P. 72 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 7101-7200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	exmidpweq 7101	Excluded middle is equivalent to the power set of 1o being 2o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jul-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> ~P 1o = 2o )
Theorem	pw1fin 7102	Excluded middle is equivalent to the power set of 1o being finite. (Contributed by SN and Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> ~P 1o e. Fin )
Theorem	pw1dc0el 7103	Another equivalent of excluded middle, which is a mere reformulation of the definition. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x e. ~P 1oDECID (/) e. x )
Theorem	exmidpw2en 7104	The power set of a set being equinumerous to set exponentiation with a base of ordinal 2o is equivalent to excluded middle. This is Metamath 100 proof #52. The forward direction uses excluded middle expressed as EXMID to show this equinumerosity. The reverse direction is the one which establishes that power set being equinumerous to set exponentiation implies excluded middle. This resolves the question of whether we will be able to prove this equinumerosity theorem in the negative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2022.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x ~P x ~~ ( 2o ^m x ) )
Theorem	ss1o0el1o 7105	Reformulation of ss1o0el1 4287 using 1o instead of { (/) }. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Aug-2024.)
|- ( A C_ 1o -> ( (/) e. A <-> A = 1o ) )
Theorem	pw1dc1 7106	If, in the set of truth values (the powerset of 1o), equality to 1o is decidable, then excluded middle holds (and conversely). (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x e. ~P 1oDECID x = 1o )
Theorem	fientri3 7107	Trichotomy of dominance for finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. Fin ) -> ( A ~<_ B \/ B ~<_ A ) )
Theorem	nnwetri 7108*	A natural number is well-ordered by _E. More specifically, this order both satisfies We and is trichotomous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2021.)
|- ( A e. om -> ( _E We A /\ A. x e. A A. y e. A ( x _E y \/ x = y \/ y _E x ) ) )
Theorem	onunsnss 7109	Adding a singleton to create an ordinal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Oct-2021.)
|- ( ( B e. V /\ ( A u. { B } ) e. On ) -> B C_ A )
Theorem	unfiexmid 7110*	If the union of any two finite sets is finite, excluded middle follows. Remark 8.1.17 of [AczelRathjen], p. 74. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 5-Mar-2022.)
|- ( ( x e. Fin /\ y e. Fin ) -> ( x u. y ) e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	unsnfi 7111	Adding a singleton to a finite set yields a finite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. V /\ -. B e. A ) -> ( A u. { B } ) e. Fin )
Theorem	unsnfidcex 7112	The B e. V condition in unsnfi 7111. This is intended to show that unsnfi 7111 without that condition would not be provable but it probably would need to be strengthened (for example, to imply included middle) to fully show that. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ -. B e. A /\ ( A u. { B } ) e. Fin ) -> DECID -. B e. _V )
Theorem	unsnfidcel 7113	The -. B e. A condition in unsnfi 7111. This is intended to show that unsnfi 7111 without that condition would not be provable but it probably would need to be strengthened (for example, to imply included middle) to fully show that. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. V /\ ( A u. { B } ) e. Fin ) -> DECID -. B e. A )
Theorem	unfidisj 7114	The union of two disjoint finite sets is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Feb-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. Fin /\ ( A i^i B ) = (/) ) -> ( A u. B ) e. Fin )
Theorem	undifdcss 7115*	Union of complementary parts into whole and decidability. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jun-2022.)
|- ( A = ( B u. ( A \ B ) ) <-> ( B C_ A /\ A. x e. A DECID x e. B ) )
Theorem	undifdc 7116*	Union of complementary parts into whole. This is a case where we can strengthen undifss 3575 from subset to equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jun-2022.)
|- ( ( A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y /\ B e. Fin /\ B C_ A ) -> A = ( B u. ( A \ B ) ) )
Theorem	undiffi 7117	Union of complementary parts into whole. This is a case where we can strengthen undifss 3575 from subset to equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Mar-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. Fin /\ B C_ A ) -> A = ( B u. ( A \ B ) ) )
Theorem	unfiin 7118	The union of two finite sets is finite if their intersection is. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Mar-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. Fin /\ ( A i^i B ) e. Fin ) -> ( A u. B ) e. Fin )
Theorem	prfidisj 7119	A pair is finite if it consists of two unequal sets. For the case where A = B, see snfig 6989. For the cases where one or both is a proper class, see prprc1 3780, prprc2 3781, or prprc 3782. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-May-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ A =/= B ) -> { A , B } e. Fin )
Theorem	prfidceq 7120*	A pair is finite if it consists of elements of a class with decidable equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2025.)
