Theorem slmd0vs 31379

Description: Zero times a vector is the zero vector. Equation 1a of [Kreyszig] p. 51. (ax-hvmul0 29273 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Apr-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
slmd0vs.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
slmd0vs.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
slmd0vs.s	⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
slmd0vs.o	⊢ 𝑂 = (0g‘𝐹)
slmd0vs.z	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
slmd0vs	⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 )

Proof of Theorem slmd0vs

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 482	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑊 ∈ SLMod)
2		slmd0vs.f	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
3		eqid 2738	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Base‘𝐹) = (Base‘𝐹)
4		slmd0vs.o	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑂 = (0g‘𝐹)
5	2, 3, 4	slmd0cl 31373	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ SLMod → 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐹))
6	5	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐹))
7		simpr 484	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)
8		slmd0vs.v	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
9		eqid 2738	. . . . 5 ⊢ (+g‘𝑊) = (+g‘𝑊)
10		slmd0vs.s	. . . . 5 ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
11		slmd0vs.z	. . . . 5 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)
12		eqid 2738	. . . . 5 ⊢ (+g‘𝐹) = (+g‘𝐹)
13		eqid 2738	. . . . 5 ⊢ (.r‘𝐹) = (.r‘𝐹)
14		eqid 2738	. . . . 5 ⊢ (1r‘𝐹) = (1r‘𝐹)
15	8, 9, 10, 11, 2, 3, 12, 13, 14, 4	slmdlema 31358	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐹) ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐹)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → (((𝑂 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑂 · (𝑋(+g‘𝑊)𝑋)) = ((𝑂 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑊)(𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑂(+g‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = ((𝑂 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑊)(𝑂 · 𝑋))) ∧ (((𝑂(.r‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = (𝑂 · (𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((1r‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 )))
16	1, 6, 6, 7, 7, 15	syl122anc 1377	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (((𝑂 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑂 · (𝑋(+g‘𝑊)𝑋)) = ((𝑂 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑊)(𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑂(+g‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = ((𝑂 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑊)(𝑂 · 𝑋))) ∧ (((𝑂(.r‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = (𝑂 · (𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((1r‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 )))
17	16	simprd 495	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (((𝑂(.r‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = (𝑂 · (𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((1r‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 ))
18	17	simp3d 1142	1 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 )

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  ‘cfv 6418  (class class class)co 7255  Basecbs 16840  +_gcplusg 16888  ._rcmulr 16889  Scalarcsca 16891   ·_𝑠 cvsca 16892  0_gc0g 17067  1_rcur 19652  SLModcslmd 31355

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-reu 3070  df-rmo 3071  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fv 6426  df-riota 7212  df-ov 7258  df-0g 17069  df-mgm 18241  df-sgrp 18290  df-mnd 18301  df-cmn 19303  df-srg 19657  df-slmd 31356

This theorem is referenced by:  slmdvs0  31380  gsumvsca2  31382