Theorem uzind4s 9925

Description: Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer M, using explicit substitution. The hypotheses are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2005.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
uzind4s.1	|- ( M e. ZZ -> [. M / k ]. ph )
uzind4s.2	|- ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
uzind4s	|- ( N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> [. N / k ]. ph )

Distinct variable group:   k, M

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( k)   N( k)

Proof of Theorem uzind4s

Dummy variables m j are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfsbcq2 3047	. 2 |- ( j = M -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [. M / k ]. ph ) )
2		sbequ 1889	. 2 |- ( j = m -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [ m / k ] ph ) )
3		dfsbcq2 3047	. 2 |- ( j = ( m + 1 ) -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
4		dfsbcq2 3047	. 2 |- ( j = N -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [. N / k ]. ph ) )
5		uzind4s.1	. 2 |- ( M e. ZZ -> [. M / k ]. ph )
6		nfv 1577	. . . 4 |- F/ k m e. ( ZZ>= ` M )
7		nfs1v 1995	. . . . 5 |- F/ k [ m / k ] ph
8		nfsbc1v 3063	. . . . 5 |- F/ k [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph
9	7, 8	nfim 1621	. . . 4 |- F/ k ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph )
10	6, 9	nfim 1621	. . 3 |- F/ k ( m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
11		eleq1 2297	. . . 4 |- ( k = m -> ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) <-> m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) )
12		sbequ12 1820	. . . . 5 |- ( k = m -> ( ph <-> [ m / k ] ph ) )
13		oveq1 6059	. . . . . 6 |- ( k = m -> ( k + 1 ) = ( m + 1 ) )
14	13	sbceq1d 3049	. . . . 5 |- ( k = m -> ( [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph <-> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
15	12, 14	imbi12d 234	. . . 4 |- ( k = m -> ( ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) <-> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) ) )
16	11, 15	imbi12d 234	. . 3 |- ( k = m -> ( ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) ) <-> ( m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) ) ) )
17		uzind4s.2	. . 3 |- ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
18	10, 16, 17	chvar 1806	. 2 |- ( m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
19	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 18	uzind4 9923	1 |- ( N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> [. N / k ]. ph )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   [wsb 1811   e. wcel 2205   [.wsbc 3044   ` cfv 5354  (class class class)co 6052   1c1 8130   + caddc 8132   ZZcz 9579   ZZ>=cuz 9856

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2207  ax-14 2208  ax-ext 2216  ax-sep 4230  ax-pow 4289  ax-pr 4324  ax-un 4556  ax-setind 4661  ax-cnex 8220  ax-resscn 8221  ax-1cn 8222  ax-1re 8223  ax-icn 8224  ax-addcl 8225  ax-addrcl 8226  ax-mulcl 8227  ax-addcom 8229  ax-addass 8231  ax-distr 8233  ax-i2m1 8234  ax-0lt1 8235  ax-0id 8237  ax-rnegex 8238  ax-cnre 8240  ax-pre-ltirr 8241  ax-pre-ltwlin 8242  ax-pre-lttrn 8243  ax-pre-ltadd 8245

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1006  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-fal 1404  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-eu 2085  df-mo 2086  df-clab 2221  df-cleq 2227  df-clel 2230  df-nfc 2375  df-ne 2415  df-nel 2510  df-ral 2527  df-rex 2528  df-reu 2529  df-rab 2531  df-v 2817  df-sbc 3045  df-dif 3215  df-un 3217  df-in 3219  df-ss 3226  df-pw 3673  df-sn 3697  df-pr 3698  df-op 3700  df-uni 3917  df-int 3952  df-br 4112  df-opab 4174  df-mpt 4175  df-id 4416  df-xp 4757  df-rel 4758  df-cnv 4759  df-co 4760  df-dm 4761  df-rn 4762  df-res 4763  df-ima 4764  df-iota 5314  df-fun 5356  df-fn 5357  df-f 5358  df-fv 5362  df-riota 6005  df-ov 6055  df-oprab 6056  df-mpo 6057  df-pnf 8312  df-mnf 8313  df-xr 8314  df-ltxr 8315  df-le 8316  df-sub 8448  df-neg 8449  df-inn 9240  df-n0 9499  df-z 9580  df-uz 9857

This theorem is referenced by: (None)