P. 83 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 8201-8300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	xpord3lem 8201*	Lemma for triple ordering. Calculate the value of the relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑈 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐⟩𝑈⟨𝑑, 𝑒, 𝑓⟩ ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (((𝑎𝑅𝑑 ∨ 𝑎 = 𝑑) ∧ (𝑏𝑆𝑒 ∨ 𝑏 = 𝑒) ∧ (𝑐𝑇𝑓 ∨ 𝑐 = 𝑓)) ∧ (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∨ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑒 ∨ 𝑐 ≠ 𝑓))))
Theorem	poxp3 8202*	Triple Cartesian product partial ordering. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑈 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Po 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Po 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 Po ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶))
Theorem	frxp3 8203*	Give well-foundedness over a triple Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑈 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Fr 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Fr 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 Fr ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶))
Theorem	xpord3pred 8204*	Calculate the predecsessor class for the triple order. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝑈 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) → Pred(𝑈, ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶), ⟨𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍⟩) = ((((Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∪ {𝑋}) × (Pred(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑌) ∪ {𝑌})) × (Pred(𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑍) ∪ {𝑍})) ∖ {⟨𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍⟩}))
Theorem	sexp3 8205*	Show that the triple order is set-like. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑈 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Se 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Se 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 Se ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶))
Theorem	xpord3inddlem 8206*	Induction over the triple Cartesian product ordering. Note that the substitutions cover all possible cases of membership in the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)
⊢ 𝑈 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑆 Fr 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑆 Po 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑆 Se 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑇 Fr 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑇 Po 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑇 Se 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜌))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜌 ↔ 𝜇))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑍 → (𝜇 ↔ 𝜆))    &   ⊢ ((𝜅 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐶)) → (((∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜃 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜁) ∧ (∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜏 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜎) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜂) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝜆)
Theorem	xpord3indd 8207*	Induction over the triple Cartesian product ordering. Note that the substitutions cover all possible cases of membership in the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑆 Fr 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑆 Po 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑆 Se 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑇 Fr 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑇 Po 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑇 Se 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜌))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜌 ↔ 𝜇))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑍 → (𝜇 ↔ 𝜆))    &   ⊢ ((𝜅 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐶)) → (((∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜃 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜁) ∧ (∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜏 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜎) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜂) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝜆)
Theorem	xpord3ind 8208*	Induction over the triple Cartesian product ordering. Note that the substitutions cover all possible cases of membership in the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Po 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑆 Fr 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝑆 Po 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝑆 Se 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝑇 Fr 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑇 Po 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝑇 Se 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜌))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜌 ↔ 𝜇))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑍 → (𝜇 ↔ 𝜆))    &   ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐶) → (((∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜃 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜁) ∧ (∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜏 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜎) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜂) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜆)
2.4.11  Ordering Ordinal Sequences
Theorem	orderseqlem 8209*	Lemma for poseq 8210 and soseq 8211. The function value of a sequence is either in 𝐴 or null. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝑓:𝑥⟶𝐴}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐹 → (𝐺‘𝑋) ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {∅}))
Theorem	poseq 8210*	A partial ordering of ordinal sequences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝑅 Po (𝐴 ∪ {∅})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝑓:𝑥⟶𝐴}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑔‘𝑦) ∧ (𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥)))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 Po 𝐹
Theorem	soseq 8211*	A linear ordering of ordinal sequences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝑅 Or (𝐴 ∪ {∅})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝑓:𝑥⟶𝐴}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑔‘𝑦) ∧ (𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥)))}    &   ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 Or 𝐹
2.4.12  The support of functions In this section, the support of functions is defined and corresponding theorems are provided. Since basic properties (see suppval 8214) are based on the Axiom of Union (usage of dmexg 7945), these definition and theorems cannot be provided earlier. Until April 2019, the support of a function was represented by the expression (◡𝑅 “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) (see suppimacnv 8227). The theorems which are based on this representation and which are provided in previous sections could be moved into this section to have all related theorems in one section, although they do not depend on the Axiom of Union. This was possible because they are not used before. The current theorems differ from the original ones by requiring that the classes representing the "function" (or its "domain") and the "zero element" are sets. Actually, this does not cause any problem (until now).
