ltgov - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ltgov		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ltgov 28653

Description: Strict "shorter than" geometric relation between segments. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
legval.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
legval.d	⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
legval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
legval.l	⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)
legval.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
legso.a	⊢ 𝐸 = ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃))
legso.f	⊢ (𝜑 → Fun − )
legso.l	⊢ < = (( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )
legso.d	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 × 𝑃) ⊆ dom − )
ltgov.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
ltgov.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ltgov	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))))

**Proof of Theorem ltgov**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		legso.l	. . . . 5 ⊢ < = (( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )
2	1	breqi 5080	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵)(( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )(𝐶 − 𝐷))
3		brdif 5127	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵)(( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )(𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵)( ≤ ↾ 𝐸)(𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
4	2, 3	bitri 275	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵)( ≤ ↾ 𝐸)(𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
5		ovex 7389	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∈ V
6	5	brresi 5942	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵)( ≤ ↾ 𝐸)(𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
7	6	anbi1i 625	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 − 𝐵)( ≤ ↾ 𝐸)(𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ↔ (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
8		an21 645	. . 3 ⊢ ((((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
9	4, 7, 8	3bitri 297	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
10		ltgov.a	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
11		ltgov.b	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
12		legso.f	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun − )
13		legso.d	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 × 𝑃) ⊆ dom − )
14	10, 11, 12, 13	elovimad 7406	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃)))
15		legso.a	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐸 = ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃))
16	14, 15	eleqtrrdi 2846	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸)
17	16	biantrurd 532	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
18	5	ideq 5796	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))
19	18	necon3bbii 2977	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))
20	17, 19	bitr3di 286	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
21	20	anbi2d 631	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷))) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
22	9, 21	bitrid 283	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1542 ∈ wcel 2114 ≠ wne 2930 ∖ cdif 3882 ⊆ wss 3885 class class class wbr 5074 I cid 5514 × cxp 5618 dom cdm 5620 ↾ cres 5622 “ cima 5623 Fun wfun 6481 ‘cfv 6487 (class class class)co 7356 Basecbs 17168 distcds 17218 TarskiGcstrkg 28483 Itvcitv 28489 ≤Gcleg 28638

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2010 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2147 ax-12 2184 ax-ext 2707 ax-sep 5220 ax-nul 5230 ax-pr 5364

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 849 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1545 df-fal 1555 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2069 df-mo 2538 df-eu 2568 df-clab 2714 df-cleq 2727 df-clel 2810 df-ne 2931 df-ral 3050 df-rex 3060 df-rab 3388 df-v 3429 df-dif 3888 df-un 3890 df-in 3892 df-ss 3902 df-nul 4264 df-if 4457 df-sn 4558 df-pr 4560 df-op 4564 df-uni 4841 df-br 5075 df-opab 5137 df-id 5515 df-xp 5626 df-rel 5627 df-cnv 5628 df-co 5629 df-dm 5630 df-rn 5631 df-res 5632 df-ima 5633 df-iota 6443 df-fun 6489 df-fn 6490 df-fv 6495 df-ov 7359

This theorem is referenced by: legov3 28654 legso 28655

W3C validator