Theorem relwlk 29606

Description: The set (Walks‘𝐺) of all walks on 𝐺 is a set of pairs by our definition of a walk, and so is a relation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 19-Feb-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
relwlk	⊢ Rel (Walks‘𝐺)

Proof of Theorem relwlk

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑘 𝑝 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-wlks 29579	. 2 ⊢ Walks = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑝:(0...(♯‘𝑓))⟶(Vtx‘𝑔) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑓))if-((𝑝‘𝑘) = (𝑝‘(𝑘 + 1)), ((iEdg‘𝑔)‘(𝑓‘𝑘)) = {(𝑝‘𝑘)}, {(𝑝‘𝑘), (𝑝‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ ((iEdg‘𝑔)‘(𝑓‘𝑘))))})
2	1	relmptopab 7657	1 ⊢ Rel (Walks‘𝐺)

Syntax hints:  if-wif 1062   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2108  ∀wral 3051  Vcvv 3459   ⊆ wss 3926  {csn 4601  {cpr 4603  dom cdm 5654  Rel wrel 5659  ⟶wf 6527  ‘cfv 6531  (class class class)co 7405  0cc0 11129  1c1 11130   + caddc 11132  ...cfz 13524  ..^cfzo 13671  ♯chash 14348  Word cword 14531  Vtxcvtx 28975  iEdgciedg 28976  Walkscwlks 29576

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5266  ax-nul 5276  ax-pr 5402

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2885  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rab 3416  df-v 3461  df-sbc 3766  df-csb 3875  df-dif 3929  df-un 3931  df-in 3933  df-ss 3943  df-nul 4309  df-if 4501  df-sn 4602  df-pr 4604  df-op 4608  df-uni 4884  df-br 5120  df-opab 5182  df-mpt 5202  df-id 5548  df-xp 5660  df-rel 5661  df-cnv 5662  df-co 5663  df-dm 5664  df-rn 5665  df-res 5666  df-ima 5667  df-iota 6484  df-fun 6533  df-fv 6539  df-wlks 29579

This theorem is referenced by:  wlkop  29608  istrl  29676  isclwlk  29755  usgrgt2cycl  35152