Theorem bnj969 35143

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 35207. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj969.1	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
bnj969.2	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
bnj969.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
bnj969.10	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj969.12	⊢ 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
bnj969.14	⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
bnj969.15	⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ 𝑛))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj969	⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝐶 ∈ V)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑖,𝑚,𝑦   𝑅,𝑖,𝑚,𝑦   𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑦   𝑖,𝑛,𝑚

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜓(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜒(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜏(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜎(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐴(𝑓,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐶(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐷(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝑅(𝑓,𝑛,𝑝)   𝑋(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)

Proof of Theorem bnj969

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 484	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴))
2		bnj667 34950	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
3		bnj969.3	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
4		bnj969.14	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
5	2, 3, 4	3imtr4i 294	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜏)
6	5	3ad2ant1 1140	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝜏)
7	6	adantl 483	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝜏)
8	3	bnj1232 35000	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
9		vex 3437	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑚 ∈ V
10	9	bnj216 34930	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = suc 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ 𝑛)
11		id 22	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 → 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)
12	8, 10, 11	3anim123i 1158	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
13		bnj969.15	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ 𝑛))
14		3ancomb 1105	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ 𝑛) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
15	13, 14	bitri 277	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
16	12, 15	sylibr 236	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝜎)
17	16	adantl 483	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝜎)
18	1, 7, 17	jca32 521	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜎)))
19		bnj256 34904	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜎)))
20	18, 19	sylibr 236	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎))
21		bnj969.12	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
22		bnj969.10	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
23		bnj969.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
24		bnj969.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
25	22, 4, 13, 23, 24	bnj938 35134	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V)
26	21, 25	eqeltrid 2845	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝐶 ∈ V)
27	20, 26	syl 17	1 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝐶 ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 397   ∧ w3a 1093   = wceq 1548   ∈ wcel 2121  ∀wral 3055  Vcvv 3433   ∖ cdif 3882  ∅c0 4264  {csn 4558  ∪ ciun 4924  suc csuc 6316   Fn wfn 6484  ‘cfv 6489  ωcom 7810   ∧ w-bnj17 34884   predc-bnj14 34886   FrSe w-bnj15 34890

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2123  ax-9 2131  ax-11 2170  ax-12 2191  ax-ext 2713  ax-rep 5202  ax-sep 5221  ax-nul 5231  ax-pr 5365  ax-un 7682

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 398  df-or 855  df-3or 1094  df-3an 1095  df-tru 1551  df-fal 1561  df-ex 1788  df-sb 2075  df-mo 2545  df-clab 2720  df-cleq 2733  df-clel 2816  df-ne 2937  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3066  df-rab 3394  df-v 3435  df-dif 3888  df-un 3890  df-in 3892  df-ss 3902  df-pss 3905  df-nul 4265  df-if 4458  df-pw 4534  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4842  df-iun 4926  df-br 5076  df-opab 5138  df-tr 5183  df-eprel 5521  df-po 5529  df-so 5530  df-fr 5574  df-we 5576  df-ord 6317  df-on 6318  df-lim 6319  df-suc 6320  df-iota 6445  df-fv 6497  df-om 7811  df-bnj17 34885  df-bnj14 34887  df-bnj13 34889  df-bnj15 34891

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj910  35145  bnj1006  35157