ltgov - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ltgov		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ltgov 26101

Description: Strict "shorter than" geometric relation between segments. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
legval.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
legval.d	⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
legval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
legval.l	⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)
legval.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
legso.a	⊢ 𝐸 = ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃))
legso.f	⊢ (𝜑 → Fun − )
legso.l	⊢ < = (( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )
legso.d	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 × 𝑃) ⊆ dom − )
ltgov.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
ltgov.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ltgov	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))))

**Proof of Theorem ltgov**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		legso.l	. . . . 5 ⊢ < = (( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )
2	1	breqi 4932	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵)(( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )(𝐶 − 𝐷))
3		brdif 4979	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵)(( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )(𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵)( ≤ ↾ 𝐸)(𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
4	2, 3	bitri 267	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵)( ≤ ↾ 𝐸)(𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
5		ovex 7007	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∈ V
6	5	brresi 5702	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵)( ≤ ↾ 𝐸)(𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
7	6	anbi1i 615	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 − 𝐵)( ≤ ↾ 𝐸)(𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ↔ (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
8		an21 632	. . 3 ⊢ ((((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
9	4, 7, 8	3bitri 289	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
10	5	ideq 5570	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))
11	10	necon3bbii 3009	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))
12		ltgov.a	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
13		ltgov.b	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
14		legso.f	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun − )
15		legso.d	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 × 𝑃) ⊆ dom − )
16	12, 13, 14, 15	elovimad 7022	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃)))
17		legso.a	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐸 = ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃))
18	16, 17	syl6eleqr 2872	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸)
19	18	biantrurd 525	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
20	11, 19	syl5rbbr 278	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
21	20	anbi2d 620	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷))) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
22	9, 21	syl5bb 275	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 198 ∧ wa 387 = wceq 1508 ∈ wcel 2051 ≠ wne 2962 ∖ cdif 3821 ⊆ wss 3824 class class class wbr 4926 I cid 5308 × cxp 5402 dom cdm 5404 ↾ cres 5406 “ cima 5407 Fun wfun 6180 ‘cfv 6186 (class class class)co 6975 Basecbs 16338 distcds 16429 TarskiGcstrkg 25934 Itvcitv 25940 ≤Gcleg 26086

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1759 ax-4 1773 ax-5 1870 ax-6 1929 ax-7 1966 ax-8 2053 ax-9 2060 ax-10 2080 ax-11 2094 ax-12 2107 ax-13 2302 ax-ext 2745 ax-sep 5057 ax-nul 5064 ax-pr 5183

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 199 df-an 388 df-or 835 df-3an 1071 df-tru 1511 df-ex 1744 df-nf 1748 df-sb 2017 df-mo 2548 df-eu 2585 df-clab 2754 df-cleq 2766 df-clel 2841 df-nfc 2913 df-ne 2963 df-ral 3088 df-rex 3089 df-rab 3092 df-v 3412 df-sbc 3677 df-dif 3827 df-un 3829 df-in 3831 df-ss 3838 df-nul 4174 df-if 4346 df-sn 4437 df-pr 4439 df-op 4443 df-uni 4710 df-br 4927 df-opab 4989 df-id 5309 df-xp 5410 df-rel 5411 df-cnv 5412 df-co 5413 df-dm 5414 df-rn 5415 df-res 5416 df-ima 5417 df-iota 6150 df-fun 6188 df-fn 6189 df-fv 6194 df-ov 6978

This theorem is referenced by: legov3 26102 legso 26103

W3C validator