Theorem slmd0vs 33205

Description: Zero times a vector is the zero vector. Equation 1a of [Kreyszig] p. 51. (ax-hvmul0 31044 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Apr-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
slmd0vs.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
slmd0vs.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
slmd0vs.s	⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
slmd0vs.o	⊢ 𝑂 = (0g‘𝐹)
slmd0vs.z	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
slmd0vs	⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 )

Proof of Theorem slmd0vs

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 482	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑊 ∈ SLMod)
2		slmd0vs.f	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
3		eqid 2740	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Base‘𝐹) = (Base‘𝐹)
4		slmd0vs.o	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑂 = (0g‘𝐹)
5	2, 3, 4	slmd0cl 33199	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ SLMod → 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐹))
6	5	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐹))
7		simpr 484	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)
8		slmd0vs.v	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
9		eqid 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (+g‘𝑊) = (+g‘𝑊)
10		slmd0vs.s	. . . . 5 ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
11		slmd0vs.z	. . . . 5 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)
12		eqid 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (+g‘𝐹) = (+g‘𝐹)
13		eqid 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (.r‘𝐹) = (.r‘𝐹)
14		eqid 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (1r‘𝐹) = (1r‘𝐹)
15	8, 9, 10, 11, 2, 3, 12, 13, 14, 4	slmdlema 33184	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐹) ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐹)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → (((𝑂 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑂 · (𝑋(+g‘𝑊)𝑋)) = ((𝑂 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑊)(𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑂(+g‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = ((𝑂 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑊)(𝑂 · 𝑋))) ∧ (((𝑂(.r‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = (𝑂 · (𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((1r‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 )))
16	1, 6, 6, 7, 7, 15	syl122anc 1379	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (((𝑂 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑂 · (𝑋(+g‘𝑊)𝑋)) = ((𝑂 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑊)(𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑂(+g‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = ((𝑂 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑊)(𝑂 · 𝑋))) ∧ (((𝑂(.r‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = (𝑂 · (𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((1r‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 )))
17	16	simprd 495	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (((𝑂(.r‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = (𝑂 · (𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((1r‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 ))
18	17	simp3d 1144	1 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 )

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108  ‘cfv 6575  (class class class)co 7450  Basecbs 17260  +_gcplusg 17313  ._rcmulr 17314  Scalarcsca 17316   ·_𝑠 cvsca 17317  0_gc0g 17501  1_rcur 20210  SLModcslmd 33181

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rmo 3388  df-reu 3389  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-sbc 3805  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-mpt 5250  df-id 5593  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-iota 6527  df-fun 6577  df-fv 6583  df-riota 7406  df-ov 7453  df-0g 17503  df-mgm 18680  df-sgrp 18759  df-mnd 18775  df-cmn 19826  df-srg 20216  df-slmd 33182

This theorem is referenced by:  slmdvs0  33206  gsumvsca2  33208