Theorem slmd0vs 33324

Description: Zero times a vector is the zero vector. Equation 1a of [Kreyszig] p. 51. (ax-hvmul0 31104 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Apr-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
slmd0vs.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
slmd0vs.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
slmd0vs.s	⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
slmd0vs.o	⊢ 𝑂 = (0g‘𝐹)
slmd0vs.z	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
slmd0vs	⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 )

Proof of Theorem slmd0vs

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 482	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑊 ∈ SLMod)
2		slmd0vs.f	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
3		eqid 2737	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Base‘𝐹) = (Base‘𝐹)
4		slmd0vs.o	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑂 = (0g‘𝐹)
5	2, 3, 4	slmd0cl 33318	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ SLMod → 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐹))
6	5	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐹))
7		simpr 484	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)
8		slmd0vs.v	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
9		eqid 2737	. . . . 5 ⊢ (+g‘𝑊) = (+g‘𝑊)
10		slmd0vs.s	. . . . 5 ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
11		slmd0vs.z	. . . . 5 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)
12		eqid 2737	. . . . 5 ⊢ (+g‘𝐹) = (+g‘𝐹)
13		eqid 2737	. . . . 5 ⊢ (.r‘𝐹) = (.r‘𝐹)
14		eqid 2737	. . . . 5 ⊢ (1r‘𝐹) = (1r‘𝐹)
15	8, 9, 10, 11, 2, 3, 12, 13, 14, 4	slmdlema 33303	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ (𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐹) ∧ 𝑂 ∈ (Base‘𝐹)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → (((𝑂 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑂 · (𝑋(+g‘𝑊)𝑋)) = ((𝑂 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑊)(𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑂(+g‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = ((𝑂 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑊)(𝑂 · 𝑋))) ∧ (((𝑂(.r‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = (𝑂 · (𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((1r‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 )))
16	1, 6, 6, 7, 7, 15	syl122anc 1382	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (((𝑂 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑂 · (𝑋(+g‘𝑊)𝑋)) = ((𝑂 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑊)(𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑂(+g‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = ((𝑂 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑊)(𝑂 · 𝑋))) ∧ (((𝑂(.r‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = (𝑂 · (𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((1r‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 )))
17	16	simprd 495	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (((𝑂(.r‘𝐹)𝑂) · 𝑋) = (𝑂 · (𝑂 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((1r‘𝐹) · 𝑋) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 ))
18	17	simp3d 1145	1 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ SLMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 )

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  ‘cfv 6502  (class class class)co 7370  Basecbs 17150  +_gcplusg 17191  ._rcmulr 17192  Scalarcsca 17194   ·_𝑠 cvsca 17195  0_gc0g 17373  1_rcur 20133  SLModcslmd 33300

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5245  ax-nul 5255  ax-pr 5381

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-rmo 3352  df-reu 3353  df-rab 3402  df-v 3444  df-sbc 3743  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920  df-nul 4288  df-if 4482  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-mpt 5182  df-id 5529  df-xp 5640  df-rel 5641  df-cnv 5642  df-co 5643  df-dm 5644  df-iota 6458  df-fun 6504  df-fv 6510  df-riota 7327  df-ov 7373  df-0g 17375  df-mgm 18579  df-sgrp 18658  df-mnd 18674  df-cmn 19728  df-srg 20139  df-slmd 33301

This theorem is referenced by:  slmdvs0  33325  gsumvsca2  33327