dfoprab3 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > dfoprab3		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem dfoprab3 7867

Description: Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
dfoprab3.1	⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
dfoprab3	⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}

Distinct variable groups: 𝑥,𝑦,𝜑 𝜓,𝑤 𝑥,𝑧,𝑤,𝑦 Allowed substitution hints: 𝜑(𝑧,𝑤) 𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

**Proof of Theorem dfoprab3**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfoprab3s 7866	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1^st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2^nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜓)}
2		fvex 6769	. . . . 5 ⊢ (1^st ‘𝑤) ∈ V
3		fvex 6769	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2^nd ‘𝑤) ∈ V
4		eqcom 2745	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = (1^st ‘𝑤) ↔ (1^st ‘𝑤) = 𝑥)
5		eqcom 2745	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = (2^nd ‘𝑤) ↔ (2^nd ‘𝑤) = 𝑦)
6	4, 5	anbi12i 626	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = (1^st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2^nd ‘𝑤)) ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑤) = 𝑥 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑤) = 𝑦))
7		eqopi 7840	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑤) = 𝑥 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑤) = 𝑦)) → 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
8	6, 7	sylan2b 593	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ (𝑥 = (1^st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2^nd ‘𝑤))) → 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
9		dfoprab3.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
10	8, 9	syl 17	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ (𝑥 = (1^st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2^nd ‘𝑤))) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
11	10	bicomd 222	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ (𝑥 = (1^st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2^nd ‘𝑤))) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
12	11	ex 412	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) → ((𝑥 = (1^st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2^nd ‘𝑤)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)))
13	2, 3, 12	sbc2iedv 3797	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) → ([(1^st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2^nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
14	13	pm5.32i 574	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1^st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2^nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜓) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑))
15	14	opabbii 5137	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1^st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2^nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜓)} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑)}
16	1, 15	eqtr2i 2767	1 ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1539 ∈ wcel 2108 Vcvv 3422 [wsbc 3711 ⟨cop 4564 {copab 5132 × cxp 5578 ‘cfv 6418 {coprab 7256 1^st c1st 7802 2^nd c2nd 7803

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1799 ax-4 1813 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2139 ax-11 2156 ax-12 2173 ax-ext 2709 ax-sep 5218 ax-nul 5225 ax-pr 5347 ax-un 7566

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-or 844 df-3an 1087 df-tru 1542 df-fal 1552 df-ex 1784 df-nf 1788 df-sb 2069 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2569 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2730 df-clel 2817 df-nfc 2888 df-ne 2943 df-ral 3068 df-rex 3069 df-rab 3072 df-v 3424 df-sbc 3712 df-dif 3886 df-un 3888 df-in 3890 df-ss 3900 df-nul 4254 df-if 4457 df-sn 4559 df-pr 4561 df-op 4565 df-uni 4837 df-br 5071 df-opab 5133 df-mpt 5154 df-id 5480 df-xp 5586 df-rel 5587 df-cnv 5588 df-co 5589 df-dm 5590 df-rn 5591 df-iota 6376 df-fun 6420 df-fv 6426 df-oprab 7259 df-1st 7804 df-2nd 7805

This theorem is referenced by: dfoprab4 7868 cnvoprab 7873 df1st2 7909 df2nd2 7910

W3C validator