MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  mulcnsrec Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem mulcnsrec 11147
Description: Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. The trick involves ecid 8787, which shows that the coset of the converse membership relation (which is not an equivalence relation) leaves a set unchanged. See also dfcnqs 11145.

Note: This is the last lemma (from which the axioms will be derived) in the construction of real and complex numbers. The construction starts at cnpi 10847. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion
Ref Expression
mulcnsrec (((𝐴R𝐵R) ∧ (𝐶R𝐷R)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] E · [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] E ) = [⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩] E )

Proof of Theorem mulcnsrec
StepHypRef Expression
1 mulcnsr 11139 . 2 (((𝐴R𝐵R) ∧ (𝐶R𝐷R)) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ · ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) = ⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩)
2 opex 5450 . . . 4 𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ V
32ecid 8787 . . 3 [⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] E = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵
4 opex 5450 . . . 4 𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∈ V
54ecid 8787 . . 3 [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] E = ⟨𝐶, 𝐷
63, 5oveq12i 7435 . 2 ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] E · [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] E ) = (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ · ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)
7 opex 5450 . . 3 ⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩ ∈ V
87ecid 8787 . 2 [⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩] E = ⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩
91, 6, 83eqtr4g 2826 1 (((𝐴R𝐵R) ∧ (𝐶R𝐷R)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] E · [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] E ) = [⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩] E )
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wa 401   = wceq 1570  wcel 2146  cop 4600   E cep 5565  ccnv 5665  (class class class)co 7423  [cec 8701  Rcnr 10868  -1Rcm1r 10871   +R cplr 10872   ·R cmr 10873   · cmul 11123
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5262  ax-pr 5409
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-id 5561  df-eprel 5566  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fv 6551  df-ov 7426  df-oprab 7427  df-ec 8705  df-c 11124  df-mul 11130
This theorem is used by:  axmulcom  11158  axmulass  11160  axdistr  11161
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator