Theorem bnj1001 33965

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 34016. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj1001.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
bnj1001.5	⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
bnj1001.6	⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
bnj1001.13	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj1001.27	⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜒″)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1001	⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒″ ∧ 𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝))

Proof of Theorem bnj1001

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1001.27	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜒″)
2		bnj1001.6	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
3	2	simplbi 498	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛)
4	3	bnj708 33762	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛)
5		bnj1001.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
6	5	bnj1232 33809	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
7	6	bnj706 33760	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
8		bnj1001.13	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
9	8	bnj923 33774	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝑛 ∈ ω)
10	7, 9	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑛 ∈ ω)
11		elnn 7865	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ω) → 𝑖 ∈ ω)
12	4, 10, 11	syl2anc 584	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑖 ∈ ω)
13		bnj1001.5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
14	13	simp3bi 1147	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜏 → 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)
15	14	bnj707 33761	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)
16		nnord 7862	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ω → Ord 𝑛)
17		ordsucelsuc 7809	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Ord 𝑛 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛))
18	9, 16, 17	3syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛))
19	18	biimpa 477	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛) → suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)
20		eleq2 2822	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 → (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛))
21	19, 20	anim12i 613	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → (suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛 ∧ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)))
22	7, 4, 15, 21	syl21anc 836	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → (suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛 ∧ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)))
23		bianir 1057	. . 3 ⊢ ((suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛 ∧ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)) → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝)
24	22, 23	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝)
25	1, 12, 24	3jca 1128	1 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒″ ∧ 𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2106   ∖ cdif 3945  ∅c0 4322  {csn 4628  Ord word 6363  suc csuc 6366   Fn wfn 6538  ‘cfv 6543  ωcom 7854   ∧ w-bnj17 33692

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5427  ax-un 7724

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2724  df-clel 2810  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3433  df-v 3476  df-dif 3951  df-un 3953  df-in 3955  df-ss 3965  df-pss 3967  df-nul 4323  df-if 4529  df-pw 4604  df-sn 4629  df-pr 4631  df-op 4635  df-uni 4909  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-tr 5266  df-eprel 5580  df-po 5588  df-so 5589  df-fr 5631  df-we 5633  df-ord 6367  df-on 6368  df-lim 6369  df-suc 6370  df-om 7855  df-bnj17 33693

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1020  33971