| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 82 of 494) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30937) |
(30938-32460) |
(32461-49324) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | mpoexg 8101* | Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | mpoexga 8102* | If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the operation is a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | mpoexw 8103* | Weak version of mpoex 8104 that holds without ax-rep 5279. If the domain and codomain of an operation given by maps-to notation are sets, the operation is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V & ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | mpoex 8104* | If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the operation is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | mptmpoopabbrd 8105* | The operation value of a function value of a collection of ordered pairs of elements related in two ways. (Contributed by Alexander van Vekens, 8-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jan-2021.) Add disjoint variable condition on 𝐷, 𝑓, ℎ to remove hypotheses; avoid ax-rep 5279. (Revised by SN, 7-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐵‘𝐺)) & ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑌) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (𝐴‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (𝐵‘𝑔) ↦ {〈𝑓, ℎ〉 ∣ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑓(𝐷‘𝑔)ℎ)})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(𝑀‘𝐺)𝑌) = {〈𝑓, ℎ〉 ∣ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑓(𝐷‘𝐺)ℎ)}) | ||
| Theorem | mptmpoopabbrdOLD 8106* | Obsolete version of mptmpoopabbrd 8105 as of 7-Apr-2025. (Contributed by Alexander van Vekens, 8-Nov-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐵‘𝐺)) & ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑌) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (𝐴‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (𝐵‘𝑔) ↦ {〈𝑓, ℎ〉 ∣ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑓(𝐷‘𝑔)ℎ)})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(𝑀‘𝐺)𝑌) = {〈𝑓, ℎ〉 ∣ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑓(𝐷‘𝐺)ℎ)}) | ||
| Theorem | mptmpoopabovd 8107* | The operation value of a function value of a collection of ordered pairs of related elements. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jan-2021.) Add disjoint variable condition on 𝐷, 𝑓, ℎ to remove hypotheses. (Revised by SN, 13-Dec-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐵‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (𝐴‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (𝐵‘𝑔) ↦ {〈𝑓, ℎ〉 ∣ (𝑓(𝑎(𝐶‘𝑔)𝑏)ℎ ∧ 𝑓(𝐷‘𝑔)ℎ)})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(𝑀‘𝐺)𝑌) = {〈𝑓, ℎ〉 ∣ (𝑓(𝑋(𝐶‘𝐺)𝑌)ℎ ∧ 𝑓(𝐷‘𝐺)ℎ)}) | ||
| Theorem | mptmpoopabbrdOLDOLD 8108* | Obsolete version of mptmpoopabbrd 8105 as of 13-Dec-2024. (Contributed by Alexander van Vekens, 8-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jan-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐵‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈𝑓, ℎ〉 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓(𝐷‘𝐺)ℎ) → 𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑌) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (𝐴‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (𝐵‘𝑔) ↦ {〈𝑓, ℎ〉 ∣ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑓(𝐷‘𝑔)ℎ)})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(𝑀‘𝐺)𝑌) = {〈𝑓, ℎ〉 ∣ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑓(𝐷‘𝐺)ℎ)}) | ||
| Theorem | mptmpoopabovdOLD 8109* | Obsolete version of mptmpoopabovd 8107 as of 13-Dec-2024. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jan-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐵‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈𝑓, ℎ〉 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓(𝐷‘𝐺)ℎ) → 𝜓) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (𝐴‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (𝐵‘𝑔) ↦ {〈𝑓, ℎ〉 ∣ (𝑓(𝑎(𝐶‘𝑔)𝑏)ℎ ∧ 𝑓(𝐷‘𝑔)ℎ)})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(𝑀‘𝐺)𝑌) = {〈𝑓, ℎ〉 ∣ (𝑓(𝑋(𝐶‘𝐺)𝑌)ℎ ∧ 𝑓(𝐷‘𝐺)ℎ)}) | ||
| Theorem | el2mpocsbcl 8110* | If the operation value of the operation value of two nested maps-to notation is not empty, all involved arguments belong to the corresponding base classes of the maps-to notations. (Contributed by AV, 21-May-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑠 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐶 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝑆(𝑋𝑂𝑌)𝑇) → ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝑌 / 𝑦⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝑌 / 𝑦⦌𝐷)))) | ||
| Theorem | el2mpocl 8111* | If the operation value of the operation value of two nested maps-to notation is not empty, all involved arguments belong to the corresponding base classes of the maps-to notations. Using implicit substitution. (Contributed by AV, 21-May-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑠 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐸)) & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → (𝐶 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝐷 = 𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐶 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝑆(𝑋𝑂𝑌)𝑇) → ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐺)))) | ||
