P. 112 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 11101-11200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	addgt0sr 11101	The sum of two positive signed reals is positive. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((0R <R 𝐴 ∧ 0R <R 𝐵) → 0R <R (𝐴 +R 𝐵))
Theorem	mulgt0sr 11102	The product of two positive signed reals is positive. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((0R <R 𝐴 ∧ 0R <R 𝐵) → 0R <R (𝐴 ·R 𝐵))
Theorem	sqgt0sr 11103	The square of a nonzero signed real is positive. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0R) → 0R <R (𝐴 ·R 𝐴))
Theorem	recexsr 11104*	The reciprocal of a nonzero signed real exists. Part of Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0R) → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (𝐴 ·R 𝑥) = 1R)
Theorem	mappsrpr 11105	Mapping from positive signed reals to positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ R    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 +R -1R) <R (𝐶 +R [⟨𝐴, 1P⟩] ~R ) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ P)
Theorem	ltpsrpr 11106	Mapping of order from positive signed reals to positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ R    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 +R [⟨𝐴, 1P⟩] ~R ) <R (𝐶 +R [⟨𝐵, 1P⟩] ~R ) ↔ 𝐴<P 𝐵)
Theorem	map2psrpr 11107*	Equivalence for positive signed real. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ R    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 +R -1R) <R 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ P (𝐶 +R [⟨𝑥, 1P⟩] ~R ) = 𝐴)
Theorem	supsrlem 11108*	Lemma for supremum theorem. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑤 ∣ (𝐶 +R [⟨𝑤, 1P⟩] ~R ) ∈ 𝐴}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ R    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ R ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <R 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ R (𝑦 <R 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑧)))
Theorem	supsr 11109*	A nonempty, bounded set of signed reals has a supremum. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ R ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <R 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ R (𝑦 <R 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑧)))
Syntax	cc 11110	Class of complex numbers.
class ℂ
Syntax	cr 11111	Class of real numbers.
class ℝ
Syntax	cc0 11112	Extend class notation to include the complex number 0.
class 0
Syntax	c1 11113	Extend class notation to include the complex number 1.
class 1
Syntax	ci 11114	Extend class notation to include the complex number i.
class i
Syntax	caddc 11115	Addition on complex numbers.
class +
Syntax	cltrr 11116	'Less than' predicate (defined over real subset of complex numbers).
class <ℝ
Syntax	cmul 11117	Multiplication on complex numbers. The token · is a center dot.
class ·
Definition	df-c 11118	Define the set of complex numbers. The 23 axioms for complex numbers start at axresscn 11145. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ = (R × R)
Definition	df-0 11119	Define the complex number 0. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 0 = ⟨0R, 0R⟩
Definition	df-1 11120	Define the complex number 1. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1 = ⟨1R, 0R⟩
Definition	df-i 11121	Define the complex number i (the imaginary unit). (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ i = ⟨0R, 1R⟩
Definition	df-r 11122	Define the set of real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℝ = (R × {0R})
Definition	df-add 11123*	Define addition over complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ + = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = ⟨(𝑤 +R 𝑢), (𝑣 +R 𝑓)⟩))}
Definition	df-mul 11124*	Define multiplication over complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ · = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = ⟨((𝑤 ·R 𝑢) +R (-1R ·R (𝑣 ·R 𝑓))), ((𝑣 ·R 𝑢) +R (𝑤 ·R 𝑓))⟩))}
Definition	df-lt 11125*	Define 'less than' on the real subset of complex numbers. Proofs should typically use < instead; see df-ltxr 11255. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ <ℝ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑤, 0R⟩) ∧ 𝑧 <R 𝑤))}
Theorem	opelcn 11126	Ordered pair membership in the class of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ ℂ ↔ (𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R))
Theorem	opelreal 11127	Ordered pair membership in class of real subset of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 0R⟩ ∈ ℝ ↔ 𝐴 ∈ R)
Theorem	elreal 11128*	Membership in class of real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ R ⟨𝑥, 0R⟩ = 𝐴)
Theorem	elreal2 11129	Ordered pair membership in the class of complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ↔ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ R ∧ 𝐴 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐴), 0R⟩))
Theorem	0ncn 11130	The empty set is not a complex number. Note: do not use this after the real number axioms are developed, since it is a construction-dependent property. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ ℂ
Theorem	ltrelre 11131	'Less than' is a relation on real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ <ℝ ⊆ (ℝ × ℝ)
Theorem	addcnsr 11132	Addition of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ + ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) = ⟨(𝐴 +R 𝐶), (𝐵 +R 𝐷)⟩)
Theorem	mulcnsr 11133	Multiplication of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ · ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) = ⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩)
Theorem	eqresr 11134	Equality of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 0R⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 0R⟩ ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	addresr 11135	Addition of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (⟨𝐴, 0R⟩ + ⟨𝐵, 0R⟩) = ⟨(𝐴 +R 𝐵), 0R⟩)
Theorem	mulresr 11136	Multiplication of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (⟨𝐴, 0R⟩ · ⟨𝐵, 0R⟩) = ⟨(𝐴 ·R 𝐵), 0R⟩)
Theorem	ltresr 11137	Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 0R⟩ <ℝ ⟨𝐵, 0R⟩ ↔ 𝐴 <R 𝐵)
Theorem	ltresr2 11138	Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ↔ (1st ‘𝐴) <R (1st ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	dfcnqs 11139	Technical trick to permit reuse of previous lemmas to prove arithmetic operation laws in ℂ from those in R. The trick involves qsid 8779, which shows that the coset of the converse membership relation (which is not an equivalence relation) acts as an identity divisor for the quotient set operation. This lets us "pretend" that ℂ is a quotient set, even though it is not (compare df-c 11118), and allows to reuse some of the equivalence class lemmas we developed for the transition from positive reals to signed reals, etc. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ = ((R × R) / ◡ E )
Theorem	addcnsrec 11140	Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. See dfcnqs 11139 and mulcnsrec 11141. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩]◡ E + [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩]◡ E ) = [⟨(𝐴 +R 𝐶), (𝐵 +R 𝐷)⟩]◡ E )
Theorem	mulcnsrec 11141	Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. The trick involves ecid 8778, which shows that the coset of the converse membership relation (which is not an equivalence relation) leaves a set unchanged. See also dfcnqs 11139. Note: This is the last lemma (from which the axioms will be derived) in the construction of real and complex numbers. The construction starts at cnpi 10841. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩]◡ E · [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩]◡ E ) = [⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩]◡ E )
5.1.2  Final derivation of real and complex number postulates
Theorem	axaddf 11142	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This theorem can be used as an alternate axiom for complex numbers in place of the less specific axaddcl 11148. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-addf 11191. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ + :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Theorem	axmulf 11143	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This theorem can be used as an alternate axiom for complex numbers in place of the less specific axmulcl 11150. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-mulf 11192. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ · :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Theorem	axcnex 11144	The complex numbers form a set. This axiom is redundant in the presence of the other axioms (see cnexALT 12972), but the proof requires the axiom of replacement, while the derivation from the construction here does not. Thus, we can avoid ax-rep 5285 in later theorems by invoking Axiom ax-cnex 11168 instead of cnexALT 12972. Use cnex 11193 instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Theorem	axresscn 11145	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom 1 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-resscn 11169. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℝ ⊆ ℂ
Theorem	ax1cn 11146	1 is a complex number. Axiom 2 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1cn 11170. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	axicn 11147	i is a complex number. Axiom 3 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-icn 11171. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ i ∈ ℂ
Theorem	axaddcl 11148	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom 4 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcl 11172 be used later. Instead, in most cases use addcl 11194. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	axaddrcl 11149	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom 5 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addrcl 11173 be used later. Instead, in most cases use readdcl 11195. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	axmulcl 11150	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom 6 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcl 11174 be used later. Instead, in most cases use mulcl 11196. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	axmulrcl 11151	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom 7 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulrcl 11175 be used later. Instead, in most cases use remulcl 11197. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	axmulcom 11152	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom 8 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcom 11176 be used later. Instead, use mulcom 11198. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Theorem	axaddass 11153	Addition of complex numbers is associative. This theorem transfers the associative laws for the real and imaginary signed real components of complex number pairs, to complex number addition itself. Axiom 9 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addass 11177 be used later. Instead, use addass 11199. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	axmulass 11154	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom 10 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-mulass 11178. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	axdistr 11155	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom 11 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-distr 11179 be used later. Instead, use adddi 11201. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	axi2m1 11156	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom 12 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-i2m1 11180. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((i · i) + 1) = 0
Theorem	ax1ne0 11157	1 and 0 are distinct. Axiom 13 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1ne0 11181. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1 ≠ 0
Theorem	ax1rid 11158	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom 14 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Weakened from the original axiom in the form of statement in mulrid 11214, based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1rid 11182. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴)
Theorem	axrnegex 11159*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom 15 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-rnegex 11183. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
Theorem	axrrecex 11160*	Existence of reciprocal of nonzero real number. Axiom 16 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-rrecex 11184. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1)
Theorem	axcnre 11161*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom 17 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-cnre 11185. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Theorem	axpre-lttri 11162	Ordering on reals satisfies strict trichotomy. Axiom 18 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axlttri 11287. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-lttri 11186. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐴)))
Theorem	axpre-lttrn 11163	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom 19 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axlttrn 11288. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-lttrn 11187. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐶) → 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶))
Theorem	axpre-ltadd 11164	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom 20 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axltadd 11289. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltadd 11188. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) <ℝ (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	axpre-mulgt0 11165	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom 21 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axmulgt0 11290. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulgt0 11189. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 <ℝ 𝐴 ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐵) → 0 <ℝ (𝐴 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	axpre-sup 11166*	A nonempty, bounded-above set of reals has a supremum. Axiom 22 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version with ordering on extended reals is axsup 11291. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-sup 11190. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧)))
Theorem	wuncn 11167	A weak universe containing ω contains the complex number construction. This theorem is construction-dependent in the literal sense, but will also be satisfied by any other reasonable implementation of the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ℂ ∈ 𝑈)
5.1.3  Real and complex number postulates restated as axioms
Axiom	ax-cnex 11168	The complex numbers form a set. This axiom is redundant - see cnexALT 12972- but we provide this axiom because the justification theorem axcnex 11144 does not use ax-rep 5285 even though the redundancy proof does. Proofs should normally use cnex 11193 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Axiom	ax-resscn 11169	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom 1 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axresscn 11145. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ℝ ⊆ ℂ
Axiom	ax-1cn 11170	1 is a complex number. Axiom 2 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1cn 11146. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℂ
Axiom	ax-icn 11171	i is a complex number. Axiom 3 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axicn 11147. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ i ∈ ℂ
Axiom	ax-addcl 11172	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom 4 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddcl 11148. Proofs should normally use addcl 11194 instead, which asserts the same thing but follows our naming conventions for closures. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Axiom	ax-addrcl 11173	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom 6 of 23 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddrcl 11149. Proofs should normally use readdcl 11195 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Axiom	ax-mulcl 11174	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom 6 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcl 11150. Proofs should normally use mulcl 11196 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Axiom	ax-mulrcl 11175	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom 7 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulrcl 11151. Proofs should normally use remulcl 11197 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Axiom	ax-mulcom 11176	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom 8 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcom 11152. Proofs should normally use mulcom 11198 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Axiom	ax-addass 11177	Addition of complex numbers is associative. Axiom 9 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddass 11153. Proofs should normally use addass 11199 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Axiom	ax-mulass 11178	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom 10 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulass 11154. Proofs should normally use mulass 11200 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Axiom	ax-distr 11179	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom 11 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axdistr 11155. Proofs should normally use adddi 11201 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Axiom	ax-i2m1 11180	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom 12 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axi2m1 11156. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
⊢ ((i · i) + 1) = 0
Axiom	ax-1ne0 11181	1 and 0 are distinct. Axiom 13 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1ne0 11157. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
⊢ 1 ≠ 0
Axiom	ax-1rid 11182	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom 14 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1rid 11158. Weakened from the original axiom in the form of statement in mulrid 11214, based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴)
Axiom	ax-rnegex 11183*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom 15 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axrnegex 11159. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
Axiom	ax-rrecex 11184*	Existence of reciprocal of nonzero real number. Axiom 16 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axrrecex 11160. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Apr-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1)
Axiom	ax-cnre 11185*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom 17 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcnre 11161. For naming consistency, use cnre 11213 for new proofs. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Axiom	ax-pre-lttri 11186	Ordering on reals satisfies strict trichotomy. Axiom 18 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-lttri 11162. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axlttri 11287. Normally new proofs would use xrlttri 13120. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐴)))
Axiom	ax-pre-lttrn 11187	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom 19 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-lttrn 11163. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axlttrn 11288. Normally new proofs would use lttr 11292. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐶) → 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶))
Axiom	ax-pre-ltadd 11188	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom 20 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltadd 11164. Normally new proofs would use axltadd 11289. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) <ℝ (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
Axiom	ax-pre-mulgt0 11189	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom 21 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulgt0 11165. Normally new proofs would use axmulgt0 11290. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 <ℝ 𝐴 ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐵) → 0 <ℝ (𝐴 · 𝐵)))
Axiom	ax-pre-sup 11190*	A nonempty, bounded-above set of reals has a supremum. Axiom 22 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-sup 11166. Note: Normally new proofs would use axsup 11291. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧)))
Axiom	ax-addf 11191	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This deprecated axiom is provided for historical compatibility but is not a bona fide axiom for complex numbers (independent of set theory) since it cannot be interpreted as a first-order or second-order statement (see https://us.metamath.org/downloads/schmidt-cnaxioms.pdf). It may be deleted in the future and should be avoided for new theorems. Instead, the less specific addcl 11194 should be used. Note that uses of ax-addf 11191 can be eliminated by using the defined operation (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑦)) in place of +, from which this axiom (with the defined operation in place of +) follows as a theorem. This axiom is justified by Theorem axaddf 11142. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ + :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Axiom	ax-mulf 11192	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This deprecated axiom is provided for historical compatibility but is not a bona fide axiom for complex numbers (independent of set theory) since it cannot be interpreted as a first-order or second-order statement (see https://us.metamath.org/downloads/schmidt-cnaxioms.pdf). It may be deleted in the future and should be avoided for new theorems. Instead, the less specific ax-mulcl 11174 should be used. Note that uses of ax-mulf 11192 can be eliminated by using the defined operation (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)) in place of ·, from which this axiom (with the defined operation in place of ·) follows as a theorem. This axiom is justified by Theorem axmulf 11143. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ · :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
5.2  Derive the basic properties from the field axioms
5.2.1  Some deductions from the field axioms for complex numbers
Theorem	cnex 11193	Alias for ax-cnex 11168. See also cnexALT 12972. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Theorem	addcl 11194	Alias for ax-addcl 11172, for naming consistency with addcli 11222. Use this theorem instead of ax-addcl 11172 or axaddcl 11148. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	readdcl 11195	Alias for ax-addrcl 11173, for naming consistency with readdcli 11231. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	mulcl 11196	Alias for ax-mulcl 11174, for naming consistency with mulcli 11223. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	remulcl 11197	Alias for ax-mulrcl 11175, for naming consistency with remulcli 11232. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	mulcom 11198	Alias for ax-mulcom 11176, for naming consistency with mulcomi 11224. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Theorem	addass 11199	Alias for ax-addass 11177, for naming consistency with addassi 11226. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	mulass 11200	Alias for ax-mulass 11178, for naming consistency with mulassi 11227. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)))