Theorem uzind4s 9990

Description: Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀, using explicit substitution. The hypotheses are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2005.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
uzind4s.1	⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → [𝑀 / 𝑘]𝜑)
uzind4s.2	⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜑 → [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
uzind4s	⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → [𝑁 / 𝑘]𝜑)

Distinct variable group:   𝑘,𝑀

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑘)   𝑁(𝑘)

Proof of Theorem uzind4s

Dummy variables 𝑚 𝑗 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfsbcq2 3054	. 2 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → ([𝑗 / 𝑘]𝜑 ↔ [𝑀 / 𝑘]𝜑))
2		sbequ 1893	. 2 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑚 → ([𝑗 / 𝑘]𝜑 ↔ [𝑚 / 𝑘]𝜑))
3		dfsbcq2 3054	. 2 ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑚 + 1) → ([𝑗 / 𝑘]𝜑 ↔ [(𝑚 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑))
4		dfsbcq2 3054	. 2 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → ([𝑗 / 𝑘]𝜑 ↔ [𝑁 / 𝑘]𝜑))
5		uzind4s.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → [𝑀 / 𝑘]𝜑)
6		nfv 1581	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘 𝑚 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)
7		nfs1v 1999	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘[𝑚 / 𝑘]𝜑
8		nfsbc1v 3070	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘[(𝑚 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑
9	7, 8	nfim 1625	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘([𝑚 / 𝑘]𝜑 → [(𝑚 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑)
10	6, 9	nfim 1625	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘(𝑚 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → ([𝑚 / 𝑘]𝜑 → [(𝑚 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑))
11		eleq1 2301	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑚 → (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ↔ 𝑚 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)))
12		sbequ12 1824	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑚 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑚 / 𝑘]𝜑))
13		oveq1 6092	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑚 → (𝑘 + 1) = (𝑚 + 1))
14	13	sbceq1d 3056	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑚 → ([(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑 ↔ [(𝑚 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑))
15	12, 14	imbi12d 234	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑚 → ((𝜑 → [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑) ↔ ([𝑚 / 𝑘]𝜑 → [(𝑚 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑)))
16	11, 15	imbi12d 234	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑚 → ((𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜑 → [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑)) ↔ (𝑚 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → ([𝑚 / 𝑘]𝜑 → [(𝑚 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑))))
17		uzind4s.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜑 → [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑))
18	10, 16, 17	chvar 1810	. 2 ⊢ (𝑚 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → ([𝑚 / 𝑘]𝜑 → [(𝑚 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑))
19	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 18	uzind4 9988	1 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → [𝑁 / 𝑘]𝜑)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4  [wsb 1815   ∈ wcel 2209  [wsbc 3051  ‘cfv 5377  (class class class)co 6085  1c1 8180   + caddc 8182  ℤcz 9644  ℤ_≥cuz 9921

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-setind 4684  ax-cnex 8270  ax-resscn 8271  ax-1cn 8272  ax-1re 8273  ax-icn 8274  ax-addcl 8275  ax-addrcl 8276  ax-mulcl 8277  ax-addcom 8279  ax-addass 8281  ax-distr 8283  ax-i2m1 8284  ax-0lt1 8285  ax-0id 8287  ax-rnegex 8288  ax-cnre 8290  ax-pre-ltirr 8291  ax-pre-ltwlin 8292  ax-pre-lttrn 8293  ax-pre-ltadd 8295

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1010  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-nel 2516  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-reu 2535  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-id 4438  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-ima 4787  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-f 5381  df-fv 5385  df-riota 6038  df-ov 6088  df-oprab 6089  df-mpo 6090  df-pnf 8362  df-mnf 8363  df-xr 8364  df-ltxr 8365  df-le 8366  df-sub 8499  df-neg 8500  df-inn 9305  df-n0 9564  df-z 9645  df-uz 9922

This theorem is used by: (None)