| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rabss2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Subclass law for restricted abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by TM, 1-Feb-2026.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabss2 | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ssel 3927 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
| 2 | 1 | anim1d 611 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 3 | 2 | ss2abdv 4017 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
| 4 | df-rab 3400 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 5 | df-rab 3400 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 6 | 3, 4, 5 | 3sstr4g 3987 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 395 ∈ wcel 2113 {cab 2714 {crab 3399 ⊆ wss 3901 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1968 ax-7 2009 ax-8 2115 ax-9 2123 ax-ext 2708 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-ex 1781 df-sb 2068 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2728 df-clel 2811 df-rab 3400 df-ss 3918 |
| This theorem is referenced by: rabssrabd 4035 sess2 5590 hashbcss 16932 dprdss 19960 minveclem4 25388 prmdvdsfi 27073 mumul 27147 sqff1o 27148 rpvmasumlem 27454 disjxwwlkn 29986 clwwlknfi 30120 shatomistici 32436 rabfodom 32580 xpinpreima2 34064 ballotth 34695 bj-unrab 37127 icorempo 37556 lssats 39272 lpssat 39273 lssatle 39275 lssat 39276 atlatmstc 39579 dochspss 41638 unitscyglem4 42452 idomodle 43433 sssmf 46982 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |