P. 72 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 7101-7200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	isomnimap 7101*	The predicate of being omniscient stated in terms of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2022.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. Omni <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m A ) ( E. x e. A ( f ` x ) = (/) \/ A. x e. A ( f ` x ) = 1o ) ) )
Theorem	enomnilem 7102	Lemma for enomni 7103. One direction of the biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2022.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. Omni -> B e. Omni ) )
Theorem	enomni 7103	Omniscience is invariant with respect to equinumerosity. For example, this means that we can express the Limited Principle of Omniscience as either om e. Omni or NN0 e. Omni. The former is a better match to conventional notation in the sense that df2o3 6398 says that 2o = { (/) , 1o } whereas the corresponding relationship does not exist between 2 and { 0 , 1 }. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2022.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. Omni <-> B e. Omni ) )
Theorem	finomni 7104	A finite set is omniscient. Remark right after Definition 3.1 of [Pierik], p. 14. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jun-2022.)
|- ( A e. Fin -> A e. Omni )
Theorem	exmidomniim 7105	Given excluded middle, every set is omniscient. Remark following Definition 3.1 of [Pierik], p. 14. This is one direction of the biconditional exmidomni 7106. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jun-2022.)
|- (EXMID -> A. x x e. Omni )
Theorem	exmidomni 7106	Excluded middle is equivalent to every set being omniscient. (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jun-2022.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x x e. Omni )
Theorem	exmidlpo 7107	Excluded middle implies the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Mar-2023.)
|- (EXMID -> om e. Omni )
Theorem	fodjuomnilemdc 7108*	Lemma for fodjuomni 7113. Decidability of a condition we use in various lemmas. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ph -> F : O -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ X e. O ) -> DECID E. z e. A ( F ` X ) = (inl ` z ) )
Theorem	fodjuf 7109*	Lemma for fodjuomni 7113 and fodjumkv 7124. Domain and range of P. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2022.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 25-Mar-2023.)
|- ( ph -> F : O -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )   &    |- P = ( y e. O |-> if ( E. z e. A ( F ` y ) = (inl ` z ) , (/) , 1o ) )   &    |- ( ph -> O e. V )   =>    |- ( ph -> P e. ( 2o ^m O ) )
Theorem	fodjum 7110*	Lemma for fodjuomni 7113 and fodjumkv 7124. A condition which shows that A is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2022.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 25-Mar-2023.)
|- ( ph -> F : O -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )   &    |- P = ( y e. O |-> if ( E. z e. A ( F ` y ) = (inl ` z ) , (/) , 1o ) )   &    |- ( ph -> E. w e. O ( P ` w ) = (/) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x x e. A )
Theorem	fodju0 7111*	Lemma for fodjuomni 7113 and fodjumkv 7124. A condition which shows that A is empty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2022.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 25-Mar-2023.)
|- ( ph -> F : O -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )   &    |- P = ( y e. O |-> if ( E. z e. A ( F ` y ) = (inl ` z ) , (/) , 1o ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. w e. O ( P ` w ) = 1o )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = (/) )
Theorem	fodjuomnilemres 7112*	Lemma for fodjuomni 7113. The final result with P expressed as a local definition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ph -> O e. Omni )   &    |- ( ph -> F : O -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )   &    |- P = ( y e. O |-> if ( E. z e. A ( F ` y ) = (inl ` z ) , (/) , 1o ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x x e. A \/ A = (/) ) )
Theorem	fodjuomni 7113*	A condition which ensures A is either inhabited or empty. Lemma 3.2 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 4. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ph -> O e. Omni )   &    |- ( ph -> F : O -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x x e. A \/ A = (/) ) )
Theorem	ctssexmid 7114*	The decidability condition in ctssdc 7078 is needed. More specifically, ctssdc 7078 minus that condition, plus the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO), implies excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2023.)
|- ( ( y C_ om /\ E. f f : y -onto-> x ) -> E. f f : om -onto-> ( x ⊔ 1o ) )   &    |- om e. Omni   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
2.6.39  Markov's principle
Syntax	cmarkov 7115	Extend class definition to include the class of Markov sets.
class Markov
Definition	df-markov 7116*	A Markov set is one where if a predicate (here represented by a function f) on that set does not hold (where hold means is equal to 1o) for all elements, then there exists an element where it fails (is equal to (/)). Generalization of definition 2.5 of [Pierik], p. 9. In particular, om e. Markov is known as Markov's Principle (MP). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2023.)
|- Markov = { y | A. f ( f : y --> 2o -> ( -. A. x e. y ( f ` x ) = 1o -> E. x e. y ( f ` x ) = (/) ) ) }
Theorem	ismkv 7117*	The predicate of being Markov. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2023.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. Markov <-> A. f ( f : A --> 2o -> ( -. A. x e. A ( f ` x ) = 1o -> E. x e. A ( f ` x ) = (/) ) ) ) )
Theorem	ismkvmap 7118*	The predicate of being Markov stated in terms of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2023.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. Markov <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m A ) ( -. A. x e. A ( f ` x ) = 1o -> E. x e. A ( f ` x ) = (/) ) ) )
Theorem	ismkvnex 7119*	The predicate of being Markov stated in terms of double negation and comparison with 1o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Nov-2023.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. Markov <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m A ) ( -. -. E. x e. A ( f ` x ) = 1o -> E. x e. A ( f ` x ) = 1o ) ) )
Theorem	omnimkv 7120	An omniscient set is Markov. In particular, the case where A is om means that the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO) implies Markov's Principle (MP). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2023.)
|- ( A e. Omni -> A e. Markov )
Theorem	exmidmp 7121	Excluded middle implies Markov's Principle (MP). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Apr-2023.)
|- (EXMID -> om e. Markov )
Theorem	mkvprop 7122*	Markov's Principle expressed in terms of propositions (or more precisely, the A = om case is Markov's Principle). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Mar-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. Markov /\ A. n e. A DECID ph /\ -. A. n e. A -. ph ) -> E. n e. A ph )
Theorem	fodjumkvlemres 7123*	Lemma for fodjumkv 7124. The final result with P expressed as a local definition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Mar-2023.)
|- ( ph -> M e. Markov )   &    |- ( ph -> F : M -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )   &    |- P = ( y e. M |-> if ( E. z e. A ( F ` y ) = (inl ` z ) , (/) , 1o ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A =/= (/) -> E. x x e. A ) )
Theorem	fodjumkv 7124*	A condition which ensures that a nonempty set is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Mar-2023.)
|- ( ph -> M e. Markov )   &    |- ( ph -> F : M -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A =/= (/) -> E. x x e. A ) )
Theorem	enmkvlem 7125	Lemma for enmkv 7126. One direction of the biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. Markov -> B e. Markov ) )
Theorem	enmkv 7126	Being Markov is invariant with respect to equinumerosity. For example, this means that we can express the Markov's Principle as either om e. Markov or NN0 e. Markov. The former is a better match to conventional notation in the sense that df2o3 6398 says that 2o = { (/) , 1o } whereas the corresponding relationship does not exist between 2 and { 0 , 1 }. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. Markov <-> B e. Markov ) )
2.6.40  Weakly omniscient sets
Syntax	cwomni 7127	Extend class definition to include the class of weakly omniscient sets.
class WOmni
Definition	df-womni 7128*	A weakly omniscient set is one where we can decide whether a predicate (here represented by a function f) holds (is equal to 1o) for all elements or not. Generalization of definition 2.4 of [Pierik], p. 9. In particular, om e. WOmni is known as the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO). The term WLPO is common in the literature; there appears to be no widespread term for what we are calling a weakly omniscient set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
|- WOmni = { y | A. f ( f : y --> 2o -> DECID A. x e. y ( f ` x ) = 1o ) }
Theorem	iswomni 7129*	The predicate of being weakly omniscient. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. WOmni <-> A. f ( f : A --> 2o -> DECID A. x e. A ( f ` x ) = 1o ) ) )
Theorem	iswomnimap 7130*	The predicate of being weakly omniscient stated in terms of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. WOmni <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m A )DECID A. x e. A ( f ` x ) = 1o ) )
Theorem	omniwomnimkv 7131	A set is omniscient if and only if it is weakly omniscient and Markov. The case A = om says that LPO <-> WLPO /\ MP which is a remark following Definition 2.5 of [Pierik], p. 9. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A e. Omni <-> ( A e. WOmni /\ A e. Markov ) )
Theorem	lpowlpo 7132	LPO implies WLPO. Easy corollary of the more general omniwomnimkv 7131. There is an analogue in terms of analytic omniscience principles at tridceq 13935. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jul-2024.)
|- ( om e. Omni -> om e. WOmni )
Theorem	enwomnilem 7133	Lemma for enwomni 7134. One direction of the biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. WOmni -> B e. WOmni ) )
Theorem	enwomni 7134	Weak omniscience is invariant with respect to equinumerosity. For example, this means that we can express the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience as either om e. WOmni or NN0 e. WOmni. The former is a better match to conventional notation in the sense that df2o3 6398 says that 2o = { (/) , 1o } whereas the corresponding relationship does not exist between 2 and { 0 , 1 }. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. WOmni <-> B e. WOmni ) )
2.6.41  Cardinal numbers
Syntax	ccrd 7135	Extend class definition to include the cardinal size function.
