Theorem fvconstr 48686

Description: Two ways of expressing 𝐴𝑅𝐵. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Sep-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fvconstr.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑅 × {𝑌}))
fvconstr.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)
fvconstr.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fvconstr	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌))

Proof of Theorem fvconstr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-br 5149	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
2		fvconstr.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑅 × {𝑌}))
3	2	oveqd 7448	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴(𝑅 × {𝑌})𝐵))
4		df-ov 7434	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 × {𝑌})𝐵) = ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
5	3, 4	eqtrdi 2791	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
6	5	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
7		fvconstr.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)
8		fvconst2g 7222	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝑌)
9	7, 8	sylan 580	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝑌)
10	6, 9	eqtrd 2775	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌)
11		simpr 484	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌)
12		fvconstr.3	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)
13	12	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)
14	11, 13	eqnetrd 3006	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅)
15	5	neeq1d 2998	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅ ↔ ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅))
16	15	adantr 480	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅ ↔ ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅))
17	14, 16	mpbid 232	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅)
18		dmxpss 6193	. . . . 5 ⊢ dom (𝑅 × {𝑌}) ⊆ 𝑅
19		ndmfv 6942	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom (𝑅 × {𝑌}) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ∅)
20	19	necon1ai 2966	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅ → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom (𝑅 × {𝑌}))
21	18, 20	sselid 3993	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅ → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
22	17, 21	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
23	10, 22	impbida 801	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌))
24	1, 23	bitrid 283	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2106   ≠ wne 2938  ∅c0 4339  {csn 4631  ⟨cop 4637   class class class wbr 5148   × cxp 5687  dom cdm 5689  ‘cfv 6563  (class class class)co 7431

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2706  ax-sep 5302  ax-nul 5312  ax-pr 5438

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2063  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2890  df-ne 2939  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3434  df-v 3480  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-ss 3980  df-nul 4340  df-if 4532  df-sn 4632  df-pr 4634  df-op 4638  df-uni 4913  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-id 5583  df-xp 5695  df-rel 5696  df-cnv 5697  df-co 5698  df-dm 5699  df-rn 5700  df-iota 6516  df-fun 6565  df-fn 6566  df-f 6567  df-fv 6571  df-ov 7434

This theorem is referenced by:  prsthinc  48855  prstchom2ALT  48880