Theorem eloprabi 8046

Description: A consequence of membership in an operation class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2006.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
eloprabi.1	⊢ (𝑥 = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
eloprabi.2	⊢ (𝑦 = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
eloprabi.3	⊢ (𝑧 = (2nd ‘𝐴) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eloprabi	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜃)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝜃,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem eloprabi

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq1 2768	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐴 → (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ↔ 𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩))
2	1	anbi1d 640	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐴 → ((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
3	2	3exbidv 1947	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
4		df-oprab 7402	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
5	3, 4	elab2g 3641	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
6	5	ibi 269	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
7		opex 5433	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ V
8		vex 3460	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
9	7, 8	op1std 7982	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (1st ‘𝐴) = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
10	9	fveq2d 6873	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) = (1st ‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
11		vex 3460	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
12		vex 3460	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
13	11, 12	op1st 7980	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (1st ‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑥
14	10, 13	eqtr2di 2816	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → 𝑥 = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)))
15		eloprabi.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
16	14, 15	syl 17	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
17	9	fveq2d 6873	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) = (2nd ‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
18	11, 12	op2nd 7981	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (2nd ‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑦
19	17, 18	eqtr2di 2816	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → 𝑦 = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)))
20		eloprabi.2	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
21	19, 20	syl 17	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
22	7, 8	op2ndd 7983	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝑧)
23	22	eqcomd 2770	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → 𝑧 = (2nd ‘𝐴))
24		eloprabi.3	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = (2nd ‘𝐴) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
25	23, 24	syl 17	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
26	16, 21, 25	3bitrd 307	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
27	26	biimpa 480	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)
28	27	exlimiv 1952	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)
29	28	exlimiv 1952	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)
30	29	exlimiv 1952	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)
31	6, 30	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜃)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1562  ∃wex 1801   ∈ wcel 2144  ⟨cop 4590  ‘cfv 6523  {coprab 7399  1^st c1st 7970  2^nd c2nd 7971

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1817  ax-4 1831  ax-5 1932  ax-6 1989  ax-7 2030  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2214  ax-ext 2736  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5258  ax-pr 5392  ax-un 7720

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1101  df-tru 1565  df-fal 1575  df-ex 1802  df-nf 1806  df-sb 2093  df-mo 2568  df-eu 2598  df-clab 2743  df-cleq 2756  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3417  df-v 3458  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5103  df-opab 5165  df-mpt 5184  df-id 5544  df-xp 5655  df-rel 5656  df-cnv 5657  df-co 5658  df-dm 5659  df-rn 5660  df-iota 6479  df-fun 6525  df-fv 6531  df-oprab 7402  df-1st 7972  df-2nd 7973

This theorem is referenced by:  sectpropdlem  49662  invpropdlem  49664  isopropdlem  49666