Theorem eldisjim3 39095

Description: ElDisj elimination (two chosen elements). Standard specialization lemma: from ElDisj 𝐴 infer the disjointness condition for two specific elements. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Feb-2026.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eldisjim3	⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅ → 𝐵 = 𝐶)))

Proof of Theorem eldisjim3

Dummy variables 𝑢 𝑣 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simp1 1137	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ElDisj 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
2		simp2 1138	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ElDisj 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)
3		eleq1 2825	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝐵 → (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
4		eleq1 2825	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝐶 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴))
5	3, 4	bi2anan9 639	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑢 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝐶) → ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)))
6		ineq12 4169	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑢 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝐶) → (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))
7	6	neeq1d 2992	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝐶) → ((𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) ≠ ∅ ↔ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅))
8		eqeq12 2754	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝐶) → (𝑢 = 𝑣 ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
9	7, 8	imbi12d 344	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑢 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝐶) → (((𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅ → 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
10	5, 9	imbi12d 344	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑢 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝐶) → (((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣)) ↔ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅ → 𝐵 = 𝐶))))
11		dfeldisj5a 39094	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
12		rsp2 3255	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣)))
13	11, 12	sylbi 217	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 → ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣)))
14	13	3ad2ant3 1136	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ElDisj 𝐴) → ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣)))
15	1, 2, 10, 14	vtocl2d 3521	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ElDisj 𝐴) → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅ → 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
16	15	3expia 1122	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → ( ElDisj 𝐴 → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅ → 𝐵 = 𝐶))))
17	16	pm2.43b 55	1 ⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅ → 𝐵 = 𝐶)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114   ≠ wne 2933  ∀wral 3052   ∩ cin 3902  ∅c0 4287   ElDisj weldisj 38501

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5245  ax-pr 5381

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-rmo 3352  df-rab 3402  df-v 3444  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920  df-nul 4288  df-if 4482  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-id 5529  df-eprel 5534  df-xp 5640  df-rel 5641  df-cnv 5642  df-co 5643  df-dm 5644  df-rn 5645  df-res 5646  df-ima 5647  df-ec 8649  df-coss 38781  df-cnvrefrel 38887  df-disjALTV 39070  df-eldisj 39072

This theorem is referenced by:  eldisjdmqsim2  39096  eldisjdmqsim  39097  suceldisj  39098  rnqmapeleldisjsim  39142