Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Jonathan Ben-Naim < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  bnj910 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem bnj910 35498
Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 35560. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
bnj910.1 (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
bnj910.2 (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
bnj910.3 (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛𝐷𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓))
bnj910.4 (𝜑′[𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜑)
bnj910.5 (𝜓′[𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜓)
bnj910.6 (𝜒′[𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜒)
bnj910.7 (𝜑″[𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜑′)
bnj910.8 (𝜓″[𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜓′)
bnj910.9 (𝜒″[𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜒′)
bnj910.10 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj910.11 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛𝐷 (𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓)}
bnj910.12 𝐶 = 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
bnj910.13 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, 𝐶⟩})
bnj910.14 (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓))
bnj910.15 (𝜎 ↔ (𝑛𝐷𝑝 = suc 𝑛𝑚𝑛))
Assertion
Ref Expression
bnj910 (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴𝑋𝐴) ∧ (𝜒𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝜒″)
Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑦   𝐷,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛   𝑖,𝐺   𝑅,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑦   𝑓,𝑋,𝑖,𝑛   𝑓,𝑝,𝑖,𝑛   𝜑,𝑖
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝜓(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝜒(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝜏(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝜎(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝐴(𝑝)   𝐵(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝐶(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝐷(𝑦, 𝑚, 𝑝)   𝑅(𝑝)   𝐺(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝑋(𝑦, 𝑚, 𝑝)   𝜑′(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝜓′(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝜒′(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝜑″(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝜓″(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝜒″(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑚, 𝑛, 𝑝)

Proof of Theorem bnj910
StepHypRef Expression
1 bnj910.3 . . . 4 (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛𝐷𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓))
2 bnj910.10 . . . 4 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
31, 2bnj970 35497 . . 3 (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴𝑋𝐴) ∧ (𝜒𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑝𝐷)
4 bnj910.1 . . . . 5 (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
5 bnj910.2 . . . . 5 (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
6 bnj910.12 . . . . 5 𝐶 = 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
7 bnj910.14 . . . . 5 (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓))
8 bnj910.15 . . . . 5 (𝜎 ↔ (𝑛𝐷𝑝 = suc 𝑛𝑚𝑛))
94, 5, 1, 2, 6, 7, 8bnj969 35496 . . . 4 (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴𝑋𝐴) ∧ (𝜒𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝐶 ∈ V)
10 simpr3 1215 . . . 4 (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴𝑋𝐴) ∧ (𝜒𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)
111bnj1235 35354 . . . . . 6 (𝜒𝑓 Fn 𝑛)
12113ad2ant1 1151 . . . . 5 ((𝜒𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑓 Fn 𝑛)
1312adantl 487 . . . 4 (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴𝑋𝐴) ∧ (𝜒𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑓 Fn 𝑛)
14 bnj910.13 . . . . . 6 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, 𝐶⟩})
1514bnj941 35323 . . . . 5 (𝐶 ∈ V → ((𝑝 = suc 𝑛𝑓 Fn 𝑛) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑝))
16153impib 1134 . . . 4 ((𝐶 ∈ V ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛𝑓 Fn 𝑛) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑝)
179, 10, 13, 16syl3anc 1398 . . 3 (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴𝑋𝐴) ∧ (𝜒𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑝)
18 bnj910.4 . . . 4 (𝜑′[𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜑)
19 bnj910.7 . . . 4 (𝜑″[𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜑′)
204, 5, 1, 18, 19, 2, 6, 14, 7, 8bnj944 35488 . . 3 (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴𝑋𝐴) ∧ (𝜒𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝜑″)
21 bnj910.5 . . . 4 (𝜓′[𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜓)
22 bnj910.8 . . . 4 (𝜓″[𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜓′)
235, 1, 2, 6, 14, 9bnj967 35495 . . . 4 (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴𝑋𝐴) ∧ (𝜒𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ∧ (𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖𝑝 ∧ suc 𝑖𝑛)) → (𝐺‘suc 𝑖) = 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
241, 2, 6, 14, 9, 17bnj966 35494 . . . 4 (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴𝑋𝐴) ∧ (𝜒𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ∧ (𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖𝑝𝑛 = suc 𝑖)) → (𝐺‘suc 𝑖) = 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
255, 1, 21, 22, 6, 14, 23, 24bnj964 35493 . . 3 (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴𝑋𝐴) ∧ (𝜒𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝜓″)
263, 17, 20, 25bnj951 35326 . 2 (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴𝑋𝐴) ∧ (𝜒𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → (𝑝𝐷𝐺 Fn 𝑝𝜑″𝜓″))
27 bnj910.6 . . . 4 (𝜒′[𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜒)
28 vex 3454 . . . 4 𝑝 ∈ V
291, 18, 21, 27, 28bnj919 35318 . . 3 (𝜒′ ↔ (𝑝𝐷𝑓 Fn 𝑝𝜑′𝜓′))
30 bnj910.9 . . 3 (𝜒″[𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜒′)
3114bnj918 35317 . . 3 𝐺 ∈ V
3229, 19, 22, 30, 31bnj976 35328 . 2 (𝜒″ ↔ (𝑝𝐷𝐺 Fn 𝑝𝜑″𝜓″))
3326, 32sylibr 237 1 (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴𝑋𝐴) ∧ (𝜒𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝜒″)
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wb 209  wa 401  w3a 1103   = wceq 1570  wcel 2145  {cab 2738  wral 3076  wrex 3086  Vcvv 3450  [wsbc 3739  cdif 3896  cun 3897  c0 4279  {csn 4584  cop 4590   ciun 4951  suc csuc 6354   Fn wfn 6523  cfv 6528  ωcom 7861  w-bnj17 35237   predc-bnj14 35239   FrSe w-bnj15 35243
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7735  ax-reg 9564
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-tr 5213  df-id 5543  df-eprel 5548  df-po 5556  df-so 5557  df-fr 5601  df-we 5603  df-xp 5654  df-rel 5655  df-cnv 5656  df-co 5657  df-dm 5658  df-res 5660  df-ord 6355  df-on 6356  df-lim 6357  df-suc 6358  df-iota 6484  df-fun 6530  df-fn 6531  df-fv 6536  df-om 7862  df-bnj17 35238  df-bnj14 35240  df-bnj13 35242  df-bnj15 35244
This theorem is used by:  bnj998  35507
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator