Theorem xpord2ind 8165

Description: Induction over the Cartesian product ordering. Note that the substitutions cover all possible cases of membership in the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
xpord2ind.1	⊢ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴
xpord2ind.2	⊢ 𝑅 Po 𝐴
xpord2ind.3	⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴
xpord2ind.4	⊢ 𝑆 Fr 𝐵
xpord2ind.5	⊢ 𝑆 Po 𝐵
xpord2ind.6	⊢ 𝑆 Se 𝐵
xpord2ind.7	⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑐 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
xpord2ind.8	⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
xpord2ind.9	⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑐 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒))
xpord2ind.11	⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))
xpord2ind.12	⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))
xpord2ind.i	⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑐 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜃) → 𝜑))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xpord2ind	⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜂)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑   𝜓,𝑎   𝜏,𝑎   𝐵,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑   𝜒,𝑏   𝜂,𝑏   𝜑,𝑐   𝜃,𝑐   𝜓,𝑑   𝑅,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑   𝑆,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑   𝑋,𝑎,𝑏   𝑌,𝑏

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑑)   𝜓(𝑏, 𝑐)   𝜒(𝑎, 𝑐, 𝑑)   𝜃(𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑑)   𝜏(𝑏, 𝑐, 𝑑)   𝜂(𝑎, 𝑐, 𝑑)   𝑋(𝑐, 𝑑)   𝑌(𝑎, 𝑐, 𝑑)

Proof of Theorem xpord2ind

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2761	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}
2		xpord2ind.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴
3		xpord2ind.2	. 2 ⊢ 𝑅 Po 𝐴
4		xpord2ind.3	. 2 ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴
5		xpord2ind.4	. 2 ⊢ 𝑆 Fr 𝐵
6		xpord2ind.5	. 2 ⊢ 𝑆 Po 𝐵
7		xpord2ind.6	. 2 ⊢ 𝑆 Se 𝐵
8		xpord2ind.7	. 2 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑐 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
9		xpord2ind.8	. 2 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
10		xpord2ind.9	. 2 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑐 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒))
11		xpord2ind.11	. 2 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))
12		xpord2ind.12	. 2 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))
13		xpord2ind.i	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑐 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜃) → 𝜑))
14	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13	xpord2indlem 8164	1 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜂)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2956  ∀wral 3077   class class class wbr 5103  {copab 5167   Po wpo 5557   Fr wfr 5601   Se wse 5602   × cxp 5649  Predcpred 6303  ‘cfv 6538  1^st c1st 7999  2^nd c2nd 8000

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7751

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-po 5559  df-fr 5604  df-se 5605  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-pred 6304  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fv 6546  df-1st 8001  df-2nd 8002

This theorem is used by:  on2ind  8678  no2indlesm  28340  ons2ind  28661