Syntax	csupp 8212	Extend class definition to include the support of functions.
class supp
Definition	df-supp 8213*	Define the support of a function against a "zero" value. According to Wikipedia ("Support (mathematics)", 31-Mar-2019, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Support_(mathematics)) "In mathematics, the support of a real-valued function f is the subset of the domain containing those elements which are not mapped to zero." and "The notion of support also extends in a natural way to functions taking values in more general sets than R [the real numbers] and to other objects." The following definition allows for such extensions, being applicable for any sets (which usually are functions) and any element (even not necessarily from the range of the function) regarded as "zero". (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ supp = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}})
Theorem	suppval 8214*	The value of the operation constructing the support of a function. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})
Theorem	supp0prc 8215	The support of a class is empty if either the class or the "zero" is a proper class. (Contributed by AV, 28-May-2019.)
⊢ (¬ (𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ V) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = ∅)
Theorem	suppvalbr 8216*	The value of the operation constructing the support of a function expressed by binary relations. (Contributed by AV, 7-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by Sky Winter, 14-Oct-2026.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 supp 𝑍) = {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑍))})
Theorem	suppvalbrOLD 8217*	Obsolete version of suppvalbr 8216 as of 14-Oct-2026. The value of the operation constructing the support of a function expressed by binary relations. (Contributed by AV, 7-Apr-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 supp 𝑍) = {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑍))})
Theorem	supp0 8218	The support of the empty set is the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑊 → (∅ supp 𝑍) = ∅)
Theorem	suppval1 8219*	The value of the operation constructing the support of a function. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋‘𝑖) ≠ 𝑍})
Theorem	suppvalfng 8220*	The value of the operation constructing the support of a function with a given domain. This version of suppvalfn 8221 assumes 𝐹 is a set rather than its domain 𝑋, avoiding ax-rep 5236. (Contributed by SN, 5-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑖) ≠ 𝑍})
Theorem	suppvalfn 8221*	The value of the operation constructing the support of a function with a given domain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 22-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑖) ≠ 𝑍})
Theorem	elsuppfng 8222	An element of the support of a function with a given domain. This version of elsuppfn 8223 assumes 𝐹 is a set rather than its domain 𝑋, avoiding ax-rep 5236. (Contributed by SN, 5-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑆) ≠ 𝑍)))
Theorem	elsuppfn 8223	An element of the support of a function with a given domain. (Contributed by AV, 27-May-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑆) ≠ 𝑍)))
Theorem	fvdifsupp 8224	Function value is zero outside of its support. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑍)
Theorem	cnvimadfsn 8225*	The support of functions "defined" by inverse images expressed by binary relations. (Contributed by AV, 7-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (◡𝑅 “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑍)}
Theorem	suppimacnvss 8226	The support of functions "defined" by inverse images is a subset of the support defined by df-supp 8213. (Contributed by AV, 7-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (◡𝑅 “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) ⊆ (𝑅 supp 𝑍))
Theorem	suppimacnv 8227	Support sets of functions expressed by inverse images. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 7-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 supp 𝑍) = (◡𝑅 “ (V ∖ {𝑍})))
Theorem	fsuppeq 8228	Two ways of writing the support of a function with known codomain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹:𝐼⟶𝑆 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = (◡𝐹 “ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑍}))))
Theorem	fsuppeqg 8229	Version of fsuppeq 8228 avoiding ax-rep 5236 by assuming 𝐹 is a set rather than its domain 𝐼. (Contributed by SN, 30-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹:𝐼⟶𝑆 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = (◡𝐹 “ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑍}))))
Theorem	suppssdm 8230	The support of a function is a subset of the function's domain. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ dom 𝐹
Theorem	suppsnop 8231	The support of a singleton of an ordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = if(𝑌 = 𝑍, ∅, {𝑋}))
Theorem	snopsuppss 8232	The support of a singleton containing an ordered pair is a subset of the singleton containing the first element of the ordered pair, i.e. it is empty or the singleton itself. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ({⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩} supp 𝑍) ⊆ {𝑋}
Theorem	fvn0elsupp 8233	If the function value for a given argument is not empty, the argument belongs to the support of the function with the empty set as zero. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 4-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐺 Fn 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑋) ≠ ∅)) → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐺 supp ∅))
Theorem	fvn0elsuppb 8234	The function value for a given argument is not empty iff the argument belongs to the support of the function with the empty set as zero. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) → ((𝐺‘𝑋) ≠ ∅ ↔ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐺 supp ∅)))
Theorem	rexsupp 8235*	Existential quantification restricted to a support. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 27-May-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	ressuppss 8236	The support of the restriction of a function is a subset of the support of the function itself. (Contributed by AV, 22-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐹 supp 𝑍))
Theorem	suppun 8237	The support of a class/function is a subset of the support of the union of this class/function with another class/function. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ ((𝐹 ∪ 𝐺) supp 𝑍))
Theorem	ressuppssdif 8238	The support of the restriction of a function is a subset of the support of the function itself. (Contributed by AV, 22-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) supp 𝑍) ∪ (dom 𝐹 ∖ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mptsuppdifd 8239*	The support of a function in maps-to notation with a class difference. (Contributed by AV, 28-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐵 ∈ (V ∖ {𝑍})})
Theorem	mptsuppd 8240*	The support of a function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by AV, 10-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐵 ≠ 𝑍})
Theorem	extmptsuppeq 8241*	The support of an extended function is the same as the original. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝑋 = 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑋) supp 𝑍) = ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑋) supp 𝑍))
Theorem	suppfnss 8242*	The support of a function which has the same zero values (in its domain) as another function is a subset of the support of this other function. (Contributed by AV, 30-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 6-Jun-2022.)
⊢ (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊)) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝑍 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑍) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐺 supp 𝑍)))
Theorem	funsssuppss 8243	The support of a function which is a subset of another function is a subset of the support of this other function. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐺 supp 𝑍))
Theorem	fnsuppres 8244	Two ways to express restriction of a support set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐵 × {𝑍})))
Theorem	fnsuppeq0 8245	The support of a function is empty iff it is identically zero. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) = ∅ ↔ 𝐹 = (𝐴 × {𝑍})))
Theorem	fczsupp0 8246	The support of a constant function with value zero is empty. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐵 × {𝑍}) supp 𝑍) = ∅
Theorem	suppss 8247*	Show that the support of a function is contained in a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.) (Proof shortened by SN, 5-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝑊)
Theorem	suppssr 8248	A function is zero outside its support. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑍)
Theorem	suppssrg 8249	A function is zero outside its support. Version of suppssr 8248 avoiding ax-rep 5236 by assuming 𝐹 is a set rather than its domain 𝐴. (Contributed by SN, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑍)
Theorem	suppssov1 8250*	Formula building theorem for support restrictions: operator with left annihilator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.) (Proof shortened by SN, 11-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐴) supp 𝑌) ⊆ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝑌𝑂𝑣) = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝐴𝑂𝐵)) supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝐿)
Theorem	suppssov2 8251*	Formula building theorem for support restrictions: operator with right annihilator. (Contributed by SN, 11-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵) supp 𝑌) ⊆ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝑣𝑂𝑌) = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝐴𝑂𝐵)) supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝐿)
Theorem	suppssof1 8252*	Formula building theorem for support restrictions: vector operation with left annihilator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 supp 𝑌) ⊆ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝑌𝑂𝑣) = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝐷⟶𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐷⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∘f 𝑂𝐵) supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝐿)
Theorem	suppss2 8253*	Show that the support of a function is contained in a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑊)) → 𝐵 = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝑊)
Theorem	suppsssn 8254*	Show that the support of a function is a subset of a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ≠ 𝑊) → 𝐵 = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) supp 𝑍) ⊆ {𝑊})
Theorem	suppssfv 8255*	Formula building theorem for support restriction, on a function which preserves zero. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐴) supp 𝑌) ⊆ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑌) = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝐹‘𝐴)) supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝐿)
Theorem	suppofssd 8256	Condition for the support of a function operation to be a subset of the union of the supports of the left and right function terms. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 28-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍𝑋𝑍) = 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑋𝐺) supp 𝑍) ⊆ ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) ∪ (𝐺 supp 𝑍)))
Theorem	suppofss1d 8257*	Condition for the support of a function operation to be a subset of the support of the left function term. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑍𝑋𝑥) = 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑋𝐺) supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐹 supp 𝑍))
Theorem	suppofss2d 8258*	Condition for the support of a function operation to be a subset of the support of the right function term. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥𝑋𝑍) = 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑋𝐺) supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐺 supp 𝑍))
Theorem	suppco 8259	The support of the composition of two functions is the inverse image by the inner function of the support of the outer function. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2019.) Extract this statement from the proof of supp0cosupp0 8261. (Revised by SN, 15-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) supp 𝑍) = (◡𝐺 “ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)))
Theorem	suppcoss 8260	The support of the composition of two functions is a subset of the support of the inner function if the outer function preserves zero. Compare suppssfv 8255, which has a sethood condition on 𝐴 instead of 𝐵. (Contributed by SN, 25-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑌) = 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐺 supp 𝑌))
Theorem	supp0cosupp0 8261	The support of the composition of two functions is empty if the support of the outer function is empty. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) = ∅ → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) supp 𝑍) = ∅))
Theorem	imacosupp 8262	The image of the support of the composition of two functions is the support of the outer function. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ ran 𝐺) → (𝐺 “ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) supp 𝑍)) = (𝐹 supp 𝑍)))
2.4.13  Special maps-to operations The following theorems are about maps-to operations (see df-mpo 7454) where the domain of the second argument depends on the domain of the first argument, especially when the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, in short "x-maps-to operations". For labels, the abbreviations "mpox" are used (since "x" usually denotes the first argument). This is in line with the currently used conventions for such cases (see cbvmpox 7542, ovmpox 7603 and fmpox 8111). If the first argument is an ordered pair, as in the following, the abbreviation is extended to "mpoxop", and the maps-to operations are called "x-op maps-to operations" for short.
Theorem	opeliunxp2f 8263*	Membership in a union of Cartesian products, using bound-variable hypothesis for 𝐸 instead of distinct variable conditions as in opeliunxp2 5823. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐸    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	mpoxeldm 8264*	If there is an element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, then the first argument is an element of the first component of the domain and the second argument is an element of the second component of the domain depending on the first argument. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (𝑋𝐹𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
Theorem	mpoxneldm 8265*	If the first argument of an operation given by a maps-to rule is not an element of the first component of the domain or the second argument is not an element of the second component of the domain depending on the first argument, then the value of the operation is the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∉ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑌 ∉ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) → (𝑋𝐹𝑌) = ∅)
Theorem	mpoxopn0yelv 8266*	If there is an element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, then the second argument is an element of the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉))
Theorem	mpoxopynvov0g 8267*	If the second argument of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument is not element of the first component of the first argument, then the value of the operation is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∉ 𝑉) → (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) = ∅)
Theorem	mpoxopxnop0 8268*	If the first argument of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, is not an ordered pair, then the value of the operation is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝑉 ∈ (V × V) → (𝑉𝐹𝐾) = ∅)
Theorem	mpoxopx0ov0 8269*	If the first argument of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, is the empty set, then the value of the operation is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (∅𝐹𝐾) = ∅
Theorem	mpoxopxprcov0 8270*	If the components of the first argument of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, are not sets, then the value of the operation is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ (𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝑊 ∈ V) → (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) = ∅)
Theorem	mpoxopynvov0 8271*	If the second argument of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument is not element of the first component of the first argument, then the value of the operation is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∉ 𝑉 → (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) = ∅)
Theorem	mpoxopoveq 8272*	Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑})    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) → (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑})
Theorem	mpoxopovel 8273*	Element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens and Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑)))
Theorem	mpoxopoveqd 8274*	Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑})    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌))    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) → {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑} = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑})
Theorem	brovex 8275*	A binary relation of the value of an operation given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) → Rel (𝑉𝑂𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(𝑉𝑂𝐸)𝑃 → ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V)))
Theorem	brovmpoex 8276*	A binary relation of the value of an operation given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ 𝜑})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(𝑉𝑂𝐸)𝑃 → ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V)))
Theorem	sprmpod 8277*	The extension of a binary relation which is the value of an operation given in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 20-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑣 ∈ V, 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥(𝑣𝑅𝑒)𝑦 ∧ 𝜒)})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ 𝑒 = 𝐸) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥(𝑉𝑅𝐸)𝑦 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜃} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉𝑀𝐸) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥(𝑉𝑅𝐸)𝑦 ∧ 𝜓)})
2.4.14  Function transposition
Syntax	ctpos 8278	The transposition of a function.
