Theorem bnj945 35071

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 35307. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bnj945.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, 𝐶⟩})

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj945	⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑛) → (𝐺‘𝐴) = (𝑓‘𝐴))

Proof of Theorem bnj945

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fndm 6626	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 → dom 𝑓 = 𝑛)
2	1	ad2antll 739	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛)) → dom 𝑓 = 𝑛)
3	2	eleq2d 2850	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛)) → (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑛))
4	3	pm5.32i 582	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑓) ↔ ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑛))
5		bnj945.1	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, 𝐶⟩})
6	5	bnj941 35070	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ V → ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑝))
7	6	imp 410	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛)) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑝)
8	7	fnfund 6624	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛)) → Fun 𝐺)
9	5	bnj931 35068	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺
10	8, 9	jctir 528	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛)) → (Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺))
11	10	anim1i 624	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑓) → ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑓))
12	4, 11	sylbir 237	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑛) → ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑓))
13		df-bnj17 34985	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑛) ↔ ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑛))
14		3ancomb 1112	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ V ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛))
15		3anass 1107	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ V ∧ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛)))
16	14, 15	bitri 277	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ V ∧ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛)))
17	16	anbi1i 633	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑛) ↔ ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑛))
18	13, 17	bitri 277	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑛) ↔ ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑛))
19		df-3an 1101	. . 3 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑓) ↔ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑓))
20	12, 18, 19	3imtr4i 294	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑛) → (Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑓))
21		funssfv 6890	. 2 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑓) → (𝐺‘𝐴) = (𝑓‘𝐴))
22	20, 21	syl 17	1 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑛) → (𝐺‘𝐴) = (𝑓‘𝐴))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   ∧ w3a 1099   = wceq 1562   ∈ wcel 2144  Vcvv 3456   ∪ cun 3904   ⊆ wss 3906  {csn 4584  ⟨cop 4590  dom cdm 5649  suc csuc 6350  Fun wfun 6517   Fn wfn 6518  ‘cfv 6523   ∧ w-bnj17 34984

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1817  ax-4 1831  ax-5 1932  ax-6 1989  ax-7 2030  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-12 2214  ax-ext 2736  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5258  ax-pr 5392  ax-reg 9542

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1101  df-tru 1565  df-fal 1575  df-ex 1802  df-sb 2093  df-mo 2568  df-eu 2598  df-clab 2743  df-cleq 2756  df-clel 2839  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3417  df-v 3458  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5103  df-opab 5165  df-id 5544  df-xp 5655  df-rel 5656  df-cnv 5657  df-co 5658  df-dm 5659  df-res 5661  df-suc 6354  df-iota 6479  df-fun 6525  df-fn 6526  df-fv 6531  df-bnj17 34985

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj966  35241  bnj967  35242  bnj1006  35257