| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 82 of 504) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31077) |
(31078-32600) |
(32601-50386) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | poxp 8101* | A lexicographical ordering of two posets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦))))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Po 𝐵) → 𝑇 Po (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | soxp 8102* | A lexicographical ordering of two strictly ordered classes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦))))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Or 𝐵) → 𝑇 Or (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | wexp 8103* | A lexicographical ordering of two well-ordered classes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦))))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 We 𝐵) → 𝑇 We (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | fnwelem 8104* | Lemma for fnwe 8105. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑆𝑦)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 We 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝑤) ∈ V) & ⊢ 𝑄 = {〈𝑢, 𝑣〉 ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐴) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐴)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑢)𝑅(1st ‘𝑣) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑢) = (1st ‘𝑣) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑢)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑣))))} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 〈(𝐹‘𝑧), 𝑧〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 We 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | fnwe 8105* | A variant on lexicographic order, which sorts first by some function of the base set, and then by a "backup" well-ordering when the function value is equal on both elements. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑆𝑦)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 We 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝑤) ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 We 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | fnse 8106* | Condition for the well-order in fnwe 8105 to be set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑆𝑦)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 “ 𝑤) ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Se 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | fvproj 8107* | Value of a function on ordered pairs with values expressed as ordered pairs. Note that 𝐹 and 𝐺 are the projections of 𝐻 to the first and second coordinate respectively. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 〈(𝐹‘𝑥), (𝐺‘𝑦)〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘〈𝑋, 𝑌〉) = 〈(𝐹‘𝑋), (𝐺‘𝑌)〉) | ||
| Theorem | fimaproj 8108* | Image of a cartesian product for a function on ordered pairs with values expressed as ordered pairs. Note that 𝐹 and 𝐺 are the projections of 𝐻 to the first and second coordinate respectively. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 〈(𝐹‘𝑥), (𝐺‘𝑦)〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 “ (𝑋 × 𝑌)) = ((𝐹 “ 𝑋) × (𝐺 “ 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | ralxpes 8109* | A version of ralxp 5809 with explicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)[(1st ‘𝑥) / 𝑦][(2nd ‘𝑥) / 𝑧]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ralxp3f 8110* | Restricted for all over a triple Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 〈𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ralxp3 8111* | Restricted for all over a triple Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 〈𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ralxp3es 8112* | Restricted for-all over a triple Cartesian product with explicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶)[(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) / 𝑦][(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) / 𝑧][(2nd ‘𝑥) / 𝑤]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | frpoins3xpg 8113* | Special case of founded partial induction over a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑧∀𝑤(〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 ∈ Pred(𝑅, (𝐴 × 𝐵), 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉) → 𝜒) → 𝜑)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑅 Po (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑅 Se (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | frpoins3xp3g 8114* | Special case of founded partial recursion over a triple Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → (∀𝑤∀𝑡∀𝑢(〈𝑤, 𝑡, 𝑢〉 ∈ Pred(𝑅, ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶), 〈𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧〉) → 𝜃) → 𝜑)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑡 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑢 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑅 Po ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑅 Se ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶)) → 𝜁) | ||
| Theorem | xpord2lem 8115* | Lemma for Cartesian product ordering. Calculate the value of the Cartesian product relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝑎, 𝑏〉𝑇〈𝑐, 𝑑〉 ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑐 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝑎𝑅𝑐 ∨ 𝑎 = 𝑐) ∧ (𝑏𝑆𝑑 ∨ 𝑏 = 𝑑) ∧ (𝑎 ≠ 𝑐 ∨ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑑)))) | ||
| Theorem | poxp2 8116* | Another way of partially ordering a Cartesian product of two classes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Po 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Po (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | frxp2 8117* | Another way of giving a well-founded order to a Cartesian product of two classes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Fr 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Fr (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | xpord2pred 8118* | Calculate the predecessor class in frxp2 8117. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → Pred(𝑇, (𝐴 × 𝐵), 〈𝑋, 𝑌〉) = (((Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∪ {𝑋}) × (Pred(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑌) ∪ {𝑌})) ∖ {〈𝑋, 𝑌〉})) | ||
| Theorem | sexp2 8119* | Condition for the relation in frxp2 8117 to be set-like. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Se 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Se (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | xpord2indlem 8120* | Induction over the Cartesian product ordering. Note that the substitutions cover all possible cases of membership in the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑆 Fr 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑆 Po 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑆 Se 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑐 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑐 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑐 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜃) → 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | xpord2ind 8121* | Induction over the Cartesian product ordering. Note that the substitutions cover all possible cases of membership in the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑆 Fr 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑆 Po 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑆 Se 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑐 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑐 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑐 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜃) → 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | xpord3lem 8122* | Lemma for triple ordering. Calculate the value of the relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐〉𝑈〈𝑑, 𝑒, 𝑓〉 ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (((𝑎𝑅𝑑 ∨ 𝑎 = 𝑑) ∧ (𝑏𝑆𝑒 ∨ 𝑏 = 𝑒) ∧ (𝑐𝑇𝑓 ∨ 𝑐 = 𝑓)) ∧ (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∨ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑒 ∨ 𝑐 ≠ 𝑓)))) | ||
| Theorem | poxp3 8123* | Triple Cartesian product partial ordering. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Po 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Po 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 Po ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | frxp3 8124* | Give well-foundedness over a triple Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Fr 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Fr 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 Fr ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | xpord3pred 8125* | Calculate the predecsessor class for the triple order. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) → Pred(𝑈, ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶), 〈𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍〉) = ((((Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∪ {𝑋}) × (Pred(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑌) ∪ {𝑌})) × (Pred(𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑍) ∪ {𝑍})) ∖ {〈𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍〉})) | ||
| Theorem | sexp3 8126* | Show that the triple order is set-like. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Se 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Se 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 Se ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | xpord3inddlem 8127* | Induction over the triple Cartesian product ordering. Note that the substitutions cover all possible cases of membership in the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑆 Fr 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑆 Po 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑆 Se 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑇 Fr 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑇 Po 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑇 Se 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜌)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜌 ↔ 𝜇)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑍 → (𝜇 ↔ 𝜆)) & ⊢ ((𝜅 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐶)) → (((∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜃 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜁) ∧ (∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜏 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜎) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜂) → 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝜆) | ||
| Theorem | xpord3indd 8128* | Induction over the triple Cartesian product ordering. Note that the substitutions cover all possible cases of membership in the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑆 Fr 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑆 Po 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑆 Se 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑇 Fr 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑇 Po 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝑇 Se 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜌)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜌 ↔ 𝜇)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑍 → (𝜇 ↔ 𝜆)) & ⊢ ((𝜅 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐶)) → (((∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜃 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜁) ∧ (∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜏 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜎) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜂) → 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜅 → 𝜆) | ||
| Theorem | xpord3ind 8129* | Induction over the triple Cartesian product ordering. Note that the substitutions cover all possible cases of membership in the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑆 Fr 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑆 Po 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑆 Se 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑇 Fr 𝐶 & ⊢ 𝑇 Po 𝐶 & ⊢ 𝑇 Se 𝐶 & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜌)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜌 ↔ 𝜇)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑍 → (𝜇 ↔ 𝜆)) & ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐶) → (((∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜃 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜁) ∧ (∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜏 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜎) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜂) → 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜆) | ||
| Theorem | orderseqlem 8130* | Lemma for poseq 8131 and soseq 8132. The function value of a sequence is either in 𝐴 or null. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝑓:𝑥⟶𝐴} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐹 → (𝐺‘𝑋) ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {∅})) | ||
| Theorem | poseq 8131* | A partial ordering of ordinal sequences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Po (𝐴 ∪ {∅}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝑓:𝑥⟶𝐴} & ⊢ 𝑆 = {〈𝑓, 𝑔〉 ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑔‘𝑦) ∧ (𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥)))} ⇒ ⊢ 𝑆 Po 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | soseq 8132* | A linear ordering of ordinal sequences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or (𝐴 ∪ {∅}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝑓:𝑥⟶𝐴} & ⊢ 𝑆 = {〈𝑓, 𝑔〉 ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑔‘𝑦) ∧ (𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥)))} & ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ 𝑆 Or 𝐹 | ||
In this section, the support of functions is defined and corresponding theorems are provided. Since basic properties (see suppval 8135) are based on the Axiom of Union (usage of dmexg 7876), these definition and theorems cannot be provided earlier. Until April 2019, the support of a function was represented by the expression (◡𝑅 “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) (see suppimacnv 8147). The theorems which are based on this representation and which are provided in previous sections could be moved into this section to have all related theorems in one section, although they do not depend on the Axiom of Union. This was possible because they are not used before. The current theorems differ from the original ones by requiring that the classes representing the "function" (or its "domain") and the "zero element" are sets. Actually, this does not cause any problem (until now). | ||
| Syntax | csupp 8133 | Extend class definition to include the support of functions. |
| class supp | ||
| Definition | df-supp 8134* | Define the support of a function against a "zero" value. According to Wikipedia ("Support (mathematics)", 31-Mar-2019, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Support_(mathematics)) "In mathematics, the support of a real-valued function f is the subset of the domain containing those elements which are not mapped to zero." and "The notion of support also extends in a natural way to functions taking values in more general sets than R [the real numbers] and to other objects." The following definition allows for such extensions, being applicable for any sets (which usually are functions) and any element (even not necessarily from the range of the function) regarded as "zero". (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 6-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ supp = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}}) | ||
| Theorem | suppval 8135* | The value of the operation constructing the support of a function. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 6-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}}) | ||
| Theorem | supp0prc 8136 | The support of a class is empty if either the class or the "zero" is a proper class. (Contributed by AV, 28-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (¬ (𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ V) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | suppvalbr 8137* | The value of the operation constructing the support of a function expressed by binary relations. (Contributed by AV, 7-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 supp 𝑍) = {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑍))}) | ||
| Theorem | supp0 8138 | The support of the empty set is the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑊 → (∅ supp 𝑍) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | suppval1 8139* | The value of the operation constructing the support of a function. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋‘𝑖) ≠ 𝑍}) | ||
| Theorem | suppvalfng 8140* | The value of the operation constructing the support of a function with a given domain. This version of suppvalfn 8141 assumes 𝐹 is a set rather than its domain 𝑋, avoiding ax-rep 5224. (Contributed by SN, 5-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑖) ≠ 𝑍}) | ||
| Theorem | suppvalfn 8141* | The value of the operation constructing the support of a function with a given domain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 22-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑖) ≠ 𝑍}) | ||
| Theorem | elsuppfng 8142 | An element of the support of a function with a given domain. This version of elsuppfn 8143 assumes 𝐹 is a set rather than its domain 𝑋, avoiding ax-rep 5224. (Contributed by SN, 5-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑆) ≠ 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | elsuppfn 8143 | An element of the support of a function with a given domain. (Contributed by AV, 27-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑆) ≠ 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | fvdifsupp 8144 | Function value is zero outside of its support. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | cnvimadfsn 8145* | The support of functions "defined" by inverse images expressed by binary relations. (Contributed by AV, 7-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ (◡𝑅 “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑍)} | ||
| Theorem | suppimacnvss 8146 | The support of functions "defined" by inverse images is a subset of the support defined by df-supp 8134. (Contributed by AV, 7-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (◡𝑅 “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) ⊆ (𝑅 supp 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | suppimacnv 8147 | Support sets of functions expressed by inverse images. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 7-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 supp 𝑍) = (◡𝑅 “ (V ∖ {𝑍}))) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppeq 8148 | Two ways of writing the support of a function with known codomain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹:𝐼⟶𝑆 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = (◡𝐹 “ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑍})))) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppeqg 8149 | Version of fsuppeq 8148 avoiding ax-rep 5224 by assuming 𝐹 is a set rather than its domain 𝐼. (Contributed by SN, 30-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹:𝐼⟶𝑆 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = (◡𝐹 “ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑍})))) | ||
| Theorem | suppssdm 8150 | The support of a function is a subset of the function's domain. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ dom 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | suppsnop 8151 | The support of a singleton of an ordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝑋, 𝑌〉} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = if(𝑌 = 𝑍, ∅, {𝑋})) | ||
| Theorem | snopsuppss 8152 | The support of a singleton containing an ordered pair is a subset of the singleton containing the first element of the ordered pair, i.e. it is empty or the singleton itself. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ({〈𝑋, 𝑌〉} supp 𝑍) ⊆ {𝑋} | ||
| Theorem | fvn0elsupp 8153 | If the function value for a given argument is not empty, the argument belongs to the support of the function with the empty set as zero. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 4-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐺 Fn 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑋) ≠ ∅)) → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐺 supp ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | fvn0elsuppb 8154 | The function value for a given argument is not empty iff the argument belongs to the support of the function with the empty set as zero. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) → ((𝐺‘𝑋) ≠ ∅ ↔ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐺 supp ∅))) | ||
| Theorem | rexsupp 8155* | Existential quantification restricted to a support. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 27-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | ressuppss 8156 | The support of the restriction of a function is a subset of the support of the function itself. (Contributed by AV, 22-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | suppun 8157 | The support of a class/function is a subset of the support of the union of this class/function with another class/function. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ ((𝐹 ∪ 𝐺) supp 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | ressuppssdif 8158 | The support of the restriction of a function is a subset of the support of the function itself. (Contributed by AV, 22-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) supp 𝑍) ∪ (dom 𝐹 ∖ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | mptsuppdifd 8159* | The support of a function in maps-to notation with a class difference. (Contributed by AV, 28-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐵 ∈ (V ∖ {𝑍})}) | ||
| Theorem | mptsuppd 8160* | The support of a function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by AV, 10-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐵 ≠ 𝑍}) | ||
| Theorem | extmptsuppeq 8161* | The support of an extended function is the same as the original. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝑋 = 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑋) supp 𝑍) = ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑋) supp 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | suppfnss 8162* | The support of a function which has the same zero values (in its domain) as another function is a subset of the support of this other function. (Contributed by AV, 30-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 6-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊)) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝑍 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑍) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐺 supp 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | funsssuppss 8163 | The support of a function which is a subset of another function is a subset of the support of this other function. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐺 supp 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | fnsuppres 8164 | Two ways to express restriction of a support set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐵 × {𝑍}))) | ||
| Theorem | fnsuppeq0 8165 | The support of a function is empty iff it is identically zero. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) = ∅ ↔ 𝐹 = (𝐴 × {𝑍}))) | ||
| Theorem | fczsupp0 8166 | The support of a constant function with value zero is empty. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 × {𝑍}) supp 𝑍) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | suppss 8167* | Show that the support of a function is contained in a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.) (Proof shortened by SN, 5-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝑊) | ||
| Theorem | suppssr 8168 | A function is zero outside its support. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | suppssrg 8169 | A function is zero outside its support. Version of suppssr 8168 avoiding ax-rep 5224 by assuming 𝐹 is a set rather than its domain 𝐴. (Contributed by SN, 5-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | suppssov1 8170* | Formula building theorem for support restrictions: operator with left annihilator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.) (Proof shortened by SN, 11-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐴) supp 𝑌) ⊆ 𝐿) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝑌𝑂𝑣) = 𝑍) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝐴𝑂𝐵)) supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝐿) | ||
| Theorem | suppssov2 8171* | Formula building theorem for support restrictions: operator with right annihilator. (Contributed by SN, 11-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵) supp 𝑌) ⊆ 𝐿) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝑣𝑂𝑌) = 𝑍) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝐴𝑂𝐵)) supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝐿) | ||
| Theorem | suppssof1 8172* | Formula building theorem for support restrictions: vector operation with left annihilator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 supp 𝑌) ⊆ 𝐿) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝑌𝑂𝑣) = 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝐷⟶𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐷⟶𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∘f 𝑂𝐵) supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝐿) | ||
| Theorem | suppss2 8173* | Show that the support of a function is contained in a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑊)) → 𝐵 = 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝑊) | ||
| Theorem | suppsssn 8174* | Show that the support of a function is a subset of a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ≠ 𝑊) → 𝐵 = 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) supp 𝑍) ⊆ {𝑊}) | ||
| Theorem | suppssfv 8175* | Formula building theorem for support restriction, on a function which preserves zero. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐴) supp 𝑌) ⊆ 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑌) = 𝑍) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝐹‘𝐴)) supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝐿) | ||
| Theorem | suppofssd 8176 | Condition for the support of a function operation to be a subset of the union of the supports of the left and right function terms. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 28-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍𝑋𝑍) = 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑋𝐺) supp 𝑍) ⊆ ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) ∪ (𝐺 supp 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | suppofss1d 8177* | Condition for the support of a function operation to be a subset of the support of the left function term. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑍𝑋𝑥) = 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑋𝐺) supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | suppofss2d 8178* | Condition for the support of a function operation to be a subset of the support of the right function term. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥𝑋𝑍) = 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑋𝐺) supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐺 supp 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | suppco 8179 | The support of the composition of two functions is the inverse image by the inner function of the support of the outer function. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2019.) Extract this statement from the proof of supp0cosupp0 8181. (Revised by SN, 15-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) supp 𝑍) = (◡𝐺 “ (𝐹 supp 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | suppcoss 8180 | The support of the composition of two functions is a subset of the support of the inner function if the outer function preserves zero. Compare suppssfv 8175, which has a sethood condition on 𝐴 instead of 𝐵. (Contributed by SN, 25-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑌) = 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐺 supp 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | supp0cosupp0 8181 | The support of the composition of two functions is empty if the support of the outer function is empty. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) = ∅ → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) supp 𝑍) = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | imacosupp 8182 | The image of the support of the composition of two functions is the support of the outer function. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ ran 𝐺) → (𝐺 “ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) supp 𝑍)) = (𝐹 supp 𝑍))) | ||
