Theorem fvconstr 49488

Description: Two ways of expressing 𝐴𝑅𝐵. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Sep-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fvconstr.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑅 × {𝑌}))
fvconstr.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)
fvconstr.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fvconstr	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌))

Proof of Theorem fvconstr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-br 5103	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
2		fvconstr.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑅 × {𝑌}))
3	2	oveqd 7415	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴(𝑅 × {𝑌})𝐵))
4		df-ov 7401	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 × {𝑌})𝐵) = ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
5	3, 4	eqtrdi 2815	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
6	5	adantr 484	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
7		fvconstr.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)
8		fvconst2g 7188	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝑌)
9	7, 8	sylan 589	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝑌)
10	6, 9	eqtrd 2799	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌)
11		simpr 488	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌)
12		fvconstr.3	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)
13	12	adantr 484	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)
14	11, 13	eqnetrd 3026	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅)
15	5	neeq1d 3018	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅ ↔ ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅))
16	15	adantr 484	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅ ↔ ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅))
17	14, 16	mpbid 234	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅)
18		dmxpss 6159	. . . . 5 ⊢ dom (𝑅 × {𝑌}) ⊆ 𝑅
19		ndmfv 6901	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom (𝑅 × {𝑌}) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ∅)
20	19	necon1ai 2986	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅ → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom (𝑅 × {𝑌}))
21	18, 20	sselid 3936	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅ → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
22	17, 21	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
23	10, 22	impbida 810	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌))
24	1, 23	bitrid 285	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1562   ∈ wcel 2144   ≠ wne 2959  ∅c0 4287  {csn 4584  ⟨cop 4590   class class class wbr 5102   × cxp 5647  dom cdm 5649  ‘cfv 6523  (class class class)co 7398

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1817  ax-4 1831  ax-5 1932  ax-6 1989  ax-7 2030  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2214  ax-ext 2736  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5258  ax-pr 5392

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1101  df-tru 1565  df-fal 1575  df-ex 1802  df-nf 1806  df-sb 2093  df-mo 2568  df-eu 2598  df-clab 2743  df-cleq 2756  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3417  df-v 3458  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5103  df-opab 5165  df-mpt 5184  df-id 5544  df-xp 5655  df-rel 5656  df-cnv 5657  df-co 5658  df-dm 5659  df-rn 5660  df-iota 6479  df-fun 6525  df-fn 6526  df-f 6527  df-fv 6531  df-ov 7401

This theorem is referenced by:  prsthinc  50090  prstchom2ALT  50190