Theorem relwlk 30035

Description: The set (Walks‘𝐺) of all walks on 𝐺 is a set of pairs by our definition of a walk, and so is a relation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 19-Feb-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
relwlk	⊢ Rel (Walks‘𝐺)

Proof of Theorem relwlk

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑘 𝑝 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-wlks 30009	. 2 ⊢ Walks = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑝:(0...(♯‘𝑓))⟶(Vtx‘𝑔) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑓))if-((𝑝‘𝑘) = (𝑝‘(𝑘 + 1)), ((iEdg‘𝑔)‘(𝑓‘𝑘)) = {(𝑝‘𝑘)}, {(𝑝‘𝑘), (𝑝‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ ((iEdg‘𝑔)‘(𝑓‘𝑘))))})
2	1	relmptopab 7670	1 ⊢ Rel (Walks‘𝐺)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  if-wif 1078   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3081  Vcvv 3457   ⊆ wss 3906  {csn 4591  {cpr 4593  dom cdm 5663  Rel wrel 5668  ⟶wf 6536  ‘cfv 6540  (class class class)co 7419  0cc0 11117  1c1 11118   + caddc 11120  ...cfz 13553  ..^cfzo 13701  ♯chash 14386  Word cword 14570  Vtxcvtx 29403  iEdgciedg 29404  Walkscwlks 30006

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pr 5406

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fv 6548  df-wlks 30009

This theorem is used by:  wlkop  30037  istrl  30108  isclwlk  30189  usgrgt2cycl  35669