eucalgval - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > eucalgval		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem eucalgval 16630

Description: Euclid's Algorithm eucalg 16635 computes the greatest common divisor of two nonnegative integers by repeatedly replacing the larger of them with its remainder modulo the smaller until the remainder is 0.

The value of the step function 𝐸 for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
eucalgval.1	⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ₀, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ₀ ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)⟩))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
eucalgval	⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘𝑋) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, 𝑋, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩))

Distinct variable group: 𝑥,𝑦,𝑋 Allowed substitution hints: 𝐸(𝑥,𝑦)

**Proof of Theorem eucalgval**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ov 7403	. . 3 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑋)𝐸(2^nd ‘𝑋)) = (𝐸‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩)
2		xp1st 8006	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀)
3		xp2nd 8007	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (2^nd ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀)
4		eucalgval.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ₀, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ₀ ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)⟩))
5	4	eucalgval2 16629	. . . 4 ⊢ (((1^st ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀ ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ‘𝑋)𝐸(2^nd ‘𝑋)) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
6	2, 3, 5	syl2anc 595	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ((1^st ‘𝑋)𝐸(2^nd ‘𝑋)) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
7	1, 6	eqtr3id 2814	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
8		1st2nd2 8013	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → 𝑋 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩)
9	8	fveq2d 6875	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘𝑋) = (𝐸‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩))
10	8	fveq2d 6875	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ( mod ‘𝑋) = ( mod ‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩))
11		df-ov 7403	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋)) = ( mod ‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩)
12	10, 11	eqtr4di 2818	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ( mod ‘𝑋) = ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋)))
13	12	opeq2d 4841	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩ = ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩)
14	8, 13	ifeq12d 4505	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, 𝑋, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
15	7, 9, 14	3eqtr4d 2810	1 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘𝑋) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, 𝑋, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 = wceq 1563 ∈ wcel 2145 ifcif 4483 ⟨cop 4591 × cxp 5650 ‘cfv 6525 (class class class)co 7400 ∈ cmpo 7402 1^st c1st 7972 2^nd c2nd 7973 0cc0 11088 ℕ₀cn0 12495 mod cmo 13893

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1818 ax-4 1832 ax-5 1933 ax-6 1990 ax-7 2031 ax-8 2147 ax-9 2155 ax-10 2178 ax-11 2194 ax-12 2215 ax-ext 2737 ax-sep 5251 ax-nul 5261 ax-pr 5395 ax-un 7722

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-or 861 df-3an 1103 df-tru 1566 df-fal 1576 df-ex 1803 df-nf 1807 df-sb 2094 df-mo 2569 df-eu 2599 df-clab 2744 df-cleq 2757 df-clel 2840 df-nfc 2914 df-ne 2961 df-ral 3080 df-rex 3090 df-rab 3418 df-v 3459 df-sbc 3748 df-dif 3910 df-un 3912 df-in 3914 df-ss 3924 df-nul 4289 df-if 4484 df-sn 4586 df-pr 4588 df-op 4592 df-uni 4869 df-br 5106 df-opab 5168 df-mpt 5187 df-id 5547 df-xp 5658 df-rel 5659 df-cnv 5660 df-co 5661 df-dm 5662 df-rn 5663 df-iota 6481 df-fun 6527 df-fv 6533 df-ov 7403 df-oprab 7404 df-mpo 7405 df-1st 7974 df-2nd 7975

This theorem is referenced by: eucalginv 16632 eucalglt 16633

W3C validator