Theorem bnj548 34206

Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 34230. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj548.1	⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑚 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′))
bnj548.2	⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
bnj548.3	⊢ 𝐾 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
bnj548.4	⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝐶⟩})
bnj548.5	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj548	⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → 𝐵 = 𝐾)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐺   𝑦,𝑓   𝑦,𝑖

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜏(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝜎(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝐴(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝐵(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝐶(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝑅(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝐺(𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝐾(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝜑′(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝜓′(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj548

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj548.5	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛)
2	1	fnfund 6649	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → Fun 𝐺)
3	2	adantr 479	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → Fun 𝐺)
4		bnj548.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑚 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′))
5	4	simp1bi 1143	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜏 → 𝑓 Fn 𝑚)
6		fndm 6651	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 Fn 𝑚 → dom 𝑓 = 𝑚)
7		eleq2 2820	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (dom 𝑓 = 𝑚 → (𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↔ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚))
8	7	biimpar 476	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((dom 𝑓 = 𝑚 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓)
9	6, 8	sylan 578	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn 𝑚 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓)
10	5, 9	sylan 578	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜏 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓)
11	10	3ad2antl2 1184	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓)
12	3, 11	jca 510	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → (Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓))
13		bnj548.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝐶⟩})
14	13	bnj931 34079	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺
15	12, 14	jctil 518	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → (𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺 ∧ (Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓)))
16		3anan12 1094	. . 3 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓) ↔ (𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺 ∧ (Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓)))
17	15, 16	sylibr 233	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → (Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓))
18		funssfv 6911	. 2 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓) → (𝐺‘𝑖) = (𝑓‘𝑖))
19		iuneq1 5012	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺‘𝑖) = (𝑓‘𝑖) → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
20	19	eqcomd 2736	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺‘𝑖) = (𝑓‘𝑖) → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
21		bnj548.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
22		bnj548.3	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐾 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
23	20, 21, 22	3eqtr4g 2795	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺‘𝑖) = (𝑓‘𝑖) → 𝐵 = 𝐾)
24	17, 18, 23	3syl 18	1 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → 𝐵 = 𝐾)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 394   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2104   ∪ cun 3945   ⊆ wss 3947  {csn 4627  ⟨cop 4633  ∪ ciun 4996  dom cdm 5675  Fun wfun 6536   Fn wfn 6537  ‘cfv 6542   predc-bnj14 33997   FrSe w-bnj15 34001

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2106  ax-9 2114  ax-10 2135  ax-12 2169  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5298  ax-nul 5305  ax-pr 5426

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2532  df-eu 2561  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2808  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3431  df-v 3474  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-nul 4322  df-if 4528  df-sn 4628  df-pr 4630  df-op 4634  df-uni 4908  df-iun 4998  df-br 5148  df-opab 5210  df-id 5573  df-xp 5681  df-rel 5682  df-cnv 5683  df-co 5684  df-dm 5685  df-res 5687  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6544  df-fn 6545  df-fv 6550

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj553  34207