Theorem flimval 24287

Description: The set of limit points of a filter. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 4-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Aug-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
flimval.1	⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽

Assertion

Ref	Expression
flimval	⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ∪ ran Fil) → (𝐽 fLim 𝐹) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐹   𝑥,𝐽   𝑥,𝑋

Proof of Theorem flimval

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑗 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		flimval.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽
2	1	topopn 23229	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐽)
3	2	adantr 486	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ∪ ran Fil) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐽)
4		rabexg 5298	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐽 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)} ∈ V)
5	3, 4	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ∪ ran Fil) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)} ∈ V)
6		simpl 488	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → 𝑗 = 𝐽)
7	6	unieqd 4879	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → ∪ 𝑗 = ∪ 𝐽)
8	7, 1	eqtr4di 2813	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → ∪ 𝑗 = 𝑋)
9	6	fveq2d 6889	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → (nei‘𝑗) = (nei‘𝐽))
10	9	fveq1d 6887	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → ((nei‘𝑗)‘{𝑥}) = ((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}))
11		simpr 490	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → 𝑓 = 𝐹)
12	10, 11	sseq12d 3941	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → (((nei‘𝑗)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝑓 ↔ ((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹))
13	8	pweqd 4573	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 = 𝒫 𝑋)
14	11, 13	sseq12d 3941	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → (𝑓 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 ↔ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋))
15	12, 14	anbi12d 644	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → ((((nei‘𝑗)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗) ↔ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)))
16	8, 15	rabeqbidv 3429	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → {𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝑗 ∣ (((nei‘𝑗)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)})
17		df-flim 24263	. . 3 ⊢ fLim = (𝑗 ∈ Top, 𝑓 ∈ ∪ ran Fil ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝑗 ∣ (((nei‘𝑗)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗)})
18	16, 17	ovmpoga 7574	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ∪ ran Fil ∧ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)} ∈ V) → (𝐽 fLim 𝐹) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)})
19	5, 18	mpd3an3 1491	1 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ∪ ran Fil) → (𝐽 fLim 𝐹) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  {crab 3412  Vcvv 3450   ⊆ wss 3895  𝒫 cpw 4556  {csn 4584  ∪ cuni 4866  ran crn 5651  ‘cfv 6538  (class class class)co 7420  Topctop 23216  neicnei 23420  Filcfil 24169   fLim cflim 24258

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-id 5545  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fv 6546  df-ov 7423  df-oprab 7424  df-mpo 7425  df-top 23217  df-flim 24263

This theorem is used by:  elflim2  24288