eucalgval - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > eucalgval		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem eucalgval 16521

Description: Euclid's Algorithm eucalg 16526 computes the greatest common divisor of two nonnegative integers by repeatedly replacing the larger of them with its remainder modulo the smaller until the remainder is 0.

The value of the step function 𝐸 for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
eucalgval.1	⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ₀, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ₀ ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)⟩))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
eucalgval	⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘𝑋) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, 𝑋, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩))

Distinct variable group: 𝑥,𝑦,𝑋 Allowed substitution hints: 𝐸(𝑥,𝑦)

**Proof of Theorem eucalgval**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ov 7371	. . 3 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑋)𝐸(2^nd ‘𝑋)) = (𝐸‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩)
2		xp1st 7975	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀)
3		xp2nd 7976	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (2^nd ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀)
4		eucalgval.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ₀, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ₀ ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)⟩))
5	4	eucalgval2 16520	. . . 4 ⊢ (((1^st ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀ ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ‘𝑋)𝐸(2^nd ‘𝑋)) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
6	2, 3, 5	syl2anc 585	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ((1^st ‘𝑋)𝐸(2^nd ‘𝑋)) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
7	1, 6	eqtr3id 2786	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
8		1st2nd2 7982	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → 𝑋 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩)
9	8	fveq2d 6846	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘𝑋) = (𝐸‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩))
10	8	fveq2d 6846	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ( mod ‘𝑋) = ( mod ‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩))
11		df-ov 7371	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋)) = ( mod ‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩)
12	10, 11	eqtr4di 2790	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ( mod ‘𝑋) = ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋)))
13	12	opeq2d 4838	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩ = ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩)
14	8, 13	ifeq12d 4503	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, 𝑋, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
15	7, 9, 14	3eqtr4d 2782	1 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘𝑋) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, 𝑋, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 = wceq 1542 ∈ wcel 2114 ifcif 4481 ⟨cop 4588 × cxp 5630 ‘cfv 6500 (class class class)co 7368 ∈ cmpo 7370 1^st c1st 7941 2^nd c2nd 7942 0cc0 11038 ℕ₀cn0 12413 mod cmo 13801

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2010 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2147 ax-11 2163 ax-12 2185 ax-ext 2709 ax-sep 5243 ax-nul 5253 ax-pr 5379 ax-un 7690

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 849 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1545 df-fal 1555 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2069 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2570 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2812 df-nfc 2886 df-ne 2934 df-ral 3053 df-rex 3063 df-rab 3402 df-v 3444 df-sbc 3743 df-dif 3906 df-un 3908 df-in 3910 df-ss 3920 df-nul 4288 df-if 4482 df-sn 4583 df-pr 4585 df-op 4589 df-uni 4866 df-br 5101 df-opab 5163 df-mpt 5182 df-id 5527 df-xp 5638 df-rel 5639 df-cnv 5640 df-co 5641 df-dm 5642 df-rn 5643 df-iota 6456 df-fun 6502 df-fv 6508 df-ov 7371 df-oprab 7372 df-mpo 7373 df-1st 7943 df-2nd 7944

This theorem is referenced by: eucalginv 16523 eucalglt 16524

W3C validator