Theorem sbcg 3819

Description: Substitution for a variable not occurring in a wff does not affect it. Distinct variable form of sbcgf 3817. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 12-Oct-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbcg	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem sbcg

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-sbc 3748	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
2		dfclel 2841	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
3		df-clab 2744	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
4		sbv 2124	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
5	3, 4	bitri 278	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
6	5	anbi2i 634	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ (𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
7	6	exbii 1871	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
8	1, 2, 7	3bitrri 301	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
9		dfclel 2841	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉))
10	9	biimpi 219	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉))
11		simpr 489	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑)
12	11	ax-gen 1818	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∀𝑦((𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑)
13		19.23v 1965	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦((𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑))
14	13	biimpi 219	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦((𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑) → (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑))
15	12, 14	mp1i 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉) → (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑))
16		2a1 29	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝐴)))
17	16	imp 411	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝐴))
18	17	ancrd 560	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝜑 → (𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
19	18	eximi 1858	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉) → ∃𝑦(𝜑 → (𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
20		19.37imv 1970	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝜑 → (𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (𝜑 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
21	19, 20	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝜑 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
22	15, 21	impbid 215	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉) → (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜑))
23	10, 22	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜑))
24	8, 23	bitr3id 288	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400  ∀wal 1561   = wceq 1563  ∃wex 1802  [wsb 2093   ∈ wcel 2145  {cab 2743  [wsbc 3747

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1818  ax-4 1832  ax-5 1933  ax-6 1990  ax-7 2031  ax-8 2147

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-ex 1803  df-sb 2094  df-clab 2744  df-clel 2840  df-sbc 3748

This theorem is referenced by:  sbcabel  3834  csbconstg  3874  2nreu  4401  csbuni  4899  csbxp  5753  sbcfung  6549  fmptsnd  7157  csbfrecsg  8269  opsbc2ie  32732  f1od2  32976  bnj89  35027  bnj525  35044  bnj1128  35295  csbrdgg  37835  csboprabg  37836  mptsnunlem  37844  topdifinffinlem  37853  relowlpssretop  37870  rdgeqoa  37876  csbfinxpg  37894  gm-sbtru  38617  sbfal  38618  cdlemk40  41553  cdlemkid3N  41569  cdlemkid4  41570  frege70  44521  frege77  44528  frege116  44567  frege118  44569  trsbc  45114  trsbcVD  45450  csbxpgVD  45467  csbunigVD  45471