P. 112 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 11101-11200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Axiom	ax-cnre 11101*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom 17 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcnre 11077. For naming consistency, use cnre 11131 for new proofs. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Axiom	ax-pre-lttri 11102	Ordering on reals satisfies strict trichotomy. Axiom 18 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-lttri 11078. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axlttri 11205. Normally new proofs would use xrlttri 13059. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐴)))
Axiom	ax-pre-lttrn 11103	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom 19 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-lttrn 11079. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axlttrn 11206. Normally new proofs would use lttr 11210. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐶) → 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶))
Axiom	ax-pre-ltadd 11104	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom 20 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltadd 11080. Normally new proofs would use axltadd 11207. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) <ℝ (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
Axiom	ax-pre-mulgt0 11105	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom 21 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulgt0 11081. Normally new proofs would use axmulgt0 11208. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 <ℝ 𝐴 ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐵) → 0 <ℝ (𝐴 · 𝐵)))
Axiom	ax-pre-sup 11106*	A nonempty, bounded-above set of reals has a supremum. Axiom 22 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-sup 11082. Note: Normally new proofs would use axsup 11209. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧)))
Axiom	ax-addf 11107	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This deprecated axiom is provided for historical compatibility but is not a bona fide axiom for complex numbers (independent of set theory) since it cannot be interpreted as a first-order or second-order statement (see https://us.metamath.org/downloads/schmidt-cnaxioms.pdf). It may be deleted in the future and should be avoided for new theorems. Instead, the less specific addcl 11110 should be used. Note that uses of ax-addf 11107 can be eliminated by using the defined operation (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑦)) in place of +, from which this axiom (with the defined operation in place of +) follows as a theorem. This axiom is justified by Theorem axaddf 11058. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ + :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Axiom	ax-mulf 11108	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This axiom tells us that · is defined only on complex numbers which is analogous to the way that other operations are defined, for example see subf 11383 or eff 16006. However, while Metamath can handle this axiom, if we wish to work with weaker complex number axioms, we can avoid it by using the less specific mulcl 11112. Note that uses of ax-mulf 11108 can be eliminated by using the defined operation (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)) in place of ·, as seen in mpomulf 11123. This axiom is justified by Theorem axmulf 11059. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ · :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
5.2  Derive the basic properties from the field axioms
5.2.1  Some deductions from the field axioms for complex numbers
Theorem	cnex 11109	Alias for ax-cnex 11084. See also cnexALT 12905. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Theorem	addcl 11110	Alias for ax-addcl 11088, for naming consistency with addcli 11140. Use this theorem instead of ax-addcl 11088 or axaddcl 11064. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	readdcl 11111	Alias for ax-addrcl 11089, for naming consistency with readdcli 11149. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	mulcl 11112	Alias for ax-mulcl 11090, for naming consistency with mulcli 11141. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	remulcl 11113	Alias for ax-mulrcl 11091, for naming consistency with remulcli 11150. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	mulcom 11114	Alias for ax-mulcom 11092, for naming consistency with mulcomi 11142. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Theorem	addass 11115	Alias for ax-addass 11093, for naming consistency with addassi 11144. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	mulass 11116	Alias for ax-mulass 11094, for naming consistency with mulassi 11145. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	adddi 11117	Alias for ax-distr 11095, for naming consistency with adddii 11146. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	recn 11118	A real number is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	reex 11119	The real numbers form a set. See also reexALT 12903. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ℝ ∈ V
Theorem	reelprrecn 11120	Reals are a subset of the pair of real and complex numbers. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ ℝ ∈ {ℝ, ℂ}
Theorem	cnelprrecn 11121	Complex numbers are a subset of the pair of real and complex numbers . (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ {ℝ, ℂ}
Theorem	mpoaddf 11122*	Addition is an operation on complex numbers. Version of ax-addf 11107 using maps-to notation, proved from the axioms of set theory and ax-addcl 11088. (Contributed by GG, 31-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑦)):(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Theorem	mpomulf 11123*	Multiplication is an operation on complex numbers. Version of ax-mulf 11108 using maps-to notation, proved from the axioms of set theory and ax-mulcl 11090. (Contributed by GG, 16-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)):(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Theorem	elimne0 11124	Hypothesis for weak deduction theorem to eliminate 𝐴 ≠ 0. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.)
