P. 81 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8001-8100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	recexprlemopu 8001*	The upper cut of 𝐵 is open. Lemma for recexpr 8012. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨{𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 <Q 𝑦 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (2nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑦 <Q 𝑥 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (1st ‘𝐴))}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑟 ∈ Q ∧ 𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵)) → ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑞 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	recexprlemupu 8002*	The upper cut of 𝐵 is upper. Lemma for recexpr 8012. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨{𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 <Q 𝑦 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (2nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑦 <Q 𝑥 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (1st ‘𝐴))}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑟 ∈ Q) → (∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑞 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵)) → 𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	recexprlemrnd 8003*	𝐵 is rounded. Lemma for recexpr 8012. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨{𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 <Q 𝑦 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (2nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑦 <Q 𝑥 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (1st ‘𝐴))}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → (∀𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑞 ∈ (1st ‘𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑞 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ (1st ‘𝐵))) ∧ ∀𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑞 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵)))))
Theorem	recexprlemdisj 8004*	𝐵 is disjoint. Lemma for recexpr 8012. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨{𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 <Q 𝑦 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (2nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑦 <Q 𝑥 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (1st ‘𝐴))}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ¬ (𝑞 ∈ (1st ‘𝐵) ∧ 𝑞 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	recexprlemloc 8005*	𝐵 is located. Lemma for recexpr 8012. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨{𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 <Q 𝑦 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (2nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑦 <Q 𝑥 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (1st ‘𝐴))}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ∀𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑞 <Q 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ (1st ‘𝐵) ∨ 𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵))))
Theorem	recexprlempr 8006*	𝐵 is a positive real. Lemma for recexpr 8012. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨{𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 <Q 𝑦 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (2nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑦 <Q 𝑥 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (1st ‘𝐴))}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → 𝐵 ∈ P)
Theorem	recexprlem1ssl 8007*	The lower cut of one is a subset of the lower cut of 𝐴 ·P 𝐵. Lemma for recexpr 8012. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨{𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 <Q 𝑦 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (2nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑦 <Q 𝑥 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (1st ‘𝐴))}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → (1st ‘1P) ⊆ (1st ‘(𝐴 ·P 𝐵)))
Theorem	recexprlem1ssu 8008*	The upper cut of one is a subset of the upper cut of 𝐴 ·P 𝐵. Lemma for recexpr 8012. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨{𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 <Q 𝑦 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (2nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑦 <Q 𝑥 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (1st ‘𝐴))}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → (2nd ‘1P) ⊆ (2nd ‘(𝐴 ·P 𝐵)))
Theorem	recexprlemss1l 8009*	The lower cut of 𝐴 ·P 𝐵 is a subset of the lower cut of one. Lemma for recexpr 8012. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨{𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 <Q 𝑦 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (2nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑦 <Q 𝑥 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (1st ‘𝐴))}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → (1st ‘(𝐴 ·P 𝐵)) ⊆ (1st ‘1P))
Theorem	recexprlemss1u 8010*	The upper cut of 𝐴 ·P 𝐵 is a subset of the upper cut of one. Lemma for recexpr 8012. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨{𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 <Q 𝑦 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (2nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑦 <Q 𝑥 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (1st ‘𝐴))}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → (2nd ‘(𝐴 ·P 𝐵)) ⊆ (2nd ‘1P))
Theorem	recexprlemex 8011*	𝐵 is the reciprocal of 𝐴. Lemma for recexpr 8012. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨{𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 <Q 𝑦 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (2nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑦 <Q 𝑥 ∧ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ (1st ‘𝐴))}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → (𝐴 ·P 𝐵) = 1P)
Theorem	recexpr 8012*	The reciprocal of a positive real exists. Part of Proposition 9-3.7(v) of [Gleason] p. 124. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → ∃𝑥 ∈ P (𝐴 ·P 𝑥) = 1P)
Theorem	aptiprleml 8013	Lemma for aptipr 8015. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P ∧ ¬ 𝐵<P 𝐴) → (1st ‘𝐴) ⊆ (1st ‘𝐵))
Theorem	aptiprlemu 8014	Lemma for aptipr 8015. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P ∧ ¬ 𝐵<P 𝐴) → (2nd ‘𝐵) ⊆ (2nd ‘𝐴))
Theorem	aptipr 8015	Apartness of positive reals is tight. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P ∧ ¬ (𝐴<P 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵<P 𝐴)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	ltmprr 8016	Ordering property of multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐶 ∈ P) → ((𝐶 ·P 𝐴)<P (𝐶 ·P 𝐵) → 𝐴<P 𝐵))
Theorem	archpr 8017*	For any positive real, there is an integer that is greater than it. This is also known as the "archimedean property". The integer 𝑥 is embedded into the reals as described at nnprlu 7927. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → ∃𝑥 ∈ N 𝐴<P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑥, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑥, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩)
Theorem	caucvgprlemcanl 8018*	Lemma for cauappcvgprlemladdrl 8031. Cancelling a term from both sides. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑅 +Q 𝑄) ∈ (1st ‘(𝐿 +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (𝑆 +Q 𝑄)}, {𝑢 ∣ (𝑆 +Q 𝑄) <Q 𝑢}⟩)) ↔ 𝑅 ∈ (1st ‘(𝐿 +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑢 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑢}⟩))))
Theorem	cauappcvgprlemm 8019*	Lemma for cauappcvgpr 8036. The putative limit is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:Q⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑠 ∈ Q 𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ Q 𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	cauappcvgprlemopl 8020*	Lemma for cauappcvgpr 8036. The lower cut of the putative limit is open. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:Q⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	cauappcvgprlemlol 8021*	Lemma for cauappcvgpr 8036. The lower cut of the putative limit is lower. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:Q⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿)) → 𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿))
Theorem	cauappcvgprlemopu 8022*	Lemma for cauappcvgpr 8036. The upper cut of the putative limit is open. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:Q⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)) → ∃𝑠 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	cauappcvgprlemupu 8023*	Lemma for cauappcvgpr 8036. The upper cut of the putative limit is upper. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:Q⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)) → 𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿))
Theorem	cauappcvgprlemrnd 8024*	Lemma for cauappcvgpr 8036. The putative limit is rounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:Q⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑠 ∈ Q (𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿))) ∧ ∀𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿) ↔ ∃𝑠 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))))
Theorem	cauappcvgprlemdisj 8025*	Lemma for cauappcvgpr 8036. The putative limit is disjoint. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:Q⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ Q ¬ (𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	cauappcvgprlemloc 8026*	Lemma for cauappcvgpr 8036. The putative limit is located. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:Q⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ Q ∀𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑟 → (𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ∨ 𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿))))
Theorem	cauappcvgprlemcl 8027*	Lemma for cauappcvgpr 8036. The putative limit is a positive real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:Q⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ P)
Theorem	cauappcvgprlemladdfu 8028*	Lemma for cauappcvgprlemladd 8032. The forward subset relationship for the upper cut. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:Q⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(𝐿 +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑢 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑢}⟩)) ⊆ (2nd ‘⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑆)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) +Q 𝑆) <Q 𝑢}⟩))
Theorem	cauappcvgprlemladdfl 8029*	Lemma for cauappcvgprlemladd 8032. The forward subset relationship for the lower cut. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:Q⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘(𝐿 +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑢 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑢}⟩)) ⊆ (1st ‘⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑆)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) +Q 𝑆) <Q 𝑢}⟩))
Theorem	cauappcvgprlemladdru 8030*	Lemma for cauappcvgprlemladd 8032. The reverse subset relationship for the upper cut. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:Q⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑆)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) +Q 𝑆) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ⊆ (2nd ‘(𝐿 +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑢 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑢}⟩)))
Theorem	cauappcvgprlemladdrl 8031*	Lemma for cauappcvgprlemladd 8032. The forward subset relationship for the lower cut. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:Q⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑆)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) +Q 𝑆) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ⊆ (1st ‘(𝐿 +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑢 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑢}⟩)))
Theorem	cauappcvgprlemladd 8032*	Lemma for cauappcvgpr 8036. This takes 𝐿 and offsets it by the positive fraction 𝑆. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:Q⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿 +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑢 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑢}⟩) = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑆)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) +Q 𝑆) <Q 𝑢}⟩)
Theorem	cauappcvgprlem1 8033*	Lemma for cauappcvgpr 8036. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:Q⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (𝐹‘𝑄)}, {𝑢 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑄) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P (𝐿 +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (𝑄 +Q 𝑅)}, {𝑢 ∣ (𝑄 +Q 𝑅) <Q 𝑢}⟩))
Theorem	cauappcvgprlem2 8034*	Lemma for cauappcvgpr 8036. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:Q⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿<P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q ((𝐹‘𝑄) +Q (𝑄 +Q 𝑅))}, {𝑢 ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑄) +Q (𝑄 +Q 𝑅)) <Q 𝑢}⟩)
Theorem	cauappcvgprlemlim 8035*	Lemma for cauappcvgpr 8036. The putative limit is a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:Q⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑝))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑙 +Q 𝑞) <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q 𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ∀𝑟 ∈ Q (⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P (𝐿 +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (𝑞 +Q 𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∣ (𝑞 +Q 𝑟) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ 𝐿<P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑞 +Q 𝑟))}, {𝑢 ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑞 +Q 𝑟)) <Q 𝑢}⟩))
Theorem	cauappcvgpr 8036*	A Cauchy approximation has a limit. A Cauchy approximation, here 𝐹, is similar to a Cauchy sequence but is indexed by the desired tolerance (that is, how close together terms needs to be) rather than by natural numbers. This is basically Theorem 11.2.12 of [HoTT], p. (varies) with a few differences such as that we are proving the existence of a limit without anything about how fast it converges (that is, mere existence instead of existence, in HoTT terms), and that the codomain of 𝐹 is Q rather than P. We also specify that every term needs to be larger than a fraction 𝐴, to avoid the case where we have positive terms which "converge" to zero (which is not a positive real). This proof (including its lemmas) is similar to the proofs of caucvgpr 8056 and caucvgprpr 8086 but is somewhat simpler, so reading this one first may help understanding the other two. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:Q⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑝) +Q (𝑝 +Q 𝑞))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ Q 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑝))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ P ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ∀𝑟 ∈ Q (⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (𝐹‘𝑞)}, {𝑢 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑞) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P (𝑦 +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (𝑞 +Q 𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∣ (𝑞 +Q 𝑟) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ 𝑦<P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑞 +Q 𝑟))}, {𝑢 ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑞) +Q (𝑞 +Q 𝑟)) <Q 𝑢}⟩))
Theorem	archrecnq 8037*	Archimedean principle for fractions (reciprocal version). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Q → ∃𝑗 ∈ N (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝐴)
Theorem	archrecpr 8038*	Archimedean principle for positive reals (reciprocal version). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → ∃𝑗 ∈ N ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P 𝐴)
Theorem	caucvgprlemk 8039	Lemma for caucvgpr 8056. Reciprocals of positive integers decrease as the positive integers increase. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 <N 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑄)
Theorem	caucvgprlemnkj 8040*	Lemma for caucvgpr 8056. Part of disjointness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ((𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝐾) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐽) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑆))
Theorem	caucvgprlemnbj 8041*	Lemma for caucvgpr 8056. Non-existence of two elements of the sequence which are too far from each other. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ N)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (((𝐹‘𝐵) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐵, 1o⟩] ~Q )) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝐽))
Theorem	caucvgprlemm 8042*	Lemma for caucvgpr 8056. The putative limit is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ N 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑠 ∈ Q 𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ Q 𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	caucvgprlemopl 8043*	Lemma for caucvgpr 8056. The lower cut of the putative limit is open. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ N 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	caucvgprlemlol 8044*	Lemma for caucvgpr 8056. The lower cut of the putative limit is lower. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ N 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿)) → 𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿))
Theorem	caucvgprlemopu 8045*	Lemma for caucvgpr 8056. The upper cut of the putative limit is open. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ N 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)) → ∃𝑠 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	caucvgprlemupu 8046*	Lemma for caucvgpr 8056. The upper cut of the putative limit is upper. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ N 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)) → 𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿))
Theorem	caucvgprlemrnd 8047*	Lemma for caucvgpr 8056. The putative limit is rounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ N 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑠 ∈ Q (𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿))) ∧ ∀𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿) ↔ ∃𝑠 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))))
Theorem	caucvgprlemdisj 8048*	Lemma for caucvgpr 8056. The putative limit is disjoint. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ N 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ Q ¬ (𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	caucvgprlemloc 8049*	Lemma for caucvgpr 8056. The putative limit is located. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ N 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ Q ∀𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑟 → (𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ∨ 𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿))))
