Theorem ecopover 8835

Description: Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation ∼, specified by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 1-May-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ecopopr.1	⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}
ecopopr.com	⊢ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥)
ecopopr.cl	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)
ecopopr.ass	⊢ ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧))
ecopopr.can	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ecopover	⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢, +   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢

Allowed substitution hints:   ∼ (𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤, 𝑣, 𝑢)

Proof of Theorem ecopover

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 ℎ are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ecopopr.1	. . 3 ⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}
2	1	relopabiv 5798	. 2 ⊢ Rel ∼
3		ecopopr.com	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥)
4	1, 3	ecopovsym 8833	. 2 ⊢ (𝑓 ∼ 𝑔 → 𝑔 ∼ 𝑓)
5		ecopopr.cl	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)
6		ecopopr.ass	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧))
7		ecopopr.can	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
8	1, 3, 5, 6, 7	ecopovtrn 8834	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑓 ∼ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ∼ ℎ) → 𝑓 ∼ ℎ)
9		vex 3455	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑔 ∈ V
10		vex 3455	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ℎ ∈ V
11	9, 10, 3	caovcom 7616	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑔 + ℎ) = (ℎ + 𝑔)
12	1	ecopoveq 8832	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆)) → (⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ ↔ (𝑔 + ℎ) = (ℎ + 𝑔)))
13	11, 12	mpbiri 261	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆)) → ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩)
14	13	anidms 577	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆) → ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩)
15	14	rgen2 3203	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝑆 ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩
16		breq12 5108	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑓 = ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ ∧ 𝑓 = ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩) → (𝑓 ∼ 𝑓 ↔ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩))
17	16	anidms 577	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ → (𝑓 ∼ 𝑓 ↔ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩))
18	17	ralxp 5818	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)𝑓 ∼ 𝑓 ↔ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝑆 ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩)
19	15, 18	mpbir 234	. . . 4 ⊢ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)𝑓 ∼ 𝑓
20	19	rspec 3254	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) → 𝑓 ∼ 𝑓)
21		opabssxp 5743	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))} ⊆ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) × (𝑆 × 𝑆))
22	1, 21	eqsstri 3977	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∼ ⊆ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) × (𝑆 × 𝑆))
23	22	ssbri 5150	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 ∼ 𝑓 → 𝑓((𝑆 × 𝑆) × (𝑆 × 𝑆))𝑓)
24		brxp 5700	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓((𝑆 × 𝑆) × (𝑆 × 𝑆))𝑓 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)))
25	24	simplbi 502	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓((𝑆 × 𝑆) × (𝑆 × 𝑆))𝑓 → 𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆))
26	23, 25	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 ∼ 𝑓 → 𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆))
27	20, 26	impbii 212	. 2 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ↔ 𝑓 ∼ 𝑓)
28	2, 4, 8, 27	iseri 8738	1 ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3077  ⟨cop 4590   class class class wbr 5103  {copab 5167   × cxp 5649  (class class class)co 7418   Er wer 8707

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pr 5391

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-iota 6493  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7421  df-er 8710

This theorem is used by:  enqer  10999  enrer  11141