Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Zhi Wang < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  eloppf2 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem eloppf2 49952
Description: Both components of a pre-image of a non-empty opposite functor exist; and the second component is a relation on triples. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Nov-2025.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
eloppf2.k (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = 𝐾
eloppf2.x (𝜑𝑋𝐾)
Assertion
Ref Expression
eloppf2 (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) ∧ (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺)))

Proof of Theorem eloppf2
Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 eloppf2.x . . . 4 (𝜑𝑋𝐾)
2 eloppf2.k . . . 4 (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = 𝐾
31, 2eleqtrrdi 2877 . . 3 (𝜑𝑋 ∈ (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺))
4 df-oppf 49941 . . . 4 oppFunc = (𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ if((Rel 𝑔 ∧ Rel dom 𝑔), ⟨𝑓, tpos 𝑔⟩, ∅))
54elmpocl 7664 . . 3 (𝑋 ∈ (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) → (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V))
63, 5syl 18 . 2 (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V))
7 oppfvalg 49944 . . . . . 6 ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) → (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅))
86, 7syl 18 . . . . 5 (𝜑 → (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅))
93, 8eleqtrd 2868 . . . 4 (𝜑𝑋 ∈ if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅))
109ne0d 4298 . . 3 (𝜑 → if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅) ≠ ∅)
11 iffalse 4501 . . . 4 (¬ (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺) → if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅) = ∅)
1211necon1ai 2988 . . 3 (if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅) ≠ ∅ → (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺))
1310, 12syl 18 . 2 (𝜑 → (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺))
146, 13jca 521 1 (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) ∧ (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺)))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wa 401   = wceq 1570  wcel 2146  wne 2961  Vcvv 3458  c0 4289  ifcif 4492  cop 4600  dom cdm 5666  Rel wrel 5671  (class class class)co 7423  tpos ctpos 8230   oppFunc coppf 49940
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pr 5409
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-sbc 3748  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-mpt 5198  df-id 5561  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-res 5678  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fv 6551  df-ov 7426  df-oprab 7427  df-mpo 7428  df-tpos 8231  df-oppf 49941
This theorem is used by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator