Theorem fvconstr 48487

Description: Two ways of expressing 𝐴𝑅𝐵. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Sep-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fvconstr.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑅 × {𝑌}))
fvconstr.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)
fvconstr.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fvconstr	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌))

Proof of Theorem fvconstr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-br 5170	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
2		fvconstr.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑅 × {𝑌}))
3	2	oveqd 7462	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴(𝑅 × {𝑌})𝐵))
4		df-ov 7448	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 × {𝑌})𝐵) = ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
5	3, 4	eqtrdi 2790	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
6	5	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
7		fvconstr.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)
8		fvconst2g 7237	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝑌)
9	7, 8	sylan 579	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝑌)
10	6, 9	eqtrd 2774	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌)
11		simpr 484	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌)
12		fvconstr.3	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)
13	12	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)
14	11, 13	eqnetrd 3010	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅)
15	5	neeq1d 3002	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅ ↔ ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅))
16	15	adantr 480	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅ ↔ ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅))
17	14, 16	mpbid 232	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅)
18		dmxpss 6201	. . . . 5 ⊢ dom (𝑅 × {𝑌}) ⊆ 𝑅
19		ndmfv 6954	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom (𝑅 × {𝑌}) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ∅)
20	19	necon1ai 2970	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅ → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom (𝑅 × {𝑌}))
21	18, 20	sselid 4000	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅ → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
22	17, 21	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
23	10, 22	impbida 800	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌))
24	1, 23	bitrid 283	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2103   ≠ wne 2942  ∅c0 4347  {csn 4648  ⟨cop 4654   class class class wbr 5169   × cxp 5697  dom cdm 5699  ‘cfv 6572  (class class class)co 7445

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2105  ax-9 2113  ax-10 2136  ax-11 2153  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2705  ax-sep 5320  ax-nul 5327  ax-pr 5450

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2537  df-eu 2566  df-clab 2712  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2813  df-nfc 2890  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3064  df-rex 3073  df-rab 3439  df-v 3484  df-dif 3973  df-un 3975  df-ss 3987  df-nul 4348  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-br 5170  df-opab 5232  df-mpt 5253  df-id 5597  df-xp 5705  df-rel 5706  df-cnv 5707  df-co 5708  df-dm 5709  df-rn 5710  df-iota 6524  df-fun 6574  df-fn 6575  df-f 6576  df-fv 6580  df-ov 7448

This theorem is referenced by:  prsthinc  48639  prstchom2ALT  48664