Theorem uzind4s 9814

Description: Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer M, using explicit substitution. The hypotheses are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2005.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
uzind4s.1	|- ( M e. ZZ -> [. M / k ]. ph )
uzind4s.2	|- ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
uzind4s	|- ( N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> [. N / k ]. ph )

Distinct variable group:   k, M

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( k)   N( k)

Proof of Theorem uzind4s

Dummy variables m j are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfsbcq2 3032	. 2 |- ( j = M -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [. M / k ]. ph ) )
2		sbequ 1886	. 2 |- ( j = m -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [ m / k ] ph ) )
3		dfsbcq2 3032	. 2 |- ( j = ( m + 1 ) -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
4		dfsbcq2 3032	. 2 |- ( j = N -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [. N / k ]. ph ) )
5		uzind4s.1	. 2 |- ( M e. ZZ -> [. M / k ]. ph )
6		nfv 1574	. . . 4 |- F/ k m e. ( ZZ>= ` M )
7		nfs1v 1990	. . . . 5 |- F/ k [ m / k ] ph
8		nfsbc1v 3048	. . . . 5 |- F/ k [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph
9	7, 8	nfim 1618	. . . 4 |- F/ k ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph )
10	6, 9	nfim 1618	. . 3 |- F/ k ( m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
11		eleq1 2292	. . . 4 |- ( k = m -> ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) <-> m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) )
12		sbequ12 1817	. . . . 5 |- ( k = m -> ( ph <-> [ m / k ] ph ) )
13		oveq1 6020	. . . . . 6 |- ( k = m -> ( k + 1 ) = ( m + 1 ) )
14	13	sbceq1d 3034	. . . . 5 |- ( k = m -> ( [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph <-> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
15	12, 14	imbi12d 234	. . . 4 |- ( k = m -> ( ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) <-> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) ) )
16	11, 15	imbi12d 234	. . 3 |- ( k = m -> ( ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) ) <-> ( m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) ) ) )
17		uzind4s.2	. . 3 |- ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
18	10, 16, 17	chvar 1803	. 2 |- ( m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
19	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 18	uzind4 9812	1 |- ( N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> [. N / k ]. ph )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   [wsb 1808   e. wcel 2200   [.wsbc 3029   ` cfv 5324  (class class class)co 6013   1c1 8023   + caddc 8025   ZZcz 9469   ZZ>=cuz 9745

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-13 2202  ax-14 2203  ax-ext 2211  ax-sep 4205  ax-pow 4262  ax-pr 4297  ax-un 4528  ax-setind 4633  ax-cnex 8113  ax-resscn 8114  ax-1cn 8115  ax-1re 8116  ax-icn 8117  ax-addcl 8118  ax-addrcl 8119  ax-mulcl 8120  ax-addcom 8122  ax-addass 8124  ax-distr 8126  ax-i2m1 8127  ax-0lt1 8128  ax-0id 8130  ax-rnegex 8131  ax-cnre 8133  ax-pre-ltirr 8134  ax-pre-ltwlin 8135  ax-pre-lttrn 8136  ax-pre-ltadd 8138

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1003  df-3an 1004  df-tru 1398  df-fal 1401  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-eu 2080  df-mo 2081  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ne 2401  df-nel 2496  df-ral 2513  df-rex 2514  df-reu 2515  df-rab 2517  df-v 2802  df-sbc 3030  df-dif 3200  df-un 3202  df-in 3204  df-ss 3211  df-pw 3652  df-sn 3673  df-pr 3674  df-op 3676  df-uni 3892  df-int 3927  df-br 4087  df-opab 4149  df-mpt 4150  df-id 4388  df-xp 4729  df-rel 4730  df-cnv 4731  df-co 4732  df-dm 4733  df-rn 4734  df-res 4735  df-ima 4736  df-iota 5284  df-fun 5326  df-fn 5327  df-f 5328  df-fv 5332  df-riota 5966  df-ov 6016  df-oprab 6017  df-mpo 6018  df-pnf 8206  df-mnf 8207  df-xr 8208  df-ltxr 8209  df-le 8210  df-sub 8342  df-neg 8343  df-inn 9134  df-n0 9393  df-z 9470  df-uz 9746

This theorem is referenced by: (None)