Theorem nninfdcinf 7162

Description: The Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO) implies that it is decidable whether an element of ℕ_∞ equals the point at infinity. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Dec-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nninfdcinf.w	|- ( ph -> om e. WOmni )
nninfdcinf.n	|- ( ph -> N e. ℕ∞ )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nninfdcinf	|- ( ph -> DECID N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) )

Distinct variable groups:   i, N   ph, i

Proof of Theorem nninfdcinf

Dummy variables f x are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq1 5509	. . . . . 6 |- ( f = N -> ( f ` x ) = ( N ` x ) )
2	1	eqeq1d 2186	. . . . 5 |- ( f = N -> ( ( f ` x ) = 1o <-> ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
3	2	ralbidv 2477	. . . 4 |- ( f = N -> ( A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o <-> A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
4	3	dcbid 838	. . 3 |- ( f = N -> (DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o <-> DECID A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
5		nninfdcinf.w	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> om e. WOmni )
6	5	elexd 2750	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> om e. _V )
7		iswomnimap 7157	. . . . 5 |- ( om e. _V -> ( om e. WOmni <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m om )DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o ) )
8	6, 7	syl 14	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( om e. WOmni <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m om )DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o ) )
9	5, 8	mpbid 147	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A. f e. ( 2o ^m om )DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o )
10		nninfdcinf.n	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> N e. ℕ∞ )
11		nninff 7114	. . . . 5 |- ( N e. ℕ∞ -> N : om --> 2o )
12	10, 11	syl 14	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> N : om --> 2o )
13		2onn 6515	. . . . . 6 |- 2o e. om
14	13	elexi 2749	. . . . 5 |- 2o e. _V
15		omex 4588	. . . . 5 |- om e. _V
16	14, 15	elmap 6670	. . . 4 |- ( N e. ( 2o ^m om ) <-> N : om --> 2o )
17	12, 16	sylibr 134	. . 3 |- ( ph -> N e. ( 2o ^m om ) )
18	4, 9, 17	rspcdva 2846	. 2 |- ( ph -> DECID A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o )
19	12	ffnd 5361	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> N Fn om )
20		eqidd 2178	. . . 4 |- ( x = i -> 1o = 1o )
21		1onn 6514	. . . . 5 |- 1o e. om
22	21	a1i 9	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. om ) -> 1o e. om )
23	21	a1i 9	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ i e. om ) -> 1o e. om )
24	19, 20, 22, 23	fnmptfvd 5615	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) <-> A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
25	24	dcbid 838	. 2 |- ( ph -> (DECID N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) <-> DECID A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
26	18, 25	mpbird 167	1 |- ( ph -> DECID N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105  DECID wdc 834   = wceq 1353   e. wcel 2148   A.wral 2455   _Vcvv 2737   |-> cmpt 4061   omcom 4585   -->wf 5207   ` cfv 5211  (class class class)co 5868   1oc1o 6403   2oc2o 6404   ^m cmap 6641  ℕ_∞xnninf 7111  WOmnicwomni 7154

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 614  ax-in2 615  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-13 2150  ax-14 2151  ax-ext 2159  ax-sep 4118  ax-nul 4126  ax-pow 4171  ax-pr 4205  ax-un 4429  ax-setind 4532  ax-iinf 4583

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 835  df-3an 980  df-tru 1356  df-fal 1359  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-eu 2029  df-mo 2030  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-ne 2348  df-ral 2460  df-rex 2461  df-rab 2464  df-v 2739  df-sbc 2963  df-csb 3058  df-dif 3131  df-un 3133  df-in 3135  df-ss 3142  df-nul 3423  df-pw 3576  df-sn 3597  df-pr 3598  df-op 3600  df-uni 3808  df-int 3843  df-br 4001  df-opab 4062  df-mpt 4063  df-id 4289  df-suc 4367  df-iom 4586  df-xp 4628  df-rel 4629  df-cnv 4630  df-co 4631  df-dm 4632  df-rn 4633  df-iota 5173  df-fun 5213  df-fn 5214  df-f 5215  df-fv 5219  df-ov 5871  df-oprab 5872  df-mpo 5873  df-1o 6410  df-2o 6411  df-map 6643  df-nninf 7112  df-womni 7155

This theorem is referenced by: (None)