Theorem bnj1001 35356

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 35407. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj1001.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
bnj1001.5	⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
bnj1001.6	⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
bnj1001.13	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj1001.27	⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜒″)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1001	⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒″ ∧ 𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝))

Proof of Theorem bnj1001

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1001.27	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜒″)
2		bnj1001.6	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
3	2	simplbi 501	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛)
4	3	bnj708 35154	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛)
5		bnj1001.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
6	5	bnj1232 35200	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
7	6	bnj706 35152	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
8		bnj1001.13	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
9	8	bnj923 35166	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝑛 ∈ ω)
10	7, 9	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑛 ∈ ω)
11		elnn 7871	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ω) → 𝑖 ∈ ω)
12	4, 10, 11	syl2anc 595	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑖 ∈ ω)
13		bnj1001.5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
14	13	simp3bi 1164	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜏 → 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)
15	14	bnj707 35153	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)
16		nnord 7868	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ω → Ord 𝑛)
17		ordsucelsuc 7816	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Ord 𝑛 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛))
18	9, 16, 17	3syl 19	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛))
19	18	biimpa 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛) → suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)
20		eleq2 2851	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 → (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛))
21	19, 20	anim12i 624	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → (suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛 ∧ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)))
22	7, 4, 15, 21	syl21anc 850	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → (suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛 ∧ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)))
23		bianir 1073	. . 3 ⊢ ((suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛 ∧ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)) → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝)
24	22, 23	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝)
25	1, 12, 24	3jca 1145	1 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒″ ∧ 𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1102   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2142   ∖ cdif 3901  ∅c0 4285  {csn 4588  Ord word 6359  suc csuc 6362   Fn wfn 6531  ‘cfv 6536  ωcom 7860   ∧ w-bnj17 35084

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5256  ax-pr 5403  ax-un 7734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1103  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-sb 2096  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-pss 3924  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-pw 4563  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-tr 5218  df-eprel 5560  df-po 5568  df-so 5569  df-fr 5613  df-we 5615  df-ord 6363  df-on 6364  df-lim 6365  df-suc 6366  df-om 7861  df-bnj17 35085

This theorem is used by:  bnj1020  35362