P. 81 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8001-8100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	pitonnlem1p1 8001	Lemma for pitonn 8003. Simplifying an expression involving signed reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → [⟨(𝐴 +P (1P +P 1P)), (1P +P 1P)⟩] ~R = [⟨(𝐴 +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R )
Theorem	pitonnlem2 8002*	Lemma for pitonn 8003. Two ways to add one to a number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ N → (⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ + 1) = ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨(𝐾 +N 1o), 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨(𝐾 +N 1o), 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩)
Theorem	pitonn 8003*	Mapping from N to ℕ. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)})
Theorem	pitoregt0 8004*	Embedding from N to ℝ yields a number greater than zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → 0 <ℝ ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩)
Theorem	pitore 8005*	Embedding from N to ℝ. Similar to pitonn 8003 but separate in the sense that we have not proved nnssre 9082 yet. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	recnnre 8006*	Embedding the reciprocal of a natural number into ℝ. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	peano1nnnn 8007*	One is an element of ℕ. This is a counterpart to 1nn 9089 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8055). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ 1 ∈ 𝑁
Theorem	peano2nnnn 8008*	A successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. This is a counterpart to peano2nn 9090 designed for real number axioms which involve to natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8055). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ 𝑁)
Theorem	ltrennb 8009*	Ordering of natural numbers with <N or <ℝ. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ N ∧ 𝐾 ∈ N) → (𝐽 <N 𝐾 ↔ ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ <ℝ ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩))
Theorem	ltrenn 8010*	Ordering of natural numbers with <N or <ℝ. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐽 <N 𝐾 → ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ <ℝ ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩)
Theorem	recidpipr 8011*	Another way of saying that a number times its reciprocal is one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → (⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ ·P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) = 1P)
Theorem	recidpirqlemcalc 8012	Lemma for recidpirq 8013. Rearranging some of the expressions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·P 𝐵) = 1P)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝐴 +P 1P) ·P (𝐵 +P 1P)) +P (1P ·P 1P)) +P 1P) = ((((𝐴 +P 1P) ·P 1P) +P (1P ·P (𝐵 +P 1P))) +P (1P +P 1P)))
Theorem	recidpirq 8013*	A real number times its reciprocal is one, where reciprocal is expressed with *Q. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → (⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ · ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = 1)
4.1.2  Final derivation of real and complex number postulates
Theorem	axcnex 8014	The complex numbers form a set. Use cnex 8091 instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Theorem	axresscn 8015	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-resscn 8059. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℝ ⊆ ℂ
Theorem	ax1cn 8016	1 is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1cn 8060. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	ax1re 8017	1 is a real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1re 8061. In the Metamath Proof Explorer, this is not a complex number axiom but is proved from ax-1cn 8060 and the other axioms. It is not known whether we can do so here, but the Metamath Proof Explorer proof (accessed 13-Jan-2020) uses excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ
Theorem	axicn 8018	i is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-icn 8062. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ i ∈ ℂ
Theorem	axaddcl 8019	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcl 8063 be used later. Instead, in most cases use addcl 8092. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	axaddrcl 8020	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addrcl 8064 be used later. Instead, in most cases use readdcl 8093. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	axmulcl 8021	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcl 8065 be used later. Instead, in most cases use mulcl 8094. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	axmulrcl 8022	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulrcl 8066 be used later. Instead, in most cases use remulcl 8095. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	axaddf 8023	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This theorem can be used as an alternate axiom for complex numbers in place of the less specific axaddcl 8019. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-addf 8089. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ + :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Theorem	axmulf 8024	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This is the construction-dependent version of ax-mulf 8090 and it should not be referenced outside the construction. We generally prefer to develop our theory using the less specific mulcl 8094. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ · :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Theorem	axaddcom 8025	Addition commutes. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcom 8067 be used later. Instead, use addcom 8251. In the Metamath Proof Explorer this is not a complex number axiom but is instead proved from other axioms. That proof relies on real number trichotomy and it is not known whether it is possible to prove this from the other axioms without it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Theorem	axmulcom 8026	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcom 8068 be used later. Instead, use mulcom 8096. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Theorem	axaddass 8027	Addition of complex numbers is associative. This theorem transfers the associative laws for the real and imaginary signed real components of complex number pairs, to complex number addition itself. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addass 8069 be used later. Instead, use addass 8097. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	axmulass 8028	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-mulass 8070. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	axdistr 8029	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-distr 8071 be used later. Instead, use adddi 8099. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	axi2m1 8030	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-i2m1 8072. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((i · i) + 1) = 0
