Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Zhi Wang < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  eloppf2 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem eloppf2 49969
Description: Both components of a pre-image of a non-empty opposite functor exist; and the second component is a relation on triples. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Nov-2025.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
eloppf2.k (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = 𝐾
eloppf2.x (𝜑𝑋𝐾)
Assertion
Ref Expression
eloppf2 (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) ∧ (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺)))

Proof of Theorem eloppf2
Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 eloppf2.x . . . 4 (𝜑𝑋𝐾)
2 eloppf2.k . . . 4 (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = 𝐾
31, 2eleqtrrdi 2876 . . 3 (𝜑𝑋 ∈ (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺))
4 df-oppf 49958 . . . 4 oppFunc = (𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ if((Rel 𝑔 ∧ Rel dom 𝑔), ⟨𝑓, tpos 𝑔⟩, ∅))
54elmpocl 7661 . . 3 (𝑋 ∈ (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) → (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V))
63, 5syl 18 . 2 (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V))
7 oppfvalg 49961 . . . . . 6 ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) → (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅))
86, 7syl 18 . . . . 5 (𝜑 → (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅))
93, 8eleqtrd 2867 . . . 4 (𝜑𝑋 ∈ if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅))
109ne0d 4295 . . 3 (𝜑 → if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅) ≠ ∅)
11 iffalse 4498 . . . 4 (¬ (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺) → if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅) = ∅)
1211necon1ai 2987 . . 3 (if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅) ≠ ∅ → (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺))
1310, 12syl 18 . 2 (𝜑 → (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺))
146, 13jca 521 1 (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) ∧ (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺)))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wa 401   = wceq 1570  wcel 2146  wne 2960  Vcvv 3457  c0 4286  ifcif 4489  cop 4597  dom cdm 5663  Rel wrel 5668  (class class class)co 7419  tpos ctpos 8227   oppFunc coppf 49957
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pr 5406
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-res 5675  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fv 6548  df-ov 7422  df-oprab 7423  df-mpo 7424  df-tpos 8228  df-oppf 49958
This theorem is used by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator