Theorem nninfdcinf 7511

Description: The Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO) implies that it is decidable whether an element of ℕ_∞ equals the point at infinity. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Dec-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nninfdcinf.w	|- ( ph -> om e. WOmni )
nninfdcinf.n	|- ( ph -> N e. ℕ∞ )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nninfdcinf	|- ( ph -> DECID N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) )

Distinct variable groups:   i, N   ph, i

Proof of Theorem nninfdcinf

Dummy variables f x are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq1 5694	. . . . . 6 |- ( f = N -> ( f ` x ) = ( N ` x ) )
2	1	eqeq1d 2247	. . . . 5 |- ( f = N -> ( ( f ` x ) = 1o <-> ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
3	2	ralbidv 2550	. . . 4 |- ( f = N -> ( A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o <-> A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
4	3	dcbid 850	. . 3 |- ( f = N -> (DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o <-> DECID A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
5		nninfdcinf.w	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> om e. WOmni )
6	5	elexd 2835	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> om e. _V )
7		iswomnimap 7506	. . . . 5 |- ( om e. _V -> ( om e. WOmni <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m om )DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o ) )
8	6, 7	syl 14	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( om e. WOmni <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m om )DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o ) )
9	5, 8	mpbid 147	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A. f e. ( 2o ^m om )DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o )
10		nninfdcinf.n	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> N e. ℕ∞ )
11		nninff 7462	. . . . 5 |- ( N e. ℕ∞ -> N : om --> 2o )
12	10, 11	syl 14	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> N : om --> 2o )
13		2onn 6794	. . . . . 6 |- 2o e. om
14	13	elexi 2834	. . . . 5 |- 2o e. _V
15		omex 4740	. . . . 5 |- om e. _V
16	14, 15	elmap 6958	. . . 4 |- ( N e. ( 2o ^m om ) <-> N : om --> 2o )
17	12, 16	sylibr 134	. . 3 |- ( ph -> N e. ( 2o ^m om ) )
18	4, 9, 17	rspcdva 2934	. 2 |- ( ph -> DECID A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o )
19	12	ffnd 5534	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> N Fn om )
20		eqidd 2239	. . . 4 |- ( x = i -> 1o = 1o )
21		1onn 6793	. . . . 5 |- 1o e. om
22	21	a1i 9	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. om ) -> 1o e. om )
23	21	a1i 9	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ i e. om ) -> 1o e. om )
24	19, 20, 22, 23	fnmptfvd 5813	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) <-> A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
25	24	dcbid 850	. 2 |- ( ph -> (DECID N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) <-> DECID A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
26	18, 25	mpbird 167	1 |- ( ph -> DECID N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) )

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105  DECID wdc 846   = wceq 1402   e. wcel 2209   A.wral 2528   _Vcvv 2821   |-> cmpt 4192   omcom 4737   -->wf 5373   ` cfv 5377  (class class class)co 6085   1oc1o 6680   2oc2o 6681   ^m cmap 6922  ℕ_∞xnninf 7459  WOmnicwomni 7503

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-nul 4259  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-setind 4684  ax-iinf 4735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 847  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-id 4438  df-suc 4516  df-iom 4738  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-f 5381  df-fv 5385  df-ov 6088  df-oprab 6089  df-mpo 6090  df-1o 6687  df-2o 6688  df-map 6924  df-nninf 7460  df-womni 7504

This theorem is used by:  nninfinfwlpo  7520