Theorem bnj1001 31408

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 31458. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj1001.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
bnj1001.5	⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
bnj1001.6	⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
bnj1001.13	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj1001.27	⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜒″)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1001	⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒″ ∧ 𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝))

Proof of Theorem bnj1001

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1001.27	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜒″)
2		bnj1001.6	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
3	2	simplbi 491	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛)
4	3	bnj708 31206	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛)
5		bnj1001.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
6	5	bnj1232 31254	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
7	6	bnj706 31204	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
8		bnj1001.13	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
9	8	bnj923 31218	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝑛 ∈ ω)
10	7, 9	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑛 ∈ ω)
11		elnn 7273	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ω) → 𝑖 ∈ ω)
12	4, 10, 11	syl2anc 579	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑖 ∈ ω)
13		bnj1001.5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
14	13	simp3bi 1177	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜏 → 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)
15	14	bnj707 31205	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)
16		nnord 7271	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ω → Ord 𝑛)
17		ordsucelsuc 7220	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Ord 𝑛 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛))
18	9, 16, 17	3syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛))
19	18	biimpa 468	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛) → suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)
20		eleq2 2833	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 → (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛))
21	19, 20	anim12i 606	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → (suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛 ∧ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)))
22	7, 4, 15, 21	syl21anc 866	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → (suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛 ∧ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)))
23		bianir 1081	. . 3 ⊢ ((suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛 ∧ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)) → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝)
24	22, 23	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝)
25	1, 12, 24	3jca 1158	1 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒″ ∧ 𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 197   ∧ wa 384   ∧ w3a 1107   = wceq 1652   ∈ wcel 2155   ∖ cdif 3729  ∅c0 4079  {csn 4334  Ord word 5907  suc csuc 5910   Fn wfn 6063  ‘cfv 6068  ωcom 7263   ∧ w-bnj17 31135

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1890  ax-4 1904  ax-5 2005  ax-6 2070  ax-7 2105  ax-8 2157  ax-9 2164  ax-10 2183  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2211  ax-13 2352  ax-ext 2743  ax-sep 4941  ax-nul 4949  ax-pr 5062  ax-un 7147

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 198  df-an 385  df-or 874  df-3or 1108  df-3an 1109  df-tru 1656  df-ex 1875  df-nf 1879  df-sb 2063  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2582  df-clab 2752  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2761  df-nfc 2896  df-ne 2938  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3061  df-rab 3064  df-v 3352  df-sbc 3597  df-dif 3735  df-un 3737  df-in 3739  df-ss 3746  df-pss 3748  df-nul 4080  df-if 4244  df-sn 4335  df-pr 4337  df-tp 4339  df-op 4341  df-uni 4595  df-br 4810  df-opab 4872  df-tr 4912  df-eprel 5190  df-po 5198  df-so 5199  df-fr 5236  df-we 5238  df-ord 5911  df-on 5912  df-lim 5913  df-suc 5914  df-om 7264  df-bnj17 31136

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1020  31413