ltgov - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ltgov		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ltgov 28623

Description: Strict "shorter than" geometric relation between segments. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
legval.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
legval.d	⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
legval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
legval.l	⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)
legval.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
legso.a	⊢ 𝐸 = ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃))
legso.f	⊢ (𝜑 → Fun − )
legso.l	⊢ < = (( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )
legso.d	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 × 𝑃) ⊆ dom − )
ltgov.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
ltgov.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ltgov	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))))

**Proof of Theorem ltgov**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		legso.l	. . . . 5 ⊢ < = (( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )
2	1	breqi 5172	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵)(( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )(𝐶 − 𝐷))
3		brdif 5219	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵)(( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )(𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵)( ≤ ↾ 𝐸)(𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
4	2, 3	bitri 275	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵)( ≤ ↾ 𝐸)(𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
5		ovex 7481	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∈ V
6	5	brresi 6018	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵)( ≤ ↾ 𝐸)(𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
7	6	anbi1i 623	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 − 𝐵)( ≤ ↾ 𝐸)(𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ↔ (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
8		an21 643	. . 3 ⊢ ((((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
9	4, 7, 8	3bitri 297	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
10		ltgov.a	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
11		ltgov.b	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
12		legso.f	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun − )
13		legso.d	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 × 𝑃) ⊆ dom − )
14	10, 11, 12, 13	elovimad 7498	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃)))
15		legso.a	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐸 = ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃))
16	14, 15	eleqtrrdi 2855	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸)
17	16	biantrurd 532	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
18	5	ideq 5877	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))
19	18	necon3bbii 2994	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))
20	17, 19	bitr3di 286	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
21	20	anbi2d 629	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷))) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
22	9, 21	bitrid 283	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1537 ∈ wcel 2108 ≠ wne 2946 ∖ cdif 3973 ⊆ wss 3976 class class class wbr 5166 I cid 5592 × cxp 5698 dom cdm 5700 ↾ cres 5702 “ cima 5703 Fun wfun 6567 ‘cfv 6573 (class class class)co 7448 Basecbs 17258 distcds 17320 TarskiGcstrkg 28453 Itvcitv 28459 ≤Gcleg 28608

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1793 ax-4 1807 ax-5 1909 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2141 ax-12 2178 ax-ext 2711 ax-sep 5317 ax-nul 5324 ax-pr 5447

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 847 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1540 df-fal 1550 df-ex 1778 df-nf 1782 df-sb 2065 df-mo 2543 df-eu 2572 df-clab 2718 df-cleq 2732 df-clel 2819 df-ne 2947 df-ral 3068 df-rex 3077 df-rab 3444 df-v 3490 df-dif 3979 df-un 3981 df-in 3983 df-ss 3993 df-nul 4353 df-if 4549 df-sn 4649 df-pr 4651 df-op 4655 df-uni 4932 df-br 5167 df-opab 5229 df-id 5593 df-xp 5706 df-rel 5707 df-cnv 5708 df-co 5709 df-dm 5710 df-rn 5711 df-res 5712 df-ima 5713 df-iota 6525 df-fun 6575 df-fn 6576 df-fv 6581 df-ov 7451

This theorem is referenced by: legov3 28624 legso 28625

W3C validator