dfoprab3 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > dfoprab3		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem dfoprab3 8095

Description: Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
dfoprab3.1	⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
dfoprab3	⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}

Distinct variable groups: 𝑥,𝑦,𝜑 𝜓,𝑤 𝑥,𝑧,𝑤,𝑦 Allowed substitution hints: 𝜑(𝑧,𝑤) 𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

**Proof of Theorem dfoprab3**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfoprab3s 8094	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1^st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2^nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜓)}
2		fvex 6933	. . . . 5 ⊢ (1^st ‘𝑤) ∈ V
3		fvex 6933	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2^nd ‘𝑤) ∈ V
4		eqcom 2747	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = (1^st ‘𝑤) ↔ (1^st ‘𝑤) = 𝑥)
5		eqcom 2747	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = (2^nd ‘𝑤) ↔ (2^nd ‘𝑤) = 𝑦)
6	4, 5	anbi12i 627	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = (1^st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2^nd ‘𝑤)) ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑤) = 𝑥 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑤) = 𝑦))
7		eqopi 8066	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑤) = 𝑥 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑤) = 𝑦)) → 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
8	6, 7	sylan2b 593	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ (𝑥 = (1^st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2^nd ‘𝑤))) → 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
9		dfoprab3.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
10	8, 9	syl 17	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ (𝑥 = (1^st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2^nd ‘𝑤))) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
11	10	bicomd 223	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ (𝑥 = (1^st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2^nd ‘𝑤))) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
12	11	ex 412	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) → ((𝑥 = (1^st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2^nd ‘𝑤)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)))
13	2, 3, 12	sbc2iedv 3889	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) → ([(1^st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2^nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
14	13	pm5.32i 574	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1^st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2^nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜓) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑))
15	14	opabbii 5233	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1^st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2^nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜓)} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑)}
16	1, 15	eqtr2i 2769	1 ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1537 ∈ wcel 2108 Vcvv 3488 [wsbc 3804 ⟨cop 4654 {copab 5228 × cxp 5698 ‘cfv 6573 {coprab 7449 1^st c1st 8028 2^nd c2nd 8029

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1793 ax-4 1807 ax-5 1909 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2141 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2178 ax-ext 2711 ax-sep 5317 ax-nul 5324 ax-pr 5447 ax-un 7770

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 847 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1540 df-fal 1550 df-ex 1778 df-nf 1782 df-sb 2065 df-mo 2543 df-eu 2572 df-clab 2718 df-cleq 2732 df-clel 2819 df-nfc 2895 df-ne 2947 df-ral 3068 df-rex 3077 df-rab 3444 df-v 3490 df-sbc 3805 df-dif 3979 df-un 3981 df-in 3983 df-ss 3993 df-nul 4353 df-if 4549 df-sn 4649 df-pr 4651 df-op 4655 df-uni 4932 df-br 5167 df-opab 5229 df-mpt 5250 df-id 5593 df-xp 5706 df-rel 5707 df-cnv 5708 df-co 5709 df-dm 5710 df-rn 5711 df-iota 6525 df-fun 6575 df-fv 6581 df-oprab 7452 df-1st 8030 df-2nd 8031

This theorem is referenced by: dfoprab4 8096 cnvoprab 8101 df1st2 8139 df2nd2 8140

W3C validator