Theorem fvconstr 47986

Description: Two ways of expressing 𝐴𝑅𝐵. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Sep-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fvconstr.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑅 × {𝑌}))
fvconstr.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)
fvconstr.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fvconstr	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌))

Proof of Theorem fvconstr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-br 5153	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
2		fvconstr.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑅 × {𝑌}))
3	2	oveqd 7443	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴(𝑅 × {𝑌})𝐵))
4		df-ov 7429	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 × {𝑌})𝐵) = ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
5	3, 4	eqtrdi 2784	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
6	5	adantr 479	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
7		fvconstr.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)
8		fvconst2g 7220	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝑌)
9	7, 8	sylan 578	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝑌)
10	6, 9	eqtrd 2768	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌)
11		simpr 483	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌)
12		fvconstr.3	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)
13	12	adantr 479	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)
14	11, 13	eqnetrd 3005	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅)
15	5	neeq1d 2997	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅ ↔ ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅))
16	15	adantr 479	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅ ↔ ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅))
17	14, 16	mpbid 231	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅)
18		dmxpss 6180	. . . . 5 ⊢ dom (𝑅 × {𝑌}) ⊆ 𝑅
19		ndmfv 6937	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom (𝑅 × {𝑌}) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ∅)
20	19	necon1ai 2965	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅ → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom (𝑅 × {𝑌}))
21	18, 20	sselid 3980	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅ → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
22	17, 21	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
23	10, 22	impbida 799	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌))
24	1, 23	bitrid 282	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 394   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098   ≠ wne 2937  ∅c0 4326  {csn 4632  ⟨cop 4638   class class class wbr 5152   × cxp 5680  dom cdm 5682  ‘cfv 6553  (class class class)co 7426

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2166  ax-ext 2699  ax-sep 5303  ax-nul 5310  ax-pr 5433

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 846  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2529  df-eu 2558  df-clab 2706  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2938  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3068  df-rab 3431  df-v 3475  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-nul 4327  df-if 4533  df-sn 4633  df-pr 4635  df-op 4639  df-uni 4913  df-br 5153  df-opab 5215  df-mpt 5236  df-id 5580  df-xp 5688  df-rel 5689  df-cnv 5690  df-co 5691  df-dm 5692  df-rn 5693  df-iota 6505  df-fun 6555  df-fn 6556  df-f 6557  df-fv 6561  df-ov 7429

This theorem is referenced by:  prsthinc  48138  prstchom2ALT  48163