⊢ if(𝐴 ≠ 0, 𝐴, 1) ≠ 0
Theorem	adddir 11125	Distributive law for complex numbers (right-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	0cn 11126	Zero is a complex number. See also 0cnALT 11369. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.)
⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	0cnd 11127	Zero is a complex number, deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	c0ex 11128	Zero is a set. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 0 ∈ V
Theorem	1cnd 11129	One is a complex number, deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	1ex 11130	One is a set. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 1 ∈ V
Theorem	cnre 11131*	Alias for ax-cnre 11101, for naming consistency. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Theorem	mulrid 11132	The number 1 is an identity element for multiplication. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴)
Theorem	mullid 11133	Identity law for multiplication. See mulrid 11132 for commuted version. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (1 · 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	1re 11134	The number 1 is real. This used to be one of our postulates for complex numbers, but Eric Schmidt discovered that it could be derived from a weaker postulate, ax-1cn 11086, by exploiting properties of the imaginary unit i. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ
Theorem	1red 11135	The number 1 is real, deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	0re 11136	The number 0 is real. Remark: the first step could also be ax-icn 11087. See also 0reALT 11479. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 11-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 0 ∈ ℝ
Theorem	0red 11137	The number 0 is real, deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	mulridi 11138	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴
Theorem	mullidi 11139	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (1 · 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	addcli 11140	Closure law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ
Theorem	mulcli 11141	Closure law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ
Theorem	mulcomi 11142	Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴)
Theorem	mulcomli 11143	Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 · 𝐴) = 𝐶
Theorem	addassi 11144	Associative law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶))
Theorem	mulassi 11145	Associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶))
Theorem	adddii 11146	Distributive law (left-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶))
Theorem	adddiri 11147	Distributive law (right-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐶))
Theorem	recni 11148	A real number is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	readdcli 11149	Closure law for addition of reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ
Theorem	remulcli 11150	Closure law for multiplication of reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ
Theorem	mulridd 11151	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴)
Theorem	mullidd 11152	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (1 · 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addcld 11153	Closure law for addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	mulcld 11154	Closure law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	mulcomd 11155	Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Theorem	addassd 11156	Associative law for addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	mulassd 11157	Associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	adddid 11158	Distributive law (left-distributivity). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	adddird 11159	Distributive law (right-distributivity). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	adddirp1d 11160	Distributive law, plus 1 version. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 1) · 𝐵) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + 𝐵))
Theorem	joinlmuladdmuld 11161	Join AB+CB into (A+C) on LHS. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 26-Oct-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐶 · 𝐵)) = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) · 𝐵) = 𝐷)
Theorem	recnd 11162	Deduction from real number to complex number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	readdcld 11163	Closure law for addition of reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	remulcld 11164	Closure law for multiplication of reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
5.2.2  Infinity and the extended real number system
Syntax	cpnf 11165	Plus infinity.
class +∞
Syntax	cmnf 11166	Minus infinity.
class -∞
Syntax	cxr 11167	The set of extended reals (includes plus and minus infinity).
class ℝ*
Syntax	clt 11168	'Less than' predicate (extended to include the extended reals).
class <
Syntax	cle 11169	Extend wff notation to include the 'less than or equal to' relation.
class ≤
Definition	df-pnf 11170	Define plus infinity. Note that the definition is arbitrary, requiring only that +∞ be a set not in ℝ and different from -∞ (df-mnf 11171). We use 𝒫 ∪ ℂ to make it independent of the construction of ℂ, and Cantor's Theorem will show that it is different from any member of ℂ and therefore ℝ. See pnfnre 11175, mnfnre 11177, and pnfnemnf 11189. A simpler possibility is to define +∞ as ℂ and -∞ as {ℂ}, but that approach requires the Axiom of Regularity to show that +∞ and -∞ are different from each other and from all members of ℝ. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ +∞ = 𝒫 ∪ ℂ
Definition	df-mnf 11171	Define minus infinity as the power set of plus infinity. Note that the definition is arbitrary, requiring only that -∞ be a set not in ℝ and different from +∞ (see mnfnre 11177 and pnfnemnf 11189). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ -∞ = 𝒫 +∞
Definition	df-xr 11172	Define the set of extended reals that includes plus and minus infinity. Definition 12-3.1 of [Gleason] p. 173. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ℝ* = (ℝ ∪ {+∞, -∞})
Definition	df-ltxr 11173*	Define 'less than' on the set of extended reals. Definition 12-3.1 of [Gleason] p. 173. Note that in our postulates for complex numbers, <ℝ is primitive and not necessarily a relation on ℝ. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ < = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦)} ∪ (((ℝ ∪ {-∞}) × {+∞}) ∪ ({-∞} × ℝ)))
Definition	df-le 11174	Define 'less than or equal to' on the extended real subset of complex numbers. Theorem leloe 11220 relates it to 'less than' for reals. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ≤ = ((ℝ* × ℝ*) ∖ ◡ < )
Theorem	pnfnre 11175	Plus infinity is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ +∞ ∉ ℝ
Theorem	pnfnre2 11176	Plus infinity is not a real number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ¬ +∞ ∈ ℝ
Theorem	mnfnre 11177	Minus infinity is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ -∞ ∉ ℝ
Theorem	ressxr 11178	The standard reals are a subset of the extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ℝ ⊆ ℝ*
Theorem	rexpssxrxp 11179	The Cartesian product of standard reals are a subset of the Cartesian product of extended reals. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (ℝ × ℝ) ⊆ (ℝ* × ℝ*)
Theorem	rexr 11180	A standard real is an extended real. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)
Theorem	0xr 11181	Zero is an extended real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 0 ∈ ℝ*
Theorem	renepnf 11182	No (finite) real equals plus infinity. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ≠ +∞)
Theorem	renemnf 11183	No real equals minus infinity. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ≠ -∞)
Theorem	rexrd 11184	A standard real is an extended real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)
Theorem	renepnfd 11185	No (finite) real equals plus infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ +∞)
Theorem	renemnfd 11186	No real equals minus infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ -∞)
Theorem	pnfex 11187	Plus infinity exists. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 7-Dec-2022.)
⊢ +∞ ∈ V
Theorem	pnfxr 11188	Plus infinity belongs to the set of extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Anthony Hart, 29-Aug-2011.)
⊢ +∞ ∈ ℝ*
Theorem	pnfnemnf 11189	Plus and minus infinity are different elements of ℝ*. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
⊢ +∞ ≠ -∞
Theorem	mnfnepnf 11190	Minus and plus infinity are different. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ -∞ ≠ +∞
Theorem	mnfxr 11191	Minus infinity belongs to the set of extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Anthony Hart, 29-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ -∞ ∈ ℝ*
Theorem	rexri 11192	A standard real is an extended real (inference form.) (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*
Theorem	1xr 11193	1 is an extended real number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ*
Theorem	renfdisj 11194	The reals and the infinities are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (ℝ ∩ {+∞, -∞}) = ∅
Theorem	ltrelxr 11195	"Less than" is a relation on extended reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ < ⊆ (ℝ* × ℝ*)
Theorem	ltrel 11196	"Less than" is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
⊢ Rel <
Theorem	lerelxr 11197	"Less than or equal to" is a relation on extended reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ≤ ⊆ (ℝ* × ℝ*)
Theorem	lerel 11198	"Less than or equal to" is a relation. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ Rel ≤
Theorem	xrlenlt 11199	"Less than or equal to" expressed in terms of "less than", for extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))
Theorem	xrlenltd 11200	"Less than or equal to" expressed in terms of "less than", for extended reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))