Theorem eloppf 49110

Description: The pre-image of a non-empty opposite functor is non-empty; and the second component of the pre-image is a relation on triples. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Nov-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
eloppf.g	⊢ 𝐺 = (oppFunc‘𝐹)
eloppf.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eloppf	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ≠ ∅ ∧ (Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹))))

Proof of Theorem eloppf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eloppf.x	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐺)
2		eloppf.g	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺 = (oppFunc‘𝐹)
3	1, 2	eleqtrdi 2839	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (oppFunc‘𝐹))
4		elfvdm 6897	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (oppFunc‘𝐹) → 𝐹 ∈ dom oppFunc)
5		oppffn 49101	. . . . . 6 ⊢ oppFunc Fn (V × V)
6	5	fndmi 6624	. . . . 5 ⊢ dom oppFunc = (V × V)
7	4, 6	eleqtrdi 2839	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (oppFunc‘𝐹) → 𝐹 ∈ (V × V))
8	3, 7	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (V × V))
9		0nelxp 5674	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ (V × V)
10		nelne2 3024	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ (V × V)) → 𝐹 ≠ ∅)
11	8, 9, 10	sylancl 586	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ≠ ∅)
12		1st2nd2 8009	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (V × V) → 𝐹 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩)
13	3, 7, 12	3syl 18	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩)
14	13	fveq2d 6864	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (oppFunc‘𝐹) = (oppFunc‘⟨(1st ‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩))
15		df-ov 7392	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((1st ‘𝐹)oppFunc(2nd ‘𝐹)) = (oppFunc‘⟨(1st ‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩)
16		fvex 6873	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (1st ‘𝐹) ∈ V
17		fvex 6873	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ V
18		oppfvalg 49103	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((1st ‘𝐹) ∈ V ∧ (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ V) → ((1st ‘𝐹)oppFunc(2nd ‘𝐹)) = if((Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)), ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩, ∅))
19	16, 17, 18	mp2an 692	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((1st ‘𝐹)oppFunc(2nd ‘𝐹)) = if((Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)), ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩, ∅)
20	15, 19	eqtr3i 2755	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (oppFunc‘⟨(1st ‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩) = if((Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)), ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩, ∅)
21	14, 20	eqtrdi 2781	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (oppFunc‘𝐹) = if((Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)), ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩, ∅))
22	3, 21	eleqtrd 2831	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ if((Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)), ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩, ∅))
23	22	ne0d 4307	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → if((Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)), ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩, ∅) ≠ ∅)
24		iffalse 4499	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)) → if((Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)), ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩, ∅) = ∅)
25	24	necon1ai 2953	. . 3 ⊢ (if((Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)), ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩, ∅) ≠ ∅ → (Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)))
26	23, 25	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)))
27	11, 26	jca 511	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ≠ ∅ ∧ (Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109   ≠ wne 2926  Vcvv 3450  ∅c0 4298  ifcif 4490  ⟨cop 4597   × cxp 5638  dom cdm 5640  Rel wrel 5645  ‘cfv 6513  (class class class)co 7389  1^st c1st 7968  2^nd c2nd 7969  tpos ctpos 8206  oppFunccoppf 49099

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5253  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5389  ax-un 7713

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3756  df-csb 3865  df-dif 3919  df-un 3921  df-in 3923  df-ss 3933  df-nul 4299  df-if 4491  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4874  df-iun 4959  df-br 5110  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5535  df-xp 5646  df-rel 5647  df-cnv 5648  df-co 5649  df-dm 5650  df-rn 5651  df-res 5652  df-ima 5653  df-iota 6466  df-fun 6515  df-fn 6516  df-f 6517  df-fv 6521  df-ov 7392  df-oprab 7393  df-mpo 7394  df-1st 7970  df-2nd 7971  df-tpos 8207  df-oppf 49100

This theorem is referenced by:  oppc1stflem  49258