Theorem uzind4s 9506

Description: Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer M, using explicit substitution. The hypotheses are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2005.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
uzind4s.1	|- ( M e. ZZ -> [. M / k ]. ph )
uzind4s.2	|- ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
uzind4s	|- ( N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> [. N / k ]. ph )

Distinct variable group:   k, M

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( k)   N( k)

Proof of Theorem uzind4s

Dummy variables m j are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfsbcq2 2940	. 2 |- ( j = M -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [. M / k ]. ph ) )
2		sbequ 1820	. 2 |- ( j = m -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [ m / k ] ph ) )
3		dfsbcq2 2940	. 2 |- ( j = ( m + 1 ) -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
4		dfsbcq2 2940	. 2 |- ( j = N -> ( [ j / k ] ph <-> [. N / k ]. ph ) )
5		uzind4s.1	. 2 |- ( M e. ZZ -> [. M / k ]. ph )
6		nfv 1508	. . . 4 |- F/ k m e. ( ZZ>= ` M )
7		nfs1v 1919	. . . . 5 |- F/ k [ m / k ] ph
8		nfsbc1v 2955	. . . . 5 |- F/ k [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph
9	7, 8	nfim 1552	. . . 4 |- F/ k ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph )
10	6, 9	nfim 1552	. . 3 |- F/ k ( m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
11		eleq1 2220	. . . 4 |- ( k = m -> ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) <-> m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) )
12		sbequ12 1751	. . . . 5 |- ( k = m -> ( ph <-> [ m / k ] ph ) )
13		oveq1 5833	. . . . . 6 |- ( k = m -> ( k + 1 ) = ( m + 1 ) )
14	13	sbceq1d 2942	. . . . 5 |- ( k = m -> ( [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph <-> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
15	12, 14	imbi12d 233	. . . 4 |- ( k = m -> ( ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) <-> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) ) )
16	11, 15	imbi12d 233	. . 3 |- ( k = m -> ( ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) ) <-> ( m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) ) ) )
17		uzind4s.2	. . 3 |- ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( ph -> [. ( k + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
18	10, 16, 17	chvar 1737	. 2 |- ( m e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> ( [ m / k ] ph -> [. ( m + 1 ) / k ]. ph ) )
19	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 18	uzind4 9504	1 |- ( N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) -> [. N / k ]. ph )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   [wsb 1742   e. wcel 2128   [.wsbc 2937   ` cfv 5172  (class class class)co 5826   1c1 7735   + caddc 7737   ZZcz 9172   ZZ>=cuz 9444

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-io 699  ax-5 1427  ax-7 1428  ax-gen 1429  ax-ie1 1473  ax-ie2 1474  ax-8 1484  ax-10 1485  ax-11 1486  ax-i12 1487  ax-bndl 1489  ax-4 1490  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-13 2130  ax-14 2131  ax-ext 2139  ax-sep 4084  ax-pow 4137  ax-pr 4171  ax-un 4395  ax-setind 4498  ax-cnex 7825  ax-resscn 7826  ax-1cn 7827  ax-1re 7828  ax-icn 7829  ax-addcl 7830  ax-addrcl 7831  ax-mulcl 7832  ax-addcom 7834  ax-addass 7836  ax-distr 7838  ax-i2m1 7839  ax-0lt1 7840  ax-0id 7842  ax-rnegex 7843  ax-cnre 7845  ax-pre-ltirr 7846  ax-pre-ltwlin 7847  ax-pre-lttrn 7848  ax-pre-ltadd 7850

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3or 964  df-3an 965  df-tru 1338  df-fal 1341  df-nf 1441  df-sb 1743  df-eu 2009  df-mo 2010  df-clab 2144  df-cleq 2150  df-clel 2153  df-nfc 2288  df-ne 2328  df-nel 2423  df-ral 2440  df-rex 2441  df-reu 2442  df-rab 2444  df-v 2714  df-sbc 2938  df-dif 3104  df-un 3106  df-in 3108  df-ss 3115  df-pw 3546  df-sn 3567  df-pr 3568  df-op 3570  df-uni 3775  df-int 3810  df-br 3968  df-opab 4028  df-mpt 4029  df-id 4255  df-xp 4594  df-rel 4595  df-cnv 4596  df-co 4597  df-dm 4598  df-rn 4599  df-res 4600  df-ima 4601  df-iota 5137  df-fun 5174  df-fn 5175  df-f 5176  df-fv 5180  df-riota 5782  df-ov 5829  df-oprab 5830  df-mpo 5831  df-pnf 7916  df-mnf 7917  df-xr 7918  df-ltxr 7919  df-le 7920  df-sub 8052  df-neg 8053  df-inn 8839  df-n0 9096  df-z 9173  df-uz 9445

This theorem is referenced by: (None)