Theorem elxp6 5954

Description: Membership in a cross product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 4931. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elxp6	|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) )

Proof of Theorem elxp6

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 2631	. 2 |- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> A e. _V )
2		opexg 4064	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) -> <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. e. _V )
3	2	adantl 272	. . 3 |- ( ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) -> <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. e. _V )
4		eleq1 2151	. . . 4 |- ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. -> ( A e. _V <-> <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. e. _V ) )
5	4	adantr 271	. . 3 |- ( ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) -> ( A e. _V <-> <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. e. _V ) )
6	3, 5	mpbird 166	. 2 |- ( ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) -> A e. _V )
7		1stvalg 5927	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. _V -> ( 1st ` A ) = U. dom { A } )
8		2ndvalg 5928	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. _V -> ( 2nd ` A ) = U. ran { A } )
9	7, 8	opeq12d 3636	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. _V -> <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. = <. U. dom { A } , U. ran { A } >. )
10	9	eqeq2d 2100	. . . 4 |- ( A e. _V -> ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. <-> A = <. U. dom { A } , U. ran { A } >. ) )
11	7	eleq1d 2157	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. _V -> ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B <-> U. dom { A } e. B ) )
12	8	eleq1d 2157	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. _V -> ( ( 2nd ` A ) e. C <-> U. ran { A } e. C ) )
13	11, 12	anbi12d 458	. . . 4 |- ( A e. _V -> ( ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) <-> ( U. dom { A } e. B /\ U. ran { A } e. C ) ) )
14	10, 13	anbi12d 458	. . 3 |- ( A e. _V -> ( ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) <-> ( A = <. U. dom { A } , U. ran { A } >. /\ ( U. dom { A } e. B /\ U. ran { A } e. C ) ) ) )
15		elxp4 4931	. . 3 |- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A = <. U. dom { A } , U. ran { A } >. /\ ( U. dom { A } e. B /\ U. ran { A } e. C ) ) )
16	14, 15	syl6rbbr 198	. 2 |- ( A e. _V -> ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) ) )
17	1, 6, 16	pm5.21nii 656	1 |- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) )

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 103   <-> wb 104   = wceq 1290   e. wcel 1439   _Vcvv 2620   {csn 3450   <.cop 3453   U.cuni 3659   X. cxp 4450   dom cdm 4452   ran crn 4453   ` cfv 5028   1stc1st 5923   2ndc2nd 5924

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 666  ax-5 1382  ax-7 1383  ax-gen 1384  ax-ie1 1428  ax-ie2 1429  ax-8 1441  ax-10 1442  ax-11 1443  ax-i12 1444  ax-bndl 1445  ax-4 1446  ax-13 1450  ax-14 1451  ax-17 1465  ax-i9 1469  ax-ial 1473  ax-i5r 1474  ax-ext 2071  ax-sep 3963  ax-pow 4015  ax-pr 4045  ax-un 4269

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 927  df-tru 1293  df-nf 1396  df-sb 1694  df-eu 1952  df-mo 1953  df-clab 2076  df-cleq 2082  df-clel 2085  df-nfc 2218  df-ral 2365  df-rex 2366  df-v 2622  df-sbc 2842  df-un 3004  df-in 3006  df-ss 3013  df-pw 3435  df-sn 3456  df-pr 3457  df-op 3459  df-uni 3660  df-br 3852  df-opab 3906  df-mpt 3907  df-id 4129  df-xp 4458  df-rel 4459  df-cnv 4460  df-co 4461  df-dm 4462  df-rn 4463  df-iota 4993  df-fun 5030  df-fv 5036  df-1st 5925  df-2nd 5926

This theorem is referenced by:  elxp7  5955  eqopi  5956  1st2nd2  5959  eldju2ndl  6817  eldju2ndr  6818  qredeu  11418  qnumdencl  11504