Theorem rabsubmgmd 18943

Description: Deduction for proving that a restricted class abstraction is a submagma. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabsubmgmd.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)
rabsubmgmd.p	⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)
rabsubmgmd.m	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mgm)
rabsubmgmd.cp	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))) → 𝜂)
rabsubmgmd.th	⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))
rabsubmgmd.ta	⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))
rabsubmgmd.et	⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑥 + 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabsubmgmd	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑀))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐵   𝑥,𝑀,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦   𝜓,𝑥,𝑦   𝑧, +   𝜂,𝑧   𝜏,𝑧   𝜃,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑧)   𝜓(𝑧)   𝜃(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜏(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜂(𝑥, 𝑦)   + (𝑥, 𝑦)   𝑀(𝑧)

Proof of Theorem rabsubmgmd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssrab2 4008	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ 𝐵
2	1	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ 𝐵)
3		rabsubmgmd.th	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))
4	3	elrab 3648	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜃))
5		rabsubmgmd.ta	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))
6	5	elrab 3648	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜏))
7	4, 6	anbi12i 640	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜏)))
8		rabsubmgmd.et	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑥 + 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))
9		rabsubmgmd.m	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mgm)
10	9	adantr 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜏))) → 𝑀 ∈ Mgm)
11		simprll 791	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜏))) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
12		simprrl 793	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜏))) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
13		rabsubmgmd.b	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)
14		rabsubmgmd.p	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)
15	13, 14	mgmcl 18869	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ Mgm ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐵)
16	10, 11, 12, 15	syl3anc 1399	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜏))) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐵)
17		simpl 488	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
18		simpl 488	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
19	17, 18	anim12i 625	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜏)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
20		simpr 490	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜃)
21		simpr 490	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜏)
22	20, 21	anim12i 625	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜏)) → (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))
23	19, 22	jca 521	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜏)) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)))
24		rabsubmgmd.cp	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))) → 𝜂)
25	23, 24	sylan2 605	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜏))) → 𝜂)
26	8, 16, 25	elrabd 3650	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜏))) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})
27	7, 26	sylan2b 606	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})
28	27	ralrimivva 3209	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓}∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓} (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})
29	13, 14	issubmgm 18941	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ Mgm → ({𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑀) ↔ ({𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓}∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓} (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})))
30	9, 29	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑀) ↔ ({𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓}∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓} (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})))
31	2, 28, 30	mpbir2and 726	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑀))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080  {crab 3416   ⊆ wss 3900  ‘cfv 6566  (class class class)co 7451  Basecbs 17431  +_gcplusg 17472  Mgmcmgm 18864  SubMgmcsubmgm 18930

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5398

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5553  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fv 6574  df-ov 7454  df-mgm 18866  df-submgm 18932

This theorem is used by: (None)