Theorem uzind4s 9378

Description: Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer M, using explicit substitution. The hypotheses are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2005.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
uzind4s.1	|- ( M e. ZZ -> [. M / k ]. ph )
uzind4s.2	|- ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
uzind4s	|- ( N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> [. N / k ]. ph )

Distinct variable group:   k, M

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( k)   N( k)

Proof of Theorem uzind4s

Dummy variables m j are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfsbcq2 2907	. 2 |- ( j = M -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [. M / k ]. ph ) )
2		sbequ 1812	. 2 |- ( j = m -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [ m / k ] ph ) )
3		dfsbcq2 2907	. 2 |- ( j = ( m + 1 ) -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
4		dfsbcq2 2907	. 2 |- ( j = N -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [. N / k ]. ph ) )
5		uzind4s.1	. 2 |- ( M e. ZZ -> [. M / k ]. ph )
6		nfv 1508	. . . 4 |- F/ k m e. ( ZZ>= ` M )
7		nfs1v 1910	. . . . 5 |- F/ k [ m / k ] ph
8		nfsbc1v 2922	. . . . 5 |- F/ k [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph
9	7, 8	nfim 1551	. . . 4 |- F/ k ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph )
10	6, 9	nfim 1551	. . 3 |- F/ k ( m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
11		eleq1 2200	. . . 4 |- ( k = m -> ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) <-> m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) )
12		sbequ12 1744	. . . . 5 |- ( k = m -> ( ph <-> [ m / k ] ph ) )
13		oveq1 5774	. . . . . 6 |- ( k = m -> ( k + 1 ) = ( m + 1 ) )
14	13	sbceq1d 2909	. . . . 5 |- ( k = m -> ( [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph <-> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
15	12, 14	imbi12d 233	. . . 4 |- ( k = m -> ( ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) <-> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) ) )
16	11, 15	imbi12d 233	. . 3 |- ( k = m -> ( ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) ) <-> ( m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) ) ) )
17		uzind4s.2	. . 3 |- ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
18	10, 16, 17	chvar 1730	. 2 |- ( m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
19	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 18	uzind4 9376	1 |- ( N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> [. N / k ]. ph )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   e. wcel 1480   [wsb 1735   [.wsbc 2904   ` cfv 5118  (class class class)co 5767   1c1 7614   + caddc 7616   ZZcz 9047   ZZ>=cuz 9319

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 603  ax-in2 604  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-13 1491  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119  ax-sep 4041  ax-pow 4093  ax-pr 4126  ax-un 4350  ax-setind 4447  ax-cnex 7704  ax-resscn 7705  ax-1cn 7706  ax-1re 7707  ax-icn 7708  ax-addcl 7709  ax-addrcl 7710  ax-mulcl 7711  ax-addcom 7713  ax-addass 7715  ax-distr 7717  ax-i2m1 7718  ax-0lt1 7719  ax-0id 7721  ax-rnegex 7722  ax-cnre 7724  ax-pre-ltirr 7725  ax-pre-ltwlin 7726  ax-pre-lttrn 7727  ax-pre-ltadd 7729

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3or 963  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-fal 1337  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-eu 2000  df-mo 2001  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-ne 2307  df-nel 2402  df-ral 2419  df-rex 2420  df-reu 2421  df-rab 2423  df-v 2683  df-sbc 2905  df-dif 3068  df-un 3070  df-in 3072  df-ss 3079  df-pw 3507  df-sn 3528  df-pr 3529  df-op 3531  df-uni 3732  df-int 3767  df-br 3925  df-opab 3985  df-mpt 3986  df-id 4210  df-xp 4540  df-rel 4541  df-cnv 4542  df-co 4543  df-dm 4544  df-rn 4545  df-res 4546  df-ima 4547  df-iota 5083  df-fun 5120  df-fn 5121  df-f 5122  df-fv 5126  df-riota 5723  df-ov 5770  df-oprab 5771  df-mpo 5772  df-pnf 7795  df-mnf 7796  df-xr 7797  df-ltxr 7798  df-le 7799  df-sub 7928  df-neg 7929  df-inn 8714  df-n0 8971  df-z 9048  df-uz 9320

This theorem is referenced by: (None)