| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rabss2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Subclass law for restricted abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by TM, 1-Feb-2026.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabss2 | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ssel 3925 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
| 2 | 1 | anim1d 611 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 3 | 2 | ss2abdv 4015 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
| 4 | df-rab 3398 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 5 | df-rab 3398 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 6 | 3, 4, 5 | 3sstr4g 3985 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 395 ∈ wcel 2113 {cab 2712 {crab 3397 ⊆ wss 3899 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1968 ax-7 2009 ax-8 2115 ax-9 2123 ax-ext 2706 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-ex 1781 df-sb 2068 df-clab 2713 df-cleq 2726 df-clel 2809 df-rab 3398 df-ss 3916 |
| This theorem is referenced by: rabssrabd 4033 sess2 5588 hashbcss 16930 dprdss 19958 minveclem4 25386 prmdvdsfi 27071 mumul 27145 sqff1o 27146 rpvmasumlem 27452 disjxwwlkn 29935 clwwlknfi 30069 shatomistici 32385 rabfodom 32529 xpinpreima2 34013 ballotth 34644 bj-unrab 37070 icorempo 37495 lssats 39211 lpssat 39212 lssatle 39214 lssat 39215 atlatmstc 39518 dochspss 41577 unitscyglem4 42391 idomodle 43375 sssmf 46924 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |