Theorem f1omvdco3 19390

Description: If a point is moved by exactly one of two permutations, then it will be moved by their composite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
f1omvdco3	⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊻ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ))) → 𝑋 ∈ dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ))

Proof of Theorem f1omvdco3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		notbi 319	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I )) ↔ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I )))
2		disjsn 4670	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ∩ {𝑋}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ))
3		disj2 4412	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ∩ {𝑋}) = ∅ ↔ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}))
4	2, 3	bitr3i 277	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}))
5		disjsn 4670	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ∩ {𝑋}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ))
6		disj2 4412	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ∩ {𝑋}) = ∅ ↔ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}))
7	5, 6	bitr3i 277	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ↔ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}))
8	4, 7	bibi12i 339	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I )) ↔ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}) ↔ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋})))
9	1, 8	bitri 275	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I )) ↔ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}) ↔ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋})))
10	9	notbii 320	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ (𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I )) ↔ ¬ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}) ↔ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋})))
11		df-xor 1514	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊻ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I )) ↔ ¬ (𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I )))
12		df-xor 1514	. . 3 ⊢ ((dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}) ⊻ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋})) ↔ ¬ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}) ↔ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋})))
13	10, 11, 12	3bitr4i 303	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊻ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I )) ↔ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}) ⊻ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋})))
14		f1omvdco2 19389	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}) ⊻ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}))) → ¬ dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}))
15		disj2 4412	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ) ∩ {𝑋}) = ∅ ↔ dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}))
16		disjsn 4670	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ) ∩ {𝑋}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ))
17	15, 16	bitr3i 277	. . . 4 ⊢ (dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}) ↔ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ))
18	17	con2bii 357	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ) ↔ ¬ dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}))
19	14, 18	sylibr 234	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}) ⊻ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ) ⊆ (V ∖ {𝑋}))) → 𝑋 ∈ dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ))
20	13, 19	syl3an3b 1408	1 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊻ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐺 ∖ I ))) → 𝑋 ∈ dom ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∖ I ))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ w3a 1087   ⊻ wxo 1513   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  Vcvv 3442   ∖ cdif 3900   ∩ cin 3902   ⊆ wss 3903  ∅c0 4287  {csn 4582   I cid 5526  dom cdm 5632   ∘ ccom 5636  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6499

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5243  ax-nul 5253  ax-pr 5379

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-xor 1514  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-rab 3402  df-v 3444  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920  df-nul 4288  df-if 4482  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-id 5527  df-xp 5638  df-rel 5639  df-cnv 5640  df-co 5641  df-dm 5642  df-rn 5643  df-res 5644  df-ima 5645  df-iota 6456  df-fun 6502  df-fn 6503  df-f 6504  df-f1 6505  df-fo 6506  df-f1o 6507  df-fv 6508

This theorem is referenced by:  psgnunilem5  19435