Theorem 0subm 12959

Description: The zero submonoid of an arbitrary monoid. (Contributed by AV, 17-Feb-2024.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
0subm.z	|- .0. = ( 0g ` G )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
0subm	|- ( G e. Mnd -> { .0. } e. (SubMnd ` G ) )

Proof of Theorem 0subm

Dummy variables a b are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2189	. . . 4 |- ( Base ` G ) = ( Base ` G )
2		0subm.z	. . . 4 |- .0. = ( 0g ` G )
3	1, 2	mndidcl 12914	. . 3 |- ( G e. Mnd -> .0. e. ( Base ` G ) )
4	3	snssd 3755	. 2 |- ( G e. Mnd -> { .0. } C_ ( Base ` G ) )
5		snidg 3639	. . 3 |- ( .0. e. ( Base ` G ) -> .0. e. { .0. } )
6	3, 5	syl 14	. 2 |- ( G e. Mnd -> .0. e. { .0. } )
7		velsn 3627	. . . . 5 |- ( a e. { .0. } <-> a = .0. )
8		velsn 3627	. . . . 5 |- ( b e. { .0. } <-> b = .0. )
9	7, 8	anbi12i 460	. . . 4 |- ( ( a e. { .0. } /\ b e. { .0. } ) <-> ( a = .0. /\ b = .0. ) )
10		eqid 2189	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( +g ` G ) = ( +g ` G )
11	1, 10, 2	mndlid 12919	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( G e. Mnd /\ .0. e. ( Base ` G ) ) -> ( .0. ( +g ` G ) .0. ) = .0. )
12	3, 11	mpdan 421	. . . . . 6 |- ( G e. Mnd -> ( .0. ( +g ` G ) .0. ) = .0. )
13	12, 3	eqeltrd 2266	. . . . . . 7 |- ( G e. Mnd -> ( .0. ( +g ` G ) .0. ) e. ( Base ` G ) )
14		elsng 3625	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( .0. ( +g ` G ) .0. ) e. ( Base ` G ) -> ( ( .0. ( +g ` G ) .0. ) e. { .0. } <-> ( .0. ( +g ` G ) .0. ) = .0. ) )
15	13, 14	syl 14	. . . . . 6 |- ( G e. Mnd -> ( ( .0. ( +g ` G ) .0. ) e. { .0. } <-> ( .0. ( +g ` G ) .0. ) = .0. ) )
16	12, 15	mpbird 167	. . . . 5 |- ( G e. Mnd -> ( .0. ( +g ` G ) .0. ) e. { .0. } )
17		oveq12 5909	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( a = .0. /\ b = .0. ) -> ( a ( +g ` G ) b ) = ( .0. ( +g ` G ) .0. ) )
18	17	eleq1d 2258	. . . . 5 |- ( ( a = .0. /\ b = .0. ) -> ( ( a ( +g ` G ) b ) e. { .0. } <-> ( .0. ( +g ` G ) .0. ) e. { .0. } ) )
19	16, 18	syl5ibrcom 157	. . . 4 |- ( G e. Mnd -> ( ( a = .0. /\ b = .0. ) -> ( a ( +g ` G ) b ) e. { .0. } ) )
20	9, 19	biimtrid 152	. . 3 |- ( G e. Mnd -> ( ( a e. { .0. } /\ b e. { .0. } ) -> ( a ( +g ` G ) b ) e. { .0. } ) )
21	20	ralrimivv 2571	. 2 |- ( G e. Mnd -> A. a e. { .0. } A. b e. { .0. } ( a ( +g ` G ) b ) e. { .0. } )
22	1, 2, 10	issubm 12947	. 2 |- ( G e. Mnd -> ( { .0. } e. (SubMnd ` G ) <-> ( { .0. } C_ ( Base ` G ) /\ .0. e. { .0. } /\ A. a e. { .0. } A. b e. { .0. } ( a ( +g ` G ) b ) e. { .0. } ) ) )
23	4, 6, 21, 22	mpbir3and 1182	1 |- ( G e. Mnd -> { .0. } e. (SubMnd ` G ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1364   e. wcel 2160   A.wral 2468   C_ wss 3144   {csn 3610   ` cfv 5238  (class class class)co 5900   Basecbs 12523   +g cplusg 12600   0gc0g 12772   Mndcmnd 12900  SubMndcsubmnd 12933

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-13 2162  ax-14 2163  ax-ext 2171  ax-sep 4139  ax-pow 4195  ax-pr 4230  ax-un 4454  ax-cnex 7937  ax-resscn 7938  ax-1re 7940  ax-addrcl 7943

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2041  df-mo 2042  df-clab 2176  df-cleq 2182  df-clel 2185  df-nfc 2321  df-ral 2473  df-rex 2474  df-reu 2475  df-rmo 2476  df-rab 2477  df-v 2754  df-sbc 2978  df-csb 3073  df-un 3148  df-in 3150  df-ss 3157  df-pw 3595  df-sn 3616  df-pr 3617  df-op 3619  df-uni 3828  df-int 3863  df-br 4022  df-opab 4083  df-mpt 4084  df-id 4314  df-xp 4653  df-rel 4654  df-cnv 4655  df-co 4656  df-dm 4657  df-rn 4658  df-res 4659  df-iota 5199  df-fun 5240  df-fn 5241  df-fv 5246  df-riota 5855  df-ov 5903  df-inn 8955  df-2 9013  df-ndx 12526  df-slot 12527  df-base 12529  df-plusg 12613  df-0g 12774  df-mgm 12843  df-sgrp 12888  df-mnd 12901  df-submnd 12935

This theorem is referenced by:  0subg  13163