Theorem fodjumkvlemres 7489

Description: Lemma for fodjumkv 7490. The final result with P expressed as a local definition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Mar-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fodjumkv.o	|- ( ph -> M e. Markov )
fodjumkv.fo	|- ( ph -> F : M -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )
fodjumkv.p	|- P = ( y e. M |-> if ( E. z e. A ( F ` y ) = (inl ` z ) , (/) , 1o ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fodjumkvlemres	|- ( ph -> ( A =/= (/) -> E. x x e. A ) )

Distinct variable groups:   ph, y, z   y, M, z   z, A   z, B   z, F   x, A, z   y, A   y, F   y, P, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   B( x, y)   P( x)   F( x)   M( x)

Proof of Theorem fodjumkvlemres

Dummy variables v f w are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fodjumkv.fo	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> F : M -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )
2	1	adantr 276	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ A. w e. M ( P ` w ) = 1o ) -> F : M -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )
3		fodjumkv.p	. . . . 5 |- P = ( y e. M |-> if ( E. z e. A ( F ` y ) = (inl ` z ) , (/) , 1o ) )
4		simpr 110	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ A. w e. M ( P ` w ) = 1o ) -> A. w e. M ( P ` w ) = 1o )
5	2, 3, 4	fodju0 7477	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ A. w e. M ( P ` w ) = 1o ) -> A = (/) )
6	5	ex 115	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( A. w e. M ( P ` w ) = 1o -> A = (/) ) )
7	6	necon3ad 2462	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( A =/= (/) -> -. A. w e. M ( P ` w ) = 1o ) )
8		fveq1 5689	. . . . . . 7 |- ( f = P -> ( f ` w ) = ( P ` w ) )
9	8	eqeq1d 2247	. . . . . 6 |- ( f = P -> ( ( f ` w ) = 1o <-> ( P ` w ) = 1o ) )
10	9	ralbidv 2550	. . . . 5 |- ( f = P -> ( A. w e. M ( f ` w ) = 1o <-> A. w e. M ( P ` w ) = 1o ) )
11	10	notbid 677	. . . 4 |- ( f = P -> ( -. A. w e. M ( f ` w ) = 1o <-> -. A. w e. M ( P ` w ) = 1o ) )
12	8	eqeq1d 2247	. . . . 5 |- ( f = P -> ( ( f ` w ) = (/) <-> ( P ` w ) = (/) ) )
13	12	rexbidv 2551	. . . 4 |- ( f = P -> ( E. w e. M ( f ` w ) = (/) <-> E. w e. M ( P ` w ) = (/) ) )
14	11, 13	imbi12d 234	. . 3 |- ( f = P -> ( ( -. A. w e. M ( f ` w ) = 1o -> E. w e. M ( f ` w ) = (/) ) <-> ( -. A. w e. M ( P ` w ) = 1o -> E. w e. M ( P ` w ) = (/) ) ) )
15		fodjumkv.o	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> M e. Markov )
16		ismkvmap 7484	. . . . 5 |- ( M e. Markov -> ( M e. Markov <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m M ) ( -. A. w e. M ( f ` w ) = 1o -> E. w e. M ( f ` w ) = (/) ) ) )
17	16	ibi 176	. . . 4 |- ( M e. Markov -> A. f e. ( 2o ^m M ) ( -. A. w e. M ( f ` w ) = 1o -> E. w e. M ( f ` w ) = (/) ) )
18	15, 17	syl 14	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A. f e. ( 2o ^m M ) ( -. A. w e. M ( f ` w ) = 1o -> E. w e. M ( f ` w ) = (/) ) )
19	1, 3, 15	fodjuf 7475	. . 3 |- ( ph -> P e. ( 2o ^m M ) )
20	14, 18, 19	rspcdva 2934	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( -. A. w e. M ( P ` w ) = 1o -> E. w e. M ( P ` w ) = (/) ) )
21	1	adantr 276	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ E. w e. M ( P ` w ) = (/) ) -> F : M -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )
22		simpr 110	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ E. w e. M ( P ` w ) = (/) ) -> E. w e. M ( P ` w ) = (/) )
23		fveqeq2 5699	. . . . . 6 |- ( w = v -> ( ( P ` w ) = (/) <-> ( P ` v ) = (/) ) )
24	23	cbvrexv 2787	. . . . 5 |- ( E. w e. M ( P ` w ) = (/) <-> E. v e. M ( P ` v ) = (/) )
25	22, 24	sylib 122	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ E. w e. M ( P ` w ) = (/) ) -> E. v e. M ( P ` v ) = (/) )
26	21, 3, 25	fodjum 7476	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ E. w e. M ( P ` w ) = (/) ) -> E. x x e. A )
27	26	ex 115	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( E. w e. M ( P ` w ) = (/) -> E. x x e. A ) )
28	7, 20, 27	3syld 57	1 |- ( ph -> ( A =/= (/) -> E. x x e. A ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1402   E.wex 1545   e. wcel 2209   =/= wne 2420   A.wral 2528   E.wrex 2529   (/)c0 3520   ifcif 3635   |-> cmpt 4187   -onto->wfo 5370   ` cfv 5372  (class class class)co 6075   1oc1o 6670   2oc2o 6671   ^m cmap 6912   ⊔ cdju 7367  inlcinl 7375  Markovcmarkov 7481

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4244  ax-nul 4254  ax-pow 4306  ax-pr 4341  ax-un 4573  ax-setind 4679

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 847  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-if 3636  df-pw 3687  df-sn 3711  df-pr 3712  df-op 3714  df-uni 3931  df-int 3966  df-br 4126  df-opab 4188  df-mpt 4189  df-tr 4225  df-id 4433  df-iord 4506  df-on 4508  df-suc 4511  df-iom 4733  df-xp 4775  df-rel 4776  df-cnv 4777  df-co 4778  df-dm 4779  df-rn 4780  df-res 4781  df-ima 4782  df-iota 5332  df-fun 5374  df-fn 5375  df-f 5376  df-f1 5377  df-fo 5378  df-f1o 5379  df-fv 5380  df-ov 6078  df-oprab 6079  df-mpo 6080  df-1st 6364  df-2nd 6365  df-1o 6677  df-2o 6678  df-map 6914  df-dju 7368  df-inl 7377  df-inr 7378  df-markov 7482

This theorem is referenced by:  fodjumkv  7490