cnvf1olem - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > cnvf1olem		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem cnvf1olem 8049

Description: Lemma for cnvf1o 8050. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
cnvf1olem	⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{𝐵})) → (𝐶 ∈ ^◡𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 = ∪ ^◡{𝐶}))

**Proof of Theorem cnvf1olem**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simprr 773	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{𝐵})) → 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{𝐵})
2		1st2nd 7981	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩)
3	2	adantrr 718	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{𝐵})) → 𝐵 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩)
4	3	sneqd 4569	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{𝐵})) → {𝐵} = {⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩})
5	4	cnveqd 5819	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{𝐵})) → ^◡{𝐵} = ^◡{⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩})
6	5	unieqd 4853	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{𝐵})) → ∪ ^◡{𝐵} = ∪ ^◡{⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩})
7	1, 6	eqtrd 2770	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{𝐵})) → 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩})
8		opswap 6182	. . . 4 ⊢ ∪ ^◡{⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩} = ⟨(2^nd ‘𝐵), (1^st ‘𝐵)⟩
9	7, 8	eqtrdi 2786	. . 3 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{𝐵})) → 𝐶 = ⟨(2^nd ‘𝐵), (1^st ‘𝐵)⟩)
10		simprl 771	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{𝐵})) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
11	3, 10	eqeltrrd 2836	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{𝐵})) → ⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩ ∈ 𝐴)
12		fvex 6842	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2^nd ‘𝐵) ∈ V
13		fvex 6842	. . . . 5 ⊢ (1^st ‘𝐵) ∈ V
14	12, 13	opelcnv 5825	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨(2^nd ‘𝐵), (1^st ‘𝐵)⟩ ∈ ^◡𝐴 ↔ ⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩ ∈ 𝐴)
15	11, 14	sylibr 234	. . 3 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{𝐵})) → ⟨(2^nd ‘𝐵), (1^st ‘𝐵)⟩ ∈ ^◡𝐴)
16	9, 15	eqeltrd 2835	. 2 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{𝐵})) → 𝐶 ∈ ^◡𝐴)
17		opswap 6182	. . . 4 ⊢ ∪ ^◡{⟨(2^nd ‘𝐵), (1^st ‘𝐵)⟩} = ⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩
18	17	eqcomi 2744	. . 3 ⊢ ⟨(1^st ‘𝐵), (2^nd ‘𝐵)⟩ = ∪ ^◡{⟨(2^nd ‘𝐵), (1^st ‘𝐵)⟩}
19	9	sneqd 4569	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{𝐵})) → {𝐶} = {⟨(2^nd ‘𝐵), (1^st ‘𝐵)⟩})
20	19	cnveqd 5819	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{𝐵})) → ^◡{𝐶} = ^◡{⟨(2^nd ‘𝐵), (1^st ‘𝐵)⟩})
21	20	unieqd 4853	. . 3 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{𝐵})) → ∪ ^◡{𝐶} = ∪ ^◡{⟨(2^nd ‘𝐵), (1^st ‘𝐵)⟩})
22	18, 3, 21	3eqtr4a 2796	. 2 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{𝐵})) → 𝐵 = ∪ ^◡{𝐶})
23	16, 22	jca 511	1 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ^◡{𝐵})) → (𝐶 ∈ ^◡𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 = ∪ ^◡{𝐶}))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1542 ∈ wcel 2114 {csn 4557 ⟨cop 4563 ∪ cuni 4840 ^◡ccnv 5619 Rel wrel 5625 ‘cfv 6487 1^st c1st 7929 2^nd c2nd 7930

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2010 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2147 ax-11 2163 ax-12 2184 ax-ext 2707 ax-sep 5220 ax-nul 5230 ax-pr 5364 ax-un 7678

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 849 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1545 df-fal 1555 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2069 df-mo 2538 df-eu 2568 df-clab 2714 df-cleq 2727 df-clel 2810 df-nfc 2884 df-ne 2931 df-ral 3050 df-rex 3060 df-rab 3388 df-v 3429 df-dif 3888 df-un 3890 df-in 3892 df-ss 3902 df-nul 4264 df-if 4457 df-sn 4558 df-pr 4560 df-op 4564 df-uni 4841 df-br 5075 df-opab 5137 df-mpt 5156 df-id 5515 df-xp 5626 df-rel 5627 df-cnv 5628 df-co 5629 df-dm 5630 df-rn 5631 df-iota 6443 df-fun 6489 df-fv 6495 df-1st 7931 df-2nd 7932

This theorem is referenced by: cnvf1o 8050 fcnvgreu 32733 gsumhashmul 33116

W3C validator