eucalgval - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > eucalgval		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem eucalgval 16639

Description: Euclid's Algorithm eucalg 16644 computes the greatest common divisor of two nonnegative integers by repeatedly replacing the larger of them with its remainder modulo the smaller until the remainder is 0.

The value of the step function 𝐸 for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
eucalgval.1	⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ₀, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ₀ ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)⟩))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
eucalgval	⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘𝑋) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, 𝑋, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩))

Distinct variable group: 𝑥,𝑦,𝑋 Allowed substitution hints: 𝐸(𝑥,𝑦)

**Proof of Theorem eucalgval**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ov 7413	. . 3 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑋)𝐸(2^nd ‘𝑋)) = (𝐸‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩)
2		xp1st 8017	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀)
3		xp2nd 8018	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (2^nd ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀)
4		eucalgval.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ₀, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ₀ ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)⟩))
5	4	eucalgval2 16638	. . . 4 ⊢ (((1^st ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀ ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ‘𝑋)𝐸(2^nd ‘𝑋)) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
6	2, 3, 5	syl2anc 595	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ((1^st ‘𝑋)𝐸(2^nd ‘𝑋)) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
7	1, 6	eqtr3id 2810	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
8		1st2nd2 8024	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → 𝑋 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩)
9	8	fveq2d 6885	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘𝑋) = (𝐸‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩))
10	8	fveq2d 6885	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ( mod ‘𝑋) = ( mod ‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩))
11		df-ov 7413	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋)) = ( mod ‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩)
12	10, 11	eqtr4di 2814	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ( mod ‘𝑋) = ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋)))
13	12	opeq2d 4844	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩ = ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩)
14	8, 13	ifeq12d 4508	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, 𝑋, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
15	7, 9, 14	3eqtr4d 2806	1 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘𝑋) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, 𝑋, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 = wceq 1568 ∈ wcel 2141 ifcif 4486 ⟨cop 4594 × cxp 5659 ‘cfv 6536 (class class class)co 7410 ∈ cmpo 7412 1^st c1st 7983 2^nd c2nd 7984 0cc0 11099 ℕ₀cn0 12503 mod cmo 13902

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1823 ax-4 1837 ax-5 1938 ax-6 1995 ax-7 2036 ax-8 2143 ax-9 2151 ax-10 2174 ax-11 2190 ax-12 2211 ax-ext 2733 ax-sep 5256 ax-nul 5268 ax-pr 5404 ax-un 7732

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-or 861 df-3an 1103 df-tru 1571 df-fal 1581 df-ex 1808 df-nf 1812 df-sb 2095 df-mo 2565 df-eu 2595 df-clab 2740 df-cleq 2753 df-clel 2836 df-nfc 2910 df-ne 2957 df-ral 3078 df-rex 3088 df-rab 3415 df-v 3455 df-sbc 3744 df-dif 3907 df-un 3909 df-in 3911 df-ss 3921 df-nul 4286 df-if 4487 df-sn 4589 df-pr 4591 df-op 4595 df-uni 4872 df-br 5109 df-opab 5173 df-mpt 5192 df-id 5556 df-xp 5667 df-rel 5668 df-cnv 5669 df-co 5670 df-dm 5671 df-rn 5672 df-iota 6492 df-fun 6538 df-fv 6544 df-ov 7413 df-oprab 7414 df-mpo 7415 df-1st 7985 df-2nd 7986

This theorem is referenced by: eucalginv 16641 eucalglt 16642

W3C validator