|- ( ph -> A e. C )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. C )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. C A. y e. C DECID x = y )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , B } e. Fin )
Theorem	tpfidisj 7121	A triple is finite if it consists of three unequal sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Oct-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. X )   &    |- ( ph -> A =/= B )   &    |- ( ph -> A =/= C )   &    |- ( ph -> B =/= C )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , B , C } e. Fin )
Theorem	tpfidceq 7122*	A triple is finite if it consists of elements of a class with decidable equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2025.)
|- ( ph -> A e. D )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. D )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. D )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. D A. y e. D DECID x = y )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , B , C } e. Fin )
Theorem	fiintim 7123*	If a class is closed under pairwise intersections, then it is closed under nonempty finite intersections. The converse would appear to require an additional condition, such as x and y not being equal, or A having decidable equality. This theorem is applicable to a topology, which (among other axioms) is closed under finite intersections. Some texts use a pairwise intersection and some texts use a finite intersection, but most topology texts assume excluded middle (in which case the two intersection properties would be equivalent). (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2002.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2023.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y e. A ( x i^i y ) e. A -> A. x ( ( x C_ A /\ x =/= (/) /\ x e. Fin ) -> |^| x e. A ) )
Theorem	xpfi 7124	The Cartesian product of two finite sets is finite. Lemma 8.1.16 of [AczelRathjen], p. 74. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. Fin ) -> ( A X. B ) e. Fin )
Theorem	imaf1fi 7125	The image of a finite set under a one-to-one mapping is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Mar-2026.)
|- ( ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ X C_ A /\ X e. Fin ) -> ( F " X ) e. Fin )
Theorem	3xpfi 7126	The Cartesian product of three finite sets is a finite set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Mar-2018.)
|- ( V e. Fin -> ( ( V X. V ) X. V ) e. Fin )
Theorem	fisseneq 7127	A finite set is equal to its subset if they are equinumerous. (Contributed by FL, 11-Aug-2008.)
|- ( ( B e. Fin /\ A C_ B /\ A ~~ B ) -> A = B )
Theorem	phpeqd 7128	Corollary of the Pigeonhole Principle using equality. Strengthening of phpm 7052 expressed without negation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.)
|- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> B C_ A )   &    |- ( ph -> A ~~ B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = B )
Theorem	ssfirab 7129*	A subset of a finite set is finite if it is defined by a decidable property. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A DECID ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x e. A | ps } e. Fin )
Theorem	ssfidc 7130*	A subset of a finite set is finite if membership in the subset is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B C_ A /\ A. x e. A DECID x e. B ) -> B e. Fin )
Theorem	exmidssfi 7131*	Excluded middle is equivalent to any subset of a finite set being finite. Theorem 2.1 of [Bauer], p. 485. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Mar-2026.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x A. y ( ( x e. Fin /\ y C_ x ) -> y e. Fin ) )
Theorem	opabfi 7132*	Finiteness of an ordered pair abstraction which is a decidable subset of finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2025.)
|- S = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) }   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. B DECID ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> S e. Fin )
Theorem	infidc 7133*	The intersection of two sets is finite if one of them is and the other is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ A. x e. A DECID x e. B ) -> ( A i^i B ) e. Fin )
Theorem	snon0 7134	An ordinal which is a singleton is { (/) }. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Oct-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ { A } e. On ) -> A = (/) )
Theorem	fnfi 7135	A version of fnex 5876 for finite sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( ( F Fn A /\ A e. Fin ) -> F e. Fin )
Theorem	fundmfi 7136	The domain of a finite function is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ Fun A ) -> dom A e. Fin )
Theorem	fundmfibi 7137	A function is finite if and only if its domain is finite. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jan-2020.)
|- ( Fun F -> ( F e. Fin <-> dom F e. Fin ) )
Theorem	resfnfinfinss 7138	The restriction of a function to a finite subset of its domain is finite. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Feb-2018.)
|- ( ( F Fn A /\ B e. Fin /\ B C_ A ) -> ( F |` B ) e. Fin )
Theorem	residfi 7139	A restricted identity function is finite iff the restricting class is finite. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( _I |` A ) e. Fin <-> A e. Fin )
Theorem	relcnvfi 7140	If a relation is finite, its converse is as well. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2022.)
|- ( ( Rel A /\ A e. Fin ) -> `' A e. Fin )
Theorem	funrnfi 7141	The range of a finite relation is finite if its converse is a function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2022.)
|- ( ( Rel A /\ Fun `' A /\ A e. Fin ) -> ran A e. Fin )
Theorem	f1ofi 7142	If a 1-1 and onto function has a finite domain, its range is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ F : A -1-1-onto-> B ) -> B e. Fin )
Theorem	f1dmvrnfibi 7143	A one-to-one function whose domain is a set is finite if and only if its range is finite. See also f1vrnfibi 7144. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ F : A -1-1-> B ) -> ( F e. Fin <-> ran F e. Fin ) )
Theorem	f1vrnfibi 7144	A one-to-one function which is a set is finite if and only if its range is finite. See also f1dmvrnfibi 7143. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ F : A -1-1-> B ) -> ( F e. Fin <-> ran F e. Fin ) )
Theorem	iunfidisj 7145*	The finite union of disjoint finite sets is finite. Note that B depends on x, i.e. can be thought of as B ( x ). (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 7-Oct-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ A. x e. A B e. Fin /\ Disj x e. A B ) -> U_ x e. A B e. Fin )
Theorem	f1finf1o 7146	Any injection from one finite set to another of equal size must be a bijection. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jun-2010.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ B e. Fin ) -> ( F : A -1-1-> B <-> F : A -1-1-onto-> B ) )
Theorem	en1eqsn 7147	A set with one element is a singleton. (Contributed by FL, 18-Aug-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ B ~~ 1o ) -> B = { A } )
Theorem	en1eqsnbi 7148	A set containing an element has exactly one element iff it is a singleton. (Contributed by FL, 13-Feb-2010.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jan-2020.)
|- ( A e. B -> ( B ~~ 1o <-> B = { A } ) )
Theorem	snexxph 7149*	A case where the antecedent of snexg 4274 is not needed. The class { x | ph } is from dcextest 4679. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 4-Jul-2022.)
|- { { x | ph } } e. _V
Theorem	preimaf1ofi 7150	The preimage of a finite set under a one-to-one, onto function is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Sep-2022.)
|- ( ph -> C C_ B )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A -1-1-onto-> B )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( `' F " C ) e. Fin )
Theorem	fidcenumlemim 7151*	Lemma for fidcenum 7155. Forward direction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Oct-2022.)
|- ( A e. Fin -> ( A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y /\ E. n e. om E. f f : n -onto-> A ) )
Theorem	fidcenumlemrks 7152*	Lemma for fidcenum 7155. Induction step for fidcenumlemrk 7153. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Oct-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y )   &    |- ( ph -> F : N -onto-> A )   &    |- ( ph -> J e. om )   &    |- ( ph -> suc J C_ N )   &    |- ( ph -> ( X e. ( F " J ) \/ -. X e. ( F " J ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. A )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( X e. ( F " suc J ) \/ -. X e. ( F " suc J ) ) )
Theorem	fidcenumlemrk 7153*	Lemma for fidcenum 7155. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Oct-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y )   &    |- ( ph -> F : N -onto-> A )   &    |- ( ph -> K e. om )   &    |- ( ph -> K C_ N )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. A )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( X e. ( F " K ) \/ -. X e. ( F " K ) ) )
Theorem	fidcenumlemr 7154*	Lemma for fidcenum 7155. Reverse direction (put into deduction form). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Oct-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y )   &    |- ( ph -> F : N -onto-> A )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. om )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )
Theorem	fidcenum 7155*	A set is finite if and only if it has decidable equality and is finitely enumerable. Proposition 8.1.11 of [AczelRathjen], p. 72. The definition of "finitely enumerable" as E. n e. om E. f f : n -onto-> A is Definition 8.1.4 of [AczelRathjen], p. 71. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Oct-2022.)
|- ( A e. Fin <-> ( A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y /\ E. n e. om E. f f : n -onto-> A ) )
2.6.32  Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem
Theorem	sbthlem1 7156*	Lemma for isbth 7166. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- D = { x | ( x C_ A /\ ( g " ( B \ ( f " x ) ) ) C_ ( A \ x ) ) }   =>    |- U. D C_ ( A \ ( g " ( B \ ( f " U. D ) ) ) )
Theorem	sbthlem2 7157*	Lemma for isbth 7166. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- D = { x | ( x C_ A /\ ( g " ( B \ ( f " x ) ) ) C_ ( A \ x ) ) }   =>    |- ( ran g C_ A -> ( A \ ( g " ( B \ ( f " U. D ) ) ) ) C_ U. D )
Theorem	sbthlemi3 7158*	Lemma for isbth 7166. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- D = { x | ( x C_ A /\ ( g " ( B \ ( f " x ) ) ) C_ ( A \ x ) ) }   =>    |- ( (EXMID /\ ran g C_ A ) -> ( g " ( B \ ( f " U. D ) ) ) = ( A \ U. D ) )
Theorem	sbthlemi4 7159*	Lemma for isbth 7166. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- D = { x | ( x C_ A /\ ( g " ( B \ ( f " x ) ) ) C_ ( A \ x ) ) }   =>    |- ( (EXMID /\ ( dom g = B /\ ran g C_ A ) /\ Fun `' g ) -> ( `' g " ( A \ U. D ) ) = ( B \ ( f " U. D ) ) )
Theorem	sbthlemi5 7160*	Lemma for isbth 7166. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- D = { x | ( x C_ A /\ ( g " ( B \ ( f " x ) ) ) C_ ( A \ x ) ) }   &    |- H = ( ( f |` U. D ) u. ( `' g |` ( A \ U. D ) ) )   =>    |- ( (EXMID /\ ( dom f = A /\ ran g C_ A ) ) -> dom H = A )
Theorem	sbthlemi6 7161*	Lemma for isbth 7166. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- D = { x | ( x C_ A /\ ( g " ( B \ ( f " x ) ) ) C_ ( A \ x ) ) }   &    |- H = ( ( f |` U. D ) u. ( `' g |` ( A \ U. D ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( (EXMID /\ ran f C_ B ) /\ ( ( dom g = B /\ ran g C_ A ) /\ Fun `' g ) ) -> ran H = B )
Theorem	sbthlem7 7162*	Lemma for isbth 7166. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- D = { x | ( x C_ A /\ ( g " ( B \ ( f " x ) ) ) C_ ( A \ x ) ) }   &    |- H = ( ( f |` U. D ) u. ( `' g |` ( A \ U. D ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( Fun f /\ Fun `' g ) -> Fun H )
Theorem	sbthlemi8 7163*	Lemma for isbth 7166. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- D = { x | ( x C_ A /\ ( g " ( B \ ( f " x ) ) ) C_ ( A \ x ) ) }   &    |- H = ( ( f |` U. D ) u. ( `' g |` ( A \ U. D ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( (EXMID /\ Fun `' f ) /\ ( ( ( Fun g /\ dom g = B ) /\ ran g C_ A ) /\ Fun `' g ) ) -> Fun `' H )
Theorem	sbthlemi9 7164*	Lemma for isbth 7166. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- D = { x | ( x C_ A /\ ( g " ( B \ ( f " x ) ) ) C_ ( A \ x ) ) }   &    |- H = ( ( f |` U. D ) u. ( `' g |` ( A \ U. D ) ) )   =>    |- ( (EXMID /\ f : A -1-1-> B /\ g : B -1-1-> A ) -> H : A -1-1-onto-> B )
Theorem	sbthlemi10 7165*	Lemma for isbth 7166. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- D = { x | ( x C_ A /\ ( g " ( B \ ( f " x ) ) ) C_ ( A \ x ) ) }   &    |- H = ( ( f |` U. D ) u. ( `' g |` ( A \ U. D ) ) )   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( (EXMID /\ ( A ~<_ B /\ B ~<_ A ) ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	isbth 7166	Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem. Theorem 18 of [Suppes] p. 95. This theorem states that if set A is smaller (has lower cardinality) than B and vice-versa, then A and B are equinumerous (have the same cardinality). The interesting thing is that this can be proved without invoking the Axiom of Choice, as we do here, but the proof as you can see is quite difficult. (The theorem can be proved more easily if we allow AC.) The main proof consists of lemmas sbthlem1 7156 through sbthlemi10 7165; this final piece mainly changes bound variables to eliminate the hypotheses of sbthlemi10 7165. We follow closely the proof in Suppes, which you should consult to understand our proof at a higher level. Note that Suppes' proof, which is credited to J. M. Whitaker, does not require the Axiom of Infinity. The proof does require the law of the excluded middle which cannot be avoided as shown at exmidsbthr 16653. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1998.)
|- ( (EXMID /\ ( A ~<_ B /\ B ~<_ A ) ) -> A ~~ B )
2.6.33  Finite intersections
Syntax	cfi 7167	Extend class notation with the function whose value is the class of finite intersections of the elements of a given set.
class fi
Definition	df-fi 7168*	Function whose value is the class of finite intersections of the elements of the argument. Note that the empty intersection being the universal class, hence a proper class, it cannot be an element of that class. Therefore, the function value is the class of nonempty finite intersections of elements of the argument (see elfi2 7171). (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.)
|- fi = ( x e. _V |-> { z | E. y e. ( ~P x i^i Fin ) z = |^| y } )
Theorem	fival 7169*	The set of all the finite intersections of the elements of A. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( fi ` A ) = { y | E. x e. ( ~P A i^i Fin ) y = |^| x } )
Theorem	elfi 7170*	Specific properties of an element of ( fi ` B ). (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A e. ( fi ` B ) <-> E. x e. ( ~P B i^i Fin ) A = |^| x ) )
Theorem	elfi2 7171*	The empty intersection need not be considered in the set of finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( A e. ( fi ` B ) <-> E. x e. ( ( ~P B i^i Fin ) \ { (/) } ) A = |^| x ) )
Theorem	elfir 7172	Sufficient condition for an element of ( fi ` B ). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
|- ( ( B e. V /\ ( A C_ B /\ A =/= (/) /\ A e. Fin ) ) -> |^| A e. ( fi ` B ) )
Theorem	ssfii 7173	Any element of a set A is the intersection of a finite subset of A. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> A C_ ( fi ` A ) )
Theorem	fi0 7174	The set of finite intersections of the empty set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.)
|- ( fi ` (/) ) = (/)
Theorem	fieq0 7175	A set is empty iff the class of all the finite intersections of that set is empty. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A = (/) <-> ( fi ` A ) = (/) ) )
Theorem	fiss 7176	Subset relationship for function fi. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Oct-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
|- ( ( B e. V /\ A C_ B ) -> ( fi ` A ) C_ ( fi ` B ) )
Theorem	fiuni 7177	The union of the finite intersections of a set is simply the union of the set itself. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 5-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
|- ( A e. V -> U. A = U. ( fi ` A ) )
Theorem	fipwssg 7178	If a set is a family of subsets of some base set, then so is its finite intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Aug-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ A C_ ~P X ) -> ( fi ` A ) C_ ~P X )
Theorem	fifo 7179*	Describe a surjection from nonempty finite sets to finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
|- F = ( y e. ( ( ~P A i^i Fin ) \ { (/) } ) |-> |^| y )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> F : ( ( ~P A i^i Fin ) \ { (/) } ) -onto-> ( fi ` A ) )
Theorem	dcfi 7180*	Decidability of a family of propositions indexed by a finite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Sep-2024.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ A. x e. A DECID ph ) -> DECID A. x e. A ph )
2.6.34  Supremum and infimum
Syntax	csup 7181	Extend class notation to include supremum of class A. Here R is ordinarily a relation that strictly orders class B. For example, R could be 'less than' and B could be the set of real numbers.
class sup ( A , B , R )
Syntax	cinf 7182	Extend class notation to include infimum of class A. Here R is ordinarily a relation that strictly orders class B. For example, R could be 'less than' and B could be the set of real numbers.
class inf ( A , B , R )
Definition	df-sup 7183*	Define the supremum of class A. It is meaningful when R is a relation that strictly orders B and when the supremum exists. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)
|- sup ( A , B , R ) = U. { x e. B | ( A. y e. A -. x R y /\ A. y e. B ( y R x -> E. z e. A y R z ) ) }
Definition	df-inf 7184	Define the infimum of class A. It is meaningful when R is a relation that strictly orders B and when the infimum exists. For example, R could be 'less than', B could be the set of real numbers, and A could be the set of all positive reals; in this case the infimum is 0. The infimum is defined as the supremum using the converse ordering relation. In the given example, 0 is the supremum of all reals (greatest real number) for which all positive reals are greater. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.)
|- inf ( A , B , R ) = sup ( A , B , `' R )
Theorem	supeq1 7185	Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)
|- ( B = C -> sup ( B , A , R ) = sup ( C , A , R ) )
Theorem	supeq1d 7186	Equality deduction for supremum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ph -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> sup ( B , A , R ) = sup ( C , A , R ) )
Theorem	supeq1i 7187	Equality inference for supremum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- B = C   =>    |- sup ( B , A , R ) = sup ( C , A , R )
Theorem	supeq2 7188	Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( B = C -> sup ( A , B , R ) = sup ( A , C , R ) )
Theorem	supeq3 7189	Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.)
|- ( R = S -> sup ( A , B , R ) = sup ( A , B , S ) )
Theorem	supeq123d 7190	Equality deduction for supremum. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
|- ( ph -> A = D )   &    |- ( ph -> B = E )   &    |- ( ph -> C = F )   =>    |- ( ph -> sup ( A , B , C ) = sup ( D , E , F ) )
Theorem	nfsup 7191	Hypothesis builder for supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Mar-2014.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   &    |- F/_ x R   =>    |- F/_ x sup ( A , B , R )
Theorem	supmoti 7192*	Any class B has at most one supremum in A (where R is interpreted as 'less than'). The hypothesis is satisfied by real numbers (see lttri3 8259) or other orders which correspond to tight apartnesses. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2021.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( u e. A /\ v e. A ) ) -> ( u = v <-> ( -. u R v /\ -. v R u ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E* x e. A ( A. y e. B -. x R y /\ A. y e. A ( y R x -> E. z e. B y R z ) ) )
Theorem	supeuti 7193*	A supremum is unique. Similar to Theorem I.26 of [Apostol] p. 24 (but for suprema in general). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2021.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( u e. A /\ v e. A ) ) -> ( u = v <-> ( -. u R v /\ -. v R u ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. A ( A. y e. B -. x R y /\ A. y e. A ( y R x -> E. z e. B y R z ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E! x e. A ( A. y e. B -. x R y /\ A. y e. A ( y R x -> E. z e. B y R z ) ) )
Theorem	supval2ti 7194*	Alternate expression for the supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2021.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( u e. A /\ v e. A ) ) -> ( u = v <-> ( -. u R v /\ -. v R u ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. A ( A. y e. B -. x R y /\ A. y e. A ( y R x -> E. z e. B y R z ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> sup ( B , A , R ) = ( iota_ x e. A ( A. y e. B -. x R y /\ A. y e. A ( y R x -> E. z e. B y R z ) ) ) )
Theorem	eqsupti 7195*	Sufficient condition for an element to be equal to the supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2021.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( u e. A /\ v e. A ) ) -> ( u = v <-> ( -. u R v /\ -. v R u ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( C e. A /\ A. y e. B -. C R y /\ A. y e. A ( y R C -> E. z e. B y R z ) ) -> sup ( B , A , R ) = C ) )
Theorem	eqsuptid 7196*	Sufficient condition for an element to be equal to the supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Nov-2021.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( u e. A /\ v e. A ) ) -> ( u = v <-> ( -. u R v /\ -. v R u ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ y e. B ) -> -. C R y )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( y e. A /\ y R C ) ) -> E. z e. B y R z )   =>    |- ( ph -> sup ( B , A , R ) = C )
Theorem	supclti 7197*	A supremum belongs to its base class (closure law). See also supubti 7198 and suplubti 7199. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Nov-2021.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( u e. A /\ v e. A ) ) -> ( u = v <-> ( -. u R v /\ -. v R u ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. A ( A. y e. B -. x R y /\ A. y e. A ( y R x -> E. z e. B y R z ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> sup ( B , A , R ) e. A )
Theorem	supubti 7198*	A supremum is an upper bound. See also supclti 7197 and suplubti 7199. This proof demonstrates how to expand an iota-based definition (df-iota 5286) using riotacl2 5986. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Nov-2021.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( u e. A /\ v e. A ) ) -> ( u = v <-> ( -. u R v /\ -. v R u ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. A ( A. y e. B -. x R y /\ A. y e. A ( y R x -> E. z e. B y R z ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( C e. B -> -. sup ( B , A , R ) R C ) )
Theorem	suplubti 7199*	A supremum is the least upper bound. See also supclti 7197 and supubti 7198. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Nov-2021.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( u e. A /\ v e. A ) ) -> ( u = v <-> ( -. u R v /\ -. v R u ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. A ( A. y e. B -. x R y /\ A. y e. A ( y R x -> E. z e. B y R z ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( C e. A /\ C R sup ( B , A , R ) ) -> E. z e. B C R z ) )
Theorem	suplub2ti 7200*	Bidirectional form of suplubti 7199. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( u e. A /\ v e. A ) ) -> ( u = v <-> ( -. u R v /\ -. v R u ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. A ( A. y e. B -. x R y /\ A. y e. A ( y R x -> E. z e. B y R z ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> R Or A )   &    |- ( ph -> B C_ A )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ C e. A ) -> ( C R sup ( B , A , R ) <-> E. z e. B C R z ) )