P. 494 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 49301-49400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cofid1 49301	Express the object part of (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼 explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐸 Func 𝐷)𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	cofid2 49302	Express the morphism part of (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼 explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐸 Func 𝐷)𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐿(𝐹‘𝑌))‘((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑅)) = 𝑅)
Theorem	cofidvala 49303*	The property "𝐹 is a section of 𝐺 " in a category of small categories (in a universe); expressed explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐸 Func 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((1st ‘𝐺) ∘ (1st ‘𝐹)) = ( I ↾ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑥)(2nd ‘𝐺)((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑦)) ∘ (𝑥(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑦))) = (𝑧 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↦ ( I ↾ (𝐻‘𝑧)))))
Theorem	cofidf2a 49304	If "𝐹 is a section of 𝐺 " in a category of small categories (in a universe), then the morphism part of 𝐹 is injective, and the morphism part of 𝐺 is surjective in the image of 𝐹. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐸 Func 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑌):(𝑋𝐻𝑌)–1-1→(((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋)𝐽((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑌)) ∧ (((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋)(2nd ‘𝐺)((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑌)):(((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋)𝐽((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑌))–onto→(𝑋𝐻𝑌)))
Theorem	cofidf1a 49305	If "𝐹 is a section of 𝐺 " in a category of small categories (in a universe), then the object part of 𝐹 is injective, and the object part of 𝐺 is surjective. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐸 Func 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝐹):𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ (1st ‘𝐺):𝐶–onto→𝐵))
Theorem	cofidval 49306*	The property "⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩ is a section of ⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ " in a category of small categories (in a universe); expressed explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐸 Func 𝐷)𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (((𝐹‘𝑥)𝐿(𝐹‘𝑦)) ∘ (𝑥𝐺𝑦))) = (𝑧 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↦ ( I ↾ (𝐻‘𝑧)))))
Theorem	cofidf2 49307	If "𝐹 is a section of 𝐺 " in a category of small categories (in a universe), then the morphism part of 𝐹 is injective, and the morphism part of 𝐺 is surjective in the image of 𝐹. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐸 Func 𝐷)𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋𝐺𝑌):(𝑋𝐻𝑌)–1-1→((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌)) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐿(𝐹‘𝑌)):((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌))–onto→(𝑋𝐻𝑌)))
Theorem	cofidf1 49308	If "⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩ is a section of ⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ " in a category of small categories (in a universe), then 𝐹 is injective, and 𝐾 is surjective. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐸 Func 𝐷)𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐾:𝐶–onto→𝐵))
21.49.15.8  Opposite functors
Syntax	coppf 49309	Extend class notation with the operation generating opposite functors.
class oppFunc
Definition	df-oppf 49310*	Definition of the operation generating opposite functors. Definition 3.41 of [Adamek] p. 39. The object part of the functor is unchanged while the morphism part is transposed due to reversed direction of arrows in the opposite category. The opposite functor is a functor on opposite categories (oppfoppc 49328). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.) Better reverse closure. (Revised by Zhi Wang, 13-Nov-2025.)
⊢ oppFunc = (𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ if((Rel 𝑔 ∧ Rel dom 𝑔), ⟨𝑓, tpos 𝑔⟩, ∅))
Theorem	oppffn 49311	oppFunc is a function on (V × V). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.)
⊢ oppFunc Fn (V × V)
Theorem	reldmoppf 49312	The domain of oppFunc is a relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 13-Nov-2025.)
⊢ Rel dom oppFunc
Theorem	oppfvalg 49313	Value of the opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 13-Nov-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) → (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = if((Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺), ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩, ∅))
Theorem	oppfrcllem 49314	Lemma for oppfrcl 49315. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ Rel 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	oppfrcl 49315	If an opposite functor of a class is a functor, then the original class must be an ordered pair. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ Rel 𝑅    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (V × V))
Theorem	oppfrcl2 49316	If an opposite functor of a class is a functor, then the two components of the original class must be sets. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ Rel 𝑅    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	oppfrcl3 49317	If an opposite functor of a class is a functor, then the second component of the original class must be a relation whose domain is a relation as well. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ Rel 𝑅    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Rel 𝐵 ∧ Rel dom 𝐵))
Theorem	oppf1st2nd 49318	Rewrite the opposite functor into its components (eqopi 7967). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ Rel 𝑅    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐺) = 𝐴 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐺) = tpos 𝐵)))
Theorem	2oppf 49319	The double opposite functor is the original functor. Remark 3.42 of [Adamek] p. 39. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ Rel 𝑅    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐺) = 𝐹)
Theorem	eloppf 49320	The pre-image of a non-empty opposite functor is non-empty; and the second component of the pre-image is a relation on triples. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ≠ ∅ ∧ (Rel (2nd ‘𝐹) ∧ Rel dom (2nd ‘𝐹))))
Theorem	eloppf2 49321	Both components of a pre-image of a non-empty opposite functor exist; and the second component is a relation on triples. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) ∧ (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺)))
Theorem	oppfvallem 49322	Lemma for oppfval 49323. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 13-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺 → (Rel 𝐺 ∧ Rel dom 𝐺))
Theorem	oppfval 49323	Value of the opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺 → (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) = ⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩)
Theorem	oppfval2 49324	Value of the opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 13-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷) → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) = ⟨(1st ‘𝐹), tpos (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩)
Theorem	oppfval3 49325	Value of the opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ⟨𝐺, 𝐾⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) = ⟨𝐺, tpos 𝐾⟩)
Theorem	oppf1 49326	Value of the object part of the opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘( oppFunc ‘𝐹)) = (1st ‘𝐹))
Theorem	oppf2 49327	Value of the morphism part of the opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀(2nd ‘( oppFunc ‘𝐹))𝑁) = (𝑁(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑀))
Theorem	oppfoppc 49328	The opposite functor is a functor on opposite categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑃))
Theorem	oppfoppc2 49329	The opposite functor is a functor on opposite categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑃))
Theorem	funcoppc2 49330	A functor on opposite categories yields a functor on the original categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑂 Func 𝑃)𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)tpos 𝐺)
Theorem	funcoppc4 49331	A functor on opposite categories yields a functor on the original categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 oppFunc 𝐺) ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺)
Theorem	funcoppc5 49332	A functor on opposite categories yields a functor on the original categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))
Theorem	2oppffunc 49333	The opposite functor of an opposite functor is a functor on the original categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.) The functor in opposite categories does not have to be an opposite functor. (Revised by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))
Theorem	funcoppc3 49334	A functor on opposite categories yields a functor on the original categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑂 Func 𝑃)tpos 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺)
Theorem	oppff1 49335	The operation generating opposite functors is injective. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ( oppFunc ↾ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)):(𝐶 Func 𝐷)–1-1→(𝑂 Func 𝑃)
Theorem	oppff1o 49336	The operation generating opposite functors is bijective. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ↾ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)):(𝐶 Func 𝐷)–1-1-onto→(𝑂 Func 𝑃))
Theorem	cofuoppf 49337	Composition of opposite functors. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( oppFunc ‘𝐺) ∘func ( oppFunc ‘𝐹)) = ( oppFunc ‘𝐾))
21.49.15.9  Full & faithful functors
Theorem	imasubc 49338*	An image of a full functor is a full subcategory. Remark 4.2(3) of [Adamek] p. 48. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Full 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Homf ‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 Fn (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐽 ↾ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) = 𝐾))
Theorem	imasubc2 49339*	An image of a full functor is a (full) subcategory. Remark 4.2(3) of [Adamek] p. 48. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Full 𝐸)𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐸))
Theorem	imassc 49340*	An image of a functor satisfies the subcategory subset relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Homf ‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⊆cat 𝐽)
Theorem	imaid 49341*	An image of a functor preserves the identity morphism. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝑋) ∈ (𝑋𝐾𝑋))
Theorem	imaf1co 49342*	An image of a functor whose object part is injective preserves the composition. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑋𝐾𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (𝑌𝐾𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∙ 𝑍)𝑀) ∈ (𝑋𝐾𝑍))
Theorem	imasubc3 49343*	An image of a functor injective on objects is a subcategory. Remark 4.2(3) of [Adamek] p. 48. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐹 “ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ∪ 𝑝 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}) × (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}))((𝐺‘𝑝) “ (𝐻‘𝑝)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun ◡𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐸))
