Theorem rnqmapeleldisjsim 39597

Description: Element-disjointness of the quotient carrier forces coset disjointness. Supplies the "cosets don't overlap unless equal" direction, but expressed via ran QMap 𝑅 (the quotient carrier) and ElDisjs. This is the structural reason Disjs needs a "carrier disjointness" level distinct from the "unique representatives" level. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rnqmapeleldisjsim	⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs ∧ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅)) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))

Proof of Theorem rnqmapeleldisjsim

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rnqmap 39189	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran QMap 𝑅 = (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)
2	1	eleq1i 2853	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs ↔ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∈ ElDisjs )
3		dmqsex 39097	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∈ V)
4		eleldisjseldisj 39564	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∈ V → ((dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∈ ElDisjs ↔ ElDisj (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)))
5	3, 4	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ((dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∈ ElDisjs ↔ ElDisj (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)))
6	2, 5	bitrid 286	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs ↔ ElDisj (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)))
7		eldisjim3 39550	. . . 4 ⊢ ( ElDisj (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∧ [𝐵]𝑅 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅)))
8		eceldmqs 8790	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴]𝑅 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅))
9		eceldmqs 8790	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐵]𝑅 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ↔ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅))
10	8, 9	anbi12d 644	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∧ [𝐵]𝑅 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅)))
11	10	imbi1d 344	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ((([𝐴]𝑅 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∧ [𝐵]𝑅 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅)) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))))
12	7, 11	imbitrid 247	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ( ElDisj (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) → ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))))
13	6, 12	sylbid 243	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs → ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))))
14	13	3imp 1128	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs ∧ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅)) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2957  Vcvv 3453   ∩ cin 3901  ∅c0 4282  dom cdm 5659  ran crn 5660  [cec 8697   / cqs 8698   QMap cqmap 38910   ElDisjs celdisjs 38955   ElDisj weldisj 38956

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5255  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7739

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rmo 3367  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5554  df-eprel 5559  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-ec 8701  df-qs 8705  df-rels 39175  df-qmap 39181  df-coss 39236  df-ssr 39313  df-cnvrefs 39340  df-cnvrefrels 39341  df-cnvrefrel 39342  df-disjss 39523  df-disjs 39524  df-disjALTV 39525  df-eldisjs 39526  df-eldisj 39527

This theorem is used by:  eldisjs6  39675