legov3 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > legov3		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem legov3 28878

Description: An equivalent definition of the less-than relationship, from the strict relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
legval.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
legval.d	⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
legval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
legval.l	⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)
legval.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
legso.a	⊢ 𝐸 = ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃))
legso.f	⊢ (𝜑 → Fun − )
legso.l	⊢ < = (( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )
legso.d	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 × 𝑃) ⊆ dom − )
ltgov.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
ltgov.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
legov3	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∨ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))))

**Proof of Theorem legov3**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		legval.p	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		legval.d	. . . 4 ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
3		legval.i	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
4		legval.l	. . . 4 ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)
5		legval.g	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
6		legso.a	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐸 = ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃))
7		legso.f	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun − )
8		legso.l	. . . 4 ⊢ < = (( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )
9		legso.d	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 × 𝑃) ⊆ dom − )
10		ltgov.a	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
11		ltgov.b	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
12	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11	ltgov 28877	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
13	12	orbi1d 929	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∨ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ↔ (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ∨ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
14		simprl 782	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ∨ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷))
15	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11	legid 28867	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐴 − 𝐵))
16	15	adantr 485	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐴 − 𝐵))
17		simpr 489	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))
18	16, 17	breqtrd 5136	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷))
19	18	adantlr 727	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ∨ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷))
20		simpr 489	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ∨ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))) → (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ∨ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
21	14, 19, 20	mpjaodan 972	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ∨ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷))
22		simplr 780	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷))
23		simpr 489	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) → ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))
24	23	neqned 2964	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))
25	22, 24	jca 520	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
26	25	ex 417	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) → (¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
27	26	orrd 876	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∨ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
28	27	orcomd 884	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) → (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ∨ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
29	21, 28	impbida 812	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ∨ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
30	13, 29	bitr2d 283	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∨ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 400 ∨ wo 860 = wceq 1569 ∈ wcel 2142 ≠ wne 2957 ∖ cdif 3901 ⊆ wss 3904 class class class wbr 5108 I cid 5554 × cxp 5658 dom cdm 5660 ↾ cres 5662 “ cima 5663 Fun wfun 6530 ‘cfv 6536 (class class class)co 7412 Basecbs 17275 distcds 17325 TarskiGcstrkg 28707 Itvcitv 28713 ≤Gcleg 28862

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1824 ax-4 1838 ax-5 1939 ax-6 1996 ax-7 2037 ax-8 2144 ax-9 2152 ax-10 2175 ax-11 2191 ax-12 2212 ax-ext 2734 ax-rep 5237 ax-sep 5256 ax-nul 5268 ax-pow 5335 ax-pr 5403 ax-un 7734 ax-cnex 11162 ax-resscn 11163 ax-1cn 11164 ax-icn 11165 ax-addcl 11166 ax-addrcl 11167 ax-mulcl 11168 ax-mulrcl 11169 ax-mulcom 11170 ax-addass 11171 ax-mulass 11172 ax-distr 11173 ax-i2m1 11174 ax-1ne0 11175 ax-1rid 11176 ax-rnegex 11177 ax-rrecex 11178 ax-cnre 11179 ax-pre-lttri 11180 ax-pre-lttrn 11181 ax-pre-ltadd 11182 ax-pre-mulgt0 11183

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-or 861 df-3or 1103 df-3an 1104 df-tru 1572 df-fal 1582 df-ex 1809 df-nf 1813 df-sb 2096 df-mo 2566 df-eu 2596 df-clab 2741 df-cleq 2754 df-clel 2837 df-nfc 2911 df-ne 2958 df-nel 3064 df-ral 3079 df-rex 3089 df-reu 3369 df-rab 3416 df-v 3456 df-sbc 3744 df-csb 3853 df-dif 3907 df-un 3909 df-in 3911 df-ss 3921 df-pss 3924 df-nul 4286 df-if 4487 df-pw 4563 df-sn 4589 df-pr 4591 df-tp 4593 df-op 4595 df-uni 4872 df-int 4912 df-iun 4957 df-br 5109 df-opab 5173 df-mpt 5192 df-tr 5218 df-id 5555 df-eprel 5560 df-po 5568 df-so 5569 df-fr 5613 df-we 5615 df-xp 5666 df-rel 5667 df-cnv 5668 df-co 5669 df-dm 5670 df-rn 5671 df-res 5672 df-ima 5673 df-pred 6302 df-ord 6363 df-on 6364 df-lim 6365 df-suc 6366 df-iota 6492 df-fun 6538 df-fn 6539 df-f 6540 df-f1 6541 df-fo 6542 df-f1o 6543 df-fv 6544 df-riota 7369 df-ov 7415 df-oprab 7416 df-mpo 7417 df-om 7861 df-1st 7984 df-2nd 7985 df-frecs 8276 df-wrecs 8307 df-recs 8356 df-rdg 8395 df-1o 8451 df-oadd 8455 df-er 8692 df-pm 8825 df-en 8942 df-dom 8943 df-sdom 8944 df-fin 8945 df-dju 9894 df-card 9932 df-pnf 11251 df-mnf 11252 df-xr 11253 df-ltxr 11254 df-le 11255 df-sub 11449 df-neg 11450 df-nn 12240 df-2 12309 df-3 12310 df-n0 12511 df-xnn0 12584 df-z 12598 df-uz 12869 df-fz 13542 df-fzo 13690 df-hash 14374 df-word 14558 df-concat 14615 df-s1 14641 df-s2 14892 df-s3 14893 df-trkgc 28728 df-trkgb 28729 df-trkgcb 28730 df-trkg 28733 df-cgrg 28791 df-leg 28863

This theorem is used by: legso 28879

W3C validator