Theorem relwlk 30086

Description: The set (Walks‘𝐺) of all walks on 𝐺 is a set of pairs by our definition of a walk, and so is a relation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 19-Feb-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
relwlk	⊢ Rel (Walks‘𝐺)

Proof of Theorem relwlk

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑘 𝑝 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-wlks 30060	. 2 ⊢ Walks = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑝:(0...(♯‘𝑓))⟶(Vtx‘𝑔) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑓))if-((𝑝‘𝑘) = (𝑝‘(𝑘 + 1)), ((iEdg‘𝑔)‘(𝑓‘𝑘)) = {(𝑝‘𝑘)}, {(𝑝‘𝑘), (𝑝‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ ((iEdg‘𝑔)‘(𝑓‘𝑘))))})
2	1	relmptopab 7665	1 ⊢ Rel (Walks‘𝐺)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  if-wif 1078   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3076  Vcvv 3450   ⊆ wss 3899  {csn 4584  {cpr 4586  dom cdm 5655  Rel wrel 5660  ⟶wf 6529  ‘cfv 6533  (class class class)co 7414  0cc0 11125  1c1 11126   + caddc 11128  ...cfz 13562  ..^cfzo 13710  ♯chash 14395  Word cword 14579  Vtxcvtx 29454  iEdgciedg 29455  Walkscwlks 30057

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5398

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fv 6541  df-wlks 30060

This theorem is used by:  wlkop  30088  istrl  30159  isclwlk  30240  usgrgt2cycl  35724