Theorem slmd0vs 32944

Description: Zero times a vector is the zero vector. Equation 1a of [Kreyszig] p. 51. (ax-hvmul0 30833 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Apr-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
slmd0vs.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
slmd0vs.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
slmd0vs.s	⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
slmd0vs.o	⊢ 𝑂 = (0g‘𝐹)
slmd0vs.z	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
slmd0vs	⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 )

Proof of Theorem slmd0vs

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 482	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑊 ∈ SLMod)
2		slmd0vs.f	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
3		eqid 2728	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Base‘𝐹) = (Base‘𝐹)
4		slmd0vs.o	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑂 = (0g‘𝐹)
5	2, 3, 4	slmd0cl 32938	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ SLMod → 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐹))
6	5	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐹))
7		simpr 484	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)
8		slmd0vs.v	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
9		eqid 2728	. . . . 5 ⊢ (+g‘𝑊) = (+g‘𝑊)
10		slmd0vs.s	. . . . 5 ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
11		slmd0vs.z	. . . . 5 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)
12		eqid 2728	. . . . 5 ⊢ (+g‘𝐹) = (+g‘𝐹)
13		eqid 2728	. . . . 5 ⊢ (.r‘𝐹) = (.r‘𝐹)
14		eqid 2728	. . . . 5 ⊢ (1r‘𝐹) = (1r‘𝐹)
15	8, 9, 10, 11, 2, 3, 12, 13, 14, 4	slmdlema 32923	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐹) ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐹)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → (((𝑂 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑂 · (𝑋(+g‘𝑊)𝑋)) = ((𝑂 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑊)(𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑂(+g‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = ((𝑂 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑊)(𝑂 · 𝑋))) ∧ (((𝑂(.r‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = (𝑂 · (𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((1r‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 )))
16	1, 6, 6, 7, 7, 15	syl122anc 1377	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (((𝑂 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑂 · (𝑋(+g‘𝑊)𝑋)) = ((𝑂 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑊)(𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑂(+g‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = ((𝑂 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑊)(𝑂 · 𝑋))) ∧ (((𝑂(.r‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = (𝑂 · (𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((1r‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 )))
17	16	simprd 495	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (((𝑂(.r‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = (𝑂 · (𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((1r‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 ))
18	17	simp3d 1142	1 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 )

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1534   ∈ wcel 2099  ‘cfv 6548  (class class class)co 7420  Basecbs 17180  +_gcplusg 17233  ._rcmulr 17234  Scalarcsca 17236   ·_𝑠 cvsca 17237  0_gc0g 17421  1_rcur 20121  SLModcslmd 32920

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-10 2130  ax-11 2147  ax-12 2167  ax-ext 2699  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5429

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1537  df-fal 1547  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2061  df-mo 2530  df-eu 2559  df-clab 2706  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2938  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3068  df-rmo 3373  df-reu 3374  df-rab 3430  df-v 3473  df-sbc 3777  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-uni 4909  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-id 5576  df-xp 5684  df-rel 5685  df-cnv 5686  df-co 5687  df-dm 5688  df-iota 6500  df-fun 6550  df-fv 6556  df-riota 7376  df-ov 7423  df-0g 17423  df-mgm 18600  df-sgrp 18679  df-mnd 18695  df-cmn 19737  df-srg 20127  df-slmd 32921

This theorem is referenced by:  slmdvs0  32945  gsumvsca2  32947