess2 5559 hashbcss 16714 dprdss 19641 minveclem4 24605 prmdvdsfi 26265 mumul 26339 sqff1o 26340 rpvmasumlem 26644 disjxwwlkn 28287 clwwlknfi 28418 shatomistici 30732 rabfodom 30860 xpinpreima2 31866 ballotth 32513 bj-unrab 35123 icorempo 35531 lssats 37033 lpssat 37034 lssatle 37036 lssat 37037 atlatmstc 37340 dochspss 39399 rmxyelqirr 40739 idomodle 41028 sssmf 44283 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |