Theorem flimval 24157

Description: The set of limit points of a filter. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 4-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Aug-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
flimval.1	⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽

Assertion

Ref	Expression
flimval	⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ∪ ran Fil) → (𝐽 fLim 𝐹) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐹   𝑥,𝐽   𝑥,𝑋

Proof of Theorem flimval

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑗 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		flimval.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽
2	1	topopn 23100	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐽)
3	2	adantr 486	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ∪ ran Fil) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐽)
4		rabexg 5313	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐽 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)} ∈ V)
5	3, 4	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ∪ ran Fil) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)} ∈ V)
6		simpl 488	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → 𝑗 = 𝐽)
7	6	unieqd 4890	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → ∪ 𝑗 = ∪ 𝐽)
8	7, 1	eqtr4di 2819	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → ∪ 𝑗 = 𝑋)
9	6	fveq2d 6892	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → (nei‘𝑗) = (nei‘𝐽))
10	9	fveq1d 6890	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → ((nei‘𝑗)‘{𝑥}) = ((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}))
11		simpr 490	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → 𝑓 = 𝐹)
12	10, 11	sseq12d 3973	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → (((nei‘𝑗)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝑓 ↔ ((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹))
13	8	pweqd 4584	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 = 𝒫 𝑋)
14	11, 13	sseq12d 3973	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → (𝑓 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 ↔ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋))
15	12, 14	anbi12d 644	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → ((((nei‘𝑗)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗) ↔ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)))
16	8, 15	rabeqbidv 3437	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → {𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝑗 ∣ (((nei‘𝑗)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)})
17		df-flim 24133	. . 3 ⊢ fLim = (𝑗 ∈ Top, 𝑓 ∈ ∪ ran Fil ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝑗 ∣ (((nei‘𝑗)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗)})
18	16, 17	ovmpoga 7577	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ∪ ran Fil ∧ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)} ∈ V) → (𝐽 fLim 𝐹) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)})
19	5, 18	mpd3an3 1491	1 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ∪ ran Fil) → (𝐽 fLim 𝐹) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  {crab 3419  Vcvv 3458   ⊆ wss 3908  𝒫 cpw 4567  {csn 4594  ∪ cuni 4877  ran crn 5667  ‘cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7423  Topctop 23087  neicnei 23291  Filcfil 24039   fLim cflim 24128

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5262  ax-pr 5409

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-sbc 3748  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-id 5561  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fv 6551  df-ov 7426  df-oprab 7427  df-mpo 7428  df-top 23088  df-flim 24133

This theorem is used by:  elflim2  24158