Theorem smoiso 7982

Description: If 𝐹 is an isomorphism from an ordinal 𝐴 onto 𝐵, which is a subset of the ordinals, then 𝐹 is a strictly monotonic function. Exercise 3 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 50. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-Nov-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
smoiso	⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → Smo 𝐹)

Proof of Theorem smoiso

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isof1o 7055	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
2		f1of 6590	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
3	1, 2	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
4		ffdm 6510	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐵 ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐴))
5	4	simpld 498	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐵)
6		fss 6501	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On)
7	5, 6	sylan 583	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On)
8	7	3adant2 1128	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On)
9	3, 8	syl3an1 1160	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On)
10		fdm 6495	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
11	10	eqcomd 2804	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → 𝐴 = dom 𝐹)
12		ordeq 6166	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = dom 𝐹 → (Ord 𝐴 ↔ Ord dom 𝐹))
13	1, 2, 11, 12	4syl 19	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → (Ord 𝐴 ↔ Ord dom 𝐹))
14	13	biimpa 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴) → Ord dom 𝐹)
15	14	3adant3 1129	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → Ord dom 𝐹)
16	10	eleq2d 2875	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
17	10	eleq2d 2875	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
18	16, 17	anbi12d 633	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)))
19	1, 2, 18	3syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)))
20		isorel 7058	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 E 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) E (𝐹‘𝑦)))
21		epel 5433	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 E 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)
22		fvex 6658	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ V
23	22	epeli 5432	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) E (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦))
24	20, 21, 23	3bitr3g 316	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
25	24	biimpd 232	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
26	25	ex 416	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
27	19, 26	sylbid 243	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
28	27	ralrimivv 3155	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
29	28	3ad2ant1 1130	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
30		df-smo 7966	. 2 ⊢ (Smo 𝐹 ↔ (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On ∧ Ord dom 𝐹 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
31	9, 15, 29, 30	syl3anbrc 1340	1 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → Smo 𝐹)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   ∧ w3a 1084   = wceq 1538   ∈ wcel 2111  ∀wral 3106   ⊆ wss 3881   class class class wbr 5030   E cep 5429  dom cdm 5519  Ord word 6158  Oncon0 6159  ⟶wf 6320  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6323  ‘cfv 6324   Isom wiso 6325  Smo wsmo 7965

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770  ax-sep 5167  ax-nul 5174  ax-pr 5295

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2598  df-eu 2629  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ne 2988  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-v 3443  df-sbc 3721  df-dif 3884  df-un 3886  df-in 3888  df-ss 3898  df-nul 4244  df-if 4426  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528  df-op 4532  df-uni 4801  df-br 5031  df-opab 5093  df-tr 5137  df-eprel 5430  df-po 5438  df-so 5439  df-fr 5478  df-we 5480  df-ord 6162  df-iota 6283  df-fn 6327  df-f 6328  df-f1 6329  df-f1o 6331  df-fv 6332  df-isom 6333  df-smo 7966

This theorem is referenced by:  smoiso2  7989