Theorem resvval 33936

Description: Value of structure restriction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Sep-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
resvsca.r	⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑊 ↾v 𝐴)
resvsca.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
resvsca.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
resvval	⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌) → 𝑅 = if(𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴, 𝑊, (𝑊 sSet ⟨(Scalar‘ndx), (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)⟩)))

Proof of Theorem resvval

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resvsca.r	. 2 ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑊 ↾v 𝐴)
2		elex 3471	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝑊 ∈ V)
3		elex 3471	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑌 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
4		ovex 7453	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑊 sSet ⟨(Scalar‘ndx), (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)⟩) ∈ V
5		ifcl 4527	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ (𝑊 sSet ⟨(Scalar‘ndx), (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)⟩) ∈ V) → if(𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴, 𝑊, (𝑊 sSet ⟨(Scalar‘ndx), (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)⟩)) ∈ V)
6	4, 5	mpan2 704	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ V → if(𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴, 𝑊, (𝑊 sSet ⟨(Scalar‘ndx), (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)⟩)) ∈ V)
7	6	adantr 486	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) → if(𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴, 𝑊, (𝑊 sSet ⟨(Scalar‘ndx), (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)⟩)) ∈ V)
8		simpl 488	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝑤 = 𝑊)
9	8	fveq2d 6889	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (Scalar‘𝑤) = (Scalar‘𝑊))
10		resvsca.f	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
11	9, 10	eqtr4di 2813	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (Scalar‘𝑤) = 𝐹)
12	11	fveq2d 6889	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑤)) = (Base‘𝐹))
13		resvsca.b	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹)
14	12, 13	eqtr4di 2813	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑤)) = 𝐵)
15		simpr 490	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝑥 = 𝐴)
16	14, 15	sseq12d 3941	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑤)) ⊆ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))
17	11, 15	oveq12d 7438	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ((Scalar‘𝑤) ↾s 𝑥) = (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴))
18	17	opeq2d 4846	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ⟨(Scalar‘ndx), ((Scalar‘𝑤) ↾s 𝑥)⟩ = ⟨(Scalar‘ndx), (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)⟩)
19	8, 18	oveq12d 7438	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝑤 sSet ⟨(Scalar‘ndx), ((Scalar‘𝑤) ↾s 𝑥)⟩) = (𝑊 sSet ⟨(Scalar‘ndx), (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)⟩))
20	16, 8, 19	ifbieq12d 4510	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → if((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑤)) ⊆ 𝑥, 𝑤, (𝑤 sSet ⟨(Scalar‘ndx), ((Scalar‘𝑤) ↾s 𝑥)⟩)) = if(𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴, 𝑊, (𝑊 sSet ⟨(Scalar‘ndx), (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)⟩)))
21		df-resv 33934	. . . . 5 ⊢ ↾v = (𝑤 ∈ V, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑤)) ⊆ 𝑥, 𝑤, (𝑤 sSet ⟨(Scalar‘ndx), ((Scalar‘𝑤) ↾s 𝑥)⟩)))
22	20, 21	ovmpoga 7574	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ if(𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴, 𝑊, (𝑊 sSet ⟨(Scalar‘ndx), (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)⟩)) ∈ V) → (𝑊 ↾v 𝐴) = if(𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴, 𝑊, (𝑊 sSet ⟨(Scalar‘ndx), (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)⟩)))
23	7, 22	mpd3an3 1491	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) → (𝑊 ↾v 𝐴) = if(𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴, 𝑊, (𝑊 sSet ⟨(Scalar‘ndx), (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)⟩)))
24	2, 3, 23	syl2an 608	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑊 ↾v 𝐴) = if(𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴, 𝑊, (𝑊 sSet ⟨(Scalar‘ndx), (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)⟩)))
25	1, 24	eqtrid 2807	1 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌) → 𝑅 = if(𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴, 𝑊, (𝑊 sSet ⟨(Scalar‘ndx), (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)⟩)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  Vcvv 3450   ⊆ wss 3895  ifcif 4481  ⟨cop 4834  ‘cfv 6538  (class class class)co 7420   sSet csts 17346  ndxcnx 17376  Basecbs 17392   ↾_s cress 17413  Scalarcsca 17436   ↾_v cresv 33933

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-id 5545  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fv 6546  df-ov 7423  df-oprab 7424  df-mpo 7425  df-resv 33934

This theorem is used by:  resvid2  33937  resvval2  33938