Theorem bnj548 33117

Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 33141. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj548.1	⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑚 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′))
bnj548.2	⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
bnj548.3	⊢ 𝐾 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
bnj548.4	⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝐶⟩})
bnj548.5	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj548	⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → 𝐵 = 𝐾)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐺   𝑦,𝑓   𝑦,𝑖

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜏(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝜎(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝐴(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝐵(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝐶(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝑅(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝐺(𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝐾(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝜑′(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝜓′(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj548

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj548.5	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛)
2	1	fnfund 6580	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → Fun 𝐺)
3	2	adantr 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → Fun 𝐺)
4		bnj548.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑚 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′))
5	4	simp1bi 1144	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜏 → 𝑓 Fn 𝑚)
6		fndm 6582	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 Fn 𝑚 → dom 𝑓 = 𝑚)
7		eleq2 2825	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (dom 𝑓 = 𝑚 → (𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↔ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚))
8	7	biimpar 478	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((dom 𝑓 = 𝑚 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓)
9	6, 8	sylan 580	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn 𝑚 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓)
10	5, 9	sylan 580	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜏 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓)
11	10	3ad2antl2 1185	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓)
12	3, 11	jca 512	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → (Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓))
13		bnj548.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝐶⟩})
14	13	bnj931 32990	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺
15	12, 14	jctil 520	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → (𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺 ∧ (Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓)))
16		3anan12 1095	. . 3 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓) ↔ (𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺 ∧ (Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓)))
17	15, 16	sylibr 233	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → (Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓))
18		funssfv 6840	. 2 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓) → (𝐺‘𝑖) = (𝑓‘𝑖))
19		iuneq1 4954	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺‘𝑖) = (𝑓‘𝑖) → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
20	19	eqcomd 2742	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺‘𝑖) = (𝑓‘𝑖) → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
21		bnj548.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
22		bnj548.3	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐾 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
23	20, 21, 22	3eqtr4g 2801	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺‘𝑖) = (𝑓‘𝑖) → 𝐵 = 𝐾)
24	17, 18, 23	3syl 18	1 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) → 𝐵 = 𝐾)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2105   ∪ cun 3895   ⊆ wss 3897  {csn 4572  ⟨cop 4578  ∪ ciun 4938  dom cdm 5614  Fun wfun 6467   Fn wfn 6468  ‘cfv 6473   predc-bnj14 32908   FrSe w-bnj15 32912

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2136  ax-12 2170  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5240  ax-nul 5247  ax-pr 5369

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2067  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2814  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3404  df-v 3443  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3914  df-nul 4269  df-if 4473  df-sn 4573  df-pr 4575  df-op 4579  df-uni 4852  df-iun 4940  df-br 5090  df-opab 5152  df-id 5512  df-xp 5620  df-rel 5621  df-cnv 5622  df-co 5623  df-dm 5624  df-res 5626  df-iota 6425  df-fun 6475  df-fn 6476  df-fv 6481

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj553  33118