Theorem eloprabi 8075

Description: A consequence of membership in an operation class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2006.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
eloprabi.1	⊢ (𝑥 = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
eloprabi.2	⊢ (𝑦 = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
eloprabi.3	⊢ (𝑧 = (2nd ‘𝐴) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eloprabi	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜃)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝜃,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem eloprabi

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq1 2732	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐴 → (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ↔ 𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩))
2	1	anbi1d 629	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐴 → ((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
3	2	3exbidv 1920	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
4		df-oprab 7430	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
5	3, 4	elab2g 3671	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
6	5	ibi 266	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
7		opex 5470	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ V
8		vex 3477	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
9	7, 8	op1std 8011	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (1st ‘𝐴) = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
10	9	fveq2d 6906	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) = (1st ‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
11		vex 3477	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
12		vex 3477	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
13	11, 12	op1st 8009	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (1st ‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑥
14	10, 13	eqtr2di 2785	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → 𝑥 = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)))
15		eloprabi.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
16	14, 15	syl 17	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
17	9	fveq2d 6906	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) = (2nd ‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
18	11, 12	op2nd 8010	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (2nd ‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑦
19	17, 18	eqtr2di 2785	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → 𝑦 = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)))
20		eloprabi.2	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
21	19, 20	syl 17	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
22	7, 8	op2ndd 8012	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝑧)
23	22	eqcomd 2734	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → 𝑧 = (2nd ‘𝐴))
24		eloprabi.3	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = (2nd ‘𝐴) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
25	23, 24	syl 17	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
26	16, 21, 25	3bitrd 304	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
27	26	biimpa 475	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)
28	27	exlimiv 1925	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)
29	28	exlimiv 1925	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)
30	29	exlimiv 1925	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)
31	6, 30	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜃)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 394   = wceq 1533  ∃wex 1773   ∈ wcel 2098  ⟨cop 4638  ‘cfv 6553  {coprab 7427  1^st c1st 7999  2^nd c2nd 8000

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2166  ax-ext 2699  ax-sep 5303  ax-nul 5310  ax-pr 5433  ax-un 7748

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 846  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2529  df-eu 2558  df-clab 2706  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3068  df-rab 3431  df-v 3475  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-nul 4327  df-if 4533  df-sn 4633  df-pr 4635  df-op 4639  df-uni 4913  df-br 5153  df-opab 5215  df-mpt 5236  df-id 5580  df-xp 5688  df-rel 5689  df-cnv 5690  df-co 5691  df-dm 5692  df-rn 5693  df-iota 6505  df-fun 6555  df-fv 6561  df-oprab 7430  df-1st 8001  df-2nd 8002

This theorem is referenced by: (None)