class tpos 𝐹
Definition	df-tpos 8279*	Define the transposition of a function, which is a function 𝐺 = tpos 𝐹 satisfying 𝐺(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝐹(𝑦, 𝑥). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ (◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}))
Theorem	tposss 8280	Subset theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺 → tpos 𝐹 ⊆ tpos 𝐺)
Theorem	tposeq 8281	Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺)
Theorem	tposeqd 8282	Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺)
Theorem	tposssxp 8283	The transposition is a subset of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) × ran 𝐹)
Theorem	reltpos 8284	The transposition is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ Rel tpos 𝐹
Theorem	brtpos2 8285	Value of the transposition at an ordered pair ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴tpos 𝐹𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) ∧ ∪ ◡{𝐴}𝐹𝐵)))
Theorem	brtpos0 8286	The behavior of tpos when the left argument is the empty set (which is not an ordered pair but is the "default" value of an ordered pair when the arguments are proper classes). This allows to eliminate sethood hypotheses on 𝐴, 𝐵 in brtpos 8288. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅tpos 𝐹𝐴 ↔ ∅𝐹𝐴))
Theorem	reldmtpos 8287	Necessary and sufficient condition for dom tpos 𝐹 to be a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom tpos 𝐹 ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ dom 𝐹)
Theorem	brtpos 8288	The transposition swaps arguments of a three-parameter relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩tpos 𝐹𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	ottpos 8289	The transposition swaps the first two elements in a collection of ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	relbrtpos 8290	The transposition swaps arguments of a three-parameter relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐹 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩tpos 𝐹𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	dmtpos 8291	The domain of tpos 𝐹 when dom 𝐹 is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → dom tpos 𝐹 = ◡dom 𝐹)
Theorem	rntpos 8292	The range of tpos 𝐹 when dom 𝐹 is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → ran tpos 𝐹 = ran 𝐹)
Theorem	tposexg 8293	The transposition of a set is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → tpos 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	ovtpos 8294	The transposition swaps the arguments in a two-argument function. When 𝐹 is a matrix, which is to say a function from (1...𝑚) × (1...𝑛) to ℝ or some ring, tpos 𝐹 is the transposition of 𝐹, which is where the name comes from. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴tpos 𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴)
Theorem	tposfun 8295	The transposition of a function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → Fun tpos 𝐹)
Theorem	dftpos2 8296*	Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ ◡dom 𝐹 ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})))
Theorem	dftpos3 8297*	Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. Compare df-cnv 5664. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧})
Theorem	dftpos4 8298*	Alternate definition of tpos. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ ((V × V) ∪ {∅}) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}))
Theorem	tpostpos 8299	Value of the double transposition for a general class 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
⊢ tpos tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∩ (((V × V) ∪ {∅}) × V))
Theorem	tpostpos2 8300	Value of the double transposition for a relation on triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom 𝐹) → tpos tpos 𝐹 = 𝐹)