| Theorem | fnmpoovd 8112* | A function with a Cartesian product as domain is a mapping with two arguments defined by its operation values. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵)) & ⊢ ((𝑖 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝑗 = 𝑏) → 𝐷 = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑖𝑀𝑗) = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | offval22 8113* | The function operation expressed as a mapping, variation of offval2 7717. (Contributed by SO, 15-Jul-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐶𝑅𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | brovpreldm 8114 | If a binary relation holds for the result of an operation, the operands are in the domain of the operation. (Contributed by AV, 31-Dec-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐷(𝐵𝐴𝐶)𝐸 → 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ dom 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | bropopvvv 8115* | If a binary relation holds for the result of an operation which is a result of an operation, the involved classes are sets. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Dec-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 3-Jan-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑣 ∈ V, 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑣, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑣 ↦ {〈𝑓, 𝑝〉 ∣ 𝜑})) & ⊢ ((𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ 𝑒 = 𝐸) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐴(𝑉𝑂𝐸)𝐵) = {〈𝑓, 𝑝〉 ∣ 𝜃}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(𝑉𝑂𝐸)𝐵)𝑃 → ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉))) | ||
| Theorem | bropfvvvvlem 8116* | Lemma for bropfvvvv 8117. (Contributed by AV, 31-Dec-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑏 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑐 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ {〈𝑑, 𝑒〉 ∣ 𝜑})) & ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝐵(𝑂‘𝐴)𝐶) = {〈𝑑, 𝑒〉 ∣ 𝜃}) ⇒ ⊢ ((〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑇) ∧ 𝐷(𝐵(𝑂‘𝐴)𝐶)𝐸) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V))) | ||
| Theorem | bropfvvvv 8117* | If a binary relation holds for the result of an operation which is a function value, the involved classes are sets. (Contributed by AV, 31-Dec-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑏 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑐 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ {〈𝑑, 𝑒〉 ∣ 𝜑})) & ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝐵(𝑂‘𝐴)𝐶) = {〈𝑑, 𝑒〉 ∣ 𝜃}) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → 𝑉 = 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → 𝑊 = 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐷(𝐵(𝑂‘𝐴)𝐶)𝐸 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V)))) | ||
| Theorem | ovmptss 8118* | If all the values of the mapping are subsets of a class 𝑋, then so is any evaluation of the mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑋 → (𝐸𝐹𝐺) ⊆ 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | relmpoopab 8119* | Any function to sets of ordered pairs produces a relation on function value unconditionally. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 ∣ 𝜑}) ⇒ ⊢ Rel (𝐶𝐹𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | fmpoco 8120* | Composition of two functions. Variation of fmptco 7149 when the second function has two arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑅 → 𝑆 = 𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | oprabco 8121* | Composition of a function with an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐻‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 Fn 𝐷 → 𝐺 = (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | oprab2co 8122* | Composition of operator abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 23-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐶𝑀𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 Fn (𝑅 × 𝑆) → 𝐺 = (𝑀 ∘ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | df1st2 8123* | An alternate possible definition of the 1st function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑥} = (1st ↾ (V × V)) | ||
| Theorem | df2nd2 8124* | An alternate possible definition of the 2nd function. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑦} = (2nd ↾ (V × V)) | ||
| Theorem | 1stconst 8125 | The mapping of a restriction of the 1st function to a constant function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (1st ↾ (𝐴 × {𝐵})):(𝐴 × {𝐵})–1-1-onto→𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | 2ndconst 8126 | The mapping of a restriction of the 2nd function to a converse constant function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (2nd ↾ ({𝐴} × 𝐵)):({𝐴} × 𝐵)–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dfmpo 8127* | Alternate definition for the maps-to notation df-mpo 7436 (although it requires that 𝐶 be a set). (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝐶〉} | ||
| Theorem | mposn 8128* | An operation (in maps-to notation) on two singletons. (Contributed by AV, 4-Aug-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}, 𝑦 ∈ {𝐵} ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → 𝐷 = 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝐹 = {〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 𝐸〉}) | ||
| Theorem | curry1 8129* | Composition with ◡(2nd ↾ ({𝐶} × V)) turns any binary operation 𝐹 with a constant first operand into a function 𝐺 of the second operand only. This transformation is called "currying". (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐹 ∘ ◡(2nd ↾ ({𝐶} × V))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐶𝐹𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | curry1val 8130 | The value of a curried function with a constant first argument. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐹 ∘ ◡(2nd ↾ ({𝐶} × V))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝐷) = (𝐶𝐹𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | curry1f 8131 | Functionality of a curried function with a constant first argument. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐹 ∘ ◡(2nd ↾ ({𝐶} × V))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | curry2 8132* | Composition with ◡(1st ↾ (V × {𝐶})) turns any binary operation 𝐹 with a constant second operand into a function 𝐺 of the first operand only. This transformation is called "currying". (If this becomes frequently used, we can introduce a new notation for the hypothesis.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐹 ∘ ◡(1st ↾ (V × {𝐶}))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑥𝐹𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | curry2f 8133 | Functionality of a curried function with a constant second argument. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐹 ∘ ◡(1st ↾ (V × {𝐶}))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | curry2val 8134 | The value of a curried function with a constant second argument. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐹 ∘ ◡(1st ↾ (V × {𝐶}))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝐷) = (𝐷𝐹𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvf1olem 8135 | Lemma for cnvf1o 8136. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ◡{𝐵})) → (𝐶 ∈ ◡𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 = ∪ ◡{𝐶})) | ||
