Type | Label | Description |
Statement |
|
Theorem | pnfnre 8001 |
Plus infinity is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|
⊢ +∞ ∉ ℝ |
|
Theorem | mnfnre 8002 |
Minus infinity is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|
⊢ -∞ ∉ ℝ |
|
Theorem | ressxr 8003 |
The standard reals are a subset of the extended reals. (Contributed by
NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|
⊢ ℝ ⊆
ℝ* |
|
Theorem | rexpssxrxp 8004 |
The Cartesian product of standard reals are a subset of the Cartesian
product of extended reals (common case). (Contributed by David A.
Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|
⊢ (ℝ × ℝ) ⊆
(ℝ* × ℝ*) |
|
Theorem | rexr 8005 |
A standard real is an extended real. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ∈
ℝ*) |
|
Theorem | 0xr 8006 |
Zero is an extended real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
15-Jun-2014.)
|
⊢ 0 ∈
ℝ* |
|
Theorem | renepnf 8007 |
No (finite) real equals plus infinity. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ≠ +∞) |
|
Theorem | renemnf 8008 |
No real equals minus infinity. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Proof
shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ≠ -∞) |
|
Theorem | rexrd 8009 |
A standard real is an extended real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
28-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈
ℝ*) |
|
Theorem | renepnfd 8010 |
No (finite) real equals plus infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
28-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ +∞) |
|
Theorem | renemnfd 8011 |
No real equals minus infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
28-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ -∞) |
|
Theorem | pnfxr 8012 |
Plus infinity belongs to the set of extended reals. (Contributed by NM,
13-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Anthony Hart, 29-Aug-2011.)
|
⊢ +∞ ∈
ℝ* |
|
Theorem | pnfex 8013 |
Plus infinity exists (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler,
8-Dec-2018.)
|
⊢ +∞ ∈ V |
|
Theorem | pnfnemnf 8014 |
Plus and minus infinity are different elements of ℝ*. (Contributed
by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|
⊢ +∞ ≠ -∞ |
|
Theorem | mnfnepnf 8015 |
Minus and plus infinity are different (common case). (Contributed by
David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|
⊢ -∞ ≠ +∞ |
|
Theorem | mnfxr 8016 |
Minus infinity belongs to the set of extended reals. (Contributed by NM,
13-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Anthony Hart, 29-Aug-2011.) (Proof
shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|
⊢ -∞ ∈
ℝ* |
|
Theorem | rexri 8017 |
A standard real is an extended real (inference form.) (Contributed by
David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ
⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
ℝ* |
|
Theorem | 1xr 8018 |
1 is an extended real number. (Contributed by Glauco
Siliprandi,
2-Jan-2022.)
|
⊢ 1 ∈
ℝ* |
|
Theorem | renfdisj 8019 |
The reals and the infinities are disjoint. (Contributed by NM,
25-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|
⊢ (ℝ ∩ {+∞, -∞}) =
∅ |
|
Theorem | ltrelxr 8020 |
'Less than' is a relation on extended reals. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
|
⊢ < ⊆ (ℝ* ×
ℝ*) |
|
Theorem | ltrel 8021 |
'Less than' is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|
⊢ Rel < |
|
Theorem | lerelxr 8022 |
'Less than or equal' is a relation on extended reals. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
|
⊢ ≤ ⊆ (ℝ* ×
ℝ*) |
|
Theorem | lerel 8023 |
'Less or equal to' is a relation. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
|
⊢ Rel ≤ |
|
Theorem | xrlenlt 8024 |
'Less than or equal to' expressed in terms of 'less than', for extended
reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | ltxrlt 8025 |
The standard less-than <ℝ and the
extended real less-than < are
identical when restricted to the non-extended reals ℝ.
(Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
28-Apr-2015.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵)) |
|
4.2.3 Restate the ordering postulates with
extended real "less than"
|
|
Theorem | axltirr 8026 |
Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers,
derived from set theory. This restates ax-pre-ltirr 7925 with ordering on
the extended reals. New proofs should use ltnr 8036
instead for naming
consistency. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
15-Jan-2020.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | axltwlin 8027 |
Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex
numbers, derived from set theory. This restates ax-pre-ltwlin 7926 with
ordering on the extended reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
15-Jan-2020.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → (𝐴 < 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 < 𝐵))) |
|
Theorem | axlttrn 8028 |
Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers,
derived from set theory. This restates ax-pre-lttrn 7927 with ordering on
the extended reals. New proofs should use lttr 8033
instead for naming
consistency. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM,
13-Oct-2005.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)) |
|
Theorem | axltadd 8029 |
Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex
numbers, derived from set theory. (This restates ax-pre-ltadd 7929 with
ordering on the extended reals.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) < (𝐶 + 𝐵))) |
|
Theorem | axapti 8030 |
Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived
from set theory. (This restates ax-pre-apti 7928 with ordering on the
extended reals.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | axmulgt0 8031 |
The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex
numbers, derived from set theory. (This restates ax-pre-mulgt0 7930 with
ordering on the extended reals.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 < 𝐴 ∧ 0 < 𝐵) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵))) |
|
Theorem | axsuploc 8032* |
An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Axiom
for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. (This
restates ax-pre-suploc 7934 with ordering on the extended reals.)
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2024.)
|
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 < 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧))) |
|
4.2.4 Ordering on reals
|
|
Theorem | lttr 8033 |
Alias for axlttrn 8028, for naming consistency with lttri 8064. New proofs
should generally use this instead of ax-pre-lttrn 7927. (Contributed by NM,
10-Mar-2008.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)) |
|
Theorem | mulgt0 8034 |
The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM,
10-Mar-2008.)
|
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐵)) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | lenlt 8035 |
'Less than or equal to' expressed in terms of 'less than'. Part of
definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p.
(varies). (Contributed by NM,
13-May-1999.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | ltnr 8036 |
'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | ltso 8037 |
'Less than' is a strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jan-1997.)
|
⊢ < Or ℝ |
|
Theorem | gtso 8038 |
'Greater than' is a strict ordering. (Contributed by JJ, 11-Oct-2018.)
|
⊢ ◡
< Or ℝ |
|
Theorem | lttri3 8039 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1999.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))) |
|
Theorem | letri3 8040 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))) |
|
Theorem | ltleletr 8041 |
Transitive law, weaker form of (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶.
(Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2018.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)) |
|
Theorem | letr 8042 |
Transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1999.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)) |
|
Theorem | leid 8043 |
'Less than or equal to' is reflexive. (Contributed by NM,
18-Aug-1999.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | ltne 8044 |
'Less than' implies not equal. See also ltap 8592
which is the same but for
apartness. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
16-Sep-2015.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | ltnsym 8045 |
'Less than' is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | eqlelt 8046 |
Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed
by NM, 7-Apr-2001.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵))) |
|
Theorem | ltle 8047 |
'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM,
25-Aug-1999.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | lelttr 8048 |
Transitive law. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies).
(Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)) |
|
Theorem | ltletr 8049 |
Transitive law. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies).
(Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)) |
|
Theorem | ltnsym2 8050 |
'Less than' is antisymmetric and irreflexive. (Contributed by NM,
13-Aug-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ¬ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | eqle 8051 |
Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM,
4-Apr-2005.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | ltnri 8052 |
'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ
⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴 |
|
Theorem | eqlei 8053 |
Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM,
23-May-1999.) (Revised by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ
⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | eqlei2 8054 |
Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Alexander van
der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ
⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | gtneii 8055 |
'Less than' implies not equal. See also gtapii 8593 which is the same
for apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Sep-2013.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴 |
|
Theorem | ltneii 8056 |
'Greater than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
16-Sep-2015.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 |
|
Theorem | lttri3i 8057 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | letri3i 8058 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | ltnsymi 8059 |
'Less than' is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | lenlti 8060 |
'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by NM,
24-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | ltlei 8061 |
'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM,
14-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | ltleii 8062 |
'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to' (inference). (Contributed
by NM, 22-Aug-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 |
|
Theorem | ltnei 8063 |
'Less than' implies not equal. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | lttri 8064 |
'Less than' is transitive. Theorem I.17 of [Apostol] p. 20.
(Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | lelttri 8065 |
'Less than or equal to', 'less than' transitive law. (Contributed by
NM, 14-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | ltletri 8066 |
'Less than', 'less than or equal to' transitive law. (Contributed by
NM, 14-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | letri 8067 |
'Less than or equal to' is transitive. (Contributed by NM,
14-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | le2tri3i 8068 |
Extended trichotomy law for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by
NM, 14-Aug-2000.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | mulgt0i 8069 |
The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM,
16-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((0 < 𝐴 ∧ 0 < 𝐵) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | mulgt0ii 8070 |
The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM,
18-May-1999.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 0 < 𝐴 & ⊢ 0 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | ltnrd 8071 |
'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | gtned 8072 |
'Less than' implies not equal. See also gtapd 8596 which is the same but
for apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | ltned 8073 |
'Greater than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | lttri3d 8074 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))) |
|
Theorem | letri3d 8075 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))) |
|
Theorem | eqleltd 8076 |
Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed
by NM, 7-Apr-2001.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵))) |
|
Theorem | lenltd 8077 |
'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | ltled 8078 |
'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | ltnsymd 8079 |
'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | nltled 8080 |
'Not less than ' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by
Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | lensymd 8081 |
'Less than or equal to' implies 'not less than'. (Contributed by
Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | mulgt0d 8082 |
The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | letrd 8083 |
Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by
NM, 20-May-2005.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | lelttrd 8084 |
Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to', 'less than'.
(Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2006.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | lttrd 8085 |
Transitive law deduction for 'less than'. (Contributed by NM,
9-Jan-2006.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | 0lt1 8086 |
0 is less than 1. Theorem I.21 of [Apostol] p.
20. Part of definition
11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies).
(Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.)
|
⊢ 0 < 1 |
|
Theorem | ltntri 8087 |
Negative trichotomy property for real numbers. It is well known that we
cannot prove real number trichotomy, 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴. Does
that mean there is a pair of real numbers where none of those hold (that
is, where we can refute each of those three relationships)? Actually, no,
as shown here. This is another example of distinguishing between being
unable to prove something, or being able to refute it. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2023.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ¬ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
|
4.2.5 Initial properties of the complex
numbers
|
|
Theorem | mul12 8088 |
Commutative/associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM,
30-Apr-2005.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))) |
|
Theorem | mul32 8089 |
Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | mul31 8090 |
Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Scott Fenton,
3-Jan-2013.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) · 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | mul4 8091 |
Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
|
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷))) |
|
Theorem | muladd11 8092 |
A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2005.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((1 + 𝐴) · (1 + 𝐵)) = ((1 + 𝐴) + (𝐵 + (𝐴 · 𝐵)))) |
|
Theorem | 1p1times 8093 |
Two times a number. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario
Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((1 + 1) ·
𝐴) = (𝐴 + 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | peano2cn 8094 |
A theorem for complex numbers analogous the second Peano postulate
peano2 4596. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2005.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℂ) |
|
Theorem | peano2re 8095 |
A theorem for reals analogous the second Peano postulate peano2 4596.
(Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-2005.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℝ) |
|
Theorem | addcom 8096 |
Addition commutes. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | addid1 8097 |
0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon,
16-Jan-2020.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | addlid 8098 |
0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by
Scott Fenton,
3-Jan-2013.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | readdcan 8099 |
Cancellation law for addition over the reals. (Contributed by Scott
Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐶 + 𝐴) = (𝐶 + 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | 00id 8100 |
0 is its own additive identity. (Contributed by Scott
Fenton,
3-Jan-2013.)
|
⊢ (0 + 0) = 0 |