Theorem mpoxopovel 8214

Description: Element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens and Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
mpoxopoveq.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑})

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mpoxopovel	⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑛,𝐾,𝑥,𝑦   𝑛,𝑉,𝑥,𝑦   𝑛,𝑊,𝑥,𝑦   𝑛,𝑋,𝑥,𝑦   𝑛,𝑌,𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝑁,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑛)   𝐹(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑛)   𝑁(𝑛)

Proof of Theorem mpoxopovel

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mpoxopoveq.f	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑})
2	1	mpoxopn0yelv 8207	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉))
3	2	pm4.71rd 571	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾))))
4	1	mpoxopoveq 8213	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) → (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑})
5	4	eleq2d 2848	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑁 ∈ (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) ↔ 𝑁 ∈ {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑}))
6		nfcv 2924	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑛𝑉
7	6	elrabsf 3788	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑} ↔ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [𝑁 / 𝑛][⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑))
8		sbccom 3823	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ([𝑁 / 𝑛][⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝑁 / 𝑛][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑)
9		sbccom 3823	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ([𝑁 / 𝑛][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑)
10	9	sbcbii 3799	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ([⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝑁 / 𝑛][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑)
11	8, 10	bitri 278	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑁 / 𝑛][⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑)
12	11	anbi2i 634	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [𝑁 / 𝑛][⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑))
13	7, 12	bitri 278	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑} ↔ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑))
14	5, 13	bitrdi 290	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑁 ∈ (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑)))
15	14	pm5.32da 589	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾)) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑))))
16		3anass 1110	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑)))
17	15, 16	bitr4di 292	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾)) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑)))
18	3, 17	bitrd 282	1 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1102   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2142  {crab 3415  Vcvv 3454  [wsbc 3743  ⟨cop 4594  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7412   ∈ cmpo 7414  1^st c1st 7982

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5268  ax-pr 5403  ax-un 7734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3744  df-csb 3853  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-pw 4563  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-iun 4957  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-id 5555  df-xp 5666  df-rel 5667  df-cnv 5668  df-co 5669  df-dm 5670  df-rn 5671  df-res 5672  df-ima 5673  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-1st 7984  df-2nd 7985

This theorem is used by: (None)