Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  ecopover Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem ecopover 8199
 Description: Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation ∼, specified by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 1-May-2021.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
ecopopr.1 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧𝑤𝑣𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}
ecopopr.com (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥)
ecopopr.cl ((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)
ecopopr.ass ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧))
ecopopr.can ((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Assertion
Ref Expression
ecopover Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢, +   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢
Allowed substitution hints:   (𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢)

Proof of Theorem ecopover
Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 ecopopr.1 . . 3 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧𝑤𝑣𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}
21relopabi 5540 . 2 Rel
3 ecopopr.com . . 3 (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥)
41, 3ecopovsym 8197 . 2 (𝑓 𝑔𝑔 𝑓)
5 ecopopr.cl . . 3 ((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)
6 ecopopr.ass . . 3 ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧))
7 ecopopr.can . . 3 ((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
81, 3, 5, 6, 7ecopovtrn 8198 . 2 ((𝑓 𝑔𝑔 ) → 𝑓 )
9 vex 3411 . . . . . . . . 9 𝑔 ∈ V
10 vex 3411 . . . . . . . . 9 ∈ V
119, 10, 3caovcom 7159 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑔 + ) = ( + 𝑔)
121ecopoveq 8196 . . . . . . . 8 (((𝑔𝑆𝑆) ∧ (𝑔𝑆𝑆)) → (⟨𝑔, 𝑔, ⟩ ↔ (𝑔 + ) = ( + 𝑔)))
1311, 12mpbiri 250 . . . . . . 7 (((𝑔𝑆𝑆) ∧ (𝑔𝑆𝑆)) → ⟨𝑔, 𝑔, ⟩)
1413anidms 559 . . . . . 6 ((𝑔𝑆𝑆) → ⟨𝑔, 𝑔, ⟩)
1514rgen2a 3169 . . . . 5 𝑔𝑆𝑆𝑔, 𝑔,
16 breq12 4930 . . . . . . 7 ((𝑓 = ⟨𝑔, ⟩ ∧ 𝑓 = ⟨𝑔, ⟩) → (𝑓 𝑓 ↔ ⟨𝑔, 𝑔, ⟩))
1716anidms 559 . . . . . 6 (𝑓 = ⟨𝑔, ⟩ → (𝑓 𝑓 ↔ ⟨𝑔, 𝑔, ⟩))
1817ralxp 5558 . . . . 5 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)𝑓 𝑓 ↔ ∀𝑔𝑆𝑆𝑔, 𝑔, ⟩)
1915, 18mpbir 223 . . . 4 𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)𝑓 𝑓
2019rspec 3150 . . 3 (𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) → 𝑓 𝑓)
21 opabssxp 5489 . . . . . 6 {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧𝑤𝑣𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))} ⊆ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) × (𝑆 × 𝑆))
221, 21eqsstri 3884 . . . . 5 ⊆ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) × (𝑆 × 𝑆))
2322ssbri 4970 . . . 4 (𝑓 𝑓𝑓((𝑆 × 𝑆) × (𝑆 × 𝑆))𝑓)
24 brxp 5449 . . . . 5 (𝑓((𝑆 × 𝑆) × (𝑆 × 𝑆))𝑓 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)))
2524simplbi 490 . . . 4 (𝑓((𝑆 × 𝑆) × (𝑆 × 𝑆))𝑓𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆))
2623, 25syl 17 . . 3 (𝑓 𝑓𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆))
2720, 26impbii 201 . 2 (𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ↔ 𝑓 𝑓)
282, 4, 8, 27iseri 8114 1 Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 198   ∧ wa 387   = wceq 1508  ∃wex 1743   ∈ wcel 2051  ∀wral 3081  ⟨cop 4441   class class class wbr 4925  {copab 4987   × cxp 5401  (class class class)co 6974   Er wer 8084 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1759  ax-4 1773  ax-5 1870  ax-6 1929  ax-7 1966  ax-8 2053  ax-9 2060  ax-10 2080  ax-11 2094  ax-12 2107  ax-13 2302  ax-ext 2743  ax-sep 5056  ax-nul 5063  ax-pr 5182 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 388  df-or 835  df-3an 1071  df-tru 1511  df-ex 1744  df-nf 1748  df-sb 2017  df-mo 2548  df-eu 2585  df-clab 2752  df-cleq 2764  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2911  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3090  df-v 3410  df-sbc 3675  df-csb 3780  df-dif 3825  df-un 3827  df-in 3829  df-ss 3836  df-nul 4173  df-if 4345  df-sn 4436  df-pr 4438  df-op 4442  df-uni 4709  df-iun 4790  df-br 4926  df-opab 4988  df-xp 5409  df-rel 5410  df-cnv 5411  df-co 5412  df-dm 5413  df-iota 6149  df-fv 6193  df-ov 6977  df-er 8087 This theorem is referenced by:  enqer  10139  enrer  10281
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator