Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8001-8100 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
Type | Label | Description |
Statement |
|
Theorem | ltnri 8001 |
'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ
⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴 |
|
Theorem | eqlei 8002 |
Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM,
23-May-1999.) (Revised by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ
⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | eqlei2 8003 |
Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Alexander van
der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ
⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | gtneii 8004 |
'Less than' implies not equal. See also gtapii 8542 which is the same
for apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Sep-2013.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴 |
|
Theorem | ltneii 8005 |
'Greater than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
16-Sep-2015.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 |
|
Theorem | lttri3i 8006 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | letri3i 8007 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | ltnsymi 8008 |
'Less than' is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | lenlti 8009 |
'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by NM,
24-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | ltlei 8010 |
'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM,
14-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | ltleii 8011 |
'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to' (inference). (Contributed
by NM, 22-Aug-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 |
|
Theorem | ltnei 8012 |
'Less than' implies not equal. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | lttri 8013 |
'Less than' is transitive. Theorem I.17 of [Apostol] p. 20.
(Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | lelttri 8014 |
'Less than or equal to', 'less than' transitive law. (Contributed by
NM, 14-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | ltletri 8015 |
'Less than', 'less than or equal to' transitive law. (Contributed by
NM, 14-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | letri 8016 |
'Less than or equal to' is transitive. (Contributed by NM,
14-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | le2tri3i 8017 |
Extended trichotomy law for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by
NM, 14-Aug-2000.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | mulgt0i 8018 |
The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM,
16-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((0 < 𝐴 ∧ 0 < 𝐵) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | mulgt0ii 8019 |
The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM,
18-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 0 < 𝐴 & ⊢ 0 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | ltnrd 8020 |
'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | gtned 8021 |
'Less than' implies not equal. See also gtapd 8545 which is the same but
for apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | ltned 8022 |
'Greater than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | lttri3d 8023 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))) |
|
Theorem | letri3d 8024 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))) |
|
Theorem | eqleltd 8025 |
Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed
by NM, 7-Apr-2001.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵))) |
|
Theorem | lenltd 8026 |
'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | ltled 8027 |
'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | ltnsymd 8028 |
'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | nltled 8029 |
'Not less than ' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by
Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | lensymd 8030 |
'Less than or equal to' implies 'not less than'. (Contributed by
Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | mulgt0d 8031 |
The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | letrd 8032 |
Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by
NM, 20-May-2005.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | lelttrd 8033 |
Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to', 'less than'.
(Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2006.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | lttrd 8034 |
Transitive law deduction for 'less than'. (Contributed by NM,
9-Jan-2006.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | 0lt1 8035 |
0 is less than 1. Theorem I.21 of [Apostol] p.
20. Part of definition
11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies).
(Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.)
|
⊢ 0 < 1 |
|
Theorem | ltntri 8036 |
Negative trichotomy property for real numbers. It is well known that we
cannot prove real number trichotomy, 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴. Does
that mean there is a pair of real numbers where none of those hold (that
is, where we can refute each of those three relationships)? Actually, no,
as shown here. This is another example of distinguishing between being
unable to prove something, or being able to refute it. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2023.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ¬ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
|
4.2.5 Initial properties of the complex
numbers
|
|
Theorem | mul12 8037 |
Commutative/associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM,
30-Apr-2005.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))) |
|
Theorem | mul32 8038 |
Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | mul31 8039 |
Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Scott Fenton,
3-Jan-2013.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) · 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | mul4 8040 |
Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
|
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷))) |
|
Theorem | muladd11 8041 |
A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2005.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((1 + 𝐴) · (1 + 𝐵)) = ((1 + 𝐴) + (𝐵 + (𝐴 · 𝐵)))) |
|
Theorem | 1p1times 8042 |
Two times a number. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario
Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((1 + 1) ·
𝐴) = (𝐴 + 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | peano2cn 8043 |
A theorem for complex numbers analogous the second Peano postulate
peano2 4577. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2005.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℂ) |
|
Theorem | peano2re 8044 |
A theorem for reals analogous the second Peano postulate peano2 4577.
(Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-2005.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℝ) |
|
Theorem | addcom 8045 |
Addition commutes. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | addid1 8046 |
0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon,
16-Jan-2020.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | addid2 8047 |
0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by
Scott Fenton,
3-Jan-2013.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | readdcan 8048 |
Cancellation law for addition over the reals. (Contributed by Scott
Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐶 + 𝐴) = (𝐶 + 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | 00id 8049 |
0 is its own additive identity. (Contributed by Scott
Fenton,
3-Jan-2013.)
|
⊢ (0 + 0) = 0 |
|
Theorem | addid1i 8050 |
0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by NM,
23-Nov-1994.)
(Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ
⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴 |
|
Theorem | addid2i 8051 |
0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by NM,
3-Jan-2013.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ
⇒ ⊢ (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴 |
|
Theorem | addcomi 8052 |
Addition commutes. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by
Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | addcomli 8053 |
Addition commutes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝐴) = 𝐶 |
|
Theorem | mul12i 8054 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two factors in a triple
product. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew
Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶)) |
|
Theorem | mul32i 8055 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two factors in a triple
product. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | mul4i 8056 |
Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1995.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷)) |
|
Theorem | addid1d 8057 |
0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | addid2d 8058 |
0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | addcomd 8059 |
Addition commutes. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by
Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | mul12d 8060 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two factors in a triple
product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))) |
|
Theorem | mul32d 8061 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two factors in a triple
product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | mul31d 8062 |
Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) · 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | mul4d 8063 |
Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷))) |
|
Theorem | muladd11r 8064 |
A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jul-2021.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 1) · (𝐵 + 1)) = (((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 + 𝐵)) + 1)) |
|
Theorem | comraddd 8065 |
Commute RHS addition, in deduction form. (Contributed by David A.
Wheeler, 11-Oct-2018.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐶 + 𝐵)) |
|
4.3 Real and complex numbers - basic
operations
|
|
4.3.1 Addition
|
|
Theorem | add12 8066 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple
sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2004.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶))) |
|
Theorem | add32 8067 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum.
(Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | add32r 8068 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum,
rearranging the parentheses. (Contributed by Paul Chapman,
18-May-2007.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | add4 8069 |
Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.)
|
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷))) |
|
Theorem | add42 8070 |
Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2005.)
|
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵))) |
|
Theorem | add12i 8071 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple
sum. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶)) |
|
Theorem | add32i 8072 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple
sum. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | add4i 8073 |
Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷)) |
|
Theorem | add42i 8074 |
Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | add12d 8075 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple
sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶))) |
|
Theorem | add32d 8076 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple
sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | add4d 8077 |
Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷))) |
|
Theorem | add42d 8078 |
Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵))) |
|
4.3.2 Subtraction
|
|
Syntax | cmin 8079 |
Extend class notation to include subtraction.
|
class − |
|
Syntax | cneg 8080 |
Extend class notation to include unary minus. The symbol - is not a
class by itself but part of a compound class definition. We do this
rather than making it a formal function since it is so commonly used.
Note: We use different symbols for unary minus (-) and subtraction
cmin 8079 (−) to prevent
syntax ambiguity. For example, looking at the
syntax definition co 5851, if we used the same symbol
then "( − 𝐴 − 𝐵) " could mean either
"− 𝐴 " minus "𝐵",
or
it could represent the (meaningless) operation of
classes "− " and "− 𝐵
" connected with "operation" "𝐴".
On the other hand, "(-𝐴 − 𝐵) " is unambiguous.
|
class -𝐴 |
|
Definition | df-sub 8081* |
Define subtraction. Theorem subval 8100 shows its value (and describes how
this definition works), Theorem subaddi 8195 relates it to addition, and
Theorems subcli 8184 and resubcli 8171 prove its closure laws. (Contributed
by NM, 26-Nov-1994.)
|
⊢ − = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ ℂ (𝑦 + 𝑧) = 𝑥)) |
|
Definition | df-neg 8082 |
Define the negative of a number (unary minus). We use different symbols
for unary minus (-) and subtraction (−) to prevent syntax
ambiguity. See cneg 8080 for a discussion of this. (Contributed by
NM,
10-Feb-1995.)
|
⊢ -𝐴 = (0 − 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | cnegexlem1 8083 |
Addition cancellation of a real number from two complex numbers. Lemma
for cnegex 8086. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 22-May-2007.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) |
|
Theorem | cnegexlem2 8084 |
Existence of a real number which produces a real number when multiplied
by i. (Hint: zero is such a number, although we
don't need to
prove that yet). Lemma for cnegex 8086. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt,
22-May-2007.)
|
⊢ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ (i · 𝑦) ∈
ℝ |
|
Theorem | cnegexlem3 8085* |
Existence of real number difference. Lemma for cnegex 8086. (Contributed
by Eric Schmidt, 22-May-2007.)
|
⊢ ((𝑏 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ) → ∃𝑐 ∈ ℝ (𝑏 + 𝑐) = 𝑦) |
|
Theorem | cnegex 8086* |
Existence of the negative of a complex number. (Contributed by Eric
Schmidt, 21-May-2007.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) |
|
Theorem | cnegex2 8087* |
Existence of a left inverse for addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton,
3-Jan-2013.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 + 𝐴) = 0) |
|
Theorem | addcan 8088 |
Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18.
(Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) |
|
Theorem | addcan2 8089 |
Cancellation law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.)
(Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | addcani 8090 |
Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18.
(Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Scott Fenton,
3-Jan-2013.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | addcan2i 8091 |
Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18.
(Contributed by NM, 14-May-2003.) (Revised by Scott Fenton,
3-Jan-2013.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | addcand 8092 |
Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) |
|
Theorem | addcan2d 8093 |
Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | addcanad 8094 |
Cancelling a term on the left-hand side of a sum in an equality.
Consequence of addcand 8092. (Contributed by David Moews,
28-Feb-2017.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | addcan2ad 8095 |
Cancelling a term on the right-hand side of a sum in an equality.
Consequence of addcan2d 8093. (Contributed by David Moews,
28-Feb-2017.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | addneintrd 8096 |
Introducing a term on the left-hand side of a sum in a negated
equality. Contrapositive of addcanad 8094. Consequence of addcand 8092.
(Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ≠ (𝐴 + 𝐶)) |
|
Theorem | addneintr2d 8097 |
Introducing a term on the right-hand side of a sum in a negated
equality. Contrapositive of addcan2ad 8095. Consequence of
addcan2d 8093. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) ≠ (𝐵 + 𝐶)) |
|
Theorem | 0cnALT 8098 |
Alternate proof of 0cn 7901. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.) (Revised
by
Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ |
|
Theorem | negeu 8099* |
Existential uniqueness of negatives. Theorem I.2 of [Apostol] p. 18.
(Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | subval 8100* |
Value of subtraction, which is the (unique) element 𝑥 such that
𝐵 +
𝑥 = 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2007.)
(Revised by Mario
Carneiro, 2-Nov-2013.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (℩𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐵 + 𝑥) = 𝐴)) |