Theorem elxp6 6118

Description: Membership in a cross product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 5074. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elxp6	|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) )

Proof of Theorem elxp6

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 2723	. 2 |- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> A e. _V )
2		opexg 4189	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) -> <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. e. _V )
3	2	adantl 275	. . 3 |- ( ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) -> <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. e. _V )
4		eleq1 2220	. . . 4 |- ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. -> ( A e. _V <-> <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. e. _V ) )
5	4	adantr 274	. . 3 |- ( ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) -> ( A e. _V <-> <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. e. _V ) )
6	3, 5	mpbird 166	. 2 |- ( ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) -> A e. _V )
7		elxp4 5074	. . 3 |- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A = <. U. dom { A } , U. ran { A } >. /\ ( U. dom { A } e. B /\ U. ran { A } e. C ) ) )
8		1stvalg 6091	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. _V -> ( 1st ` A ) = U. dom { A } )
9		2ndvalg 6092	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. _V -> ( 2nd ` A ) = U. ran { A } )
10	8, 9	opeq12d 3750	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. _V -> <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. = <. U. dom { A } , U. ran { A } >. )
11	10	eqeq2d 2169	. . . 4 |- ( A e. _V -> ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. <-> A = <. U. dom { A } , U. ran { A } >. ) )
12	8	eleq1d 2226	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. _V -> ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B <-> U. dom { A } e. B ) )
13	9	eleq1d 2226	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. _V -> ( ( 2nd ` A ) e. C <-> U. ran { A } e. C ) )
14	12, 13	anbi12d 465	. . . 4 |- ( A e. _V -> ( ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) <-> ( U. dom { A } e. B /\ U. ran { A } e. C ) ) )
15	11, 14	anbi12d 465	. . 3 |- ( A e. _V -> ( ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) <-> ( A = <. U. dom { A } , U. ran { A } >. /\ ( U. dom { A } e. B /\ U. ran { A } e. C ) ) ) )
16	7, 15	bitr4id 198	. 2 |- ( A e. _V -> ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) ) )
17	1, 6, 16	pm5.21nii 694	1 |- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) )

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 103   <-> wb 104   = wceq 1335   e. wcel 2128   _Vcvv 2712   {csn 3560   <.cop 3563   U.cuni 3773   X. cxp 4585   dom cdm 4587   ran crn 4588   ` cfv 5171   1stc1st 6087   2ndc2nd 6088

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1427  ax-7 1428  ax-gen 1429  ax-ie1 1473  ax-ie2 1474  ax-8 1484  ax-10 1485  ax-11 1486  ax-i12 1487  ax-bndl 1489  ax-4 1490  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-13 2130  ax-14 2131  ax-ext 2139  ax-sep 4083  ax-pow 4136  ax-pr 4170  ax-un 4394

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 965  df-tru 1338  df-nf 1441  df-sb 1743  df-eu 2009  df-mo 2010  df-clab 2144  df-cleq 2150  df-clel 2153  df-nfc 2288  df-ral 2440  df-rex 2441  df-v 2714  df-sbc 2938  df-un 3106  df-in 3108  df-ss 3115  df-pw 3545  df-sn 3566  df-pr 3567  df-op 3569  df-uni 3774  df-br 3967  df-opab 4027  df-mpt 4028  df-id 4254  df-xp 4593  df-rel 4594  df-cnv 4595  df-co 4596  df-dm 4597  df-rn 4598  df-iota 5136  df-fun 5173  df-fv 5179  df-1st 6089  df-2nd 6090

This theorem is referenced by:  elxp7  6119  oprssdmm  6120  eqopi  6121  1st2nd2  6124  eldju2ndl  7017  eldju2ndr  7018  qredeu  11978  qnumdencl  12066  tx1cn  12711  tx2cn  12712  psmetxrge0  12774  xmetxpbl  12950