Theorem rnqmapeleldisjsim 39795

Description: Element-disjointness of the quotient carrier forces coset disjointness. Supplies the "cosets don't overlap unless equal" direction, but expressed via ran QMap 𝑅 (the quotient carrier) and ElDisjs. This is the structural reason Disjs needs a "carrier disjointness" level distinct from the "unique representatives" level. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rnqmapeleldisjsim	⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs ∧ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅)) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))

Proof of Theorem rnqmapeleldisjsim

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rnqmap 39387	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran QMap 𝑅 = (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)
2	1	eleq1i 2851	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs ↔ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∈ ElDisjs )
3		dmqsex 39295	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∈ V)
4		eleldisjseldisj 39762	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∈ V → ((dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∈ ElDisjs ↔ ElDisj (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)))
5	3, 4	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ((dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∈ ElDisjs ↔ ElDisj (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)))
6	2, 5	bitrid 286	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs ↔ ElDisj (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)))
7		eldisjim3 39748	. . . 4 ⊢ ( ElDisj (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∧ [𝐵]𝑅 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅)))
8		eceldmqs 8808	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴]𝑅 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅))
9		eceldmqs 8808	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐵]𝑅 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ↔ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅))
10	8, 9	anbi12d 644	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∧ [𝐵]𝑅 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅)))
11	10	imbi1d 344	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ((([𝐴]𝑅 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∧ [𝐵]𝑅 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅)) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))))
12	7, 11	imbitrid 247	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ( ElDisj (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) → ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))))
13	6, 12	sylbid 243	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs → ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))))
14	13	3imp 1128	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs ∧ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅)) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144   ≠ wne 2955  Vcvv 3450   ∩ cin 4089  ∅c0 4278  dom cdm 5650  ran crn 5651  [cec 8715   / cqs 8716   QMap cqmap 39108   ElDisjs celdisjs 39153   ElDisj weldisj 39154

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5231  ax-sep 5248  ax-pow 5326  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7751

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rmo 3365  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-uni 4867  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-id 5545  df-eprel 5550  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-rn 5661  df-res 5662  df-ima 5663  df-ec 8719  df-qs 8723  df-rels 39373  df-qmap 39379  df-coss 39434  df-ssr 39511  df-cnvrefs 39538  df-cnvrefrels 39539  df-cnvrefrel 39540  df-disjss 39721  df-disjs 39722  df-disjALTV 39723  df-eldisjs 39724  df-eldisj 39725

This theorem is used by:  eldisjs6  39873