Theorem	caucvgprlemcl 8050*	Lemma for caucvgpr 8056. The putative limit is a positive real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ N 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ P)
Theorem	caucvgprlemladdfu 8051*	Lemma for caucvgpr 8056. Adding 𝑆 after embedding in positive reals, or adding it as a rational. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ N 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(𝐿 +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑢 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑢}⟩)) ⊆ {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) +Q 𝑆) <Q 𝑢})
Theorem	caucvgprlemladdrl 8052*	Lemma for caucvgpr 8056. Adding 𝑆 after embedding in positive reals, or adding it as a rational. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ N 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q 𝑆)} ⊆ (1st ‘(𝐿 +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑢 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑢}⟩)))
Theorem	caucvgprlem1 8053*	Lemma for caucvgpr 8056. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ N 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 <N 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (𝐹‘𝐾)}, {𝑢 ∣ (𝐹‘𝐾) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P (𝐿 +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q 𝑄}, {𝑢 ∣ 𝑄 <Q 𝑢}⟩))
Theorem	caucvgprlem2 8054*	Lemma for caucvgpr 8056. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ N 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 <N 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿<P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q ((𝐹‘𝐾) +Q 𝑄)}, {𝑢 ∣ ((𝐹‘𝐾) +Q 𝑄) <Q 𝑢}⟩)
Theorem	caucvgprlemlim 8055*	Lemma for caucvgpr 8056. The putative limit is a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ N 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ Q ∃𝑗 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑗 <N 𝑘 → (⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (𝐹‘𝑘)}, {𝑢 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P (𝐿 +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q 𝑥}, {𝑢 ∣ 𝑥 <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ 𝐿<P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q 𝑥)}, {𝑢 ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q 𝑥) <Q 𝑢}⟩)))
Theorem	caucvgpr 8056*	A Cauchy sequence of positive fractions with a modulus of convergence converges to a positive real. This is basically Corollary 11.2.13 of [HoTT], p. (varies) (one key difference being that this is for positive reals rather than signed reals). Also, the HoTT book theorem has a modulus of convergence (that is, a rate of convergence) specified by (11.2.9) in HoTT whereas this theorem fixes the rate of convergence to say that all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / 𝑛 of the nth term (it should later be able to prove versions of this theorem with a different fixed rate or a modulus of convergence supplied as a hypothesis). We also specify that every term needs to be larger than a fraction 𝐴, to avoid the case where we have positive terms which "converge" to zero (which is not a positive real). This proof (including its lemmas) is similar to the proofs of cauappcvgpr 8036 and caucvgprpr 8086. Reading cauappcvgpr 8036 first (the simplest of the three) might help understanding the other two. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ N 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑗))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ P ∀𝑥 ∈ Q ∃𝑗 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑗 <N 𝑘 → (⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (𝐹‘𝑘)}, {𝑢 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P (𝑦 +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q 𝑥}, {𝑢 ∣ 𝑥 <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ 𝑦<P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q 𝑥)}, {𝑢 ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q 𝑥) <Q 𝑢}⟩)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemk 8057*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. Reciprocals of positive integers decrease as the positive integers increase. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 <N 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P 𝑄)
Theorem	caucvgprprlemloccalc 8058*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. Rearranging some expressions for caucvgprprlemloc 8077. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 <Q 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 +Q 𝑌) = 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 +Q 𝑋) <Q 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (*Q‘[⟨𝑀, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑀, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑢 ∣ (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑀, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑀, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑀, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q 𝑇}, {𝑢 ∣ 𝑇 <Q 𝑢}⟩)
Theorem	caucvgprprlemell 8059*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. Membership in the lower cut of the putative limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ Q ∧ ∃𝑏 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑋 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑋 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑏)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemelu 8060*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. Membership in the upper cut of the putative limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ Q ∧ ∃𝑏 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑏) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑋}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑋 <Q 𝑞}⟩))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemcbv 8061*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. Change bound variables in Cauchy condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ N ∀𝑏 ∈ N (𝑎 <N 𝑏 → ((𝐹‘𝑎)<P ((𝐹‘𝑏) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑎, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑎, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑏)<P ((𝐹‘𝑎) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑎, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑎, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemval 8062*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. Cauchy condition expressed in terms of classes. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 <N 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝐴)<P ((𝐹‘𝐵) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐴, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐴, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝐵)<P ((𝐹‘𝐴) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐴, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐴, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemnkltj 8063*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. Part of disjointness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐾 <N 𝐽) → ¬ (⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝐾) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐽) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑞}⟩))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemnkeqj 8064*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. Part of disjointness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐾 = 𝐽) → ¬ (⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝐾) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐽) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑞}⟩))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemnjltk 8065*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. Part of disjointness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 <N 𝐾) → ¬ (⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝐾) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐽) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑞}⟩))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemnkj 8066*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. Part of disjointness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝐾) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐽) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑞}⟩))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemnbj 8067*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. Non-existence of two elements of the sequence which are too far from each other. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ N)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (((𝐹‘𝐵) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐵, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐵, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩)<P (𝐹‘𝐽))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemml 8068*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. The lower cut of the putative limit is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑠 ∈ Q 𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemmu 8069*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. The upper cut of the putative limit is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡 ∈ Q 𝑡 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemm 8070*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. The putative limit is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑠 ∈ Q 𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ Q 𝑡 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemopl 8071*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. The lower cut of the putative limit is open. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿)) → ∃𝑡 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑡 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemlol 8072*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. The lower cut of the putative limit is lower. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 <Q 𝑡 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿)) → 𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemopu 8073*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. The upper cut of the putative limit is open. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)) → ∃𝑠 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑡 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemupu 8074*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. The upper cut of the putative limit is upper. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 <Q 𝑡 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)) → 𝑡 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemrnd 8075*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. The putative limit is rounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑠 ∈ Q (𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ↔ ∃𝑡 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑡 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿))) ∧ ∀𝑡 ∈ Q (𝑡 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿) ↔ ∃𝑠 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑡 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemdisj 8076*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. The putative limit is disjoint. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ Q ¬ (𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemloc 8077*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. The putative limit is located. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ Q ∀𝑡 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑡 → (𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ∨ 𝑡 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿))))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemcl 8078*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. The putative limit is a positive real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ P)
Theorem	caucvgprprlemclphr 8079*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. The putative limit is a positive real. Like caucvgprprlemcl 8078 but without a disjoint variable condition between 𝜑 and 𝑟. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ P)
Theorem	caucvgprprlemexbt 8080*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿 +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑄}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑄 <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P 𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑏 ∈ N (((𝐹‘𝑏) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑄}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑄 <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P 𝑇)
Theorem	caucvgprprlemexb 8081*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ N)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐿 +P 𝑄) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑅, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑅, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ((𝐹‘𝑅) +P 𝑄) → ∃𝑏 ∈ N (((𝐹‘𝑏) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩) +P (𝑄 +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑅, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑅, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩))<P ((𝐹‘𝑅) +P 𝑄)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemaddq 8082*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ N (𝑋 +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P 𝑄))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋<P (𝐿 +P 𝑄))
Theorem	caucvgprprlem1 8083*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 <N 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐾)<P (𝐿 +P 𝑄))
Theorem	caucvgprprlem2 8084*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 <N 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿<P ((𝐹‘𝐾) +P 𝑄))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemlim 8085*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 8086. The putative limit is a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∃𝑗 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑗 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑘)<P (𝐿 +P 𝑥) ∧ 𝐿<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P 𝑥))))
Theorem	caucvgprpr 8086*	A Cauchy sequence of positive reals with a modulus of convergence converges to a positive real. This is basically Corollary 11.2.13 of [HoTT], p. (varies) (one key difference being that this is for positive reals rather than signed reals). Also, the HoTT book theorem has a modulus of convergence (that is, a rate of convergence) specified by (11.2.9) in HoTT whereas this theorem fixes the rate of convergence to say that all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / 𝑛 of the nth term (it should later be able to prove versions of this theorem with a different fixed rate or a modulus of convergence supplied as a hypothesis). We also specify that every term needs to be larger than a given value 𝐴, to avoid the case where we have positive terms which "converge" to zero (which is not a positive real). This is similar to caucvgpr 8056 except that values of the sequence are positive reals rather than positive fractions. Reading that proof first (or cauappcvgpr 8036) might help in understanding this one, as they are slightly simpler but similarly structured. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ P ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∃𝑗 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑗 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑘)<P (𝑦 +P 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P 𝑥))))
Theorem	suplocexprlemell 8087*	Lemma for suplocexpr 8099. Membership in the lower cut of the putative supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥))
Theorem	suplocexprlem2b 8088	Lemma for suplocexpr 8099. Expression for the lower cut of the putative supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ P → (2nd ‘𝐵) = {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢})
Theorem	suplocexprlemss 8089*	Lemma for suplocexpr 8099. 𝐴 is a set of positive reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ P)
Theorem	suplocexprlemml 8090*	Lemma for suplocexpr 8099. The lower cut of the putative supremum is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑠 ∈ Q 𝑠 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴))
Theorem	suplocexprlemrl 8091*	Lemma for suplocexpr 8099. The lower cut of the putative supremum is rounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑞 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑞 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴))))
Theorem	suplocexprlemmu 8092*	Lemma for suplocexpr 8099. The upper cut of the putative supremum is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑠 ∈ Q 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵))
Theorem	suplocexprlemru 8093*	Lemma for suplocexpr 8099. The upper cut of the putative supremum is rounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑞 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵))))
Theorem	suplocexprlemdisj 8094*	Lemma for suplocexpr 8099. The putative supremum is disjoint. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ¬ (𝑞 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑞 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	suplocexprlemloc 8095*	Lemma for suplocexpr 8099. The putative supremum is located. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ∀𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑞 <Q 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴) ∨ 𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵))))
Theorem	suplocexprlemex 8096*	Lemma for suplocexpr 8099. The putative supremum is a positive real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ P)
Theorem	suplocexprlemub 8097*	Lemma for suplocexpr 8099. The putative supremum is an upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝐵<P 𝑦)
Theorem	suplocexprlemlub 8098*	Lemma for suplocexpr 8099. The putative supremum is a least upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦<P 𝐵 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑧))
Theorem	suplocexpr 8099*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of positive reals has a supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥<P 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑦<P 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑧)))
Definition	df-enr 8100*	Define equivalence relation for signed reals. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.1 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-1995.)
⊢ ~R = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (P × P) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (P × P)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 +P 𝑢) = (𝑤 +P 𝑣)))}