eucalgval - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > eucalgval		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem eucalgval 16606

Description: Euclid's Algorithm eucalg 16611 computes the greatest common divisor of two nonnegative integers by repeatedly replacing the larger of them with its remainder modulo the smaller until the remainder is 0.

The value of the step function 𝐸 for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
eucalgval.1	⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ₀, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ₀ ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)⟩))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
eucalgval	⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘𝑋) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, 𝑋, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩))

Distinct variable group: 𝑥,𝑦,𝑋 Allowed substitution hints: 𝐸(𝑥,𝑦)

**Proof of Theorem eucalgval**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ov 7413	. . 3 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑋)𝐸(2^nd ‘𝑋)) = (𝐸‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩)
2		xp1st 8025	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀)
3		xp2nd 8026	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (2^nd ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀)
4		eucalgval.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ₀, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ₀ ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)⟩))
5	4	eucalgval2 16605	. . . 4 ⊢ (((1^st ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀ ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑋) ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ‘𝑋)𝐸(2^nd ‘𝑋)) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
6	2, 3, 5	syl2anc 584	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ((1^st ‘𝑋)𝐸(2^nd ‘𝑋)) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
7	1, 6	eqtr3id 2785	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
8		1st2nd2 8032	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → 𝑋 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩)
9	8	fveq2d 6885	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘𝑋) = (𝐸‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩))
10	8	fveq2d 6885	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ( mod ‘𝑋) = ( mod ‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩))
11		df-ov 7413	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋)) = ( mod ‘⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩)
12	10, 11	eqtr4di 2789	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ( mod ‘𝑋) = ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋)))
13	12	opeq2d 4861	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩ = ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩)
14	8, 13	ifeq12d 4527	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, 𝑋, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑋), (2^nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ((1^st ‘𝑋) mod (2^nd ‘𝑋))⟩))
15	7, 9, 14	3eqtr4d 2781	1 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ₀ × ℕ₀) → (𝐸‘𝑋) = if((2^nd ‘𝑋) = 0, 𝑋, ⟨(2^nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)⟩))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 = wceq 1540 ∈ wcel 2109 ifcif 4505 ⟨cop 4612 × cxp 5657 ‘cfv 6536 (class class class)co 7410 ∈ cmpo 7412 1^st c1st 7991 2^nd c2nd 7992 0cc0 11134 ℕ₀cn0 12506 mod cmo 13891

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2008 ax-8 2111 ax-9 2119 ax-10 2142 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2178 ax-ext 2708 ax-sep 5271 ax-nul 5281 ax-pr 5407 ax-un 7734

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1543 df-fal 1553 df-ex 1780 df-nf 1784 df-sb 2066 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2569 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2728 df-clel 2810 df-nfc 2886 df-ral 3053 df-rex 3062 df-rab 3421 df-v 3466 df-sbc 3771 df-dif 3934 df-un 3936 df-in 3938 df-ss 3948 df-nul 4314 df-if 4506 df-sn 4607 df-pr 4609 df-op 4613 df-uni 4889 df-br 5125 df-opab 5187 df-mpt 5207 df-id 5553 df-xp 5665 df-rel 5666 df-cnv 5667 df-co 5668 df-dm 5669 df-rn 5670 df-iota 6489 df-fun 6538 df-fv 6544 df-ov 7413 df-oprab 7414 df-mpo 7415 df-1st 7993 df-2nd 7994

This theorem is referenced by: eucalginv 16608 eucalglt 16609

W3C validator