Theorem bnj970 35443

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 35506. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj970.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
bnj970.10	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj970	⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑝 ∈ 𝐷)

Proof of Theorem bnj970

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj970.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
2	1	bnj1232 35299	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
3	2	3ad2ant1 1151	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
4	3	adantl 487	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
5		simpr3 1215	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)
6		bnj970.10	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
7	6	bnj923 35265	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝑛 ∈ ω)
8		peano2 7889	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ω → suc 𝑛 ∈ ω)
9		eleq1 2850	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 → (𝑝 ∈ ω ↔ suc 𝑛 ∈ ω))
10		bianir 1074	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((suc 𝑛 ∈ ω ∧ (𝑝 ∈ ω ↔ suc 𝑛 ∈ ω)) → 𝑝 ∈ ω)
11	8, 9, 10	syl2an 608	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ∈ ω)
12	7, 11	sylan 592	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ∈ ω)
13		df-suc 6367	. . . . . 6 ⊢ suc 𝑛 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛})
14	13	eqeq2i 2775	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ↔ 𝑝 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}))
15		ssun2 4128	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑛} ⊆ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛})
16		vex 3457	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑛 ∈ V
17	16	snnz 4740	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑛} ≠ ∅
18		ssn0 4358	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (({𝑛} ⊆ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ∧ {𝑛} ≠ ∅) → (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ≠ ∅)
19	15, 17, 18	mp2an 705	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ≠ ∅
20		neeq1 3019	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑝 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) → (𝑝 ≠ ∅ ↔ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ≠ ∅))
21	19, 20	mpbiri 261	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) → 𝑝 ≠ ∅)
22	14, 21	sylbi 220	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 → 𝑝 ≠ ∅)
23	22	adantl 487	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ≠ ∅)
24	6	eleq2i 2854	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑝 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}))
25		eldifsn 4751	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ↔ (𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑝 ≠ ∅))
26	24, 25	bitri 278	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ (𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑝 ≠ ∅))
27	12, 23, 26	sylanbrc 595	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ∈ 𝐷)
28	4, 5, 27	syl2anc 596	1 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑝 ∈ 𝐷)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2957   ∖ cdif 3899   ∪ cun 3900   ⊆ wss 3902  ∅c0 4282  {csn 4587  suc csuc 6363   Fn wfn 6532  ωcom 7865   ∧ w-bnj17 35183   FrSe w-bnj15 35189

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7739

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-tr 5217  df-eprel 5559  df-po 5567  df-so 5568  df-fr 5612  df-we 5614  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-lim 6366  df-suc 6367  df-om 7866  df-bnj17 35184

This theorem is used by:  bnj910  35444