Theorem uzind4s 9592

Description: Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer M, using explicit substitution. The hypotheses are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2005.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
uzind4s.1	|- ( M e. ZZ -> [. M / k ]. ph )
uzind4s.2	|- ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
uzind4s	|- ( N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> [. N / k ]. ph )

Distinct variable group:   k, M

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( k)   N( k)

Proof of Theorem uzind4s

Dummy variables m j are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfsbcq2 2967	. 2 |- ( j = M -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [. M / k ]. ph ) )
2		sbequ 1840	. 2 |- ( j = m -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [ m / k ] ph ) )
3		dfsbcq2 2967	. 2 |- ( j = ( m + 1 ) -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
4		dfsbcq2 2967	. 2 |- ( j = N -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [. N / k ]. ph ) )
5		uzind4s.1	. 2 |- ( M e. ZZ -> [. M / k ]. ph )
6		nfv 1528	. . . 4 |- F/ k m e. ( ZZ>= ` M )
7		nfs1v 1939	. . . . 5 |- F/ k [ m / k ] ph
8		nfsbc1v 2983	. . . . 5 |- F/ k [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph
9	7, 8	nfim 1572	. . . 4 |- F/ k ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph )
10	6, 9	nfim 1572	. . 3 |- F/ k ( m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
11		eleq1 2240	. . . 4 |- ( k = m -> ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) <-> m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) )
12		sbequ12 1771	. . . . 5 |- ( k = m -> ( ph <-> [ m / k ] ph ) )
13		oveq1 5884	. . . . . 6 |- ( k = m -> ( k + 1 ) = ( m + 1 ) )
14	13	sbceq1d 2969	. . . . 5 |- ( k = m -> ( [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph <-> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
15	12, 14	imbi12d 234	. . . 4 |- ( k = m -> ( ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) <-> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) ) )
16	11, 15	imbi12d 234	. . 3 |- ( k = m -> ( ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) ) <-> ( m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) ) ) )
17		uzind4s.2	. . 3 |- ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
18	10, 16, 17	chvar 1757	. 2 |- ( m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
19	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 18	uzind4 9590	1 |- ( N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> [. N / k ]. ph )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   [wsb 1762   e. wcel 2148   [.wsbc 2964   ` cfv 5218  (class class class)co 5877   1c1 7814   + caddc 7816   ZZcz 9255   ZZ>=cuz 9530

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 614  ax-in2 615  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-13 2150  ax-14 2151  ax-ext 2159  ax-sep 4123  ax-pow 4176  ax-pr 4211  ax-un 4435  ax-setind 4538  ax-cnex 7904  ax-resscn 7905  ax-1cn 7906  ax-1re 7907  ax-icn 7908  ax-addcl 7909  ax-addrcl 7910  ax-mulcl 7911  ax-addcom 7913  ax-addass 7915  ax-distr 7917  ax-i2m1 7918  ax-0lt1 7919  ax-0id 7921  ax-rnegex 7922  ax-cnre 7924  ax-pre-ltirr 7925  ax-pre-ltwlin 7926  ax-pre-lttrn 7927  ax-pre-ltadd 7929

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 979  df-3an 980  df-tru 1356  df-fal 1359  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-eu 2029  df-mo 2030  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-ne 2348  df-nel 2443  df-ral 2460  df-rex 2461  df-reu 2462  df-rab 2464  df-v 2741  df-sbc 2965  df-dif 3133  df-un 3135  df-in 3137  df-ss 3144  df-pw 3579  df-sn 3600  df-pr 3601  df-op 3603  df-uni 3812  df-int 3847  df-br 4006  df-opab 4067  df-mpt 4068  df-id 4295  df-xp 4634  df-rel 4635  df-cnv 4636  df-co 4637  df-dm 4638  df-rn 4639  df-res 4640  df-ima 4641  df-iota 5180  df-fun 5220  df-fn 5221  df-f 5222  df-fv 5226  df-riota 5833  df-ov 5880  df-oprab 5881  df-mpo 5882  df-pnf 7996  df-mnf 7997  df-xr 7998  df-ltxr 7999  df-le 8000  df-sub 8132  df-neg 8133  df-inn 8922  df-n0 9179  df-z 9256  df-uz 9531

This theorem is referenced by: (None)