Theorem disjlem18 39610

Description: Lemma for disjdmqseq 39615, partim2 39617 and petlem 39622 via disjlem19 39611, (general version of the former prtlem18 39709). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
disjlem18	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝑅   𝑥,𝑉   𝑥,𝑊

Proof of Theorem disjlem18

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspe 3257	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅))
2	1	expr 462	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 → ∃𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
3	2	adantl 487	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)) → (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 → ∃𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
4		relbrcoss 39243	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅))))
5		disjrel 39537	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → Rel 𝑅)
6	4, 5	impel 515	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
7	6	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
8	3, 7	sylibrd 262	. . . 4 ⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)) → (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 → 𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵))
9	8	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 → 𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵)))
10		disjlem17 39609	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (∃𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅) → 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
11	10	adantl 487	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (∃𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅) → 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
12		relbrcoss 39243	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅))))
13	12, 5	impel 515	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅)))
14	13	imbi1d 344	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) → ((𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) ↔ (∃𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅) → 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
15	11, 14	sylibrd 262	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
16	9, 15	impbidd 213	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵)))
17	16	ex 418	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∈ wcel 2146  ∃wrex 3091   class class class wbr 5111  dom cdm 5663  Rel wrel 5668  [cec 8698   ≀ ccoss 38890   Disj wdisjALTV 38926

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-pr 5406

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rmo 3371  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-ec 8702  df-coss 39208  df-cnvrefrel 39314  df-disjALTV 39497

This theorem is used by:  disjlem19  39611