MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  mulcnsrec Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem mulcnsrec 11139
Description: Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. The trick involves ecid 8780, which shows that the coset of the converse membership relation (which is not an equivalence relation) leaves a set unchanged. See also dfcnqs 11137.

Note: This is the last lemma (from which the axioms will be derived) in the construction of real and complex numbers. The construction starts at cnpi 10839. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion
Ref Expression
mulcnsrec (((𝐴R𝐵R) ∧ (𝐶R𝐷R)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] E · [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] E ) = [⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩] E )

Proof of Theorem mulcnsrec
StepHypRef Expression
1 mulcnsr 11131 . 2 (((𝐴R𝐵R) ∧ (𝐶R𝐷R)) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ · ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) = ⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩)
2 opex 5448 . . . 4 𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ V
32ecid 8780 . . 3 [⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] E = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵
4 opex 5448 . . . 4 𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∈ V
54ecid 8780 . . 3 [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] E = ⟨𝐶, 𝐷
63, 5oveq12i 7428 . 2 ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] E · [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] E ) = (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ · ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)
7 opex 5448 . . 3 ⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩ ∈ V
87ecid 8780 . 2 [⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩] E = ⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩
91, 6, 83eqtr4g 2826 1 (((𝐴R𝐵R) ∧ (𝐶R𝐷R)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] E · [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] E ) = [⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩] E )
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wa 401   = wceq 1570  wcel 2146  cop 4598   E cep 5563  ccnv 5663  (class class class)co 7416  [cec 8694  Rcnr 10860  -1Rcm1r 10863   +R cplr 10864   ·R cmr 10865   · cmul 11115
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5260  ax-pr 5407
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4491  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-uni 4876  df-br 5113  df-opab 5177  df-id 5559  df-eprel 5564  df-xp 5670  df-rel 5671  df-cnv 5672  df-co 5673  df-dm 5674  df-rn 5675  df-res 5676  df-ima 5677  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fv 6548  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-ec 8698  df-c 11116  df-mul 11122
This theorem is used by:  axmulcom  11150  axmulass  11152  axdistr  11153
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator