Theorem eloppf 49378

Description: The pre-image of a non-empty opposite functor is non-empty; and the second component of the pre-image is a relation on triples. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Nov-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
eloppf.g	⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹)
eloppf.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eloppf	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ≠ ∅ ∧ (Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹))))

Proof of Theorem eloppf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eloppf.x	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐺)
2		eloppf.g	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹)
3	1, 2	eleqtrdi 2846	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ( oppFunc ‘𝐹))
4		elfvdm 6868	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) → 𝐹 ∈ dom oppFunc )
5		oppffn 49369	. . . . . 6 ⊢ oppFunc Fn (V × V)
6	5	fndmi 6596	. . . . 5 ⊢ dom oppFunc = (V × V)
7	4, 6	eleqtrdi 2846	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) → 𝐹 ∈ (V × V))
8	3, 7	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (V × V))
9		0nelxp 5658	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ (V × V)
10		nelne2 3030	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ (V × V)) → 𝐹 ≠ ∅)
11	8, 9, 10	sylancl 586	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ≠ ∅)
12		1st2nd2 7972	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (V × V) → 𝐹 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩)
13	3, 7, 12	3syl 18	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩)
14	13	fveq2d 6838	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) = ( oppFunc ‘⟨(1st ‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩))
15		df-ov 7361	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((1st ‘𝐹) oppFunc (2nd ‘𝐹)) = ( oppFunc ‘⟨(1st ‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩)
16		fvex 6847	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (1st ‘𝐹) ∈ V
17		fvex 6847	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ V
18		oppfvalg 49371	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((1st ‘𝐹) ∈ V ∧ (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ V) → ((1st ‘𝐹) oppFunc (2nd ‘𝐹)) = if((Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)), ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩, ∅))
19	16, 17, 18	mp2an 692	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((1st ‘𝐹) oppFunc (2nd ‘𝐹)) = if((Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)), ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩, ∅)
20	15, 19	eqtr3i 2761	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( oppFunc ‘⟨(1st ‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩) = if((Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)), ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩, ∅)
21	14, 20	eqtrdi 2787	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) = if((Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)), ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩, ∅))
22	3, 21	eleqtrd 2838	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ if((Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)), ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩, ∅))
23	22	ne0d 4294	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → if((Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)), ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩, ∅) ≠ ∅)
24		iffalse 4488	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)) → if((Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)), ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩, ∅) = ∅)
25	24	necon1ai 2959	. . 3 ⊢ (if((Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)), ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩, ∅) ≠ ∅ → (Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)))
26	23, 25	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹)))
27	11, 26	jca 511	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ≠ ∅ ∧ (Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2113   ≠ wne 2932  Vcvv 3440  ∅c0 4285  ifcif 4479  ⟨cop 4586   × cxp 5622  dom cdm 5624  Rel wrel 5629  ‘cfv 6492  (class class class)co 7358  1^st c1st 7931  2^nd c2nd 7932  tpos ctpos 8167   oppFunc coppf 49367

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2146  ax-11 2162  ax-12 2184  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5241  ax-nul 5251  ax-pr 5377  ax-un 7680

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rab 3400  df-v 3442  df-sbc 3741  df-csb 3850  df-dif 3904  df-un 3906  df-in 3908  df-ss 3918  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-sn 4581  df-pr 4583  df-op 4587  df-uni 4864  df-iun 4948  df-br 5099  df-opab 5161  df-mpt 5180  df-id 5519  df-xp 5630  df-rel 5631  df-cnv 5632  df-co 5633  df-dm 5634  df-rn 5635  df-res 5636  df-ima 5637  df-iota 6448  df-fun 6494  df-fn 6495  df-f 6496  df-fv 6500  df-ov 7361  df-oprab 7362  df-mpo 7363  df-1st 7933  df-2nd 7934  df-tpos 8168  df-oppf 49368

This theorem is referenced by:  oppc1stflem  49532