P. 72 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 7101-7200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	mapxpen 7101	Equinumerosity law for double set exponentiation. Proposition 10.45 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 96. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( ( A ^m B ) ^m C ) ~~ ( A ^m ( B X. C ) ) )
Theorem	xpmapenlem 7102*	Lemma for xpmapen 7103. (Contributed by NM, 1-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- D = ( z e. C |-> ( 1st ` ( x ` z ) ) )   &    |- R = ( z e. C |-> ( 2nd ` ( x ` z ) ) )   &    |- S = ( z e. C |-> <. ( ( 1st ` y ) ` z ) , ( ( 2nd ` y ) ` z ) >. )   =>    |- ( ( A X. B ) ^m C ) ~~ ( ( A ^m C ) X. ( B ^m C ) )
Theorem	xpmapen 7103	Equinumerosity law for set exponentiation of a Cartesian product. Exercise 4.47 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- ( ( A X. B ) ^m C ) ~~ ( ( A ^m C ) X. ( B ^m C ) )
Theorem	mapunen 7104	Equinumerosity law for set exponentiation of a disjoint union. Exercise 4.45 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) /\ ( A i^i B ) = (/) ) -> ( C ^m ( A u. B ) ) ~~ ( ( C ^m A ) X. ( C ^m B ) ) )
Theorem	ssenen 7105*	Equinumerosity of equinumerous subsets of a set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> { x | ( x C_ A /\ x ~~ C ) } ~~ { x | ( x C_ B /\ x ~~ C ) } )
2.6.31  Pigeonhole Principle
Theorem	phplem1 7106	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. If we join a natural number to itself minus an element, we end up with its successor minus the same element. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. A ) -> ( { A } u. ( A \ { B } ) ) = ( suc A \ { B } ) )
Theorem	phplem2 7107	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus one of its elements. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) )
Theorem	phplem3 7108	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus any element of the successor. For a version without the redundant hypotheses, see phplem3g 7110. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) )
Theorem	phplem4 7109	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. Equinumerosity of successors implies equinumerosity of the original natural numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. om ) -> ( suc A ~~ suc B -> A ~~ B ) )
Theorem	phplem3g 7110	A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus any element of the successor. Version of phplem3 7108 with unnecessary hypotheses removed. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) )
Theorem	nneneq 7111	Two equinumerous natural numbers are equal. Proposition 10.20 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90 and its converse. Also compare Corollary 6E of [Enderton] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. om ) -> ( A ~~ B <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	php5 7112	A natural number is not equinumerous to its successor. Corollary 10.21(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.)
|- ( A e. om -> -. A ~~ suc A )
Theorem	snnen2og 7113	A singleton { A } is never equinumerous with the ordinal number 2. If A is a proper class, see snnen2oprc 7114. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
|- ( A e. V -> -. { A } ~~ 2o )
Theorem	snnen2oprc 7114	A singleton { A } is never equinumerous with the ordinal number 2. If A is a set, see snnen2og 7113. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
|- ( -. A e. _V -> -. { A } ~~ 2o )
Theorem	1nen2 7115	One and two are not equinumerous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jan-2022.)
|- -. 1o ~~ 2o
Theorem	phplem4dom 7116	Dominance of successors implies dominance of the original natural numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. om ) -> ( suc A ~<_ suc B -> A ~<_ B ) )
Theorem	php5dom 7117	A natural number does not dominate its successor. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
|- ( A e. om -> -. suc A ~<_ A )
Theorem	nndomo 7118	Cardinal ordering agrees with natural number ordering. Example 3 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. om ) -> ( A ~<_ B <-> A C_ B ) )
Theorem	1ndom2 7119	Two is not dominated by one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jan-2026.)
|- -. 2o ~<_ 1o
Theorem	phpm 7120*	Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is not equinumerous to a proper subset of itself. By "proper subset" here we mean that there is an element which is in the natural number and not in the subset, or in symbols E. x x e. ( A \ B ) (which is stronger than not being equal in the absence of excluded middle). Theorem (Pigeonhole Principle) of [Enderton] p. 134. The theorem is so-called because you can't put n + 1 pigeons into n holes (if each hole holds only one pigeon). The proof consists of lemmas phplem1 7106 through phplem4 7109, nneneq 7111, and this final piece of the proof. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B C_ A /\ E. x x e. ( A \ B ) ) -> -. A ~~ B )
Theorem	phpelm 7121	Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is not equinumerous to an element of itself. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. A ) -> -. A ~~ B )
Theorem	phplem4on 7122	Equinumerosity of successors of an ordinal and a natural number implies equinumerosity of the originals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. On /\ B e. om ) -> ( suc A ~~ suc B -> A ~~ B ) )
2.6.32  Finite sets
Theorem	fict 7123	A finite set is dominated by om. Also see finct 7407. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Mar-2018.)
|- ( A e. Fin -> A ~<_ om )
Theorem	fidceq 7124	Equality of members of a finite set is decidable. This may be counterintuitive: cannot any two sets be elements of a finite set? Well, to show, for example, that { B , C } is finite would require showing it is equinumerous to 1o or to 2o but to show that you'd need to know B = C or -. B = C, respectively. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. A /\ C e. A ) -> DECID B = C )
Theorem	fidifsnen 7125	All decrements of a finite set are equinumerous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( X e. Fin /\ A e. X /\ B e. X ) -> ( X \ { A } ) ~~ ( X \ { B } ) )
Theorem	fidifsnid 7126	If we remove a single element from a finite set then put it back in, we end up with the original finite set. This strengthens difsnss 3840 from subset to equality when the set is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. A ) -> ( ( A \ { B } ) u. { B } ) = A )
Theorem	nnfi 7127	Natural numbers are finite sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.)
|- ( A e. om -> A e. Fin )
Theorem	enfi 7128	Equinumerous sets have the same finiteness. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. Fin <-> B e. Fin ) )
Theorem	enfii 7129	A set equinumerous to a finite set is finite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.)
|- ( ( B e. Fin /\ A ~~ B ) -> A e. Fin )
Theorem	ssfilem 7130*	Lemma for ssfiexmid 7131. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2022.)
|- { z e. { (/) } | ph } e. Fin   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	ssfiexmid 7131*	If any subset of a finite set is finite, excluded middle follows. One direction of Theorem 2.1 of [Bauer], p. 485. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2020.)
|- A. x A. y ( ( x e. Fin /\ y C_ x ) -> y e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	ssfilemd 7132*	Lemma for ssfiexmidt 7133. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2022.)
|- ( ph -> { z e. { (/) } | ps } e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ps \/ -. ps ) )
Theorem	ssfiexmidt 7133*	If any subset of a finite set is finite, excluded middle follows. One direction of Theorem 2.1 of [Bauer], p. 485. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2020.)
|- ( A. x A. y ( ( x e. Fin /\ y C_ x ) -> y e. Fin ) -> ( ph \/ -. ph ) )
Theorem	infiexmid 7134*	If the intersection of any finite set and any other set is finite, excluded middle follows. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2022.)
|- ( x e. Fin -> ( x i^i y ) e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	domfiexmid 7135*	If any set dominated by a finite set is finite, excluded middle follows. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2022.)
|- ( ( x e. Fin /\ y ~<_ x ) -> y e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	dif1en 7136	If a set A is equinumerous to the successor of a natural number M, then A with an element removed is equinumerous to M. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Aug-2015.)
|- ( ( M e. om /\ A ~~ suc M /\ X e. A ) -> ( A \ { X } ) ~~ M )
Theorem	dif1enen 7137	Subtracting one element from each of two equinumerous finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jun-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> A ~~ B )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A \ { C } ) ~~ ( B \ { D } ) )
Theorem	fiunsnnn 7138	Adding one element to a finite set which is equinumerous to a natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. ( _V \ A ) ) /\ ( N e. om /\ A ~~ N ) ) -> ( A u. { B } ) ~~ suc N )
Theorem	php5fin 7139	A finite set is not equinumerous to a set which adds one element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. ( _V \ A ) ) -> -. A ~~ ( A u. { B } ) )
Theorem	fisbth 7140	Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem for finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. Fin ) /\ ( A ~<_ B /\ B ~<_ A ) ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	0fi 7141	The empty set is finite. (Contributed by FL, 14-Jul-2008.)
|- (/) e. Fin
Theorem	fin0 7142*	A nonempty finite set has at least one element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Sep-2021.)
|- ( A e. Fin -> ( A =/= (/) <-> E. x x e. A ) )
Theorem	fin0or 7143*	A finite set is either empty or inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Sep-2021.)
|- ( A e. Fin -> ( A = (/) \/ E. x x e. A ) )
Theorem	diffitest 7144*	If subtracting any set from a finite set gives a finite set, any proposition of the form -. ph is decidable. This is not a proof of full excluded middle, but it is close enough to show we won't be able to prove A e. Fin -> ( A \ B ) e. Fin. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Sep-2021.)
|- A. a e. Fin A. b ( a \ b ) e. Fin   =>    |- ( -. ph \/ -. -. ph )
Theorem	findcard 7145*	Schema for induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive hypothesis is that the result is true on the given set with any one element removed. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = ( y \ { z } ) -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ta ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( y e. Fin -> ( A. z e. y ch -> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. Fin -> ta )
Theorem	findcard2 7146*	Schema for induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive step shows that the result is true if one more element is added to the set. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 8-Jul-2010.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = ( y u. { z } ) -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ta ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( y e. Fin -> ( ch -> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. Fin -> ta )
Theorem	findcard2s 7147*	Variation of findcard2 7146 requiring that the element added in the induction step not be a member of the original set. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 30-Nov-2012.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = ( y u. { z } ) -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ta ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( ( y e. Fin /\ -. z e. y ) -> ( ch -> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. Fin -> ta )
Theorem	findcard2d 7148*	Deduction version of findcard2 7146. If you also need y e. Fin (which doesn't come for free due to ssfiexmid 7131), use findcard2sd 7149 instead. (Contributed by SO, 16-Jul-2018.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ps <-> th ) )   &    |- ( x = ( y u. { z } ) -> ( ps <-> ta ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ps <-> et ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ch )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( y C_ A /\ z e. ( A \ y ) ) ) -> ( th -> ta ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph -> et )
Theorem	findcard2sd 7149*	Deduction form of finite set induction . (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Sep-2021.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ps <-> th ) )   &    |- ( x = ( y u. { z } ) -> ( ps <-> ta ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ps <-> et ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ch )   &    |- ( ( ( ph /\ y e. Fin ) /\ ( y C_ A /\ z e. ( A \ y ) ) ) -> ( th -> ta ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph -> et )
Theorem	diffisn 7150	Subtracting a singleton from a finite set produces a finite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. A ) -> ( A \ { B } ) e. Fin )
Theorem	diffifi 7151	Subtracting one finite set from another produces a finite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. Fin /\ B C_ A ) -> ( A \ B ) e. Fin )
Theorem	infnfi 7152	An infinite set is not finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Feb-2022.)
|- ( om ~<_ A -> -. A e. Fin )
Theorem	ominf 7153	The set of natural numbers is not finite. Although we supply this theorem because we can, the more natural way to express " om is infinite" is om ~<_ om which is an instance of domrefg 7006. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1998.)
|- -. om e. Fin
Theorem	isinfinf 7154*	An infinite set contains subsets of arbitrarily large finite cardinality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jun-2022.)
|- ( om ~<_ A -> A. n e. om E. x ( x C_ A /\ x ~~ n ) )
Theorem	ac6sfi 7155*	Existence of a choice function for finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 26-Jun-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2014.)
|- ( y = ( f ` x ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. Fin /\ A. x e. A E. y e. B ph ) -> E. f ( f : A --> B /\ A. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	fidcen 7156	Equinumerosity of finite sets is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Feb-2026.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. Fin ) -> DECID A ~~ B )
Theorem	tridc 7157*	A trichotomous order is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2022.)
|- ( ph -> R Po A )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A ( x R y \/ x = y \/ y R x ) )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   =>    |- ( ph -> DECID B R C )
Theorem	fimax2gtrilemstep 7158*	Lemma for fimax2gtri 7159. The induction step. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2022.)
|- ( ph -> R Po A )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A ( x R y \/ x = y \/ y R x ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> A =/= (/) )   &    |- ( ph -> U e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> U C_ A )   &    |- ( ph -> Z e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> V e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> -. V e. U )   &    |- ( ph -> A. y e. U -. Z R y )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. A A. y e. ( U u. { V } ) -. x R y )
Theorem	fimax2gtri 7159*	A finite set has a maximum under a trichotomous order. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2022.)
|- ( ph -> R Po A )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A ( x R y \/ x = y \/ y R x ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> A =/= (/) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. A A. y e. A -. x R y )
Theorem	finexdc 7160*	Decidability of existence, over a finite set and defined by a decidable proposition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ A. x e. A DECID ph ) -> DECID E. x e. A ph )
Theorem	dfrex2fin 7161*	Relationship between universal and existential quantifiers over a finite set. Remark in Section 2.2.1 of [Pierik], p. 8. Although Pierik does not mention the decidability condition explicitly, it does say "only finitely many x to check" which means there must be some way of checking each value of x. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ A. x e. A DECID ph ) -> ( E. x e. A ph <-> -. A. x e. A -. ph ) )
Theorem	elssdc 7162*	Membership in a finite subset of a set with decidable equality is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Feb-2026.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. B A. y e. B DECID x = y )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ B )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph -> DECID X e. A )
Theorem	eqsndc 7163*	Decidability of equality between a finite subset of a set with decidable equality, and a singleton whose element is an element of the larger set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2026.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. B A. y e. B DECID x = y )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ B )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph -> DECID A = { X } )
Theorem	infm 7164*	An infinite set is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2022.)
|- ( om ~<_ A -> E. x x e. A )
Theorem	infn0 7165	An infinite set is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.)
|- ( om ~<_ A -> A =/= (/) )
Theorem	inffiexmid 7166*	If any given set is either finite or infinite, excluded middle follows. For another example, ~P 1o is not infinite, by pw1ninf 16765, but also cannot be shown to be finite by pw1fin 7170. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jun-2022.)
|- ( x e. Fin \/ om ~<_ x )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	en2eqpr 7167	Building a set with two elements. (Contributed by FL, 11-Aug-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( C ~~ 2o /\ A e. C /\ B e. C ) -> ( A =/= B -> C = { A , B } ) )
Theorem	exmidpw 7168	Excluded middle is equivalent to the power set of 1o having two elements. Remark of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jun-2022.)
|- (EXMID <-> ~P 1o ~~ 2o )
Theorem	exmidpweq 7169	Excluded middle is equivalent to the power set of 1o being 2o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jul-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> ~P 1o = 2o )
Theorem	pw1fin 7170	Excluded middle is equivalent to the power set of 1o being finite. (Contributed by SN and Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> ~P 1o e. Fin )
Theorem	pw1dc0el 7171	Another equivalent of excluded middle, which is a mere reformulation of the definition. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x e. ~P 1oDECID (/) e. x )
Theorem	exmidpw2en 7172	The power set of a set being equinumerous to set exponentiation with a base of ordinal 2o is equivalent to excluded middle. This is Metamath 100 proof #52. The forward direction uses excluded middle expressed as EXMID to show this equinumerosity. The reverse direction is the one which establishes that power set being equinumerous to set exponentiation implies excluded middle. This resolves the question of whether we will be able to prove this equinumerosity theorem in the negative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2022.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x ~P x ~~ ( 2o ^m x ) )
Theorem	ss1o0el1o 7173	Reformulation of ss1o0el1 4310 using 1o instead of { (/) }. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Aug-2024.)
|- ( A C_ 1o -> ( (/) e. A <-> A = 1o ) )
Theorem	pw1dc1 7174	If, in the set of truth values (the powerset of 1o), equality to 1o is decidable, then excluded middle holds (and conversely). (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x e. ~P 1oDECID x = 1o )
Theorem	fientri3 7175	Trichotomy of dominance for finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. Fin ) -> ( A ~<_ B \/ B ~<_ A ) )
Theorem	nnwetri 7176*	A natural number is well-ordered by _E. More specifically, this order both satisfies We and is trichotomous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2021.)
|- ( A e. om -> ( _E We A /\ A. x e. A A. y e. A ( x _E y \/ x = y \/ y _E x ) ) )
Theorem	onunsnss 7177	Adding a singleton to create an ordinal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Oct-2021.)
|- ( ( B e. V /\ ( A u. { B } ) e. On ) -> B C_ A )
Theorem	unfiexmid 7178*	If the union of any two finite sets is finite, excluded middle follows. Remark 8.1.17 of [AczelRathjen], p. 74. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 5-Mar-2022.)
|- ( ( x e. Fin /\ y e. Fin ) -> ( x u. y ) e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	unsnfi 7179	Adding a singleton to a finite set yields a finite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. V /\ -. B e. A ) -> ( A u. { B } ) e. Fin )
Theorem	unsnfidcex 7180	The B e. V condition in unsnfi 7179. This is intended to show that unsnfi 7179 without that condition would not be provable but it probably would need to be strengthened (for example, to imply included middle) to fully show that. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ -. B e. A /\ ( A u. { B } ) e. Fin ) -> DECID -. B e. _V )
Theorem	unsnfidcel 7181	The -. B e. A condition in unsnfi 7179. This is intended to show that unsnfi 7179 without that condition would not be provable but it probably would need to be strengthened (for example, to imply included middle) to fully show that. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. V /\ ( A u. { B } ) e. Fin ) -> DECID -. B e. A )
Theorem	unfidisj 7182	The union of two disjoint finite sets is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Feb-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. Fin /\ ( A i^i B ) = (/) ) -> ( A u. B ) e. Fin )
Theorem	undifdcss 7183*	Union of complementary parts into whole and decidability. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jun-2022.)
|- ( A = ( B u. ( A \ B ) ) <-> ( B C_ A /\ A. x e. A DECID x e. B ) )
Theorem	undifdc 7184*	Union of complementary parts into whole. This is a case where we can strengthen undifss 3590 from subset to equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jun-2022.)
|- ( ( A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y /\ B e. Fin /\ B C_ A ) -> A = ( B u. ( A \ B ) ) )
Theorem	undiffi 7185	Union of complementary parts into whole. This is a case where we can strengthen undifss 3590 from subset to equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Mar-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. Fin /\ B C_ A ) -> A = ( B u. ( A \ B ) ) )
Theorem	unfiin 7186	The union of two finite sets is finite if their intersection is. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Mar-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. Fin /\ ( A i^i B ) e. Fin ) -> ( A u. B ) e. Fin )
Theorem	prfidisj 7187	A pair is finite if it consists of two unequal sets. For the case where A = B, see snfig 7056. For the cases where one or both is a proper class, see prprc1 3800, prprc2 3801, or prprc 3802. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-May-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ A =/= B ) -> { A , B } e. Fin )
Theorem	prfidceq 7188*	A pair is finite if it consists of elements of a class with decidable equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2025.)
|- ( ph -> A e. C )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. C )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. C A. y e. C DECID x = y )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , B } e. Fin )
Theorem	tpfidisj 7189	A triple is finite if it consists of three unequal sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Oct-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. X )   &    |- ( ph -> A =/= B )   &    |- ( ph -> A =/= C )   &    |- ( ph -> B =/= C )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , B , C } e. Fin )
Theorem	tpfidceq 7190*	A triple is finite if it consists of elements of a class with decidable equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2025.)
|- ( ph -> A e. D )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. D )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. D )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. D A. y e. D DECID x = y )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , B , C } e. Fin )
Theorem	fiintim 7191*	If a class is closed under pairwise intersections, then it is closed under nonempty finite intersections. The converse would appear to require an additional condition, such as x and y not being equal, or A having decidable equality. This theorem is applicable to a topology, which (among other axioms) is closed under finite intersections. Some texts use a pairwise intersection and some texts use a finite intersection, but most topology texts assume excluded middle (in which case the two intersection properties would be equivalent). (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2002.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2023.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y e. A ( x i^i y ) e. A -> A. x ( ( x C_ A /\ x =/= (/) /\ x e. Fin ) -> |^| x e. A ) )
Theorem	xpfi 7192	The Cartesian product of two finite sets is finite. Lemma 8.1.16 of [AczelRathjen], p. 74. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. Fin ) -> ( A X. B ) e. Fin )
Theorem	imaf1fi 7193	The image of a finite set under a one-to-one mapping is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Mar-2026.)
|- ( ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ X C_ A /\ X e. Fin ) -> ( F " X ) e. Fin )
Theorem	3xpfi 7194	The Cartesian product of three finite sets is a finite set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Mar-2018.)
|- ( V e. Fin -> ( ( V X. V ) X. V ) e. Fin )
Theorem	fisseneq 7195	A finite set is equal to its subset if they are equinumerous. (Contributed by FL, 11-Aug-2008.)
|- ( ( B e. Fin /\ A C_ B /\ A ~~ B ) -> A = B )
Theorem	phpeqd 7196	Corollary of the Pigeonhole Principle using equality. Strengthening of phpm 7120 expressed without negation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.)
|- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> B C_ A )   &    |- ( ph -> A ~~ B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = B )
Theorem	ssfirab 7197*	A subset of a finite set is finite if it is defined by a decidable property. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A DECID ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x e. A | ps } e. Fin )
Theorem	ssfidc 7198*	A subset of a finite set is finite if membership in the subset is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B C_ A /\ A. x e. A DECID x e. B ) -> B e. Fin )
Theorem	exmidssfi 7199*	Excluded middle is equivalent to any subset of a finite set being finite. Theorem 2.1 of [Bauer], p. 485. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Mar-2026.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x A. y ( ( x e. Fin /\ y C_ x ) -> y e. Fin ) )
Theorem	opabfi 7200*	Finiteness of an ordered pair abstraction which is a decidable subset of finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2025.)
|- S = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) }   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. B DECID ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> S e. Fin )