Theorem smoiso 8164

Description: If 𝐹 is an isomorphism from an ordinal 𝐴 onto 𝐵, which is a subset of the ordinals, then 𝐹 is a strictly monotonic function. Exercise 3 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 50. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-Nov-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
smoiso	⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → Smo 𝐹)

Proof of Theorem smoiso

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isof1o 7174	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
2		f1of 6700	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
3	1, 2	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
4		ffdm 6614	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐵 ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐴))
5	4	simpld 494	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐵)
6		fss 6601	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On)
7	5, 6	sylan 579	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On)
8	7	3adant2 1129	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On)
9	3, 8	syl3an1 1161	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On)
10		fdm 6593	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
11	10	eqcomd 2744	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → 𝐴 = dom 𝐹)
12		ordeq 6258	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = dom 𝐹 → (Ord 𝐴 ↔ Ord dom 𝐹))
13	1, 2, 11, 12	4syl 19	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → (Ord 𝐴 ↔ Ord dom 𝐹))
14	13	biimpa 476	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴) → Ord dom 𝐹)
15	14	3adant3 1130	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → Ord dom 𝐹)
16	10	eleq2d 2824	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
17	10	eleq2d 2824	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
18	16, 17	anbi12d 630	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)))
19	1, 2, 18	3syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)))
20		isorel 7177	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 E 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) E (𝐹‘𝑦)))
21		epel 5489	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 E 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)
22		fvex 6769	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ V
23	22	epeli 5488	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) E (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦))
24	20, 21, 23	3bitr3g 312	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
25	24	biimpd 228	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
26	25	ex 412	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
27	19, 26	sylbid 239	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
28	27	ralrimivv 3113	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
29	28	3ad2ant1 1131	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
30		df-smo 8148	. 2 ⊢ (Smo 𝐹 ↔ (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On ∧ Ord dom 𝐹 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
31	9, 15, 29, 30	syl3anbrc 1341	1 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → Smo 𝐹)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  ∀wral 3063   ⊆ wss 3883   class class class wbr 5070   E cep 5485  dom cdm 5580  Ord word 6250  Oncon0 6251  ⟶wf 6414  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6417  ‘cfv 6418   Isom wiso 6419  Smo wsmo 8147

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-tr 5188  df-eprel 5486  df-po 5494  df-so 5495  df-fr 5535  df-we 5537  df-ord 6254  df-iota 6376  df-fn 6421  df-f 6422  df-f1 6423  df-f1o 6425  df-fv 6426  df-isom 6427  df-smo 8148

This theorem is referenced by:  smoiso2  8171