Theorem relwlk 30263

Description: The set (Walks‘𝐺) of all walks on 𝐺 is a set of pairs by our definition of a walk, and so is a relation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 19-Feb-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
relwlk	⊢ Rel (Walks‘𝐺)

Proof of Theorem relwlk

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑘 𝑝 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-wlks 30237	. 2 ⊢ Walks = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑝:(0...(♯‘𝑓))⟶(Vtx‘𝑔) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑓))if-((𝑝‘𝑘) = (𝑝‘(𝑘 + 1)), ((iEdg‘𝑔)‘(𝑓‘𝑘)) = {(𝑝‘𝑘)}, {(𝑝‘𝑘), (𝑝‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ ((iEdg‘𝑔)‘(𝑓‘𝑘))))})
2	1	relmptopab 7703	1 ⊢ Rel (Walks‘𝐺)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  if-wif 1078   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080  Vcvv 3454   ⊆ wss 3900  {csn 4588  {cpr 4590  dom cdm 5658  Rel wrel 5663  ⟶wf 6562  ‘cfv 6566  (class class class)co 7451  0cc0 11239  1c1 11240   + caddc 11242  ...cfz 13679  ..^cfzo 13828  ♯chash 14515  Word cword 14699  Vtxcvtx 29631  iEdgciedg 29632  Walkscwlks 30234

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pr 5398

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5553  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-rn 5669  df-res 5670  df-ima 5671  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fv 6574  df-wlks 30237

This theorem is used by:  wlkop  30265  istrl  30336  isclwlk  30417  usgrgt2cycl  36107