MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  issubmgm Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem issubmgm 18766
Description: Expand definition of a submagma. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2020.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
issubmgm.b 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)
issubmgm.p + = (+g𝑀)
Assertion
Ref Expression
issubmgm (𝑀 ∈ Mgm → (𝑆 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑀) ↔ (𝑆𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆 (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑀,𝑦   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦
Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥, 𝑦)   + (𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem issubmgm
Dummy variables 𝑚 𝑡 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 fveq2 6881 . . . . . 6 (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (Base‘𝑚) = (Base‘𝑀))
21pweqd 4578 . . . . 5 (𝑚 = 𝑀 → 𝒫 (Base‘𝑚) = 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀))
3 fveq2 6881 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (+g𝑚) = (+g𝑀))
43oveqd 7429 . . . . . . 7 (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (𝑥(+g𝑚)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦))
54eleq1d 2847 . . . . . 6 (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ((𝑥(+g𝑚)𝑦) ∈ 𝑡 ↔ (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑡))
652ralbidv 3228 . . . . 5 (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (∀𝑥𝑡𝑦𝑡 (𝑥(+g𝑚)𝑦) ∈ 𝑡 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑡𝑦𝑡 (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑡))
72, 6rabeqbidv 3433 . . . 4 (𝑚 = 𝑀 → {𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑚) ∣ ∀𝑥𝑡𝑦𝑡 (𝑥(+g𝑚)𝑦) ∈ 𝑡} = {𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∣ ∀𝑥𝑡𝑦𝑡 (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑡})
8 df-submgm 18757 . . . 4 SubMgm = (𝑚 ∈ Mgm ↦ {𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑚) ∣ ∀𝑥𝑡𝑦𝑡 (𝑥(+g𝑚)𝑦) ∈ 𝑡})
9 fvex 6894 . . . . . 6 (Base‘𝑀) ∈ V
109pwex 5350 . . . . 5 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∈ V
1110rabex 5308 . . . 4 {𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∣ ∀𝑥𝑡𝑦𝑡 (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑡} ∈ V
127, 8, 11fvmpt 6989 . . 3 (𝑀 ∈ Mgm → (SubMgm‘𝑀) = {𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∣ ∀𝑥𝑡𝑦𝑡 (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑡})
1312eleq2d 2848 . 2 (𝑀 ∈ Mgm → (𝑆 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑀) ↔ 𝑆 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∣ ∀𝑥𝑡𝑦𝑡 (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑡}))
149elpw2 5304 . . . 4 (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ↔ 𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑀))
1514anbi1i 635 . . 3 ((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆 (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑆) ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆 (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑆))
16 eleq2 2851 . . . . . 6 (𝑡 = 𝑆 → ((𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑡 ↔ (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑆))
1716raleqbi1dv 3332 . . . . 5 (𝑡 = 𝑆 → (∀𝑦𝑡 (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑡 ↔ ∀𝑦𝑆 (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑆))
1817raleqbi1dv 3332 . . . 4 (𝑡 = 𝑆 → (∀𝑥𝑡𝑦𝑡 (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑡 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆 (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑆))
1918elrab 3649 . . 3 (𝑆 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∣ ∀𝑥𝑡𝑦𝑡 (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑡} ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆 (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑆))
20 issubmgm.b . . . . 5 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)
2120sseq2i 3965 . . . 4 (𝑆𝐵𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑀))
22 issubmgm.p . . . . . . 7 + = (+g𝑀)
2322oveqi 7425 . . . . . 6 (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦)
2423eleq1i 2853 . . . . 5 ((𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆 ↔ (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)
25242ralbii 3139 . . . 4 (∀𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆 (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆 (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)
2621, 25anbi12i 639 . . 3 ((𝑆𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆 (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆) ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆 (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑆))
2715, 19, 263bitr4i 306 . 2 (𝑆 ∈ {𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∣ ∀𝑥𝑡𝑦𝑡 (𝑥(+g𝑀)𝑦) ∈ 𝑡} ↔ (𝑆𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆 (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆))
2813, 27bitrdi 290 1 (𝑀 ∈ Mgm → (𝑆 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑀) ↔ (𝑆𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆 (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wb 209  wa 400   = wceq 1569  wcel 2142  wral 3078  {crab 3415  wss 3904  𝒫 cpw 4561  cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7412  Basecbs 17275  +gcplusg 17316  Mgmcmgm 18702  SubMgmcsubmgm 18755
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5268  ax-pow 5335  ax-pr 5403
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-pw 4563  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-id 5555  df-xp 5666  df-rel 5667  df-cnv 5668  df-co 5669  df-dm 5670  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7415  df-submgm 18757
This theorem is used by:  issubmgm2  18767  rabsubmgmd  18768  submgmcl  18771  mgmhmima  18779  mgmhmeql  18780  submgmacs  18781
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator