P. 72 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 7101-7200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	mkvprop 7101*	Markov's Principle expressed in terms of propositions (or more precisely, the A = om case is Markov's Principle). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Mar-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. Markov /\ A. n e. A DECID ph /\ -. A. n e. A -. ph ) -> E. n e. A ph )
Theorem	fodjumkvlemres 7102*	Lemma for fodjumkv 7103. The final result with P expressed as a local definition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Mar-2023.)
|- ( ph -> M e. Markov )   &    |- ( ph -> F : M -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )   &    |- P = ( y e. M |-> if ( E. z e. A ( F ` y ) = (inl ` z ) , (/) , 1o ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A =/= (/) -> E. x x e. A ) )
Theorem	fodjumkv 7103*	A condition which ensures that a nonempty set is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Mar-2023.)
|- ( ph -> M e. Markov )   &    |- ( ph -> F : M -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A =/= (/) -> E. x x e. A ) )
Theorem	enmkvlem 7104	Lemma for enmkv 7105. One direction of the biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. Markov -> B e. Markov ) )
Theorem	enmkv 7105	Being Markov is invariant with respect to equinumerosity. For example, this means that we can express the Markov's Principle as either om e. Markov or NN0 e. Markov. The former is a better match to conventional notation in the sense that df2o3 6377 says that 2o = { (/) , 1o } whereas the corresponding relationship does not exist between 2 and { 0 , 1 }. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. Markov <-> B e. Markov ) )
2.6.40  Weakly omniscient sets
Syntax	cwomni 7106	Extend class definition to include the class of weakly omniscient sets.
class WOmni
Definition	df-womni 7107*	A weakly omniscient set is one where we can decide whether a predicate (here represented by a function f) holds (is equal to 1o) for all elements or not. Generalization of definition 2.4 of [Pierik], p. 9. In particular, om e. WOmni is known as the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO). The term WLPO is common in the literature; there appears to be no widespread term for what we are calling a weakly omniscient set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
|- WOmni = { y | A. f ( f : y --> 2o -> DECID A. x e. y ( f ` x ) = 1o ) }
Theorem	iswomni 7108*	The predicate of being weakly omniscient. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. WOmni <-> A. f ( f : A --> 2o -> DECID A. x e. A ( f ` x ) = 1o ) ) )
Theorem	iswomnimap 7109*	The predicate of being weakly omniscient stated in terms of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. WOmni <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m A )DECID A. x e. A ( f ` x ) = 1o ) )
Theorem	omniwomnimkv 7110	A set is omniscient if and only if it is weakly omniscient and Markov. The case A = om says that LPO <-> WLPO /\ MP which is a remark following Definition 2.5 of [Pierik], p. 9. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A e. Omni <-> ( A e. WOmni /\ A e. Markov ) )
Theorem	lpowlpo 7111	LPO implies WLPO. Easy corollary of the more general omniwomnimkv 7110. There is an analogue in terms of analytic omniscience principles at tridceq 13638. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jul-2024.)
|- ( om e. Omni -> om e. WOmni )
Theorem	enwomnilem 7112	Lemma for enwomni 7113. One direction of the biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. WOmni -> B e. WOmni ) )
Theorem	enwomni 7113	Weak omniscience is invariant with respect to equinumerosity. For example, this means that we can express the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience as either om e. WOmni or NN0 e. WOmni. The former is a better match to conventional notation in the sense that df2o3 6377 says that 2o = { (/) , 1o } whereas the corresponding relationship does not exist between 2 and { 0 , 1 }. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. WOmni <-> B e. WOmni ) )
2.6.41  Cardinal numbers
Syntax	ccrd 7114	Extend class definition to include the cardinal size function.
class card
Definition	df-card 7115*	Define the cardinal number function. The cardinal number of a set is the least ordinal number equinumerous to it. In other words, it is the "size" of the set. Definition of [Enderton] p. 197. Our notation is from Enderton. Other textbooks often use a double bar over the set to express this function. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.)
|- card = ( x e. _V |-> |^| { y e. On | y ~~ x } )
Theorem	cardcl 7116*	The cardinality of a well-orderable set is an ordinal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2021.)
|- ( E. y e. On y ~~ A -> ( card ` A ) e. On )
Theorem	isnumi 7117	A set equinumerous to an ordinal is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. On /\ A ~~ B ) -> B e. dom card )
Theorem	finnum 7118	Every finite set is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. Fin -> A e. dom card )
Theorem	onenon 7119	Every ordinal number is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. On -> A e. dom card )
Theorem	cardval3ex 7120*	The value of ( card ` A ). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2021.)
|- ( E. x e. On x ~~ A -> ( card ` A ) = |^| { y e. On | y ~~ A } )
Theorem	oncardval 7121*	The value of the cardinal number function with an ordinal number as its argument. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
|- ( A e. On -> ( card ` A ) = |^| { x e. On | x ~~ A } )
Theorem	cardonle 7122	The cardinal of an ordinal number is less than or equal to the ordinal number. Proposition 10.6(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 85. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2003.)
|- ( A e. On -> ( card ` A ) C_ A )
Theorem	card0 7123	The cardinality of the empty set is the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.)
|- ( card ` (/) ) = (/)
Theorem	carden2bex 7124*	If two numerable sets are equinumerous, then they have equal cardinalities. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2021.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ E. x e. On x ~~ A ) -> ( card ` A ) = ( card ` B ) )
Theorem	pm54.43 7125	Theorem *54.43 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 360. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2007.)
|- ( ( A ~~ 1o /\ B ~~ 1o ) -> ( ( A i^i B ) = (/) <-> ( A u. B ) ~~ 2o ) )
Theorem	pr2nelem 7126	Lemma for pr2ne 7127. (Contributed by FL, 17-Aug-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D /\ A =/= B ) -> { A , B } ~~ 2o )
Theorem	pr2ne 7127	If an unordered pair has two elements they are different. (Contributed by FL, 14-Feb-2010.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ( { A , B } ~~ 2o <-> A =/= B ) )
Theorem	exmidonfinlem 7128*	Lemma for exmidonfin 7129. (Contributed by Andrew W Swan and Jim Kingdon, 9-Mar-2024.)
|- A = { { x e. { (/) } | ph } , { x e. { (/) } | -. ph } }   =>    |- ( om = ( On i^i Fin ) -> DECID ph )
Theorem	exmidonfin 7129	If a finite ordinal is a natural number, excluded middle follows. That excluded middle implies that a finite ordinal is a natural number is proved in the Metamath Proof Explorer. That a natural number is a finite ordinal is shown at nnfi 6817 and nnon 4569. (Contributed by Andrew W Swan and Jim Kingdon, 9-Mar-2024.)
|- ( om = ( On i^i Fin ) -> EXMID )
Theorem	en2eleq 7130	Express a set of pair cardinality as the unordered pair of a given element and the other element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.)
|- ( ( X e. P /\ P ~~ 2o ) -> P = { X , U. ( P \ { X } ) } )
Theorem	en2other2 7131	Taking the other element twice in a pair gets back to the original element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.)
|- ( ( X e. P /\ P ~~ 2o ) -> U. ( P \ { U. ( P \ { X } ) } ) = X )
Theorem	dju1p1e2 7132	Disjoint union version of one plus one equals two. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
|- ( 1o ⊔ 1o ) ~~ 2o
Theorem	infpwfidom 7133	The collection of finite subsets of a set dominates the set. (We use the weaker sethood assumption ( ~P A i^i Fin ) e. _V because this theorem also implies that A is a set if ~P A i^i Fin is.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
|- ( ( ~P A i^i Fin ) e. _V -> A ~<_ ( ~P A i^i Fin ) )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemeldju 7134	Lemma for exmidfodomr 7139. A variant of djur 7013. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A C_ 1o )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ( A ⊔ 1o ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( B = (inl ` (/) ) \/ B = (inr ` (/) ) ) )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemreseldju 7135	Lemma for exmidfodomrlemrALT 7138. A variant of eldju 7012. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A C_ 1o )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ( A ⊔ 1o ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( (/) e. A /\ B = ( (inl |` A ) ` (/) ) ) \/ B = ( (inr |` 1o ) ` (/) ) ) )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemim 7136*	Excluded middle implies the existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates. Proposition 1.1 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
|- (EXMID -> A. x A. y ( ( E. z z e. y /\ y ~<_ x ) -> E. f f : x -onto-> y ) )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemr 7137*	The existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates implies excluded middle. Proposition 1.2 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
|- ( A. x A. y ( ( E. z z e. y /\ y ~<_ x ) -> E. f f : x -onto-> y ) -> EXMID )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemrALT 7138*	The existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates implies excluded middle. Proposition 1.2 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. An alternative proof of exmidfodomrlemr 7137. In particular, this proof uses eldju 7012 instead of djur 7013 and avoids djulclb 6999. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2022.)
|- ( A. x A. y ( ( E. z z e. y /\ y ~<_ x ) -> E. f f : x -onto-> y ) -> EXMID )
Theorem	exmidfodomr 7139*	Excluded middle is equivalent to the existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x A. y ( ( E. z z e. y /\ y ~<_ x ) -> E. f f : x -onto-> y ) )
2.6.42  Axiom of Choice equivalents
Syntax	wac 7140	Formula for an abbreviation of the axiom of choice.
wff CHOICE
Definition	df-ac 7141*	The expression CHOICE will be used as a readable shorthand for any form of the axiom of choice; all concrete forms are long, cryptic, have dummy variables, or all three, making it useful to have a short name. Similar to the Axiom of Choice (first form) of [Enderton] p. 49. There are some decisions about how to write this definition especially around whether ax-setind 4496 is needed to show equivalence to other ways of stating choice, and about whether choice functions are available for nonempty sets or inhabited sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2015.)
|- (CHOICE <-> A. x E. f ( f C_ x /\ f Fn dom x ) )
Theorem	acfun 7142*	A convenient form of choice. The goal here is to state choice as the existence of a choice function on a set of inhabited sets, while making full use of our notation around functions and function values. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Nov-2023.)
|- ( ph -> CHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A E. w w e. x )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f Fn A /\ A. x e. A ( f ` x ) e. x ) )
Theorem	exmidaclem 7143*	Lemma for exmidac 7144. The result, with a few hypotheses to break out commonly used expressions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2023.)
|- A = { x e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( x = (/) \/ y = { (/) } ) }   &    |- B = { x e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( x = { (/) } \/ y = { (/) } ) }   &    |- C = { A , B }   =>    |- (CHOICE -> EXMID )
Theorem	exmidac 7144	The axiom of choice implies excluded middle. See acexmid 5823 for more discussion of this theorem and a way of stating it without using CHOICE or EXMID. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2023.)
|- (CHOICE -> EXMID )
2.6.43  Cardinal number arithmetic
Theorem	endjudisj 7145	Equinumerosity of a disjoint union and a union of two disjoint sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ ( A i^i B ) = (/) ) -> ( A ⊔ B ) ~~ ( A u. B ) )
Theorem	djuen 7146	Disjoint unions of equinumerous sets are equinumerous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ C ~~ D ) -> ( A ⊔ C ) ~~ ( B ⊔ D ) )
Theorem	djuenun 7147	Disjoint union is equinumerous to union for disjoint sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2023.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ C ~~ D /\ ( B i^i D ) = (/) ) -> ( A ⊔ C ) ~~ ( B u. D ) )
Theorem	dju1en 7148	Cardinal addition with cardinal one (which is the same as ordinal one). Used in proof of Theorem 6J of [Enderton] p. 143. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ -. A e. A ) -> ( A ⊔ 1o ) ~~ suc A )
Theorem	dju0en 7149	Cardinal addition with cardinal zero (the empty set). Part (a1) of proof of Theorem 6J of [Enderton] p. 143. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A ⊔ (/) ) ~~ A )
Theorem	xp2dju 7150	Two times a cardinal number. Exercise 4.56(g) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( 2o X. A ) = ( A ⊔ A )
Theorem	djucomen 7151	Commutative law for cardinal addition. Exercise 4.56(c) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A ⊔ B ) ~~ ( B ⊔ A ) )
Theorem	djuassen 7152	Associative law for cardinal addition. Exercise 4.56(c) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( ( A ⊔ B ) ⊔ C ) ~~ ( A ⊔ ( B ⊔ C ) ) )
Theorem	xpdjuen 7153	Cardinal multiplication distributes over cardinal addition. Theorem 6I(3) of [Enderton] p. 142. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( A X. ( B ⊔ C ) ) ~~ ( ( A X. B ) ⊔ ( A X. C ) ) )
Theorem	djudoml 7154	A set is dominated by its disjoint union with another. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> A ~<_ ( A ⊔ B ) )
Theorem	djudomr 7155	A set is dominated by its disjoint union with another. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> B ~<_ ( A ⊔ B ) )
2.6.44  Ordinal trichotomy
Theorem	exmidontriimlem1 7156	Lemma for exmidontriim 7160. A variation of r19.30dc 2604. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ( A. x e. A ( ph \/ ps \/ ch ) /\ EXMID ) -> ( E. x e. A ph \/ E. x e. A ps \/ A. x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	exmidontriimlem2 7157*	Lemma for exmidontriim 7160. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ph -> B e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> EXMID )   &    |- ( ph -> A. y e. B ( A e. y \/ A = y \/ y e. A ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. B \/ A. y e. B y e. A ) )
Theorem	exmidontriimlem3 7158*	Lemma for exmidontriim 7160. What we get to do based on induction on both A and B. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ph -> A e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> EXMID )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. A A. y e. On ( z e. y \/ z = y \/ y e. z ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. y e. B ( A e. y \/ A = y \/ y e. A ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. B \/ A = B \/ B e. A ) )
Theorem	exmidontriimlem4 7159*	Lemma for exmidontriim 7160. The induction step for the induction on A. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ph -> A e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> EXMID )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. A A. y e. On ( z e. y \/ z = y \/ y e. z ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. B \/ A = B \/ B e. A ) )
Theorem	exmidontriim 7160*	Excluded middle implies ordinal trichotomy. Lemma 10.4.1 of [HoTT], p. (varies). The proof follows the proof from the HoTT book fairly closely. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID -> A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
2.6.45  Excluded middle and the power set of a singleton
Theorem	pw1on 7161	The power set of 1o is an ordinal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o e. On
Theorem	pw1dom2 7162	The power set of 1o dominates 2o. Also see pwpw0ss 3767 which is similar. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Sep-2022.)
|- 2o ~<_ ~P 1o
Theorem	pw1ne0 7163	The power set of 1o is not zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o =/= (/)
Theorem	pw1ne1 7164	The power set of 1o is not one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o =/= 1o
Theorem	pw1ne3 7165	The power set of 1o is not three. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o =/= 3o
Theorem	pw1nel3 7166	Negated excluded middle implies that the power set of 1o is not an element of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ( -. EXMID -> -. ~P 1o e. 3o )
Theorem	sucpw1ne3 7167	Negated excluded middle implies that the successor of the power set of 1o is not three . (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ( -. EXMID -> suc ~P 1o =/= 3o )
Theorem	sucpw1nel3 7168	The successor of the power set of 1o is not an element of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- -. suc ~P 1o e. 3o
Theorem	3nelsucpw1 7169	Three is not an element of the successor of the power set of 1o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- -. 3o e. suc ~P 1o
Theorem	sucpw1nss3 7170	Negated excluded middle implies that the successor of the power set of 1o is not a subset of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2024.)
|- ( -. EXMID -> -. suc ~P 1o C_ 3o )
Theorem	3nsssucpw1 7171	Negated excluded middle implies that 3o is not a subset of the successor of the power set of 1o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2024.)
|- ( -. EXMID -> -. 3o C_ suc ~P 1o )
Theorem	onntri35 7172*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. There are five equivalent statements: (1) -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ), (2) -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ), (3) A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ), (4) A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ), and (5) -. -. EXMID. That these are all equivalent is expressed by (1) implies (3) (onntri13 7173), (3) implies (5) (onntri35 7172), (5) implies (1) (onntri51 7175), (2) implies (4) (onntri24 7177), (4) implies (5) (onntri45 7176), and (5) implies (2) (onntri52 7179). Another way of stating this is that EXMID is equivalent to trichotomy, either the x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x or the x C_ y \/ y C_ x form, as shown in exmidontri 7174 and exmidontri2or 7178, respectively. Thus -. -. EXMID is equivalent to (1) or (2). In addition, -. -. EXMID is equivalent to (3) by onntri3or 7180 and (4) by onntri2or 7181. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) -> -. -. EXMID )
Theorem	onntri13 7173	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) -> A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
Theorem	exmidontri 7174*	Ordinal trichotomy is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
Theorem	onntri51 7175*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. EXMID -> -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
Theorem	onntri45 7176*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) -> -. -. EXMID )
Theorem	onntri24 7177	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) -> A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) )
Theorem	exmidontri2or 7178*	Ordinal trichotomy is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) )
Theorem	onntri52 7179*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. EXMID -> -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) )
Theorem	onntri3or 7180*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. EXMID <-> A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
Theorem	onntri2or 7181*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. EXMID <-> A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) )
PART 3  CHOICE PRINCIPLES We have already introduced the full Axiom of Choice df-ac 7141 but since it implies excluded middle as shown at exmidac 7144, it is not especially relevant to us. In this section we define countable choice and dependent choice, which are not as strong as thus often considered in mathematics which seeks to avoid full excluded middle.
