Theorem eloprabi 8029

Description: A consequence of membership in an operation class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2006.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
eloprabi.1	⊢ (𝑥 = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
eloprabi.2	⊢ (𝑦 = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
eloprabi.3	⊢ (𝑧 = (2nd ‘𝐴) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eloprabi	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜃)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝜃,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem eloprabi

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq1 2756	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐴 → (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ↔ 𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩))
2	1	anbi1d 639	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐴 → ((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
3	2	3exbidv 1935	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
4		df-oprab 7385	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
5	3, 4	elab2g 3630	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
6	5	ibi 269	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
7		opex 5421	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ V
8		vex 3448	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
9	7, 8	op1std 7965	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (1st ‘𝐴) = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
10	9	fveq2d 6856	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) = (1st ‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
11		vex 3448	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
12		vex 3448	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
13	11, 12	op1st 7963	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (1st ‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑥
14	10, 13	eqtr2di 2804	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → 𝑥 = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)))
15		eloprabi.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
16	14, 15	syl 17	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
17	9	fveq2d 6856	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) = (2nd ‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
18	11, 12	op2nd 7964	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (2nd ‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑦
19	17, 18	eqtr2di 2804	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → 𝑦 = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)))
20		eloprabi.2	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
21	19, 20	syl 17	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
22	7, 8	op2ndd 7966	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝑧)
23	22	eqcomd 2758	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → 𝑧 = (2nd ‘𝐴))
24		eloprabi.3	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = (2nd ‘𝐴) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
25	23, 24	syl 17	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
26	16, 21, 25	3bitrd 307	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
27	26	biimpa 479	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)
28	27	exlimiv 1940	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)
29	28	exlimiv 1940	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)
30	29	exlimiv 1940	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)
31	6, 30	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜃)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1550  ∃wex 1789   ∈ wcel 2132  ⟨cop 4578  ‘cfv 6506  {coprab 7382  1^st c1st 7953  2^nd c2nd 7954

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1805  ax-4 1819  ax-5 1920  ax-6 1977  ax-7 2018  ax-8 2134  ax-9 2142  ax-10 2165  ax-11 2181  ax-12 2202  ax-ext 2724  ax-sep 5236  ax-nul 5246  ax-pr 5380  ax-un 7703

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 857  df-3an 1097  df-tru 1553  df-fal 1563  df-ex 1790  df-nf 1794  df-sb 2081  df-mo 2556  df-eu 2586  df-clab 2731  df-cleq 2744  df-clel 2827  df-nfc 2901  df-ne 2948  df-ral 3067  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3405  df-v 3446  df-dif 3898  df-un 3900  df-in 3902  df-ss 3912  df-nul 4277  df-if 4471  df-sn 4573  df-pr 4575  df-op 4579  df-uni 4856  df-br 5091  df-opab 5153  df-mpt 5172  df-id 5531  df-xp 5642  df-rel 5643  df-cnv 5644  df-co 5645  df-dm 5646  df-rn 5647  df-iota 6462  df-fun 6508  df-fv 6514  df-oprab 7385  df-1st 7955  df-2nd 7956

This theorem is referenced by:  sectpropdlem  49595  invpropdlem  49597  isopropdlem  49599