P. 166 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 16501-16600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	bitsfi 16501	Every number is associated with a finite set of bits. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (bits‘𝑁) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	bitscmp 16502	The bit complement of 𝑁 is -𝑁 − 1. (Thus, by bitsfi 16501, all negative numbers have cofinite bits representations.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (ℕ0 ∖ (bits‘𝑁)) = (bits‘(-𝑁 − 1)))
Theorem	0bits 16503	The bits of zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (bits‘0) = ∅
Theorem	m1bits 16504	The bits of negative one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (bits‘-1) = ℕ0
Theorem	bitsinv1lem 16505	Lemma for bitsinv1 16506. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑁 mod (2↑(𝑀 + 1))) = ((𝑁 mod (2↑𝑀)) + if(𝑀 ∈ (bits‘𝑁), (2↑𝑀), 0)))
Theorem	bitsinv1 16506*	There is an explicit inverse to the bits function for nonnegative integers (which can be extended to negative integers using bitscmp 16502), part 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → Σ𝑛 ∈ (bits‘𝑁)(2↑𝑛) = 𝑁)
Theorem	bitsinv2 16507*	There is an explicit inverse to the bits function for nonnegative integers, part 2. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ℕ0 ∩ Fin) → (bits‘Σ𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 (2↑𝑛)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	bitsf1ocnv 16508*	The bits function restricted to nonnegative integers is a bijection from the integers to the finite sets of integers. It is in fact the inverse of the Ackermann bijection ackbijnn 15889. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((bits ↾ ℕ0):ℕ0–1-1-onto→(𝒫 ℕ0 ∩ Fin) ∧ ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0) = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ℕ0 ∩ Fin) ↦ Σ𝑛 ∈ 𝑥 (2↑𝑛)))
Theorem	bitsf1o 16509	The bits function restricted to nonnegative integers is a bijection from the integers to the finite sets of integers. It is in fact the inverse of the Ackermann bijection ackbijnn 15889. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (bits ↾ ℕ0):ℕ0–1-1-onto→(𝒫 ℕ0 ∩ Fin)
Theorem	bitsf1 16510	The bits function is an injection from ℤ to 𝒫 ℕ0. It is obviously not a bijection (by Cantor's theorem canth2 9116), and in fact its range is the set of finite and cofinite subsets of ℕ0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2016.)
⊢ bits:ℤ–1-1→𝒫 ℕ0
Theorem	2ebits 16511	The bits of a power of two. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (bits‘(2↑𝑁)) = {𝑁})
Theorem	bitsinv 16512*	The inverse of the bits function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2016.)
⊢ 𝐾 = ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ℕ0 ∩ Fin) → (𝐾‘𝐴) = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (2↑𝑘))
Theorem	bitsinvp1 16513	Recursive definition of the inverse of the bits function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2016.)
⊢ 𝐾 = ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐾‘(𝐴 ∩ (0..^(𝑁 + 1)))) = ((𝐾‘(𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) + if(𝑁 ∈ 𝐴, (2↑𝑁), 0)))
Theorem	sadadd2lem2 16514	The core of the proof of sadadd2 16524. The intuitive justification for this is that cadd is true if at least two arguments are true, and hadd is true if an odd number of arguments are true, so altogether the result is 𝑛 · 𝐴 where 𝑛 is the number of true arguments, which is equivalently obtained by adding together one 𝐴 for each true argument, on the right side. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (if(hadd(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒), 𝐴, 0) + if(cadd(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒), (2 · 𝐴), 0)) = ((if(𝜑, 𝐴, 0) + if(𝜓, 𝐴, 0)) + if(𝜒, 𝐴, 0)))
Definition	df-sad 16515*	Define the addition of two bit sequences, using df-had 1623 and df-cad 1636 bit operations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ sadd = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0 ↦ {𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ hadd(𝑘 ∈ 𝑥, 𝑘 ∈ 𝑦, ∅ ∈ (seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝑥, 𝑚 ∈ 𝑦, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))‘𝑘))})
Theorem	sadfval 16516*	Define the addition of two bit sequences, using df-had 1623 and df-cad 1636 bit operations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 sadd 𝐵) = {𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ hadd(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ (𝐶‘𝑘))})
Theorem	sadcf 16517*	The carry sequence is a sequence of elements of 2o encoding a "sequence of wffs". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶:ℕ0⟶2o)
Theorem	sadc0 16518*	The initial element of the carry sequence is ⊥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∅ ∈ (𝐶‘0))
Theorem	sadcp1 16519*	The carry sequence (which is a sequence of wffs, encoded as 1o and ∅) is defined recursively as the carry operation applied to the previous carry and the two current inputs. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∅ ∈ (𝐶‘(𝑁 + 1)) ↔ cadd(𝑁 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑁 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ (𝐶‘𝑁))))
Theorem	sadval 16520*	The full adder sequence is the half adder function applied to the inputs and the carry sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ (𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ↔ hadd(𝑁 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑁 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ (𝐶‘𝑁))))
Theorem	sadcaddlem 16521*	Lemma for sadcadd 16522. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∅ ∈ (𝐶‘𝑁) ↔ (2↑𝑁) ≤ ((𝐾‘(𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) + (𝐾‘(𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁))))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∅ ∈ (𝐶‘(𝑁 + 1)) ↔ (2↑(𝑁 + 1)) ≤ ((𝐾‘(𝐴 ∩ (0..^(𝑁 + 1)))) + (𝐾‘(𝐵 ∩ (0..^(𝑁 + 1)))))))
Theorem	sadcadd 16522*	Non-recursive definition of the carry sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∅ ∈ (𝐶‘𝑁) ↔ (2↑𝑁) ≤ ((𝐾‘(𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) + (𝐾‘(𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁))))))
Theorem	sadadd2lem 16523*	Lemma for sadadd2 16524. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾‘((𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ∩ (0..^𝑁))) + if(∅ ∈ (𝐶‘𝑁), (2↑𝑁), 0)) = ((𝐾‘(𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) + (𝐾‘(𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾‘((𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ∩ (0..^(𝑁 + 1)))) + if(∅ ∈ (𝐶‘(𝑁 + 1)), (2↑(𝑁 + 1)), 0)) = ((𝐾‘(𝐴 ∩ (0..^(𝑁 + 1)))) + (𝐾‘(𝐵 ∩ (0..^(𝑁 + 1))))))
Theorem	sadadd2 16524*	Sum of initial segments of the sadd sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾‘((𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ∩ (0..^𝑁))) + if(∅ ∈ (𝐶‘𝑁), (2↑𝑁), 0)) = ((𝐾‘(𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) + (𝐾‘(𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁)))))
Theorem	sadadd3 16525*	Sum of initial segments of the sadd sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾‘((𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ∩ (0..^𝑁))) mod (2↑𝑁)) = (((𝐾‘(𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) + (𝐾‘(𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁)))) mod (2↑𝑁)))
Theorem	sadcl 16526	The sum of two sequences is a sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) → (𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ⊆ ℕ0)
Theorem	sadcom 16527	The adder sequence function is commutative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) → (𝐴 sadd 𝐵) = (𝐵 sadd 𝐴))
Theorem	saddisjlem 16528*	Lemma for sadadd 16531. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑚 ∈ 𝐵, ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ (𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ↔ 𝑁 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
Theorem	saddisj 16529	The sum of disjoint sequences is the union of the sequences. (In this case, there are no carried bits.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 sadd 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
Theorem	sadaddlem 16530*	Lemma for sadadd 16531. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ 𝐶 = seq0((𝑐 ∈ 2o, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(cadd(𝑚 ∈ (bits‘𝐴), 𝑚 ∈ (bits‘𝐵), ∅ ∈ 𝑐), 1o, ∅)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ◡(bits ↾ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((bits‘𝐴) sadd (bits‘𝐵)) ∩ (0..^𝑁)) = (bits‘((𝐴 + 𝐵) mod (2↑𝑁))))
Theorem	sadadd 16531	For sequences that correspond to valid integers, the adder sequence function produces the sequence for the sum. This is effectively a proof of the correctness of the ripple carry adder, implemented with logic gates corresponding to df-had 1623 and df-cad 1636. It is interesting to consider in what sense the sadd function can be said to be "adding" things outside the range of the bits function, that is, when adding sequences that are not eventually constant and so do not denote any integer. The correct interpretation is that the sequences are representations of 2-adic integers, which have a natural ring structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((bits‘𝐴) sadd (bits‘𝐵)) = (bits‘(𝐴 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	sadid1 16532	The adder sequence function has a left identity, the empty set, which is the representation of the integer zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 → (𝐴 sadd ∅) = 𝐴)
Theorem	sadid2 16533	The adder sequence function has a right identity, the empty set, which is the representation of the integer zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 → (∅ sadd 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	sadasslem 16534	Lemma for sadass 16535. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 sadd 𝐵) sadd 𝐶) ∩ (0..^𝑁)) = ((𝐴 sadd (𝐵 sadd 𝐶)) ∩ (0..^𝑁)))
Theorem	sadass 16535	Sequence addition is associative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 sadd 𝐵) sadd 𝐶) = (𝐴 sadd (𝐵 sadd 𝐶)))
Theorem	sadeq 16536	Any element of a sequence sum only depends on the values of the argument sequences up to and including that point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 sadd 𝐵) ∩ (0..^𝑁)) = (((𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁)) sadd (𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) ∩ (0..^𝑁)))
Theorem	bitsres 16537	Restrict the bits of a number to an upper integer set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((bits‘𝐴) ∩ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) = (bits‘((⌊‘(𝐴 / (2↑𝑁))) · (2↑𝑁))))
Theorem	bitsuz 16538	The bits of a number are all at least 𝑁 iff the number is divisible by 2↑𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((2↑𝑁) ∥ 𝐴 ↔ (bits‘𝐴) ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)))
Theorem	bitsshft 16539*	Shifting a bit sequence to the left (toward the more significant bits) causes the number to be multiplied by a power of two. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑛 − 𝑁) ∈ (bits‘𝐴)} = (bits‘(𝐴 · (2↑𝑁))))
Definition	df-smu 16540*	Define the multiplication of two bit sequences, using repeated sequence addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ smul = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0 ↦ {𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ 𝑘 ∈ (seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝑦)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))‘(𝑘 + 1))})
Theorem	smufval 16541*	The multiplication of two bit sequences as repeated sequence addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 smul 𝐵) = {𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})
Theorem	smupf 16542*	The sequence of partial sums of the sequence multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:ℕ0⟶𝒫 ℕ0)
Theorem	smup0 16543*	The initial element of the partial sum sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘0) = ∅)
Theorem	smupp1 16544*	The initial element of the partial sum sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((𝑃‘𝑁) sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑁) ∈ 𝐵)}))
Theorem	smuval 16545*	Define the addition of two bit sequences, using df-had 1623 and df-cad 1636 bit operations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ (𝐴 smul 𝐵) ↔ 𝑁 ∈ (𝑃‘(𝑁 + 1))))
Theorem	smuval2 16546*	The partial sum sequence stabilizes at 𝑁 after the 𝑁 + 1-th element of the sequence; this stable value is the value of the sequence multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑁 + 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ (𝐴 smul 𝐵) ↔ 𝑁 ∈ (𝑃‘𝑀)))
Theorem	smupvallem 16547*	If 𝐴 only has elements less than 𝑁, then all elements of the partial sum sequence past 𝑁 already equal the final value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘𝑀) = (𝐴 smul 𝐵))
Theorem	smucl 16548	The product of two sequences is a sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0) → (𝐴 smul 𝐵) ⊆ ℕ0)
Theorem	smu01lem 16549*	Lemma for smu01 16550 and smu02 16551. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0)) → ¬ (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑘) ∈ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 smul 𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	smu01 16550	Multiplication of a sequence by 0 on the right. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 → (𝐴 smul ∅) = ∅)
Theorem	smu02 16551	Multiplication of a sequence by 0 on the left. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0 → (∅ smul 𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	smupval 16552*	Rewrite the elements of the partial sum sequence in terms of sequence multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘𝑁) = ((𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁)) smul 𝐵))
Theorem	smup1 16553*	Rewrite smupp1 16544 using only smul instead of the internal recursive function 𝑃. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∩ (0..^(𝑁 + 1))) smul 𝐵) = (((𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁)) smul 𝐵) sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑁) ∈ 𝐵)}))
Theorem	smueqlem 16554*	Any element of a sequence multiplication only depends on the values of the argument sequences up to and including that point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ 𝐵)})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = seq0((𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ0, 𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑝 sadd {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑛 − 𝑚) ∈ (𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁)))})), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ∅, (𝑛 − 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 smul 𝐵) ∩ (0..^𝑁)) = (((𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁)) smul (𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) ∩ (0..^𝑁)))
Theorem	smueq 16555	Any element of a sequence multiplication only depends on the values of the argument sequences up to and including that point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 smul 𝐵) ∩ (0..^𝑁)) = (((𝐴 ∩ (0..^𝑁)) smul (𝐵 ∩ (0..^𝑁))) ∩ (0..^𝑁)))
Theorem	smumullem 16556	Lemma for smumul 16557. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((bits‘𝐴) ∩ (0..^𝑁)) smul (bits‘𝐵)) = (bits‘((𝐴 mod (2↑𝑁)) · 𝐵)))
Theorem	smumul 16557	For sequences that correspond to valid integers, the sequence multiplication function produces the sequence for the product. This is effectively a proof of the correctness of the multiplication process, implemented in terms of logic gates for df-sad 16515, whose correctness is verified in sadadd 16531. Outside this range, the sequences cannot be representing integers, but the smul function still "works". This extended function is best interpreted in terms of the ring structure of the 2-adic integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((bits‘𝐴) smul (bits‘𝐵)) = (bits‘(𝐴 · 𝐵)))
6.1.7  The greatest common divisor operator
Syntax	cgcd 16558	Extend the definition of a class to include the greatest common divisor operator.
class gcd
Definition	df-gcd 16559*	Define the gcd operator. For example, (-6 gcd 9) = 3 (ex-gcd 30819). For an alternate definition, based on the definition in [ApostolNT] p. 15, see dfgcd2 16610. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ gcd = (𝑥 ∈ ℤ, 𝑦 ∈ ℤ ↦ if((𝑥 = 0 ∧ 𝑦 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑦)}, ℝ, < )))
Theorem	gcdval 16560*	The value of the gcd operator. (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) is the greatest common divisor of 𝑀 and 𝑁. If 𝑀 and 𝑁 are both 0, the result is defined conventionally as 0. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0), 0, sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < )))
Theorem	gcd0val 16561	The value, by convention, of the gcd operator when both operands are 0. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (0 gcd 0) = 0
Theorem	gcdn0val 16562*	The value of the gcd operator when at least one operand is nonzero. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0)) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = sup({𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁)}, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	gcdcllem1 16563*	Lemma for gcdn0cl 16566, gcddvds 16567 and dvdslegcd 16568. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∥ 𝑛}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℤ ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑛 ≠ 0) → (𝑆 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))
Theorem	gcdcllem2 16564*	Lemma for gcdn0cl 16566, gcddvds 16567 and dvdslegcd 16568. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∀𝑛 ∈ {𝑀, 𝑁}𝑧 ∥ 𝑛}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝑁)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)
Theorem	gcdcllem3 16565*	Lemma for gcdn0cl 16566, gcddvds 16567 and dvdslegcd 16568. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∀𝑛 ∈ {𝑀, 𝑁}𝑧 ∥ 𝑛}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝑁)}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0)) → (sup(𝑅, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℕ ∧ (sup(𝑅, ℝ, < ) ∥ 𝑀 ∧ sup(𝑅, ℝ, < ) ∥ 𝑁) ∧ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝐾 ≤ sup(𝑅, ℝ, < ))))
Theorem	gcdn0cl 16566	Closure of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0)) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	gcddvds 16567	The gcd of two integers divides each of them. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∥ 𝑀 ∧ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	dvdslegcd 16568	An integer which divides both operands of the gcd operator is bounded by it. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0)) → ((𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝐾 ≤ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)))
Theorem	nndvdslegcd 16569	A positive integer which divides both positive operands of the gcd operator is bounded by it. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝐾 ≤ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)))
Theorem	gcdcl 16570	Closure of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	gcdnncl 16571	Closure of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	gcdcld 16572	Closure of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	gcd2n0cl 16573	Closure of the gcd operator if the second operand is not 0. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ≠ 0) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	zeqzmulgcd 16574*	An integer is the product of an integer and the gcd of it and another integer. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ 𝐴 = (𝑛 · (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)))
Theorem	divgcdz 16575	An integer divided by the gcd of it and a nonzero integer is an integer. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → (𝐴 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)) ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	gcdf 16576	Domain and codomain of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.)
⊢ gcd :(ℤ × ℤ)⟶ℕ0
Theorem	gcdcom 16577	The gcd operator is commutative. Theorem 1.4(a) in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑁 gcd 𝑀))
Theorem	gcdcomd 16578	The gcd operator is commutative, deduction version. (Contributed by SN, 24-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑁 gcd 𝑀))
Theorem	divgcdnn 16579	A positive integer divided by the gcd of it and another integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	divgcdnnr 16580	A positive integer divided by the gcd of it and another integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 / (𝐵 gcd 𝐴)) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	gcdeq0 16581	The gcd of two integers is zero iff they are both zero. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 0 ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0)))
Theorem	gcdn0gt0 16582	The gcd of two integers is positive (nonzero) iff they are not both zero. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0) ↔ 0 < (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)))
Theorem	gcd0id 16583	The gcd of 0 and an integer is the integer's absolute value. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (0 gcd 𝑁) = (abs‘𝑁))
Theorem	gcdid0 16584	The gcd of an integer and 0 is the integer's absolute value. Theorem 1.4(d)2 in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (𝑁 gcd 0) = (abs‘𝑁))
Theorem	nn0gcdid0 16585	The gcd of a nonnegative integer with 0 is itself. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 gcd 0) = 𝑁)
Theorem	gcdneg 16586	Negating one operand of the gcd operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd -𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))
Theorem	neggcd 16587	Negating one operand of the gcd operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (-𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))
Theorem	gcdaddmlem 16588	Lemma for gcdaddm 16589. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ    &   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd ((𝐾 · 𝑀) + 𝑁))
Theorem	gcdaddm 16589	Adding a multiple of one operand of the gcd operator to the other does not alter the result. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd (𝑁 + (𝐾 · 𝑀))))
Theorem	gcdadd 16590	The GCD of two numbers is the same as the GCD of the left and their sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd (𝑁 + 𝑀)))
Theorem	gcdid 16591	The gcd of a number and itself is its absolute value. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (𝑁 gcd 𝑁) = (abs‘𝑁))
Theorem	gcd1 16592	The gcd of a number with 1 is 1. Theorem 1.4(d)1 in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (𝑀 gcd 1) = 1)
Theorem	gcdabs1 16593	gcd of the absolute value of the first operator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → ((abs‘𝑁) gcd 𝑀) = (𝑁 gcd 𝑀))
Theorem	gcdabs2 16594	gcd of the absolute value of the second operator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 gcd (abs‘𝑀)) = (𝑁 gcd 𝑀))
Theorem	gcdabs 16595	The gcd of two integers is the same as that of their absolute values. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by SN, 15-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((abs‘𝑀) gcd (abs‘𝑁)) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))
Theorem	modgcd 16596	The gcd remains unchanged if one operand is replaced with its remainder modulo the other. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝑀 mod 𝑁) gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))
Theorem	1gcd 16597	The GCD of one and an integer is one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (1 gcd 𝑀) = 1)
Theorem	gcdmultipled 16598	The greatest common divisor of a nonnegative integer 𝑀 and a multiple of it is 𝑀 itself. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd (𝑁 · 𝑀)) = 𝑀)
Theorem	gcdmultiplez 16599	The GCD of a multiple of an integer is the integer itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd (𝑀 · 𝑁)) = 𝑀)
Theorem	gcdmultiple 16600	The GCD of a multiple of a positive integer is the positive integer itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑀 gcd (𝑀 · 𝑁)) = 𝑀)