| Theorem | cnvf1o 8136* | Describe a function that maps the elements of a set to its converse bijectively. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}):𝐴–1-1-onto→◡𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | fparlem1 8137 | Lemma for fpar 8141. (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (◡(1st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) = ({𝑥} × V) | ||
| Theorem | fparlem2 8138 | Lemma for fpar 8141. (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (◡(2nd ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑦}) = (V × {𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | fparlem3 8139* | Lemma for fpar 8141. (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (◡(1st ↾ (V × V)) ∘ (𝐹 ∘ (1st ↾ (V × V)))) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (({𝑥} × V) × ({(𝐹‘𝑥)} × V))) | ||
| Theorem | fparlem4 8140* | Lemma for fpar 8141. (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐺 Fn 𝐵 → (◡(2nd ↾ (V × V)) ∘ (𝐺 ∘ (2nd ↾ (V × V)))) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((V × {𝑦}) × (V × {(𝐺‘𝑦)}))) | ||
| Theorem | fpar 8141* | Merge two functions in parallel. Use as the second argument of a composition with a binary operation to build compound functions such as (𝑥 ∈ (0[,)+∞), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((√‘𝑥) + (sin‘𝑦))), see also ex-fpar 30481. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = ((◡(1st ↾ (V × V)) ∘ (𝐹 ∘ (1st ↾ (V × V)))) ∩ (◡(2nd ↾ (V × V)) ∘ (𝐺 ∘ (2nd ↾ (V × V))))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 〈(𝐹‘𝑥), (𝐺‘𝑦)〉)) | ||
| Theorem | fsplit 8142 | A function that can be used to feed a common value to both operands of an operation. Use as the second argument of a composition with the function of fpar 8141 in order to build compound functions such as (𝑥 ∈ (0[,)+∞) ↦ ((√‘𝑥) + (sin‘𝑥))). (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2007.) Replace use of dfid2 5580 with df-id 5578. (Revised by BJ, 31-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ ◡(1st ↾ I ) = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ 〈𝑥, 𝑥〉) | ||
| Theorem | fsplitfpar 8143* | Merge two functions with a common argument in parallel. Combination of fsplit 8142 and fpar 8141. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = ((◡(1st ↾ (V × V)) ∘ (𝐹 ∘ (1st ↾ (V × V)))) ∩ (◡(2nd ↾ (V × V)) ∘ (𝐺 ∘ (2nd ↾ (V × V))))) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (◡(1st ↾ I ) ↾ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → (𝐻 ∘ 𝑆) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 〈(𝐹‘𝑥), (𝐺‘𝑥)〉)) | ||
| Theorem | offsplitfpar 8144 | Express the function operation map ∘f by the functions defined in fsplit 8142 and fpar 8141. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = ((◡(1st ↾ (V × V)) ∘ (𝐹 ∘ (1st ↾ (V × V)))) ∩ (◡(2nd ↾ (V × V)) ∘ (𝐺 ∘ (2nd ↾ (V × V))))) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (◡(1st ↾ I ) ↾ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ ( + Fn 𝐶 ∧ (ran 𝐹 × ran 𝐺) ⊆ 𝐶)) → ( + ∘ (𝐻 ∘ 𝑆)) = (𝐹 ∘f + 𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | f2ndf 8145 | The 2nd (second component of an ordered pair) function restricted to a function 𝐹 is a function from 𝐹 into the codomain of 𝐹. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (2nd ↾ 𝐹):𝐹⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | fo2ndf 8146 | The 2nd (second component of an ordered pair) function restricted to a function 𝐹 is a function from 𝐹 onto the range of 𝐹. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (2nd ↾ 𝐹):𝐹–onto→ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | f1o2ndf1 8147 | The 2nd (second component of an ordered pair) function restricted to a one-to-one function 𝐹 is a one-to-one function from 𝐹 onto the range of 𝐹. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → (2nd ↾ 𝐹):𝐹–1-1-onto→ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | opco1 8148 | Value of an operation precomposed with the projection on the first component. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) Generalize to closed form. (Revised by BJ, 27-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(𝐹 ∘ 1st )𝐵) = (𝐹‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | opco2 8149 | Value of an operation precomposed with the projection on the second component. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(𝐹 ∘ 2nd )𝐵) = (𝐹‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | opco1i 8150 | Inference form of opco1 8148. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵(𝐹 ∘ 1st )𝐶) = (𝐹‘𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | frxp 8151* | A lexicographical ordering of two well-founded classes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2013.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦))))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Fr 𝐵) → 𝑇 Fr (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | xporderlem 8152* | Lemma for lexicographical ordering theorems. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦))))} ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝑎, 𝑏〉𝑇〈𝑐, 𝑑〉 ↔ (((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑎𝑅𝑐 ∨ (𝑎 = 𝑐 ∧ 𝑏𝑆𝑑)))) | ||