The following theorems are about maps-to operations (see df-mpo 7395) where the domain of the second argument depends on the domain of the first argument, especially when the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, in short "x-maps-to operations". For labels, the abbreviations "mpox" are used (since "x" usually denotes the first argument). This is in line with the currently used conventions for such cases (see cbvmpox 7483, ovmpox 7543 and fmpox 8042). If the first argument is an ordered pair, as in the following, the abbreviation is extended to "mpoxop", and the maps-to operations are called "x-op maps-to operations" for short. | ||
| Theorem | opeliunxp2f 8183* | Membership in a union of Cartesian products, using bound-variable hypothesis for 𝐸 instead of distinct variable conditions as in opeliunxp2 5806. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐸 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → 𝐵 = 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxeldm 8184* | If there is an element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, then the first argument is an element of the first component of the domain and the second argument is an element of the second component of the domain depending on the first argument. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (𝑋𝐹𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxneldm 8185* | If the first argument of an operation given by a maps-to rule is not an element of the first component of the domain or the second argument is not an element of the second component of the domain depending on the first argument, then the value of the operation is the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∉ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑌 ∉ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) → (𝑋𝐹𝑌) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxopn0yelv 8186* | If there is an element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, then the second argument is an element of the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxopynvov0g 8187* | If the second argument of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument is not element of the first component of the first argument, then the value of the operation is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∉ 𝑉) → (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxopxnop0 8188* | If the first argument of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, is not an ordered pair, then the value of the operation is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝑉 ∈ (V × V) → (𝑉𝐹𝐾) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxopx0ov0 8189* | If the first argument of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, is the empty set, then the value of the operation is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (∅𝐹𝐾) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | mpoxopxprcov0 8190* | If the components of the first argument of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, are not sets, then the value of the operation is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ (𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝑊 ∈ V) → (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxopynvov0 8191* | If the second argument of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument is not element of the first component of the first argument, then the value of the operation is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∉ 𝑉 → (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxopoveq 8192* | Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑}) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) → (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [〈𝑉, 𝑊〉 / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxopovel 8193* | Element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens and Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [〈𝑉, 𝑊〉 / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxopoveqd 8194* | Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑}) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌)) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) → {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [〈𝑉, 𝑊〉 / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑} = ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [〈𝑉, 𝑊〉 / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | brovex 8195* | A binary relation of the value of an operation given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) → Rel (𝑉𝑂𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹(𝑉𝑂𝐸)𝑃 → ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V))) | ||
| Theorem | brovmpoex 8196* | A binary relation of the value of an operation given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 ∣ 𝜑}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹(𝑉𝑂𝐸)𝑃 → ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V))) | ||
| Theorem | sprmpod 8197* | The extension of a binary relation which is the value of an operation given in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 20-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑣 ∈ V, 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥(𝑣𝑅𝑒)𝑦 ∧ 𝜒)}) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ 𝑒 = 𝐸) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥(𝑉𝑅𝐸)𝑦 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜃} ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉𝑀𝐸) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥(𝑉𝑅𝐸)𝑦 ∧ 𝜓)}) | ||
| Syntax | ctpos 8198 | The transposition of a function. |
| class tpos 𝐹 | ||
| Definition | df-tpos 8199* | Define the transposition of a function, which is a function 𝐺 = tpos 𝐹 satisfying 𝐺(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝐹(𝑦, 𝑥). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ (◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})) | ||
| Theorem | tposss 8200 | Subset theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺 → tpos 𝐹 ⊆ tpos 𝐺) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |