Theorem bnj970 32329

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 32392. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj970.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
bnj970.10	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj970	⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑝 ∈ 𝐷)

Proof of Theorem bnj970

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj970.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
2	1	bnj1232 32185	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
3	2	3ad2ant1 1130	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
4	3	adantl 485	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
5		simpr3 1193	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)
6		bnj970.10	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
7	6	bnj923 32149	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝑛 ∈ ω)
8		peano2 7582	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ω → suc 𝑛 ∈ ω)
9		eleq1 2877	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 → (𝑝 ∈ ω ↔ suc 𝑛 ∈ ω))
10		bianir 1054	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((suc 𝑛 ∈ ω ∧ (𝑝 ∈ ω ↔ suc 𝑛 ∈ ω)) → 𝑝 ∈ ω)
11	8, 9, 10	syl2an 598	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ∈ ω)
12	7, 11	sylan 583	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ∈ ω)
13		df-suc 6165	. . . . . 6 ⊢ suc 𝑛 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛})
14	13	eqeq2i 2811	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ↔ 𝑝 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}))
15		ssun2 4100	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑛} ⊆ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛})
16		vex 3444	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑛 ∈ V
17	16	snnz 4672	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑛} ≠ ∅
18		ssn0 4308	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (({𝑛} ⊆ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ∧ {𝑛} ≠ ∅) → (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ≠ ∅)
19	15, 17, 18	mp2an 691	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ≠ ∅
20		neeq1 3049	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑝 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) → (𝑝 ≠ ∅ ↔ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ≠ ∅))
21	19, 20	mpbiri 261	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) → 𝑝 ≠ ∅)
22	14, 21	sylbi 220	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 → 𝑝 ≠ ∅)
23	22	adantl 485	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ≠ ∅)
24	6	eleq2i 2881	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑝 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}))
25		eldifsn 4680	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ↔ (𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑝 ≠ ∅))
26	24, 25	bitri 278	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ (𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑝 ≠ ∅))
27	12, 23, 26	sylanbrc 586	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ∈ 𝐷)
28	4, 5, 27	syl2anc 587	1 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑝 ∈ 𝐷)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   ∧ w3a 1084   = wceq 1538   ∈ wcel 2111   ≠ wne 2987   ∖ cdif 3878   ∪ cun 3879   ⊆ wss 3881  ∅c0 4243  {csn 4525  suc csuc 6161   Fn wfn 6319  ωcom 7560   ∧ w-bnj17 32066   FrSe w-bnj15 32072

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770  ax-sep 5167  ax-nul 5174  ax-pr 5295  ax-un 7441

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2598  df-eu 2629  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ne 2988  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-rab 3115  df-v 3443  df-sbc 3721  df-dif 3884  df-un 3886  df-in 3888  df-ss 3898  df-pss 3900  df-nul 4244  df-if 4426  df-pw 4499  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528  df-tp 4530  df-op 4532  df-uni 4801  df-br 5031  df-opab 5093  df-tr 5137  df-eprel 5430  df-po 5438  df-so 5439  df-fr 5478  df-we 5480  df-ord 6162  df-on 6163  df-lim 6164  df-suc 6165  df-om 7561  df-bnj17 32067

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj910  32330