3.1  Countable Choice and Dependent Choice
3.1.1  Introduce Countable Choice
Syntax	wacc 7182	Formula for an abbreviation of countable choice.
wff CCHOICE
Definition	df-cc 7183*	The expression CCHOICE will be used as a readable shorthand for any form of countable choice, analogous to df-ac 7141 for full choice. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Nov-2023.)
|- (CCHOICE <-> A. x ( dom x ~~ om -> E. f ( f C_ x /\ f Fn dom x ) ) )
Theorem	ccfunen 7184*	Existence of a choice function for a countably infinite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Nov-2023.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A ~~ om )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A E. w w e. x )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f Fn A /\ A. x e. A ( f ` x ) e. x ) )
Theorem	cc1 7185*	Countable choice in terms of a choice function on a countably infinite set of inhabited sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2024.)
|- (CCHOICE -> A. x ( ( x ~~ om /\ A. z e. x E. w w e. z ) -> E. f A. z e. x ( f ` z ) e. z ) )
Theorem	cc2lem 7186*	Lemma for cc2 7187. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2024.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> F Fn om )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. om E. w w e. ( F ` x ) )   &    |- A = ( n e. om |-> ( { n } X. ( F ` n ) ) )   &    |- G = ( n e. om |-> ( 2nd ` ( f ` ( A ` n ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. g ( g Fn om /\ A. n e. om ( g ` n ) e. ( F ` n ) ) )
Theorem	cc2 7187*	Countable choice using sequences instead of countable sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2024.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> F Fn om )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. om E. w w e. ( F ` x ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. g ( g Fn om /\ A. n e. om ( g ` n ) e. ( F ` n ) ) )
Theorem	cc3 7188*	Countable choice using a sequence F(n) . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 29-Apr-2024.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N F e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N E. w w e. F )   &    |- ( ph -> N ~~ om )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f Fn N /\ A. n e. N ( f ` n ) e. F ) )
Theorem	cc4f 7189*	Countable choice by showing the existence of a function f which can choose a value at each index n such that ch holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2024.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- F/_ n A   &    |- ( ph -> N ~~ om )   &    |- ( x = ( f ` n ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N E. x e. A ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f : N --> A /\ A. n e. N ch ) )
Theorem	cc4 7190*	Countable choice by showing the existence of a function f which can choose a value at each index n such that ch holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 1-May-2024.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> N ~~ om )   &    |- ( x = ( f ` n ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N E. x e. A ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f : N --> A /\ A. n e. N ch ) )
Theorem	cc4n 7191*	Countable choice with a simpler restriction on how every set in the countable collection needs to be inhabited. That is, compared with cc4 7190, the hypotheses only require an A(n) for each value of n, not a single set A which suffices for every n e. om. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2024.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N { x e. A | ps } e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> N ~~ om )   &    |- ( x = ( f ` n ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N E. x e. A ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f Fn N /\ A. n e. N ch ) )
PART 4  REAL AND COMPLEX NUMBERS This section derives the basics of real and complex numbers. To construct the real numbers constructively, we follow two main sources. The first is Metamath Proof Explorer, which has the advantage of being already formalized in metamath. Its disadvantage, for our purposes, is that it assumes the law of the excluded middle throughout. Since we have already developed natural numbers ( for example, nna0 6421 and similar theorems ), going from there to positive integers (df-ni 7224) and then positive rational numbers (df-nqqs 7268) does not involve a major change in approach compared with the Metamath Proof Explorer. It is when we proceed to Dedekind cuts that we bring in more material from Section 11.2 of [HoTT], which focuses on the aspects of Dedekind cuts which are different without excluded middle or choice principles. With excluded middle, it is natural to define a cut as the lower set only (as Metamath Proof Explorer does), but here we define the cut as a pair of both the lower and upper sets, as [HoTT] does. There are also differences in how we handle order and replacing "not equal to zero" with "apart from zero". When working constructively, there are several possible definitions of real numbers. Here we adopt the most common definition, as two-sided Dedekind cuts with the properties described at df-inp 7386. The Cauchy reals (without countable choice) fail to satisfy ax-caucvg 7852 and the MacNeille reals fail to satisfy axltwlin 7945, and we do not develop them here. For more on differing definitions of the reals, see the introduction to Chapter 11 in [HoTT] or Section 1.2 of [BauerHanson].
4.1  Construction and axiomatization of real and complex numbers
4.1.1  Dedekind-cut construction of real and complex numbers
Syntax	cnpi 7192	The set of positive integers, which is the set of natural numbers om with 0 removed. Note: This is the start of the Dedekind-cut construction of real and complex numbers.
class N.
Syntax	cpli 7193	Positive integer addition.
class +N
Syntax	cmi 7194	Positive integer multiplication.
class .N
Syntax	clti 7195	Positive integer ordering relation.
class <N
Syntax	cplpq 7196	Positive pre-fraction addition.
class +pQ
Syntax	cmpq 7197	Positive pre-fraction multiplication.
class .pQ
Syntax	cltpq 7198	Positive pre-fraction ordering relation.
class <pQ
Syntax	ceq 7199	Equivalence class used to construct positive fractions.
class ~Q
Syntax	cnq 7200	Set of positive fractions.
class Q.