P. 83 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 8201-8300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	fnsuppres 8201	Two ways to express restriction of a support set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐵 × {𝑍})))
Theorem	fnsuppeq0 8202	The support of a function is empty iff it is identically zero. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) = ∅ ↔ 𝐹 = (𝐴 × {𝑍})))
Theorem	fczsupp0 8203	The support of a constant function with value zero is empty. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐵 × {𝑍}) supp 𝑍) = ∅
Theorem	suppss 8204*	Show that the support of a function is contained in a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.) (Proof shortened by SN, 5-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝑊)
Theorem	suppssr 8205	A function is zero outside its support. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑍)
Theorem	suppssrg 8206	A function is zero outside its support. Version of suppssr 8205 avoiding ax-rep 5232 by assuming 𝐹 is a set rather than its domain 𝐴. (Contributed by SN, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑍)
Theorem	suppssov1 8207*	Formula building theorem for support restrictions: operator with left annihilator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.) (Proof shortened by SN, 11-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐴) supp 𝑌) ⊆ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝑌𝑂𝑣) = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝐴𝑂𝐵)) supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝐿)
Theorem	suppssov2 8208*	Formula building theorem for support restrictions: operator with right annihilator. (Contributed by SN, 11-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵) supp 𝑌) ⊆ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝑣𝑂𝑌) = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝐴𝑂𝐵)) supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝐿)
Theorem	suppssof1 8209*	Formula building theorem for support restrictions: vector operation with left annihilator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 supp 𝑌) ⊆ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝑌𝑂𝑣) = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝐷⟶𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐷⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∘f 𝑂𝐵) supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝐿)
Theorem	suppss2 8210*	Show that the support of a function is contained in a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑊)) → 𝐵 = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝑊)
Theorem	suppsssn 8211*	Show that the support of a function is a subset of a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ≠ 𝑊) → 𝐵 = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) supp 𝑍) ⊆ {𝑊})
Theorem	suppssfv 8212*	Formula building theorem for support restriction, on a function which preserves zero. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐴) supp 𝑌) ⊆ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑌) = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝐹‘𝐴)) supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝐿)
Theorem	suppofssd 8213	Condition for the support of a function operation to be a subset of the union of the supports of the left and right function terms. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 28-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍𝑋𝑍) = 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑋𝐺) supp 𝑍) ⊆ ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) ∪ (𝐺 supp 𝑍)))
Theorem	suppofss1d 8214*	Condition for the support of a function operation to be a subset of the support of the left function term. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑍𝑋𝑥) = 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑋𝐺) supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐹 supp 𝑍))
Theorem	suppofss2d 8215*	Condition for the support of a function operation to be a subset of the support of the right function term. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥𝑋𝑍) = 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑋𝐺) supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐺 supp 𝑍))
Theorem	suppco 8216	The support of the composition of two functions is the inverse image by the inner function of the support of the outer function. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2019.) Extract this statement from the proof of supp0cosupp0 8218. (Revised by SN, 15-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) supp 𝑍) = (◡𝐺 “ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)))
Theorem	suppcoss 8217	The support of the composition of two functions is a subset of the support of the inner function if the outer function preserves zero. Compare suppssfv 8212, which has a sethood condition on 𝐴 instead of 𝐵. (Contributed by SN, 25-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑌) = 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐺 supp 𝑌))
Theorem	supp0cosupp0 8218	The support of the composition of two functions is empty if the support of the outer function is empty. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) = ∅ → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) supp 𝑍) = ∅))
Theorem	imacosupp 8219	The image of the support of the composition of two functions is the support of the outer function. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ ran 𝐺) → (𝐺 “ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) supp 𝑍)) = (𝐹 supp 𝑍)))
2.4.13  Special maps-to operations The following theorems are about maps-to operations (see df-mpo 7423) where the domain of the second argument depends on the domain of the first argument, especially when the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, in short "x-maps-to operations". For labels, the abbreviations "mpox" are used (since "x" usually denotes the first argument). This is in line with the currently used conventions for such cases (see cbvmpox 7511, ovmpox 7571 and fmpox 8076). If the first argument is an ordered pair, as in the following, the abbreviation is extended to "mpoxop", and the maps-to operations are called "x-op maps-to operations" for short.
Theorem	opeliunxp2f 8220*	Membership in a union of Cartesian products, using bound-variable hypothesis for 𝐸 instead of distinct variable conditions as in opeliunxp2 5815. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐸    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	mpoxeldm 8221*	If there is an element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, then the first argument is an element of the first component of the domain and the second argument is an element of the second component of the domain depending on the first argument. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (𝑋𝐹𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
Theorem	mpoxneldm 8222*	If the first argument of an operation given by a maps-to rule is not an element of the first component of the domain or the second argument is not an element of the second component of the domain depending on the first argument, then the value of the operation is the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∉ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑌 ∉ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) → (𝑋𝐹𝑌) = ∅)
Theorem	mpoxopn0yelv 8223*	If there is an element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, then the second argument is an element of the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉))
Theorem	mpoxopynvov0g 8224*	If the second argument of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument is not element of the first component of the first argument, then the value of the operation is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∉ 𝑉) → (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) = ∅)
Theorem	mpoxopxnop0 8225*	If the first argument of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, is not an ordered pair, then the value of the operation is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝑉 ∈ (V × V) → (𝑉𝐹𝐾) = ∅)
Theorem	mpoxopx0ov0 8226*	If the first argument of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, is the empty set, then the value of the operation is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (∅𝐹𝐾) = ∅
Theorem	mpoxopxprcov0 8227*	If the components of the first argument of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, are not sets, then the value of the operation is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ (𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝑊 ∈ V) → (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) = ∅)
Theorem	mpoxopynvov0 8228*	If the second argument of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument is not element of the first component of the first argument, then the value of the operation is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∉ 𝑉 → (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) = ∅)
Theorem	mpoxopoveq 8229*	Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑})    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) → (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑})
Theorem	mpoxopovel 8230*	Element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens and Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑)))
Theorem	mpoxopoveqd 8231*	Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑})    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌))    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) → {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑} = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑})
Theorem	brovex 8232*	A binary relation of the value of an operation given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) → Rel (𝑉𝑂𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(𝑉𝑂𝐸)𝑃 → ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V)))
Theorem	brovmpoex 8233*	A binary relation of the value of an operation given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ 𝜑})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(𝑉𝑂𝐸)𝑃 → ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V)))
Theorem	sprmpod 8234*	The extension of a binary relation which is the value of an operation given in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 20-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑣 ∈ V, 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥(𝑣𝑅𝑒)𝑦 ∧ 𝜒)})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ 𝑒 = 𝐸) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥(𝑉𝑅𝐸)𝑦 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜃} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉𝑀𝐸) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥(𝑉𝑅𝐸)𝑦 ∧ 𝜓)})
2.4.14  Function transposition
Syntax	ctpos 8235	The transposition of a function.
class tpos 𝐹
Definition	df-tpos 8236*	Define the transposition of a function, which is a function 𝐺 = tpos 𝐹 satisfying 𝐺(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝐹(𝑦, 𝑥). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ (◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}))
Theorem	tposss 8237	Subset theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺 → tpos 𝐹 ⊆ tpos 𝐺)
Theorem	tposeq 8238	Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺)
Theorem	tposeqd 8239	Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺)
Theorem	tposssxp 8240	The transposition is a subset of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) × ran 𝐹)
Theorem	reltpos 8241	The transposition is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ Rel tpos 𝐹
Theorem	brtpos2 8242	Value of the transposition at an ordered pair ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴tpos 𝐹𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) ∧ ∪ ◡{𝐴}𝐹𝐵)))
Theorem	brtpos0 8243	The behavior of tpos when the left argument is the empty set (which is not an ordered pair but is the "default" value of an ordered pair when the arguments are proper classes). This allows to eliminate sethood hypotheses on 𝐴, 𝐵 in brtpos 8245. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅tpos 𝐹𝐴 ↔ ∅𝐹𝐴))
Theorem	reldmtpos 8244	Necessary and sufficient condition for dom tpos 𝐹 to be a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom tpos 𝐹 ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ dom 𝐹)
Theorem	brtpos 8245	The transposition swaps arguments of a three-parameter relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩tpos 𝐹𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	ottpos 8246	The transposition swaps the first two elements in a collection of ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	relbrtpos 8247	The transposition swaps arguments of a three-parameter relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐹 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩tpos 𝐹𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	dmtpos 8248	The domain of tpos 𝐹 when dom 𝐹 is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → dom tpos 𝐹 = ◡dom 𝐹)
Theorem	rntpos 8249	The range of tpos 𝐹 when dom 𝐹 is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → ran tpos 𝐹 = ran 𝐹)
Theorem	tposexg 8250	The transposition of a set is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → tpos 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	ovtpos 8251	The transposition swaps the arguments in a two-argument function. When 𝐹 is a matrix, which is to say a function from (1...𝑚) × (1...𝑛) to ℝ or some ring, tpos 𝐹 is the transposition of 𝐹, which is where the name comes from. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴tpos 𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴)
Theorem	tposfun 8252	The transposition of a function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → Fun tpos 𝐹)
Theorem	dftpos2 8253*	Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ ◡dom 𝐹 ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})))
Theorem	dftpos3 8254*	Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. Compare df-cnv 5659. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧})
Theorem	dftpos4 8255*	Alternate definition of tpos. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ ((V × V) ∪ {∅}) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}))
Theorem	tpostpos 8256	Value of the double transposition for a general class 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
⊢ tpos tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∩ (((V × V) ∪ {∅}) × V))
Theorem	tpostpos2 8257	Value of the double transposition for a relation on triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom 𝐹) → tpos tpos 𝐹 = 𝐹)
Theorem	tposfn2 8258	The domain of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → tpos 𝐹 Fn ◡𝐴))
Theorem	tposfo2 8259	Condition for a surjective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–onto→𝐵))
Theorem	tposf2 8260	The domain and codomain of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴⟶𝐵))
Theorem	tposf12 8261	Condition for an injective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
Theorem	tposf1o2 8262	Condition of a bijective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵))
Theorem	tposfo 8263	The domain and codomain/range of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐶 → tpos 𝐹:(𝐵 × 𝐴)–onto→𝐶)
Theorem	tposf 8264	The domain and codomain of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶 → tpos 𝐹:(𝐵 × 𝐴)⟶𝐶)
Theorem	tposfn 8265	Functionality of a transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) → tpos 𝐹 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐴))
Theorem	tpos0 8266	Transposition of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ tpos ∅ = ∅
Theorem	tposco 8267	Transposition of a composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ tpos (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘ tpos 𝐺)
Theorem	tpossym 8268*	Two ways to say a function is symmetric. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐴) → (tpos 𝐹 = 𝐹 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)))
Theorem	tposeqi 8269	Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺
Theorem	tposex 8270	A transposition is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ tpos 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	nftpos 8271	Hypothesis builder for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥tpos 𝐹
Theorem	tposoprab 8272*	Transposition of a class of ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	tposmpo 8273*	Transposition of a two-argument mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)
Theorem	tposconst 8274	The transposition of a constant operation using the relation representation. (Contributed by SO, 11-Jul-2018.)
⊢ tpos ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × {𝐶}) = ((𝐵 × 𝐴) × {𝐶})
2.4.15  Curry and uncurry
Syntax	ccur 8275	Extend class notation to include the currying function.
class curry 𝐴
Syntax	cunc 8276	Extend class notation to include the uncurrying function.
class uncurry 𝐴
Definition	df-cur 8277*	Define the currying of 𝐹, which splits a function of two arguments into a function of the first argument, producing a function over the second argument. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.)
⊢ curry 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ dom dom 𝐹 ↦ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩𝐹𝑧})
Definition	df-unc 8278*	Define the uncurrying of 𝐹, which takes a function producing functions, and transforms it into a two-argument function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.)
⊢ uncurry 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑦(𝐹‘𝑥)𝑧}
Theorem	mpocurryd 8279*	The currying of an operation given in maps-to notation, splitting the operation (function of two arguments) into a function of the first argument, producing a function over the second argument. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → curry 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ 𝐶)))
Theorem	mpocurryvald 8280*	The value of a curried operation given in maps-to notation is a function over the second argument of the original operation. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (curry 𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
Theorem	fvmpocurryd 8281*	The value of the value of a curried operation given in maps-to notation is the operation value of the original operation. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((curry 𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐵))
2.4.16  Undefined values
Syntax	cund 8282	Extend class notation with undefined value function.
class Undef
Definition	df-undef 8283	Define the undefined value function, whose value at set 𝑠 is guaranteed not to be a member of 𝑠 (see pwuninel 8285). (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.)
⊢ Undef = (𝑠 ∈ V ↦ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑠)
Theorem	pwuninel2 8284	Proof of pwuninel 8285 under the assumption that the union of the given class is a set, avoiding ax-pr 5391 and ax-un 7749. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ¬ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	pwuninel 8285	The powerclass of the union of a class does not belong to that class. This theorem provides a way of constructing a new set that does not belong to a given set. See also pwuninel2 8284. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) Avoid ax-pr 5391 and ax-un 7749. (Revised by Umit Teoman Dogan, 10-Jun-2026.)
⊢ ¬ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	pwuninelOLD 8286	Obsolete version of pwuninel 8285 as of 10-Jun-2026. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	undefval 8287	Value of the undefined value function. Normally we will not reference the explicit value but will use undefnel 8289 instead. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → (Undef‘𝑆) = 𝒫 ∪ 𝑆)
Theorem	undefnel2 8288	The undefined value generated from a set is not a member of the set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → ¬ (Undef‘𝑆) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	undefnel 8289	The undefined value generated from a set is not a member of the set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → (Undef‘𝑆) ∉ 𝑆)
Theorem	undefne0 8290	The undefined value generated from a set is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → (Undef‘𝑆) ≠ ∅)
2.4.17  Well-founded recursion
Syntax	cfrecs 8291	Declare the syntax for the well-founded recursion generator. See df-frecs 8292.
class frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹)
Definition	df-frecs 8292*	This is the definition for the well-founded recursion generator. Similar to df-wrecs 8323 and df-recs 8372, it is a direct definition form of normally recursive relationships. Unlike the former two definitions, it only requires a well-founded set-like relationship for its properties, not a well-ordered relationship. This proof requires either a partial order or the axiom of infinity. We develop the theorems twice, once with a partial order and once without. The second development occurs later in the database, after ax-inf 9632 has been introduced. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Dec-2021.)
⊢ frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹) = ∪ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}
Theorem	frecseq123 8293	Equality theorem for the well-founded recursion generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺) → frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹) = frecs(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝐺))
Theorem	nffrecs 8294	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the well-founded recursion generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Dec-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹)
Theorem	csbfrecsg 8295	Move class substitution in and out of the well-founded recursive function generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌frecs(𝑅, 𝐷, 𝐹) = frecs(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑅, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹))
Theorem	fpr3g 8296*	Functions defined by well-founded recursion over a partial order are identical up to relation, domain, and characteristic function. This version of frr3g 9753 does not require infinity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐻(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)))) ∧ (𝐺 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐻(𝐺 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))) → 𝐹 = 𝐺)
Theorem	frrlem1 8297*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. The final item we are interested in is the union of acceptable functions 𝐵. This lemma just changes bound variables for later use. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝑤𝐺(𝑔 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤))))}
Theorem	frrlem2 8298*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. An acceptable function is a function. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 → Fun 𝑔)
Theorem	frrlem3 8299*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. An acceptable function's domain is a subset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 → dom 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	frrlem4 8300*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. Properties of the restriction of an acceptable function to the domain of another acceptable function. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) Fn (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)((𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))‘𝑎) = (𝑎𝐺((𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) ↾ Pred(𝑅, (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ), 𝑎)))))