Theorem ltntri 7813

Description: Negative trichotomy property for real numbers. It is well known that we cannot prove real number trichotomy, 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴. Does that mean there is a pair of real numbers where none of those hold (that is, where we can refute each of those three relationships)? Actually, no, as shown here. This is another example of distinguishing between being unable to prove something, or being able to refute it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ltntri	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ¬ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem ltntri

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpll 501	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
2		simplr 502	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
3		simpr3 972	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)
4	1, 2, 3	nltled 7806	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
5		simpr1 970	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵)
6	2, 1, 5	nltled 7806	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)
7	1, 2	letri3d 7802	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)))
8	4, 6, 7	mpbir2and 911	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
9		simpr2 971	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
10	8, 9	pm2.65da 633	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ¬ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ∧ w3a 945   = wceq 1314   ∈ wcel 1463   class class class wbr 3895  ℝcr 7546   < clt 7724   ≤ cle 7725

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 586  ax-in2 587  ax-io 681  ax-5 1406  ax-7 1407  ax-gen 1408  ax-ie1 1452  ax-ie2 1453  ax-8 1465  ax-10 1466  ax-11 1467  ax-i12 1468  ax-bndl 1469  ax-4 1470  ax-13 1474  ax-14 1475  ax-17 1489  ax-i9 1493  ax-ial 1497  ax-i5r 1498  ax-ext 2097  ax-sep 4006  ax-pow 4058  ax-pr 4091  ax-un 4315  ax-setind 4412  ax-cnex 7636  ax-resscn 7637  ax-pre-ltirr 7657  ax-pre-apti 7660

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 947  df-tru 1317  df-fal 1320  df-nf 1420  df-sb 1719  df-eu 1978  df-mo 1979  df-clab 2102  df-cleq 2108  df-clel 2111  df-nfc 2244  df-ne 2283  df-nel 2378  df-ral 2395  df-rex 2396  df-rab 2399  df-v 2659  df-dif 3039  df-un 3041  df-in 3043  df-ss 3050  df-pw 3478  df-sn 3499  df-pr 3500  df-op 3502  df-uni 3703  df-br 3896  df-opab 3950  df-xp 4505  df-cnv 4507  df-pnf 7726  df-mnf 7727  df-xr 7728  df-ltxr 7729  df-le 7730

This theorem is referenced by: (None)