Theorem bnj1001 31846

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 31896. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj1001.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
bnj1001.5	⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
bnj1001.6	⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
bnj1001.13	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj1001.27	⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜒″)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1001	⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒″ ∧ 𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝))

Proof of Theorem bnj1001

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1001.27	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜒″)
2		bnj1001.6	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
3	2	simplbi 498	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛)
4	3	bnj708 31644	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛)
5		bnj1001.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
6	5	bnj1232 31692	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
7	6	bnj706 31642	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
8		bnj1001.13	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
9	8	bnj923 31656	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝑛 ∈ ω)
10	7, 9	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑛 ∈ ω)
11		elnn 7446	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ω) → 𝑖 ∈ ω)
12	4, 10, 11	syl2anc 584	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑖 ∈ ω)
13		bnj1001.5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
14	13	simp3bi 1140	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜏 → 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)
15	14	bnj707 31643	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)
16		nnord 7444	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ω → Ord 𝑛)
17		ordsucelsuc 7393	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Ord 𝑛 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛))
18	9, 16, 17	3syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛))
19	18	biimpa 477	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛) → suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)
20		eleq2 2871	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 → (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛))
21	19, 20	anim12i 612	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → (suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛 ∧ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)))
22	7, 4, 15, 21	syl21anc 834	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → (suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛 ∧ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)))
23		bianir 1051	. . 3 ⊢ ((suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛 ∧ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)) → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝)
24	22, 23	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝)
25	1, 12, 24	3jca 1121	1 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒″ ∧ 𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 207   ∧ wa 396   ∧ w3a 1080   = wceq 1522   ∈ wcel 2081   ∖ cdif 3856  ∅c0 4211  {csn 4472  Ord word 6065  suc csuc 6068   Fn wfn 6220  ‘cfv 6225  ωcom 7436   ∧ w-bnj17 31573

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1777  ax-4 1791  ax-5 1888  ax-6 1947  ax-7 1992  ax-8 2083  ax-9 2091  ax-10 2112  ax-11 2126  ax-12 2141  ax-13 2344  ax-ext 2769  ax-sep 5094  ax-nul 5101  ax-pr 5221  ax-un 7319

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 843  df-3or 1081  df-3an 1082  df-tru 1525  df-ex 1762  df-nf 1766  df-sb 2043  df-mo 2576  df-eu 2612  df-clab 2776  df-cleq 2788  df-clel 2863  df-nfc 2935  df-ne 2985  df-ral 3110  df-rex 3111  df-rab 3114  df-v 3439  df-sbc 3707  df-dif 3862  df-un 3864  df-in 3866  df-ss 3874  df-pss 3876  df-nul 4212  df-if 4382  df-sn 4473  df-pr 4475  df-tp 4477  df-op 4479  df-uni 4746  df-br 4963  df-opab 5025  df-tr 5064  df-eprel 5353  df-po 5362  df-so 5363  df-fr 5402  df-we 5404  df-ord 6069  df-on 6070  df-lim 6071  df-suc 6072  df-om 7437  df-bnj17 31574

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1020  31851