Theorem bnj970 31563

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 31624. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj970.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
bnj970.10	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj970	⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑝 ∈ 𝐷)

Proof of Theorem bnj970

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj970.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
2	1	bnj1232 31420	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
3	2	3ad2ant1 1169	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
4	3	adantl 475	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
5		simpr3 1258	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)
6		bnj970.10	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
7	6	bnj923 31384	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝑛 ∈ ω)
8		peano2 7347	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ω → suc 𝑛 ∈ ω)
9		eleq1 2894	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 → (𝑝 ∈ ω ↔ suc 𝑛 ∈ ω))
10		bianir 1087	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((suc 𝑛 ∈ ω ∧ (𝑝 ∈ ω ↔ suc 𝑛 ∈ ω)) → 𝑝 ∈ ω)
11	8, 9, 10	syl2an 591	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ∈ ω)
12	7, 11	sylan 577	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ∈ ω)
13		df-suc 5969	. . . . . 6 ⊢ suc 𝑛 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛})
14	13	eqeq2i 2837	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ↔ 𝑝 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}))
15		ssun2 4004	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑛} ⊆ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛})
16		vex 3417	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑛 ∈ V
17	16	snnz 4528	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑛} ≠ ∅
18		ssn0 4201	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (({𝑛} ⊆ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ∧ {𝑛} ≠ ∅) → (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ≠ ∅)
19	15, 17, 18	mp2an 685	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ≠ ∅
20		neeq1 3061	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑝 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) → (𝑝 ≠ ∅ ↔ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ≠ ∅))
21	19, 20	mpbiri 250	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) → 𝑝 ≠ ∅)
22	14, 21	sylbi 209	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 → 𝑝 ≠ ∅)
23	22	adantl 475	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ≠ ∅)
24	6	eleq2i 2898	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑝 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}))
25		eldifsn 4536	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ↔ (𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑝 ≠ ∅))
26	24, 25	bitri 267	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ (𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑝 ≠ ∅))
27	12, 23, 26	sylanbrc 580	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ∈ 𝐷)
28	4, 5, 27	syl2anc 581	1 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑝 ∈ 𝐷)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 198   ∧ wa 386   ∧ w3a 1113   = wceq 1658   ∈ wcel 2166   ≠ wne 2999   ∖ cdif 3795   ∪ cun 3796   ⊆ wss 3798  ∅c0 4144  {csn 4397  suc csuc 5965   Fn wfn 6118  ωcom 7326   ∧ w-bnj17 31301   FrSe w-bnj15 31307

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1896  ax-4 1910  ax-5 2011  ax-6 2077  ax-7 2114  ax-8 2168  ax-9 2175  ax-10 2194  ax-11 2209  ax-12 2222  ax-13 2391  ax-ext 2803  ax-sep 5005  ax-nul 5013  ax-pr 5127  ax-un 7209

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 387  df-or 881  df-3or 1114  df-3an 1115  df-tru 1662  df-ex 1881  df-nf 1885  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2605  df-eu 2640  df-clab 2812  df-cleq 2818  df-clel 2821  df-nfc 2958  df-ne 3000  df-ral 3122  df-rex 3123  df-rab 3126  df-v 3416  df-sbc 3663  df-dif 3801  df-un 3803  df-in 3805  df-ss 3812  df-pss 3814  df-nul 4145  df-if 4307  df-pw 4380  df-sn 4398  df-pr 4400  df-tp 4402  df-op 4404  df-uni 4659  df-br 4874  df-opab 4936  df-tr 4976  df-eprel 5255  df-po 5263  df-so 5264  df-fr 5301  df-we 5303  df-ord 5966  df-on 5967  df-lim 5968  df-suc 5969  df-om 7327  df-bnj17 31302

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj910  31564