Theorem bnj969 32926

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 32990. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj969.1	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
bnj969.2	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
bnj969.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
bnj969.10	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj969.12	⊢ 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
bnj969.14	⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
bnj969.15	⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ 𝑛))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj969	⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝐶 ∈ V)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑖,𝑚,𝑦   𝑅,𝑖,𝑚,𝑦   𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑦   𝑖,𝑛,𝑚

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜓(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜒(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜏(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜎(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐴(𝑓,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐶(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐷(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝑅(𝑓,𝑛,𝑝)   𝑋(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)

Proof of Theorem bnj969

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 483	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴))
2		bnj667 32732	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
3		bnj969.3	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
4		bnj969.14	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
5	2, 3, 4	3imtr4i 292	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜏)
6	5	3ad2ant1 1132	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝜏)
7	6	adantl 482	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝜏)
8	3	bnj1232 32783	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
9		vex 3436	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑚 ∈ V
10	9	bnj216 32711	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = suc 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ 𝑛)
11		id 22	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 → 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)
12	8, 10, 11	3anim123i 1150	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
13		bnj969.15	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ 𝑛))
14		3ancomb 1098	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ 𝑛) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
15	13, 14	bitri 274	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
16	12, 15	sylibr 233	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝜎)
17	16	adantl 482	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝜎)
18	1, 7, 17	jca32 516	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜎)))
19		bnj256 32685	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜎)))
20	18, 19	sylibr 233	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎))
21		bnj969.12	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
22		bnj969.10	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
23		bnj969.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
24		bnj969.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
25	22, 4, 13, 23, 24	bnj938 32917	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V)
26	21, 25	eqeltrid 2843	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝐶 ∈ V)
27	20, 26	syl 17	1 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝐶 ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2106  ∀wral 3064  Vcvv 3432   ∖ cdif 3884  ∅c0 4256  {csn 4561  ∪ ciun 4924  suc csuc 6268   Fn wfn 6428  ‘cfv 6433  ωcom 7712   ∧ w-bnj17 32665   predc-bnj14 32667   FrSe w-bnj15 32671

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5209  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pr 5352  ax-un 7588

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2944  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-pss 3906  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-pw 4535  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-uni 4840  df-iun 4926  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-tr 5192  df-eprel 5495  df-po 5503  df-so 5504  df-fr 5544  df-we 5546  df-ord 6269  df-on 6270  df-lim 6271  df-suc 6272  df-iota 6391  df-fv 6441  df-om 7713  df-bnj17 32666  df-bnj14 32668  df-bnj13 32670  df-bnj15 32672

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj910  32928  bnj1006  32940