class card
Definition	df-card 7136*	Define the cardinal number function. The cardinal number of a set is the least ordinal number equinumerous to it. In other words, it is the "size" of the set. Definition of [Enderton] p. 197. Our notation is from Enderton. Other textbooks often use a double bar over the set to express this function. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.)
|- card = ( x e. _V |-> |^| { y e. On | y ~~ x } )
Theorem	cardcl 7137*	The cardinality of a well-orderable set is an ordinal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2021.)
|- ( E. y e. On y ~~ A -> ( card ` A ) e. On )
Theorem	isnumi 7138	A set equinumerous to an ordinal is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. On /\ A ~~ B ) -> B e. dom card )
Theorem	finnum 7139	Every finite set is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. Fin -> A e. dom card )
Theorem	onenon 7140	Every ordinal number is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. On -> A e. dom card )
Theorem	cardval3ex 7141*	The value of ( card ` A ). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2021.)
|- ( E. x e. On x ~~ A -> ( card ` A ) = |^| { y e. On | y ~~ A } )
Theorem	oncardval 7142*	The value of the cardinal number function with an ordinal number as its argument. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
|- ( A e. On -> ( card ` A ) = |^| { x e. On | x ~~ A } )
Theorem	cardonle 7143	The cardinal of an ordinal number is less than or equal to the ordinal number. Proposition 10.6(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 85. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2003.)
|- ( A e. On -> ( card ` A ) C_ A )
Theorem	card0 7144	The cardinality of the empty set is the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.)
|- ( card ` (/) ) = (/)
Theorem	carden2bex 7145*	If two numerable sets are equinumerous, then they have equal cardinalities. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2021.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ E. x e. On x ~~ A ) -> ( card ` A ) = ( card ` B ) )
Theorem	pm54.43 7146	Theorem *54.43 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 360. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2007.)
|- ( ( A ~~ 1o /\ B ~~ 1o ) -> ( ( A i^i B ) = (/) <-> ( A u. B ) ~~ 2o ) )
Theorem	pr2nelem 7147	Lemma for pr2ne 7148. (Contributed by FL, 17-Aug-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D /\ A =/= B ) -> { A , B } ~~ 2o )
Theorem	pr2ne 7148	If an unordered pair has two elements they are different. (Contributed by FL, 14-Feb-2010.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ( { A , B } ~~ 2o <-> A =/= B ) )
Theorem	exmidonfinlem 7149*	Lemma for exmidonfin 7150. (Contributed by Andrew W Swan and Jim Kingdon, 9-Mar-2024.)
|- A = { { x e. { (/) } | ph } , { x e. { (/) } | -. ph } }   =>    |- ( om = ( On i^i Fin ) -> DECID ph )
Theorem	exmidonfin 7150	If a finite ordinal is a natural number, excluded middle follows. That excluded middle implies that a finite ordinal is a natural number is proved in the Metamath Proof Explorer. That a natural number is a finite ordinal is shown at nnfi 6838 and nnon 4587. (Contributed by Andrew W Swan and Jim Kingdon, 9-Mar-2024.)
|- ( om = ( On i^i Fin ) -> EXMID )
Theorem	en2eleq 7151	Express a set of pair cardinality as the unordered pair of a given element and the other element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.)
|- ( ( X e. P /\ P ~~ 2o ) -> P = { X , U. ( P \ { X } ) } )
Theorem	en2other2 7152	Taking the other element twice in a pair gets back to the original element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.)
|- ( ( X e. P /\ P ~~ 2o ) -> U. ( P \ { U. ( P \ { X } ) } ) = X )
Theorem	dju1p1e2 7153	Disjoint union version of one plus one equals two. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
|- ( 1o ⊔ 1o ) ~~ 2o
Theorem	infpwfidom 7154	The collection of finite subsets of a set dominates the set. (We use the weaker sethood assumption ( ~P A i^i Fin ) e. _V because this theorem also implies that A is a set if ~P A i^i Fin is.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
|- ( ( ~P A i^i Fin ) e. _V -> A ~<_ ( ~P A i^i Fin ) )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemeldju 7155	Lemma for exmidfodomr 7160. A variant of djur 7034. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A C_ 1o )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ( A ⊔ 1o ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( B = (inl ` (/) ) \/ B = (inr ` (/) ) ) )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemreseldju 7156	Lemma for exmidfodomrlemrALT 7159. A variant of eldju 7033. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A C_ 1o )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ( A ⊔ 1o ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( (/) e. A /\ B = ( (inl |` A ) ` (/) ) ) \/ B = ( (inr |` 1o ) ` (/) ) ) )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemim 7157*	Excluded middle implies the existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates. Proposition 1.1 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
|- (EXMID -> A. x A. y ( ( E. z z e. y /\ y ~<_ x ) -> E. f f : x -onto-> y ) )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemr 7158*	The existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates implies excluded middle. Proposition 1.2 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
|- ( A. x A. y ( ( E. z z e. y /\ y ~<_ x ) -> E. f f : x -onto-> y ) -> EXMID )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemrALT 7159*	The existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates implies excluded middle. Proposition 1.2 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. An alternative proof of exmidfodomrlemr 7158. In particular, this proof uses eldju 7033 instead of djur 7034 and avoids djulclb 7020. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2022.)
|- ( A. x A. y ( ( E. z z e. y /\ y ~<_ x ) -> E. f f : x -onto-> y ) -> EXMID )
Theorem	exmidfodomr 7160*	Excluded middle is equivalent to the existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x A. y ( ( E. z z e. y /\ y ~<_ x ) -> E. f f : x -onto-> y ) )
2.6.42  Axiom of Choice equivalents
Syntax	wac 7161	Formula for an abbreviation of the axiom of choice.
wff CHOICE
Definition	df-ac 7162*	The expression CHOICE will be used as a readable shorthand for any form of the axiom of choice; all concrete forms are long, cryptic, have dummy variables, or all three, making it useful to have a short name. Similar to the Axiom of Choice (first form) of [Enderton] p. 49. There are some decisions about how to write this definition especially around whether ax-setind 4514 is needed to show equivalence to other ways of stating choice, and about whether choice functions are available for nonempty sets or inhabited sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2015.)
|- (CHOICE <-> A. x E. f ( f C_ x /\ f Fn dom x ) )
Theorem	acfun 7163*	A convenient form of choice. The goal here is to state choice as the existence of a choice function on a set of inhabited sets, while making full use of our notation around functions and function values. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Nov-2023.)
|- ( ph -> CHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A E. w w e. x )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f Fn A /\ A. x e. A ( f ` x ) e. x ) )
Theorem	exmidaclem 7164*	Lemma for exmidac 7165. The result, with a few hypotheses to break out commonly used expressions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2023.)
|- A = { x e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( x = (/) \/ y = { (/) } ) }   &    |- B = { x e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( x = { (/) } \/ y = { (/) } ) }   &    |- C = { A , B }   =>    |- (CHOICE -> EXMID )
Theorem	exmidac 7165	The axiom of choice implies excluded middle. See acexmid 5841 for more discussion of this theorem and a way of stating it without using CHOICE or EXMID. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2023.)
|- (CHOICE -> EXMID )
2.6.43  Cardinal number arithmetic
Theorem	endjudisj 7166	Equinumerosity of a disjoint union and a union of two disjoint sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ ( A i^i B ) = (/) ) -> ( A ⊔ B ) ~~ ( A u. B ) )
Theorem	djuen 7167	Disjoint unions of equinumerous sets are equinumerous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ C ~~ D ) -> ( A ⊔ C ) ~~ ( B ⊔ D ) )
Theorem	djuenun 7168	Disjoint union is equinumerous to union for disjoint sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2023.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ C ~~ D /\ ( B i^i D ) = (/) ) -> ( A ⊔ C ) ~~ ( B u. D ) )
Theorem	dju1en 7169	Cardinal addition with cardinal one (which is the same as ordinal one). Used in proof of Theorem 6J of [Enderton] p. 143. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ -. A e. A ) -> ( A ⊔ 1o ) ~~ suc A )
Theorem	dju0en 7170	Cardinal addition with cardinal zero (the empty set). Part (a1) of proof of Theorem 6J of [Enderton] p. 143. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A ⊔ (/) ) ~~ A )
Theorem	xp2dju 7171	Two times a cardinal number. Exercise 4.56(g) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( 2o X. A ) = ( A ⊔ A )
Theorem	djucomen 7172	Commutative law for cardinal addition. Exercise 4.56(c) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A ⊔ B ) ~~ ( B ⊔ A ) )
Theorem	djuassen 7173	Associative law for cardinal addition. Exercise 4.56(c) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( ( A ⊔ B ) ⊔ C ) ~~ ( A ⊔ ( B ⊔ C ) ) )
Theorem	xpdjuen 7174	Cardinal multiplication distributes over cardinal addition. Theorem 6I(3) of [Enderton] p. 142. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( A X. ( B ⊔ C ) ) ~~ ( ( A X. B ) ⊔ ( A X. C ) ) )
Theorem	djudoml 7175	A set is dominated by its disjoint union with another. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> A ~<_ ( A ⊔ B ) )
Theorem	djudomr 7176	A set is dominated by its disjoint union with another. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> B ~<_ ( A ⊔ B ) )
2.6.44  Ordinal trichotomy
Theorem	exmidontriimlem1 7177	Lemma for exmidontriim 7181. A variation of r19.30dc 2613. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ( A. x e. A ( ph \/ ps \/ ch ) /\ EXMID ) -> ( E. x e. A ph \/ E. x e. A ps \/ A. x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	exmidontriimlem2 7178*	Lemma for exmidontriim 7181. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ph -> B e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> EXMID )   &    |- ( ph -> A. y e. B ( A e. y \/ A = y \/ y e. A ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. B \/ A. y e. B y e. A ) )
Theorem	exmidontriimlem3 7179*	Lemma for exmidontriim 7181. What we get to do based on induction on both A and B. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ph -> A e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> EXMID )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. A A. y e. On ( z e. y \/ z = y \/ y e. z ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. y e. B ( A e. y \/ A = y \/ y e. A ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. B \/ A = B \/ B e. A ) )
Theorem	exmidontriimlem4 7180*	Lemma for exmidontriim 7181. The induction step for the induction on A. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ph -> A e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> EXMID )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. A A. y e. On ( z e. y \/ z = y \/ y e. z ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. B \/ A = B \/ B e. A ) )
Theorem	exmidontriim 7181*	Excluded middle implies ordinal trichotomy. Lemma 10.4.1 of [HoTT], p. (varies). The proof follows the proof from the HoTT book fairly closely. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID -> A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
2.6.45  Excluded middle and the power set of a singleton
Theorem	pw1on 7182	The power set of 1o is an ordinal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o e. On
Theorem	pw1dom2 7183	The power set of 1o dominates 2o. Also see pwpw0ss 3784 which is similar. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Sep-2022.)
|- 2o ~<_ ~P 1o
Theorem	pw1ne0 7184	The power set of 1o is not zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o =/= (/)
Theorem	pw1ne1 7185	The power set of 1o is not one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o =/= 1o
Theorem	pw1ne3 7186	The power set of 1o is not three. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o =/= 3o
Theorem	pw1nel3 7187	Negated excluded middle implies that the power set of 1o is not an element of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ( -. EXMID -> -. ~P 1o e. 3o )
Theorem	sucpw1ne3 7188	Negated excluded middle implies that the successor of the power set of 1o is not three . (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ( -. EXMID -> suc ~P 1o =/= 3o )
Theorem	sucpw1nel3 7189	The successor of the power set of 1o is not an element of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- -. suc ~P 1o e. 3o
Theorem	3nelsucpw1 7190	Three is not an element of the successor of the power set of 1o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- -. 3o e. suc ~P 1o
Theorem	sucpw1nss3 7191	Negated excluded middle implies that the successor of the power set of 1o is not a subset of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2024.)
|- ( -. EXMID -> -. suc ~P 1o C_ 3o )
Theorem	3nsssucpw1 7192	Negated excluded middle implies that 3o is not a subset of the successor of the power set of 1o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2024.)
|- ( -. EXMID -> -. 3o C_ suc ~P 1o )
Theorem	onntri35 7193*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. There are five equivalent statements: (1) -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ), (2) -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ), (3) A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ), (4) A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ), and (5) -. -. EXMID. That these are all equivalent is expressed by (1) implies (3) (onntri13 7194), (3) implies (5) (onntri35 7193), (5) implies (1) (onntri51 7196), (2) implies (4) (onntri24 7198), (4) implies (5) (onntri45 7197), and (5) implies (2) (onntri52 7200). Another way of stating this is that EXMID is equivalent to trichotomy, either the x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x or the x C_ y \/ y C_ x form, as shown in exmidontri 7195 and exmidontri2or 7199, respectively. Thus -. -. EXMID is equivalent to (1) or (2). In addition, -. -. EXMID is equivalent to (3) by onntri3or 7201 and (4) by onntri2or 7202. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) -> -. -. EXMID )
Theorem	onntri13 7194	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) -> A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
Theorem	exmidontri 7195*	Ordinal trichotomy is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
Theorem	onntri51 7196*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. EXMID -> -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
Theorem	onntri45 7197*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) -> -. -. EXMID )
Theorem	onntri24 7198	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) -> A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) )
Theorem	exmidontri2or 7199*	Ordinal trichotomy is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) )
Theorem	onntri52 7200*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. EXMID -> -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) )