| Theorem | poxp 8153* | A lexicographical ordering of two posets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦))))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Po 𝐵) → 𝑇 Po (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | soxp 8154* | A lexicographical ordering of two strictly ordered classes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦))))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Or 𝐵) → 𝑇 Or (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | wexp 8155* | A lexicographical ordering of two well-ordered classes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦))))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 We 𝐵) → 𝑇 We (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | fnwelem 8156* | Lemma for fnwe 8157. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑆𝑦)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 We 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝑤) ∈ V) & ⊢ 𝑄 = {〈𝑢, 𝑣〉 ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐴) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐴)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑢)𝑅(1st ‘𝑣) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑢) = (1st ‘𝑣) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑢)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑣))))} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 〈(𝐹‘𝑧), 𝑧〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 We 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | fnwe 8157* | A variant on lexicographic order, which sorts first by some function of the base set, and then by a "backup" well-ordering when the function value is equal on both elements. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑆𝑦)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 We 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝑤) ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 We 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | fnse 8158* | Condition for the well-order in fnwe 8157 to be set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑆𝑦)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 “ 𝑤) ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Se 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | fvproj 8159* | Value of a function on ordered pairs with values expressed as ordered pairs. Note that 𝐹 and 𝐺 are the projections of 𝐻 to the first and second coordinate respectively. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 〈(𝐹‘𝑥), (𝐺‘𝑦)〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘〈𝑋, 𝑌〉) = 〈(𝐹‘𝑋), (𝐺‘𝑌)〉) | ||
| Theorem | fimaproj 8160* | Image of a cartesian product for a function on ordered pairs with values expressed as ordered pairs. Note that 𝐹 and 𝐺 are the projections of 𝐻 to the first and second coordinate respectively. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 〈(𝐹‘𝑥), (𝐺‘𝑦)〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 “ (𝑋 × 𝑌)) = ((𝐹 “ 𝑋) × (𝐺 “ 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | ralxpes 8161* | A version of ralxp 5852 with explicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)[(1st ‘𝑥) / 𝑦][(2nd ‘𝑥) / 𝑧]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ralxp3f 8162* | Restricted for all over a triple Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 〈𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ralxp3 8163* | Restricted for all over a triple Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 〈𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ralxp3es 8164* | Restricted for-all over a triple Cartesian product with explicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶)[(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) / 𝑦][(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) / 𝑧][(2nd ‘𝑥) / 𝑤]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | frpoins3xpg 8165* | Special case of founded partial induction over a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑧∀𝑤(〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 ∈ Pred(𝑅, (𝐴 × 𝐵), 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉) → 𝜒) → 𝜑)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑅 Po (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑅 Se (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | frpoins3xp3g 8166* | Special case of founded partial recursion over a triple Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → (∀𝑤∀𝑡∀𝑢(〈𝑤, 𝑡, 𝑢〉 ∈ Pred(𝑅, ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶), 〈𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧〉) → 𝜃) → 𝜑)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑡 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑢 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑅 Po ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑅 Se ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶)) → 𝜁) | ||
| Theorem | xpord2lem 8167* | Lemma for Cartesian product ordering. Calculate the value of the Cartesian product relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝑎, 𝑏〉𝑇〈𝑐, 𝑑〉 ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑐 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝑎𝑅𝑐 ∨ 𝑎 = 𝑐) ∧ (𝑏𝑆𝑑 ∨ 𝑏 = 𝑑) ∧ (𝑎 ≠ 𝑐 ∨ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑑)))) | ||
| Theorem | poxp2 8168* | Another way of partially ordering a Cartesian product of two classes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Po 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Po (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | frxp2 8169* | Another way of giving a well-founded order to a Cartesian product of two classes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Fr 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Fr (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | xpord2pred 8170* | Calculate the predecessor class in frxp2 8169. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → Pred(𝑇, (𝐴 × 𝐵), 〈𝑋, 𝑌〉) = (((Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∪ {𝑋}) × (Pred(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑌) ∪ {𝑌})) ∖ {〈𝑋, 𝑌〉})) | ||
| Theorem | sexp2 8171* | Condition for the relation in frxp2 8169 to be set-like. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Se 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Se (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | xpord2indlem 8172* | Induction over the Cartesian product ordering. Note that the substitutions cover all possible cases of membership in the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑆 Fr 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑆 Po 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑆 Se 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑐 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑐 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑐 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜃) → 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | xpord2ind 8173* | Induction over the Cartesian product ordering. Note that the substitutions cover all possible cases of membership in the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑆 Fr 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑆 Po 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑆 Se 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑐 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑐 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑐 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜃) → 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | xpord3lem 8174* | Lemma for triple ordering. Calculate the value of the relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐〉𝑈〈𝑑, 𝑒, 𝑓〉 ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (((𝑎𝑅𝑑 ∨ 𝑎 = 𝑑) ∧ (𝑏𝑆𝑒 ∨ 𝑏 = 𝑒) ∧ (𝑐𝑇𝑓 ∨ 𝑐 = 𝑓)) ∧ (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∨ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑒 ∨ 𝑐 ≠ 𝑓)))) | ||
| Theorem | poxp3 8175* | Triple Cartesian product partial ordering. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Po 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Po 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 Po ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | frxp3 8176* | Give well-foundedness over a triple Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Fr 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Fr 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 Fr ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | xpord3pred 8177* | Calculate the predecsessor class for the triple order. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) → Pred(𝑈, ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶), 〈𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍〉) = ((((Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∪ {𝑋}) × (Pred(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑌) ∪ {𝑌})) × (Pred(𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑍) ∪ {𝑍})) ∖ {〈𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍〉})) | ||
| Theorem | sexp3 8178* | Show that the triple order is set-like. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Se 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Se 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 Se ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | xpord3inddlem 8179* | Induction over the triple Cartesian product ordering. Note that the substitutions cover all possible cases of membership in the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑆 Fr 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑆 Po 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑆 Se 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑇 Fr 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑇 Po 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑇 Se 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜌)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜌 ↔ 𝜇)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑍 → (𝜇 ↔ 𝜆)) & ⊢ ((𝜅 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐶)) → (((∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜃 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜁) ∧ (∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜏 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜎) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜂) → 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝜆) | ||
| Theorem | xpord3indd 8180* | Induction over the triple Cartesian product ordering. Note that the substitutions cover all possible cases of membership in the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑆 Fr 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑆 Po 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑆 Se 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑇 Fr 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑇 Po 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑇 Se 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜌)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜌 ↔ 𝜇)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑍 → (𝜇 ↔ 𝜆)) & ⊢ ((𝜅 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐶)) → (((∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜃 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜁) ∧ (∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜏 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜎) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜂) → 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝜆) | ||
| Theorem | xpord3ind 8181* | Induction over the triple Cartesian product ordering. Note that the substitutions cover all possible cases of membership in the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑆 Fr 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑆 Po 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑆 Se 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑇 Fr 𝐶 & ⊢ 𝑇 Po 𝐶 & ⊢ 𝑇 Se 𝐶 & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜌)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜌 ↔ 𝜇)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑍 → (𝜇 ↔ 𝜆)) & ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐶) → (((∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜃 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜁) ∧ (∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜏 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜎) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜂) → 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜆) | ||
| Theorem | orderseqlem 8182* | Lemma for poseq 8183 and soseq 8184. The function value of a sequence is either in 𝐴 or null. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝑓:𝑥⟶𝐴} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐹 → (𝐺‘𝑋) ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {∅})) | ||
| Theorem | poseq 8183* | A partial ordering of ordinal sequences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Po (𝐴 ∪ {∅}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝑓:𝑥⟶𝐴} & ⊢ 𝑆 = {〈𝑓, 𝑔〉 ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑔‘𝑦) ∧ (𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥)))} ⇒ ⊢ 𝑆 Po 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | soseq 8184* | A linear ordering of ordinal sequences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or (𝐴 ∪ {∅}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝑓:𝑥⟶𝐴} & ⊢ 𝑆 = {〈𝑓, 𝑔〉 ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑔‘𝑦) ∧ (𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥)))} & ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ 𝑆 Or 𝐹 | ||
In this section, the support of functions is defined and corresponding theorems are provided. Since basic properties (see suppval 8187) are based on the Axiom of Union (usage of dmexg 7923), these definition and theorems cannot be provided earlier. Until April 2019, the support of a function was represented by the expression (◡𝑅 “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) (see suppimacnv 8199). The theorems which are based on this representation and which are provided in previous sections could be moved into this section to have all related theorems in one section, although they do not depend on the Axiom of Union. This was possible because they are not used before. The current theorems differ from the original ones by requiring that the classes representing the "function" (or its "domain") and the "zero element" are sets. Actually, this does not cause any problem (until now). | ||
| Syntax | csupp 8185 | Extend class definition to include the support of functions. |
| class supp | ||
| Definition | df-supp 8186* | Define the support of a function against a "zero" value. According to Wikipedia ("Support (mathematics)", 31-Mar-2019, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Support_(mathematics)) "In mathematics, the support of a real-valued function f is the subset of the domain containing those elements which are not mapped to zero." and "The notion of support also extends in a natural way to functions taking values in more general sets than R [the real numbers] and to other objects." The following definition allows for such extensions, being applicable for any sets (which usually are functions) and any element (even not necessarily from the range of the function) regarded as "zero". (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 6-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ supp = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}}) | ||
| Theorem | suppval 8187* | The value of the operation constructing the support of a function. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 6-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}}) | ||
| Theorem | supp0prc 8188 | The support of a class is empty if either the class or the "zero" is a proper class. (Contributed by AV, 28-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (¬ (𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ V) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | suppvalbr 8189* | The value of the operation constructing the support of a function expressed by binary relations. (Contributed by AV, 7-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 supp 𝑍) = {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑍))}) | ||
| Theorem | supp0 8190 | The support of the empty set is the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑊 → (∅ supp 𝑍) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | suppval1 8191* | The value of the operation constructing the support of a function. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋‘𝑖) ≠ 𝑍}) | ||
| Theorem | suppvalfng 8192* | The value of the operation constructing the support of a function with a given domain. This version of suppvalfn 8193 assumes 𝐹 is a set rather than its domain 𝑋, avoiding ax-rep 5279. (Contributed by SN, 5-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑖) ≠ 𝑍}) | ||
| Theorem | suppvalfn 8193* | The value of the operation constructing the support of a function with a given domain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 22-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑖) ≠ 𝑍}) | ||
| Theorem | elsuppfng 8194 | An element of the support of a function with a given domain. This version of elsuppfn 8195 assumes 𝐹 is a set rather than its domain 𝑋, avoiding ax-rep 5279. (Contributed by SN, 5-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑆) ≠ 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | elsuppfn 8195 | An element of the support of a function with a given domain. (Contributed by AV, 27-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑆) ≠ 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | fvdifsupp 8196 | Function value is zero outside of its support. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | cnvimadfsn 8197* | The support of functions "defined" by inverse images expressed by binary relations. (Contributed by AV, 7-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ (◡𝑅 “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑍)} | ||
| Theorem | suppimacnvss 8198 | The support of functions "defined" by inverse images is a subset of the support defined by df-supp 8186. (Contributed by AV, 7-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (◡𝑅 “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) ⊆ (𝑅 supp 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | suppimacnv 8199 | Support sets of functions expressed by inverse images. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 7-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 supp 𝑍) = (◡𝑅 “ (V ∖ {𝑍}))) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppeq 8200 | Two ways of writing the support of a function with known codomain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹:𝐼⟶𝑆 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = (◡𝐹 “ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑍})))) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |