eucalgval - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > eucalgval		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem eucalgval 16526

Description: Euclid's Algorithm eucalg 16531 computes the greatest common divisor of two nonnegative integers by repeatedly replacing the larger of them with its remainder modulo the smaller until the remainder is 0.

The value of the step function 𝐸 for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
eucalgval.1	⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ₀, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ₀ ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)⟩))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
eucalgval	⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘𝑋) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, 𝑋, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩))

Distinct variable group: 𝑥,𝑦,𝑋 Allowed substitution hints: 𝐸(𝑥,𝑦)

**Proof of Theorem eucalgval**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ov 7408	. . 3 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑋)𝐸(2^nd ‘𝑋)) = (𝐸‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩)
2		xp1st 8006	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀)
3		xp2nd 8007	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (2^nd ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀)
4		eucalgval.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ₀, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ₀ ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)⟩))
5	4	eucalgval2 16525	. . . 4 ⊢ (((1^st ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀ ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ‘𝑋)𝐸(2^nd ‘𝑋)) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
6	2, 3, 5	syl2anc 583	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ((1^st ‘𝑋)𝐸(2^nd ‘𝑋)) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
7	1, 6	eqtr3id 2780	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
8		1st2nd2 8013	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → 𝑋 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩)
9	8	fveq2d 6889	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘𝑋) = (𝐸‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩))
10	8	fveq2d 6889	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ( mod ‘𝑋) = ( mod ‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩))
11		df-ov 7408	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋)) = ( mod ‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩)
12	10, 11	eqtr4di 2784	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ( mod ‘𝑋) = ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋)))
13	12	opeq2d 4875	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩ = ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩)
14	8, 13	ifeq12d 4544	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, 𝑋, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
15	7, 9, 14	3eqtr4d 2776	1 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘𝑋) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, 𝑋, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 = wceq 1533 ∈ wcel 2098 ifcif 4523 ⟨cop 4629 × cxp 5667 ‘cfv 6537 (class class class)co 7405 ∈ cmpo 7407 1^st c1st 7972 2^nd c2nd 7973 0cc0 11112 ℕ₀cn0 12476 mod cmo 13840

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1789 ax-4 1803 ax-5 1905 ax-6 1963 ax-7 2003 ax-8 2100 ax-9 2108 ax-10 2129 ax-11 2146 ax-12 2163 ax-ext 2697 ax-sep 5292 ax-nul 5299 ax-pr 5420 ax-un 7722

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-or 845 df-3an 1086 df-tru 1536 df-fal 1546 df-ex 1774 df-nf 1778 df-sb 2060 df-mo 2528 df-eu 2557 df-clab 2704 df-cleq 2718 df-clel 2804 df-nfc 2879 df-ral 3056 df-rex 3065 df-rab 3427 df-v 3470 df-sbc 3773 df-dif 3946 df-un 3948 df-in 3950 df-ss 3960 df-nul 4318 df-if 4524 df-sn 4624 df-pr 4626 df-op 4630 df-uni 4903 df-br 5142 df-opab 5204 df-mpt 5225 df-id 5567 df-xp 5675 df-rel 5676 df-cnv 5677 df-co 5678 df-dm 5679 df-rn 5680 df-iota 6489 df-fun 6539 df-fv 6545 df-ov 7408 df-oprab 7409 df-mpo 7410 df-1st 7974 df-2nd 7975

This theorem is referenced by: eucalginv 16528 eucalglt 16529

W3C validator