Theorem disjlem18 39651

Description: Lemma for disjdmqseq 39656, partim2 39658 and petlem 39663 via disjlem19 39652, (general version of the former prtlem18 39750). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
disjlem18	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝑅   𝑥,𝑉   𝑥,𝑊

Proof of Theorem disjlem18

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspe 3252	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅))
2	1	expr 462	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 → ∃𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
3	2	adantl 487	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)) → (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 → ∃𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
4		relbrcoss 39284	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅))))
5		disjrel 39578	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → Rel 𝑅)
6	4, 5	impel 515	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
7	6	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
8	3, 7	sylibrd 262	. . . 4 ⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)) → (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 → 𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵))
9	8	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 → 𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵)))
10		disjlem17 39650	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (∃𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅) → 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
11	10	adantl 487	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (∃𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅) → 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
12		relbrcoss 39284	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅))))
13	12, 5	impel 515	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅)))
14	13	imbi1d 344	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) → ((𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) ↔ (∃𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅) → 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
15	11, 14	sylibrd 262	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
16	9, 15	impbidd 213	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Disj 𝑅) → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵)))
17	16	ex 418	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃wrex 3086   class class class wbr 5103  dom cdm 5655  Rel wrel 5660  [cec 8694   ≀ ccoss 38931   Disj wdisjALTV 38967

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5251  ax-pr 5398

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rmo 3365  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-ec 8698  df-coss 39249  df-cnvrefrel 39355  df-disjALTV 39538

This theorem is used by:  disjlem19  39652