Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Zhi Wang < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  eloppf2 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem eloppf2 50060
Description: Both components of a pre-image of a non-empty opposite functor exist; and the second component is a relation on triples. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Nov-2025.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
eloppf2.k (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = 𝐾
eloppf2.x (𝜑𝑋𝐾)
Assertion
Ref Expression
eloppf2 (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) ∧ (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺)))

Proof of Theorem eloppf2
Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 eloppf2.x . . . 4 (𝜑𝑋𝐾)
2 eloppf2.k . . . 4 (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = 𝐾
31, 2eleqtrrdi 2871 . . 3 (𝜑𝑋 ∈ (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺))
4 df-oppf 50049 . . . 4 oppFunc = (𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ if((Rel 𝑔 ∧ Rel dom 𝑔), ⟨𝑓, tpos 𝑔⟩, ∅))
54elmpocl 7655 . . 3 (𝑋 ∈ (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) → (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V))
63, 5syl 18 . 2 (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V))
7 oppfvalg 50052 . . . . . 6 ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) → (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅))
86, 7syl 18 . . . . 5 (𝜑 → (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅))
93, 8eleqtrd 2862 . . . 4 (𝜑𝑋 ∈ if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅))
109ne0d 4288 . . 3 (𝜑 → if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅) ≠ ∅)
11 iffalse 4491 . . . 4 (¬ (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺) → if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅) = ∅)
1211necon1ai 2982 . . 3 (if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅) ≠ ∅ → (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺))
1310, 12syl 18 . 2 (𝜑 → (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺))
146, 13jca 521 1 (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) ∧ (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺)))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wa 401   = wceq 1570  wcel 2145  wne 2955  Vcvv 3450  c0 4279  ifcif 4482  cop 4590  dom cdm 5655  Rel wrel 5660  (class class class)co 7413  tpos ctpos 8223   oppFunc coppf 50048
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5398
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-res 5667  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fv 6541  df-ov 7416  df-oprab 7417  df-mpo 7418  df-tpos 8224  df-oppf 50049
This theorem is used by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator