P. 83 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 8201-8300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	mpoxopoveq 8201*	Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑})    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) → (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑})
Theorem	mpoxopovel 8202*	Element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens and Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑)))
Theorem	mpoxopoveqd 8203*	Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑})    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌))    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) → {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑} = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑})
Theorem	brovex 8204*	A binary relation of the value of an operation given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) → Rel (𝑉𝑂𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(𝑉𝑂𝐸)𝑃 → ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V)))
Theorem	brovmpoex 8205*	A binary relation of the value of an operation given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ 𝜑})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(𝑉𝑂𝐸)𝑃 → ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V)))
Theorem	sprmpod 8206*	The extension of a binary relation which is the value of an operation given in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 20-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑣 ∈ V, 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥(𝑣𝑅𝑒)𝑦 ∧ 𝜒)})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ 𝑒 = 𝐸) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥(𝑉𝑅𝐸)𝑦 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜃} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉𝑀𝐸) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥(𝑉𝑅𝐸)𝑦 ∧ 𝜓)})
2.4.14  Function transposition
Syntax	ctpos 8207	The transposition of a function.
class tpos 𝐹
Definition	df-tpos 8208*	Define the transposition of a function, which is a function 𝐺 = tpos 𝐹 satisfying 𝐺(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝐹(𝑦, 𝑥). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ (◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}))
Theorem	tposss 8209	Subset theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺 → tpos 𝐹 ⊆ tpos 𝐺)
Theorem	tposeq 8210	Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺)
Theorem	tposeqd 8211	Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺)
Theorem	tposssxp 8212	The transposition is a subset of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) × ran 𝐹)
Theorem	reltpos 8213	The transposition is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ Rel tpos 𝐹
Theorem	brtpos2 8214	Value of the transposition at an ordered pair ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴tpos 𝐹𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) ∧ ∪ ◡{𝐴}𝐹𝐵)))
Theorem	brtpos0 8215	The behavior of tpos when the left argument is the empty set (which is not an ordered pair but is the "default" value of an ordered pair when the arguments are proper classes). This allows to eliminate sethood hypotheses on 𝐴, 𝐵 in brtpos 8217. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅tpos 𝐹𝐴 ↔ ∅𝐹𝐴))
Theorem	reldmtpos 8216	Necessary and sufficient condition for dom tpos 𝐹 to be a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom tpos 𝐹 ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ dom 𝐹)
Theorem	brtpos 8217	The transposition swaps arguments of a three-parameter relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩tpos 𝐹𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	ottpos 8218	The transposition swaps the first two elements in a collection of ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	relbrtpos 8219	The transposition swaps arguments of a three-parameter relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐹 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩tpos 𝐹𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	dmtpos 8220	The domain of tpos 𝐹 when dom 𝐹 is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → dom tpos 𝐹 = ◡dom 𝐹)
Theorem	rntpos 8221	The range of tpos 𝐹 when dom 𝐹 is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → ran tpos 𝐹 = ran 𝐹)
Theorem	tposexg 8222	The transposition of a set is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → tpos 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	ovtpos 8223	The transposition swaps the arguments in a two-argument function. When 𝐹 is a matrix, which is to say a function from (1...𝑚) × (1...𝑛) to ℝ or some ring, tpos 𝐹 is the transposition of 𝐹, which is where the name comes from. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴tpos 𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴)
Theorem	tposfun 8224	The transposition of a function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → Fun tpos 𝐹)
Theorem	dftpos2 8225*	Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ ◡dom 𝐹 ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})))
Theorem	dftpos3 8226*	Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. Compare df-cnv 5649. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧})
Theorem	dftpos4 8227*	Alternate definition of tpos. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ ((V × V) ∪ {∅}) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}))
Theorem	tpostpos 8228	Value of the double transposition for a general class 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
⊢ tpos tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∩ (((V × V) ∪ {∅}) × V))
Theorem	tpostpos2 8229	Value of the double transposition for a relation on triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom 𝐹) → tpos tpos 𝐹 = 𝐹)
Theorem	tposfn2 8230	The domain of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → tpos 𝐹 Fn ◡𝐴))
Theorem	tposfo2 8231	Condition for a surjective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–onto→𝐵))
Theorem	tposf2 8232	The domain and codomain of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴⟶𝐵))
Theorem	tposf12 8233	Condition for an injective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
Theorem	tposf1o2 8234	Condition of a bijective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵))
Theorem	tposfo 8235	The domain and codomain/range of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐶 → tpos 𝐹:(𝐵 × 𝐴)–onto→𝐶)
Theorem	tposf 8236	The domain and codomain of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶 → tpos 𝐹:(𝐵 × 𝐴)⟶𝐶)
Theorem	tposfn 8237	Functionality of a transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) → tpos 𝐹 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐴))
Theorem	tpos0 8238	Transposition of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ tpos ∅ = ∅
Theorem	tposco 8239	Transposition of a composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ tpos (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘ tpos 𝐺)
Theorem	tpossym 8240*	Two ways to say a function is symmetric. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐴) → (tpos 𝐹 = 𝐹 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)))
Theorem	tposeqi 8241	Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺
Theorem	tposex 8242	A transposition is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ tpos 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	nftpos 8243	Hypothesis builder for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥tpos 𝐹
Theorem	tposoprab 8244*	Transposition of a class of ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	tposmpo 8245*	Transposition of a two-argument mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)
Theorem	tposconst 8246	The transposition of a constant operation using the relation representation. (Contributed by SO, 11-Jul-2018.)
⊢ tpos ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × {𝐶}) = ((𝐵 × 𝐴) × {𝐶})
2.4.15  Curry and uncurry
Syntax	ccur 8247	Extend class notation to include the currying function.
class curry 𝐴
Syntax	cunc 8248	Extend class notation to include the uncurrying function.
class uncurry 𝐴
Definition	df-cur 8249*	Define the currying of 𝐹, which splits a function of two arguments into a function of the first argument, producing a function over the second argument. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.)
⊢ curry 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ dom dom 𝐹 ↦ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩𝐹𝑧})
Definition	df-unc 8250*	Define the uncurrying of 𝐹, which takes a function producing functions, and transforms it into a two-argument function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.)
⊢ uncurry 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑦(𝐹‘𝑥)𝑧}
Theorem	mpocurryd 8251*	The currying of an operation given in maps-to notation, splitting the operation (function of two arguments) into a function of the first argument, producing a function over the second argument. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → curry 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ 𝐶)))
Theorem	mpocurryvald 8252*	The value of a curried operation given in maps-to notation is a function over the second argument of the original operation. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (curry 𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
Theorem	fvmpocurryd 8253*	The value of the value of a curried operation given in maps-to notation is the operation value of the original operation. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((curry 𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐵))
2.4.16  Undefined values
Syntax	cund 8254	Extend class notation with undefined value function.
class Undef
Definition	df-undef 8255	Define the undefined value function, whose value at set 𝑠 is guaranteed not to be a member of 𝑠 (see pwuninel 8257). (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.)
⊢ Undef = (𝑠 ∈ V ↦ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑠)
Theorem	pwuninel2 8256	Proof of pwuninel 8257 under the assumption that the union of the given class is a set, avoiding ax-pr 5390 and ax-un 7714. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ¬ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	pwuninel 8257	The powerclass of the union of a class does not belong to that class. This theorem provides a way of constructing a new set that does not belong to a given set. See also pwuninel2 8256. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ¬ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	undefval 8258	Value of the undefined value function. Normally we will not reference the explicit value but will use undefnel 8260 instead. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → (Undef‘𝑆) = 𝒫 ∪ 𝑆)
Theorem	undefnel2 8259	The undefined value generated from a set is not a member of the set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → ¬ (Undef‘𝑆) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	undefnel 8260	The undefined value generated from a set is not a member of the set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → (Undef‘𝑆) ∉ 𝑆)
Theorem	undefne0 8261	The undefined value generated from a set is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → (Undef‘𝑆) ≠ ∅)
2.4.17  Well-founded recursion
Syntax	cfrecs 8262	Declare the syntax for the well-founded recursion generator. See df-frecs 8263.
class frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹)
Definition	df-frecs 8263*	This is the definition for the well-founded recursion generator. Similar to df-wrecs 8294 and df-recs 8343, it is a direct definition form of normally recursive relationships. Unlike the former two definitions, it only requires a well-founded set-like relationship for its properties, not a well-ordered relationship. This proof requires either a partial order or the axiom of infinity. We develop the theorems twice, once with a partial order and once without. The second development occurs later in the database, after ax-inf 9598 has been introduced. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Dec-2021.)
⊢ frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹) = ∪ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}
Theorem	frecseq123 8264	Equality theorem for the well-founded recursion generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺) → frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹) = frecs(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝐺))
Theorem	nffrecs 8265	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the well-founded recursion generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Dec-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹)
Theorem	csbfrecsg 8266	Move class substitution in and out of the well-founded recursive function generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌frecs(𝑅, 𝐷, 𝐹) = frecs(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑅, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹))
Theorem	fpr3g 8267*	Functions defined by well-founded recursion over a partial order are identical up to relation, domain, and characteristic function. This version of frr3g 9716 does not require infinity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐻(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)))) ∧ (𝐺 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐻(𝐺 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))) → 𝐹 = 𝐺)
Theorem	frrlem1 8268*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. The final item we are interested in is the union of acceptable functions 𝐵. This lemma just changes bound variables for later use. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝑤𝐺(𝑔 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤))))}
Theorem	frrlem2 8269*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. An acceptable function is a function. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 → Fun 𝑔)
Theorem	frrlem3 8270*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. An acceptable function's domain is a subset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 → dom 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	frrlem4 8271*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. Properties of the restriction of an acceptable function to the domain of another acceptable function. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) Fn (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)((𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))‘𝑎) = (𝑎𝐺((𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) ↾ Pred(𝑅, (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ), 𝑎)))))
Theorem	frrlem5 8272*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. State the well-founded recursion generator in terms of the acceptable functions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Aug-2022.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐵
Theorem	frrlem6 8273*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. The well-founded recursion generator is a relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Aug-2022.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ Rel 𝐹
Theorem	frrlem7 8274*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. The well-founded recursion generator's domain is a subclass of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Aug-2022.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	frrlem8 8275*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. dom 𝐹 is closed under predecessor classes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ dom 𝐹 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧) ⊆ dom 𝐹)
Theorem	frrlem9 8276*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. Show that the well-founded recursive generator produces a function. Hypothesis three will be eliminated using different induction rules depending on if we use partial orders or the axiom of infinity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Aug-2022.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥𝑔𝑢 ∧ 𝑥ℎ𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)
Theorem	frrlem10 8277*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. Under the compatibility hypothesis, compute the value of 𝐹 within its domain. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥𝑔𝑢 ∧ 𝑥ℎ𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))
Theorem	frrlem11 8278*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. For the next several theorems we will be aiming to prove that dom 𝐹 = 𝐴. To do this, we set up a function 𝐶 that supposedly contains an element of 𝐴 that is not in dom 𝐹 and we show that the element must be in dom 𝐹. Our choice of what to restrict 𝐹 to depends on if we assume partial orders or the axiom of infinity. To begin with, we establish the functionality of 𝐶. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥𝑔𝑢 ∧ 𝑥ℎ𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝑆) ∪ {⟨𝑧, (𝑧𝐺(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧)))⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹)) → 𝐶 Fn ((𝑆 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∪ {𝑧}))
Theorem	frrlem12 8279*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. Next, we calculate the value of 𝐶. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥𝑔𝑢 ∧ 𝑥ℎ𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝑆) ∪ {⟨𝑧, (𝑧𝐺(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧)))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ((𝑆 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∪ {𝑧})) → (𝐶‘𝑤) = (𝑤𝐺(𝐶 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤))))
Theorem	frrlem13 8280*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. Assuming that 𝑆 is a subset of 𝐴 and that 𝑧 is 𝑅-minimal, then 𝐶 is an acceptable function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥𝑔𝑢 ∧ 𝑥ℎ𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝑆) ∪ {⟨𝑧, (𝑧𝐺(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧)))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑆 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹) ∧ Pred(𝑅, (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹), 𝑧) = ∅)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	frrlem14 8281*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. Finally, we tie all these threads together and show that dom 𝐹 = 𝐴 when given the right 𝑆. Specifically, we prove that there can be no 𝑅-minimal element of (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥𝑔𝑢 ∧ 𝑥ℎ𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝑆) ∪ {⟨𝑧, (𝑧𝐺(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧)))⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑆 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹)Pred(𝑅, (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹), 𝑧) = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
Theorem	fprlem1 8282*	Lemma for well-founded recursion with a partial order. Two acceptable functions are compatible. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥𝑔𝑢 ∧ 𝑥ℎ𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
Theorem	fprlem2 8283*	Lemma for well-founded recursion with a partial order. Establish a subset relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑤 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧)Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧))
Theorem	fpr2a 8284	Weak version of fpr2 8286 which is useful for proofs that avoid the axiom of replacement. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝑋𝐺(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))))
Theorem	fpr1 8285	Law of well-founded recursion over a partial order, part one. Establish the functionality and domain of the recursive function generator. Note that by requiring a partial order we can avoid using the axiom of infinity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
Theorem	fpr2 8286	Law of well-founded recursion over a partial order, part two. Now we establish the value of 𝐹 within 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.) (Proof shortened by Scott Fenton, 18-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝑋𝐺(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))))
Theorem	fpr3 8287*	Law of well-founded recursion over a partial order, part three. Finally, we show that 𝐹 is unique. We do this by showing that any function 𝐻 with the same properties we proved of 𝐹 in fpr1 8285 and fpr2 8286 is identical to 𝐹. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑧) = (𝑧𝐺(𝐻 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧))))) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)
Theorem	frrrel 8288	Show without using the axiom of replacement that the well-founded recursion generator gives a relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ Rel 𝐹
Theorem	frrdmss 8289	Show without using the axiom of replacement that the domain of the well-founded recursion generator is a subclass of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	frrdmcl 8290	Show without using the axiom of replacement that for a "function" defined by well-founded recursion, the predecessor class of an element of its domain is a subclass of its domain. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2011.) (Proof shortened by Scott Fenton, 17-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ⊆ dom 𝐹)
Theorem	fprfung 8291	A "function" defined by well-founded recursion is indeed a function when the relation is a partial order. Avoids the axiom of replacement. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → Fun 𝐹)
Theorem	fprresex 8292	The restriction of a function defined by well-founded recursion to the predecessor of an element of its domain is a set. Avoids the axiom of replacement. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)) ∈ V)
2.4.18  Well-ordered recursion
Syntax	cwrecs 8293	Declare syntax for the well-ordered recursive function generator.
class wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹)
Definition	df-wrecs 8294	Define the well-ordered recursive function generator. This function takes the usual expressions from recursion theorems and forms a unified definition. Specifically, given a function 𝐹, a relation 𝑅, and a base set 𝐴, this definition generates a function 𝐺 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹) that has property that, at any point 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, (𝐺‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑥))). See wfr1 8308, wfr2 8309, and wfr3 8310. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2018.) (Revised by BJ, 27-Oct-2024.)
⊢ wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹) = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, (𝐹 ∘ 2nd ))
Theorem	wrecseq123 8295	General equality theorem for the well-ordered recursive function generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by Scott Fenton, 17-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺) → wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹) = wrecs(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝐺))
Theorem	nfwrecs 8296	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the well-ordered recursive function generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by Scott Fenton, 17-Nov-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹)
Theorem	wrecseq1 8297	Equality theorem for the well-ordered recursive function generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹) = wrecs(𝑆, 𝐴, 𝐹))
Theorem	wrecseq2 8298	Equality theorem for the well-ordered recursive function generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹) = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝐹))
Theorem	wrecseq3 8299	Equality theorem for the well-ordered recursive function generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹) = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺))
Theorem	csbwrecsg 8300	Move class substitution in and out of the well-founded recursive function generator. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 18-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌wrecs(𝑅, 𝐷, 𝐹) = wrecs(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑅, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹))