Theorem f1omvdco3 19514

Description: If a point is moved by exactly one of two permutations, then it will be moved by their composite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
f1omvdco3	⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊻ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ))) → 𝑋 ∈ dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ))

Proof of Theorem f1omvdco3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		notbi 322	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I )) ↔ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I )))
2		disjsn 4677	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ∩ {𝑋}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ))
3		disj2 4418	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ∩ {𝑋}) = ∅ ↔ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}))
4	2, 3	bitr3i 280	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}))
5		disjsn 4677	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ∩ {𝑋}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ))
6		disj2 4418	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ∩ {𝑋}) = ∅ ↔ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}))
7	5, 6	bitr3i 280	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ↔ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}))
8	4, 7	bibi12i 342	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I )) ↔ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}) ↔ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋})))
9	1, 8	bitri 278	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I )) ↔ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}) ↔ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋})))
10	9	notbii 323	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ (𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I )) ↔ ¬ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}) ↔ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋})))
11		df-xor 1542	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊻ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I )) ↔ ¬ (𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I )))
12		df-xor 1542	. . 3 ⊢ ((dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}) ⊻ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋})) ↔ ¬ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}) ↔ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋})))
13	10, 11, 12	3bitr4i 306	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊻ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I )) ↔ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}) ⊻ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋})))
14		f1omvdco2 19513	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}) ⊻ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}))) → ¬ dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}))
15		disj2 4418	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ) ∩ {𝑋}) = ∅ ↔ dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}))
16		disjsn 4677	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ) ∩ {𝑋}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ))
17	15, 16	bitr3i 280	. . . 4 ⊢ (dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}) ↔ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ))
18	17	con2bii 360	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ) ↔ ¬ dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}))
19	14, 18	sylibr 237	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}) ⊻ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}))) → 𝑋 ∈ dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ))
20	13, 19	syl3an3b 1432	1 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊻ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ))) → 𝑋 ∈ dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ w3a 1103   ⊻ wxo 1541   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  Vcvv 3455   ∖ cdif 3902   ∩ cin 3904   ⊆ wss 3905  ∅c0 4286  {csn 4589   I cid 5555  dom cdm 5661   ∘ ccom 5665  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6535

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pr 5404

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-xor 1542  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544

This theorem is referenced by:  psgnunilem5  19559