Theorem smoiso 8193

Description: If 𝐹 is an isomorphism from an ordinal 𝐴 onto 𝐵, which is a subset of the ordinals, then 𝐹 is a strictly monotonic function. Exercise 3 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 50. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-Nov-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
smoiso	⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → Smo 𝐹)

Proof of Theorem smoiso

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isof1o 7194	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
2		f1of 6716	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
3	1, 2	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
4		ffdm 6630	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐵 ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐴))
5	4	simpld 495	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐵)
6		fss 6617	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On)
7	5, 6	sylan 580	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On)
8	7	3adant2 1130	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On)
9	3, 8	syl3an1 1162	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On)
10		fdm 6609	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
11	10	eqcomd 2744	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → 𝐴 = dom 𝐹)
12		ordeq 6273	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = dom 𝐹 → (Ord 𝐴 ↔ Ord dom 𝐹))
13	1, 2, 11, 12	4syl 19	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → (Ord 𝐴 ↔ Ord dom 𝐹))
14	13	biimpa 477	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴) → Ord dom 𝐹)
15	14	3adant3 1131	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → Ord dom 𝐹)
16	10	eleq2d 2824	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
17	10	eleq2d 2824	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
18	16, 17	anbi12d 631	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)))
19	1, 2, 18	3syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)))
20		isorel 7197	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 E 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) E (𝐹‘𝑦)))
21		epel 5498	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 E 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)
22		fvex 6787	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ V
23	22	epeli 5497	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) E (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦))
24	20, 21, 23	3bitr3g 313	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
25	24	biimpd 228	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
26	25	ex 413	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
27	19, 26	sylbid 239	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
28	27	ralrimivv 3122	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) → ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
29	28	3ad2ant1 1132	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
30		df-smo 8177	. 2 ⊢ (Smo 𝐹 ↔ (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On ∧ Ord dom 𝐹 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
31	9, 15, 29, 30	syl3anbrc 1342	1 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → Smo 𝐹)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2106  ∀wral 3064   ⊆ wss 3887   class class class wbr 5074   E cep 5494  dom cdm 5589  Ord word 6265  Oncon0 6266  ⟶wf 6429  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6432  ‘cfv 6433   Isom wiso 6434  Smo wsmo 8176

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pr 5352

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-ne 2944  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-uni 4840  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-tr 5192  df-eprel 5495  df-po 5503  df-so 5504  df-fr 5544  df-we 5546  df-ord 6269  df-iota 6391  df-fn 6436  df-f 6437  df-f1 6438  df-f1o 6440  df-fv 6441  df-isom 6442  df-smo 8177

This theorem is referenced by:  smoiso2  8200