Theorem fvconstr 48856

Description: Two ways of expressing 𝐴𝑅𝐵. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Sep-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fvconstr.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑅 × {𝑌}))
fvconstr.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)
fvconstr.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fvconstr	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌))

Proof of Theorem fvconstr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-br 5093	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
2		fvconstr.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑅 × {𝑌}))
3	2	oveqd 7366	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴(𝑅 × {𝑌})𝐵))
4		df-ov 7352	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 × {𝑌})𝐵) = ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
5	3, 4	eqtrdi 2780	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
6	5	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
7		fvconstr.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)
8		fvconst2g 7138	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝑌)
9	7, 8	sylan 580	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝑌)
10	6, 9	eqtrd 2764	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌)
11		simpr 484	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌)
12		fvconstr.3	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)
13	12	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)
14	11, 13	eqnetrd 2992	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅)
15	5	neeq1d 2984	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅ ↔ ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅))
16	15	adantr 480	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅ ↔ ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅))
17	14, 16	mpbid 232	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅)
18		dmxpss 6120	. . . . 5 ⊢ dom (𝑅 × {𝑌}) ⊆ 𝑅
19		ndmfv 6855	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom (𝑅 × {𝑌}) → ((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ∅)
20	19	necon1ai 2952	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅ → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom (𝑅 × {𝑌}))
21	18, 20	sselid 3933	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 × {𝑌})‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ≠ ∅ → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
22	17, 21	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
23	10, 22	impbida 800	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌))
24	1, 23	bitrid 283	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝑌))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109   ≠ wne 2925  ∅c0 4284  {csn 4577  ⟨cop 4583   class class class wbr 5092   × cxp 5617  dom cdm 5619  ‘cfv 6482  (class class class)co 7349

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5235  ax-nul 5245  ax-pr 5371

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3395  df-v 3438  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-ss 3920  df-nul 4285  df-if 4477  df-sn 4578  df-pr 4580  df-op 4584  df-uni 4859  df-br 5093  df-opab 5155  df-mpt 5174  df-id 5514  df-xp 5625  df-rel 5626  df-cnv 5627  df-co 5628  df-dm 5629  df-rn 5630  df-iota 6438  df-fun 6484  df-fn 6485  df-f 6486  df-fv 6490  df-ov 7352

This theorem is referenced by:  prsthinc  49459  prstchom2ALT  49559