Theorem	ax0lt1 8031	0 is less than 1. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-0lt1 8073. The version of this axiom in the Metamath Proof Explorer reads 1 ≠ 0; here we change it to 0 <ℝ 1. The proof of 0 <ℝ 1 from 1 ≠ 0 in the Metamath Proof Explorer (accessed 12-Jan-2020) relies on real number trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 0 <ℝ 1
Theorem	ax1rid 8032	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1rid 8074. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴)
Theorem	ax0id 8033	0 is an identity element for real addition. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-0id 8075. In the Metamath Proof Explorer this is not a complex number axiom but is instead proved from other axioms. That proof relies on excluded middle and it is not known whether it is possible to prove this from the other axioms without excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴)
Theorem	axrnegex 8034*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-rnegex 8076. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
Theorem	axprecex 8035*	Existence of positive reciprocal of positive real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-precex 8077. In treatments which assume excluded middle, the 0 <ℝ 𝐴 condition is generally replaced by 𝐴 ≠ 0, and it may not be necessary to state that the reciproacal is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 <ℝ 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1))
Theorem	axcnre 8036*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-cnre 8078. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Theorem	axpre-ltirr 8037	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltirr 8079. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ¬ 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐴)
Theorem	axpre-ltwlin 8038	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltwlin 8080. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 <ℝ 𝐵)))
Theorem	axpre-lttrn 8039	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-lttrn 8081. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐶) → 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶))
Theorem	axpre-apti 8040	Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-apti 8082. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐴)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	axpre-ltadd 8041	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltadd 8083. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) <ℝ (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	axpre-mulgt0 8042	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulgt0 8084. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 <ℝ 𝐴 ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐵) → 0 <ℝ (𝐴 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	axpre-mulext 8043	Strong extensionality of multiplication (expressed in terms of <ℝ). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulext 8085. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) <ℝ (𝐵 · 𝐶) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐴)))
Theorem	rereceu 8044*	The reciprocal from axprecex 8035 is unique. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐴) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1)
Theorem	recriota 8045*	Two ways to express the reciprocal of a natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ · 𝑟) = 1) = ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩)
Theorem	axarch 8046*	Archimedean axiom. The Archimedean property is more naturally stated once we have defined ℕ. Unless we find another way to state it, we'll just use the right hand side of dfnn2 9080 in stating what we mean by "natural number" in the context of this axiom. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-arch 8086. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑛 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}𝐴 <ℝ 𝑛)
Theorem	peano5nnnn 8047*	Peano's inductive postulate. This is a counterpart to peano5nni 9081 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8055). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((1 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 + 1) ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑁 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	nnindnn 8048*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). This is a counterpart to nnind 9094 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8055). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑁 → 𝜏)
Theorem	nntopi 8049*	Mapping from ℕ to N. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑁 → ∃𝑧 ∈ N ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑧, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑧, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ = 𝐴)
Theorem	axcaucvglemcl 8050*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8055. Mapping to N and R. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ N) → (℩𝑧 ∈ R (𝐹‘⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩) ∈ R)
Theorem	axcaucvglemf 8051*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8055. Mapping to N and R yields a sequence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑛 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑛) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ N ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ R (𝐹‘⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:N⟶R)
Theorem	axcaucvglemval 8052*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8055. Value of sequence when mapping to N and R. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑛 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑛) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ N ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ R (𝐹‘⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ N) → (𝐹‘⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = ⟨(𝐺‘𝐽), 0R⟩)
Theorem	axcaucvglemcau 8053*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8055. The result of mapping to N and R satisfies the Cauchy condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑛 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑛) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ N ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ R (𝐹‘⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐺‘𝑛) <R ((𝐺‘𝑘) +R [⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R ) ∧ (𝐺‘𝑘) <R ((𝐺‘𝑛) +R [⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R ))))
Theorem	axcaucvglemres 8054*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8055. Mapping the limit from N and R. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑛 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑛) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ N ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ R (𝐹‘⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑗 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ (𝑦 + 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + 𝑥)))))
Theorem	axcaucvg 8055*	Real number completeness axiom. A Cauchy sequence with a modulus of convergence converges. This is basically Corollary 11.2.13 of [HoTT], p. (varies). The HoTT book theorem has a modulus of convergence (that is, a rate of convergence) specified by (11.2.9) in HoTT whereas this theorem fixes the rate of convergence to say that all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / 𝑛 of the nth term (it should later be able to prove versions of this theorem with a different fixed rate or a modulus of convergence supplied as a hypothesis). Because we are stating this axiom before we have introduced notations for ℕ or division, we use 𝑁 for the natural numbers and express a reciprocal in terms of ℩. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-caucvg 8087. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑛 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑛) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑗 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ (𝑦 + 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + 𝑥)))))
Theorem	axpre-suploclemres 8056*	Lemma for axpre-suploc 8057. The result. The proof just needs to define 𝐵 as basically the same set as 𝐴 (but expressed as a subset of R rather than a subset of ℝ), and apply suplocsr 7964. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 <ℝ 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑤 ∈ R ∣ ⟨𝑤, 0R⟩ ∈ 𝐴}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧)))
Theorem	axpre-suploc 8057*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Locatedness here means that given 𝑥 < 𝑦, either there is an element of the set greater than 𝑥, or 𝑦 is an upper bound. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-suploc 8088. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jan-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 <ℝ 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧)))
4.1.3  Real and complex number postulates restated as axioms
Axiom	ax-cnex 8058	The complex numbers form a set. Proofs should normally use cnex 8091 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Axiom	ax-resscn 8059	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axresscn 8015. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ℝ ⊆ ℂ
Axiom	ax-1cn 8060	1 is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1cn 8016. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℂ
Axiom	ax-1re 8061	1 is a real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1re 8017. Proofs should use 1re 8113 instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ
Axiom	ax-icn 8062	i is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axicn 8018. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ i ∈ ℂ
Axiom	ax-addcl 8063	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddcl 8019. Proofs should normally use addcl 8092 instead, which asserts the same thing but follows our naming conventions for closures. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Axiom	ax-addrcl 8064	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddrcl 8020. Proofs should normally use readdcl 8093 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Axiom	ax-mulcl 8065	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcl 8021. Proofs should normally use mulcl 8094 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Axiom	ax-mulrcl 8066	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulrcl 8022. Proofs should normally use remulcl 8095 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Axiom	ax-addcom 8067	Addition commutes. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddcom 8025. Proofs should normally use addcom 8251 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Axiom	ax-mulcom 8068	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcom 8026. Proofs should normally use mulcom 8096 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Axiom	ax-addass 8069	Addition of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddass 8027. Proofs should normally use addass 8097 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Axiom	ax-mulass 8070	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulass 8028. Proofs should normally use mulass 8098 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Axiom	ax-distr 8071	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axdistr 8029. Proofs should normally use adddi 8099 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Axiom	ax-i2m1 8072	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axi2m1 8030. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
⊢ ((i · i) + 1) = 0
Axiom	ax-0lt1 8073	0 is less than 1. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax0lt1 8031. Proofs should normally use 0lt1 8241 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 0 <ℝ 1
Axiom	ax-1rid 8074	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1rid 8032. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴)
Axiom	ax-0id 8075	0 is an identity element for real addition. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax0id 8033. Proofs should normally use addrid 8252 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴)
Axiom	ax-rnegex 8076*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axrnegex 8034. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
Axiom	ax-precex 8077*	Existence of reciprocal of positive real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axprecex 8035. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 <ℝ 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1))
Axiom	ax-cnre 8078*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcnre 8036. For naming consistency, use cnre 8110 for new proofs. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Axiom	ax-pre-ltirr 8079	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax-pre-ltirr 8079. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ¬ 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐴)
Axiom	ax-pre-ltwlin 8080	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltwlin 8038. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 <ℝ 𝐵)))
Axiom	ax-pre-lttrn 8081	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-lttrn 8039. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐶) → 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶))
Axiom	ax-pre-apti 8082	Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-apti 8040. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐴)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Axiom	ax-pre-ltadd 8083	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltadd 8041. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) <ℝ (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
Axiom	ax-pre-mulgt0 8084	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulgt0 8042. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 <ℝ 𝐴 ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐵) → 0 <ℝ (𝐴 · 𝐵)))
Axiom	ax-pre-mulext 8085	Strong extensionality of multiplication (expressed in terms of <ℝ). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulext 8043 (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) <ℝ (𝐵 · 𝐶) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐴)))
Axiom	ax-arch 8086*	Archimedean axiom. Definition 3.1(2) of [Geuvers], p. 9. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axarch 8046. This axiom should not be used directly; instead use arch 9334 (which is the same, but stated in terms of ℕ and <). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-May-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑛 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}𝐴 <ℝ 𝑛)
Axiom	ax-caucvg 8087*	Completeness. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcaucvg 8055. A Cauchy sequence (as defined here, which has a rate convergence built in) of real numbers converges to a real number. Specifically on rate of convergence, all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / 𝑛 of the nth term. This axiom should not be used directly; instead use caucvgre 11458 (which is the same, but stated in terms of the ℕ and 1 / 𝑛 notations). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑛 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑛) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑗 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ (𝑦 + 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + 𝑥)))))
Axiom	ax-pre-suploc 8088*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Locatedness here means that given 𝑥 < 𝑦, either there is an element of the set greater than 𝑥, or 𝑦 is an upper bound. Although this and ax-caucvg 8087 are both completeness properties, countable choice would probably be needed to derive this from ax-caucvg 8087. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 <ℝ 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧)))
Axiom	ax-addf 8089	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This deprecated axiom is provided for historical compatibility but is not a bona fide axiom for complex numbers (independent of set theory) since it cannot be interpreted as a first- or second-order statement (see https://us.metamath.org/downloads/schmidt-cnaxioms.pdf). It may be deleted in the future and should be avoided for new theorems. Instead, the less specific addcl 8092 should be used. Note that uses of ax-addf 8089 can be eliminated by using the defined operation (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑦)) in place of +, from which this axiom (with the defined operation in place of +) follows as a theorem. This axiom is justified by Theorem axaddf 8023. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ + :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Axiom	ax-mulf 8090	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This axiom tells us that · is defined only on complex numbers which is analogous to the way that other operations are defined, for example see subf 8316 or eff 12140. However, while Metamath can handle this axiom, if we wish to work with weaker complex number axioms, we can avoid it by using the less specific mulcl 8094. Note that uses of ax-mulf 8090 can be eliminated by using the defined operation (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)) in place of ·, as seen in mpomulf 8104. This axiom is justified by Theorem axmulf 8024. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ · :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
4.2  Derive the basic properties from the field axioms
4.2.1  Some deductions from the field axioms for complex numbers
Theorem	cnex 8091	Alias for ax-cnex 8058. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Theorem	addcl 8092	Alias for ax-addcl 8063, for naming consistency with addcli 8118. Use this theorem instead of ax-addcl 8063 or axaddcl 8019. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	readdcl 8093	Alias for ax-addrcl 8064, for naming consistency with readdcli 8127. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	mulcl 8094	Alias for ax-mulcl 8065, for naming consistency with mulcli 8119. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	remulcl 8095	Alias for ax-mulrcl 8066, for naming consistency with remulcli 8128. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	mulcom 8096	Alias for ax-mulcom 8068, for naming consistency with mulcomi 8120. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Theorem	addass 8097	Alias for ax-addass 8069, for naming consistency with addassi 8122. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	mulass 8098	Alias for ax-mulass 8070, for naming consistency with mulassi 8123. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	adddi 8099	Alias for ax-distr 8071, for naming consistency with adddii 8124. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	recn 8100	A real number is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)