Theorem	fthcomf 49344*	Source categories of a faithful functor have the same base, hom-sets and composition operation if the composition is compatible in images of the functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴 Faith 𝐶)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐵 Func 𝐷)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐴))) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝐴)𝑦) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐴)𝑧))) → (((𝑦𝐺𝑧)‘𝑔)(⟨(𝐹‘𝑥), (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩(comp‘𝐶)(𝐹‘𝑧))((𝑥𝐺𝑦)‘𝑓)) = (((𝑦𝐺𝑧)‘𝑔)(⟨(𝐹‘𝑥), (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩(comp‘𝐷)(𝐹‘𝑧))((𝑥𝐺𝑦)‘𝑓)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐴) = (compf‘𝐵))
Theorem	idfth 49345	The inclusion functor is a faithful functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Faith 𝐸))
Theorem	idemb 49346	The inclusion functor is an embedding. Remark 4.4(1) in [Adamek] p. 49. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Faith 𝐸) ∧ Fun ◡(1st ‘𝐼)))
Theorem	idsubc 49347	The source category of an inclusion functor is a subcategory of the target category. See also Remark 4.4 in [Adamek] p. 49. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 10-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) → 𝐻 ∈ (Subcat‘𝐸))
Theorem	idfullsubc 49348	The source category of an inclusion functor is a full subcategory of the target category if the inclusion functor is full. Remark 4.4(2) in [Adamek] p. 49. See also ressffth 17862. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 11-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Homf ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐷 Full 𝐸) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐽 ↾ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) = 𝐻))
Theorem	cofidfth 49349	If "𝐹 is a section of 𝐺 " in a category of small categories (in a universe), then 𝐹 is faithful. Combined with cofidf1 49308, this theorem proves that 𝐹 is an embedding (a faithful functor injective on objects, remark 3.28(1) of [Adamek] p. 34). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾(𝐸 Func 𝐷)𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Faith 𝐸)𝐺)
Theorem	fulloppf 49350	The opposite functor of a full functor is also full. Proposition 3.43(d) in [Adamek] p. 39. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Full 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑂 Full 𝑃))
Theorem	fthoppf 49351	The opposite functor of a faithful functor is also faithful. Proposition 3.43(c) in [Adamek] p. 39. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Faith 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑂 Faith 𝑃))
Theorem	ffthoppf 49352	The opposite functor of a fully faithful functor is also full and faithful. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 26-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐶 Full 𝐷) ∩ (𝐶 Faith 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( oppFunc ‘𝐹) ∈ ((𝑂 Full 𝑃) ∩ (𝑂 Faith 𝑃)))
21.49.15.10  Universal property
Theorem	upciclem1 49353*	Lemma for upcic 49357, upeu 49358, and upeu2 49359. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Sep-2025.) (Proof shortened by Zhi Wang, 5-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑛 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)𝑛 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑦)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑦))𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑙 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑙)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑌))𝑀))
Theorem	upciclem2 49354	Lemma for upciclem3 49355 and upeu2 49359. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑊𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋)))    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝐾)(⟨𝑊, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑌))𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑋𝐺𝑍)‘(𝐿(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑍)𝐾))(⟨𝑊, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑍))𝑀) = (((𝑌𝐺𝑍)‘𝐿)(⟨𝑊, (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑍))𝑁))
Theorem	upciclem3 49355*	Lemma for upciclem4 49356. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑤))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑤)𝑓 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑤)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑤))𝑀))    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = (((𝑌𝐺𝑋)‘𝐿)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑋))𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝐾)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑌))𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑋)𝐾) = ((Id‘𝐷)‘𝑋))
Theorem	upciclem4 49356*	Lemma for upcic 49357 and upeu 49358. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑤))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑤)𝑓 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑤)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑤))𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑣))∃!𝑙 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑣)𝑔 = (((𝑌𝐺𝑣)‘𝑙)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑣))𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐷)𝑌 ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ (𝑋(Iso‘𝐷)𝑌)𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑟)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑌))𝑀)))
Theorem	upcic 49357*	A universal property defines an object up to isomorphism given its existence. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑤))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑤)𝑓 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑤)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑤))𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑣))∃!𝑙 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑣)𝑔 = (((𝑌𝐺𝑣)‘𝑙)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑣))𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋( ≃𝑐 ‘𝐷)𝑌)
Theorem	upeu 49358*	A universal property defines an essentially unique (strong form) pair of object 𝑋 and morphism 𝑀 if it exists. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑤))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑤)𝑓 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑤)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑤))𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑣))∃!𝑙 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑣)𝑔 = (((𝑌𝐺𝑣)‘𝑙)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑣))𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑟 ∈ (𝑋(Iso‘𝐷)𝑌)𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑟)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑌))𝑀))
Theorem	upeu2 49359*	Generate new universal morphism through isomorphism from existing universal object. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑤))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑤)𝑓 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑤)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑤))𝑀))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝐾)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑌))𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑌)) ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑍𝐽(𝐹‘𝑣))∃!𝑙 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑣)𝑔 = (((𝑌𝐺𝑣)‘𝑙)(⟨𝑍, (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑣))𝑁)))
Syntax	cup 49360	Extend class notation with the class of universal properties.
class UP
Definition	df-up 49361*	Definition of the class of universal properties. Given categories 𝐷 and 𝐸, if 𝐹:𝐷⟶𝐸 is a functor and 𝑊 an object of 𝐸, a universal pair from 𝑊 to 𝐹 is a pair ⟨𝑋, 𝑀⟩ consisting of an object 𝑋 of 𝐷 and a morphism 𝑀:𝑊⟶𝐹𝑋 of 𝐸, such that to every pair ⟨𝑦, 𝑔⟩ with 𝑦 an object of 𝐷 and 𝑔:𝑊⟶𝐹𝑦 a morphism of 𝐸, there is a unique morphism 𝑘:𝑋⟶𝑦 of 𝐷 with 𝐹𝑘 ⚬ 𝑀 = 𝑔. Such property is commonly referred to as a universal property. In our definition, it is denoted as 𝑋(𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀. Note that the universal pair is termed differently as "universal arrow" in p. 55 of Mac Lane, Saunders, Categories for the Working Mathematician, 2nd Edition, Springer Science+Business Media, New York, (1998) [QA169.M33 1998]; available at https://math.mit.edu/~hrm/palestine/maclane-categories.pdf (retrieved 6 Oct 2025). Interestingly, the "universal arrow" is referring to the morphism 𝑀 instead of the pair near the end of the same piece of the text, causing name collision. The name "universal arrow" is also adopted in papers such as https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.08981. Alternatively, the universal pair is called the "universal morphism" in Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_property) as well as published works, e.g., https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.12179. But the pair ⟨𝑋, 𝑀⟩ should be named differently as the morphism 𝑀, and thus we call 𝑋 the universal object, 𝑀 the universal morphism, and ⟨𝑋, 𝑀⟩ the universal pair. Given its existence, such universal pair is essentially unique (upeu3 49382), and can be generated from an existing universal pair by isomorphisms (upeu4 49383). See also oppcup 49394 for the dual concept. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2025.)
⊢ UP = (𝑑 ∈ V, 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(Base‘𝑑) / 𝑏⦌⦋(Base‘𝑒) / 𝑐⦌⦋(Hom ‘𝑑) / ℎ⦌⦋(Hom ‘𝑒) / 𝑗⦌⦋(comp‘𝑒) / 𝑜⦌(𝑓 ∈ (𝑑 Func 𝑒), 𝑤 ∈ 𝑐 ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑚⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (𝑤𝑗((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥))) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑤𝑗((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑦))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑦)𝑔 = (((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑤, ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥)⟩𝑜((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑦))𝑚))}))
Theorem	reldmup 49362	The domain of UP is a relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.)
⊢ Rel dom UP
Theorem	upfval 49363*	Function value of the class of universal properties. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2025.) (Proof shortened by Zhi Wang, 12-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐷 UP 𝐸) = (𝑓 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸), 𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑚⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (𝑤𝐽((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥))) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑤𝐽((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑦))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)𝑔 = (((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑤, ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥)⟩𝑂((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑦))𝑚))})
Theorem	upfval2 49364*	Function value of the class of universal properties. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑚⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (𝑊𝐽((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑥))) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑊𝐽((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑦))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)𝑔 = (((𝑥(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑦)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑊, ((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑥)⟩𝑂((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑦))𝑚))})
Theorem	upfval3 49365*	Function value of the class of universal properties. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑚⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (𝑊𝐽(𝐹‘𝑥))) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑊𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)𝑔 = (((𝑥𝐺𝑦)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑊, (𝐹‘𝑥)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑦))𝑚))})
Theorem	isuplem 49366*	Lemma for isup 49367 and other theorems. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀 ↔ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (𝑊𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋))) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑊𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)𝑔 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑦)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑊, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑦))𝑀))))
Theorem	isup 49367*	The predicate "is a universal pair". (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑊𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑊𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)𝑔 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑦)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑊, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑦))𝑀)))
Theorem	uppropd 49368	If two categories have the same set of objects, morphisms, and compositions, then they have the same universal pairs. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 20-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐴) = (Homf ‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐴) = (compf‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 UP 𝐶) = (𝐵 UP 𝐷))
Theorem	reldmup2 49369	The domain of (𝐷 UP 𝐸) is a relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Oct-2025.)
⊢ Rel dom (𝐷 UP 𝐸)
Theorem	relup 49370	The set of universal pairs is a relation. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.)
⊢ Rel (𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)
Theorem	uprcl 49371	Reverse closure for the class of universal property. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	up1st2nd 49372	Rewrite the universal property predicate with separated parts. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨(1st ‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀)
Theorem	up1st2ndr 49373	Combine separated parts in the universal property predicate. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨(1st ‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀)
Theorem	up1st2ndb 49374	Combine/separate parts in the universal property predicate. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀 ↔ 𝑋(⟨(1st ‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀))
Theorem	up1st2nd2 49375	Rewrite the universal property predicate with separated parts. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘𝑋)(𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)(2nd ‘𝑋))
Theorem	uprcl2 49376	Reverse closure for the class of universal property. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)
Theorem	uprcl3 49377	Reverse closure for the class of universal property. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	uprcl4 49378	Reverse closure for the class of universal property. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	uprcl5 49379	Reverse closure for the class of universal property. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑊𝐽(𝐹‘𝑋)))
Theorem	uobrcl 49380	Reverse closure for universal object. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 17-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊) → (𝐷 ∈ Cat ∧ 𝐸 ∈ Cat))
Theorem	isup2 49381*	The universal property of a universal pair. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑊𝐽(𝐹‘𝑦))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)𝑔 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑦)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑊, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂(𝐹‘𝑦))𝑀))
Theorem	upeu3 49382*	The universal pair ⟨𝑋, 𝑀⟩ from object 𝑊 to functor ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩ is essentially unique (strong form) if it exists. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⚬ = (⟨𝑊, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩(comp‘𝐸)(𝐹‘𝑌)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑟 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝑟) ⚬ 𝑀))
Theorem	upeu4 49383	Generate a new universal morphism through an isomorphism from an existing universal object, and pair with the codomain of the isomorphism to form a universal pair. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 25-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⚬ = (⟨𝑊, (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩(comp‘𝐸)(𝐹‘𝑌)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝐾) ⚬ 𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐷 UP 𝐸)𝑊)𝑁)
Theorem	uptposlem 49384	Lemma for uptpos 49385. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑊)𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → tpos 𝐺 = 𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → tpos 𝐻 = 𝐺)
Theorem	uptpos 49385	Rewrite the predicate of universal property in the form of opposite functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑊)𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → tpos 𝐺 = 𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐻⟩(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑊)𝑀)
Theorem	oppcuprcl4 49386	Reverse closure for the class of universal property in opposite categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑊)𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	oppcuprcl3 49387	Reverse closure for the class of universal property in opposite categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑊)𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	oppcuprcl5 49388	Reverse closure for the class of universal property in opposite categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑊)𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐽𝑊))
Theorem	oppcuprcl2 49389	Reverse closure for the class of universal property in opposite categories. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑊)𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → tpos 𝐺 = 𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐻)
Theorem	uprcl2a 49390	Reverse closure for the class of universal property. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐺(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑊)𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑃))
Theorem	oppfuprcl 49391	Reverse closure for the class of universal property for opposite functors. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐺(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑊)𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸))
Theorem	oppfuprcl2 49392	Reverse closure for the class of universal property for opposite functors. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 14-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐺(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑊)𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ( oppFunc ‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐵)
Theorem	oppcup3lem 49393*	Lemma for oppcup3 49396. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑛 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑦)𝐽𝑍)∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑋)𝑛 = (𝑀(⟨(𝐹‘𝑦), (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂𝑍)((𝑦𝐺𝑋)‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑌)𝐽𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑙 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑋)𝑁 = (𝑀(⟨(𝐹‘𝑌), (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩𝑂𝑍)((𝑌𝐺𝑋)‘𝑙)))
Theorem	oppcup 49394*	The universal pair ⟨𝑋, 𝑀⟩ from a functor to an object is universal from an object to a functor in the opposite category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐽𝑊))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑊)𝑀 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑦)𝐽𝑊)∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑋)𝑔 = (𝑀(⟨(𝐹‘𝑦), (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩ ∙ 𝑊)((𝑦𝐺𝑋)‘𝑘))))
Theorem	oppcup2 49395*	The universal property for the universal pair ⟨𝑋, 𝑀⟩ from a functor to an object, expressed explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐷 Func 𝐸)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, tpos 𝐺⟩(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑊)𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑦)𝐽𝑊)∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑋)𝑔 = (𝑀(⟨(𝐹‘𝑦), (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩ ∙ 𝑊)((𝑦𝐺𝑋)‘𝑘)))
Theorem	oppcup3 49396*	The universal property for the universal pair ⟨𝑋, 𝑀⟩ from a functor to an object, expressed explicitly. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 4-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (oppCat‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(⟨𝐹, 𝑇⟩(𝑂 UP 𝑃)𝑊)𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → tpos 𝑇 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑌)𝐽𝑊))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑋)𝑁 = (𝑀(⟨(𝐹‘𝑌), (𝐹‘𝑋)⟩ ∙ 𝑊)((𝑌𝐺𝑋)‘𝑘)))
Theorem	uptrlem1 49397*	Lemma for uptr 49400. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ ⚬ = (comp‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝑋) = 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑋𝐼(𝐹‘𝑍)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋𝑁(𝐹‘𝑍))‘𝐴) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀((𝐷 Full 𝐸) ∩ (𝐷 Faith 𝐸))𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = ⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀ℎ ∈ (𝑌𝐽(𝐾‘𝑊))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑊)ℎ = (((𝑍𝐿𝑊)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑌, (𝐾‘𝑍)⟩ ⚬ (𝐾‘𝑊))𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑋𝐼(𝐹‘𝑊))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑊)𝑔 = (((𝑍𝐺𝑊)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑋, (𝐹‘𝑍)⟩ ∙ (𝐹‘𝑊))𝐴)))
Theorem	uptrlem2 49398*	Lemma for uptr 49400. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ ⚬ = (comp‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝐾)‘𝑋) = 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑋𝐼((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑍)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐾)((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑍))‘𝑀) = 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ((𝐷 Full 𝐸) ∩ (𝐷 Faith 𝐸)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∘func 𝐹) = 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀ℎ ∈ (𝑌𝐽((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑊))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑊)ℎ = (((𝑍(2nd ‘𝐺)𝑊)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑌, ((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑍)⟩ ⚬ ((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑊))𝑁) ↔ ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑋𝐼((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑊))∃!𝑘 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑊)𝑔 = (((𝑍(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑊)‘𝑘)(⟨𝑋, ((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑍)⟩ ∙ ((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑊))𝑀)))
Theorem	uptrlem3 49399	Lemma for uptr 49400. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅‘𝑋) = 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅((𝐷 Full 𝐸) ∩ (𝐷 Faith 𝐸))𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑅, 𝑆⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = ⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋𝑆(𝐹‘𝑍))‘𝑀) = 𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑋𝐽(𝐹‘𝑍)))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐶 UP 𝐷)𝑋)𝑀 ↔ 𝑍(⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩(𝐶 UP 𝐸)𝑌)𝑁))
Theorem	uptr 49400	Universal property and fully faithful functor. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 16-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅‘𝑋) = 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅((𝐷 Full 𝐸) ∩ (𝐷 Faith 𝐸))𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑅, 𝑆⟩ ∘func ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = ⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐶 Func 𝐷)𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋𝑆(𝐹‘𝑍))‘𝑀) = 𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑋𝐽(𝐹‘𝑍)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍(⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝐶 UP 𝐷)𝑋)𝑀 ↔ 𝑍(⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩(𝐶 UP 𝐸)𝑌)𝑁))