Theorem ltntri 8149

Description: Negative trichotomy property for real numbers. It is well known that we cannot prove real number trichotomy, 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴. Does that mean there is a pair of real numbers where none of those hold (that is, where we can refute each of those three relationships)? Actually, no, as shown here. This is another example of distinguishing between being unable to prove something, or being able to refute it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ltntri	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ¬ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem ltntri

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpll 527	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
2		simplr 528	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
3		simpr3 1007	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)
4	1, 2, 3	nltled 8142	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
5		simpr1 1005	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵)
6	2, 1, 5	nltled 8142	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)
7	1, 2	letri3d 8137	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)))
8	4, 6, 7	mpbir2and 946	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
9		simpr2 1006	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
10	8, 9	pm2.65da 662	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ¬ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ∧ w3a 980   = wceq 1364   ∈ wcel 2164   class class class wbr 4030  ℝcr 7873   < clt 8056   ≤ cle 8057

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-13 2166  ax-14 2167  ax-ext 2175  ax-sep 4148  ax-pow 4204  ax-pr 4239  ax-un 4465  ax-setind 4570  ax-cnex 7965  ax-resscn 7966  ax-pre-ltirr 7986  ax-pre-apti 7989

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-fal 1370  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2045  df-mo 2046  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ne 2365  df-nel 2460  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-rab 2481  df-v 2762  df-dif 3156  df-un 3158  df-in 3160  df-ss 3167  df-pw 3604  df-sn 3625  df-pr 3626  df-op 3628  df-uni 3837  df-br 4031  df-opab 4092  df-xp 4666  df-cnv 4668  df-pnf 8058  df-mnf 8059  df-xr 8060  df-ltxr 8061  df-le 8062

This theorem is referenced by: (None)