Theorem nninfdcinf 7232

Description: The Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO) implies that it is decidable whether an element of ℕ_∞ equals the point at infinity. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Dec-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nninfdcinf.w	|- ( ph -> om e. WOmni )
nninfdcinf.n	|- ( ph -> N e. ℕ∞ )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nninfdcinf	|- ( ph -> DECID N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) )

Distinct variable groups:   i, N   ph, i

Proof of Theorem nninfdcinf

Dummy variables f x are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq1 5554	. . . . . 6 |- ( f = N -> ( f ` x ) = ( N ` x ) )
2	1	eqeq1d 2202	. . . . 5 |- ( f = N -> ( ( f ` x ) = 1o <-> ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
3	2	ralbidv 2494	. . . 4 |- ( f = N -> ( A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o <-> A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
4	3	dcbid 839	. . 3 |- ( f = N -> (DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o <-> DECID A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
5		nninfdcinf.w	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> om e. WOmni )
6	5	elexd 2773	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> om e. _V )
7		iswomnimap 7227	. . . . 5 |- ( om e. _V -> ( om e. WOmni <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m om )DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o ) )
8	6, 7	syl 14	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( om e. WOmni <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m om )DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o ) )
9	5, 8	mpbid 147	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A. f e. ( 2o ^m om )DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o )
10		nninfdcinf.n	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> N e. ℕ∞ )
11		nninff 7183	. . . . 5 |- ( N e. ℕ∞ -> N : om --> 2o )
12	10, 11	syl 14	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> N : om --> 2o )
13		2onn 6576	. . . . . 6 |- 2o e. om
14	13	elexi 2772	. . . . 5 |- 2o e. _V
15		omex 4626	. . . . 5 |- om e. _V
16	14, 15	elmap 6733	. . . 4 |- ( N e. ( 2o ^m om ) <-> N : om --> 2o )
17	12, 16	sylibr 134	. . 3 |- ( ph -> N e. ( 2o ^m om ) )
18	4, 9, 17	rspcdva 2870	. 2 |- ( ph -> DECID A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o )
19	12	ffnd 5405	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> N Fn om )
20		eqidd 2194	. . . 4 |- ( x = i -> 1o = 1o )
21		1onn 6575	. . . . 5 |- 1o e. om
22	21	a1i 9	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. om ) -> 1o e. om )
23	21	a1i 9	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ i e. om ) -> 1o e. om )
24	19, 20, 22, 23	fnmptfvd 5663	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) <-> A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
25	24	dcbid 839	. 2 |- ( ph -> (DECID N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) <-> DECID A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
26	18, 25	mpbird 167	1 |- ( ph -> DECID N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105  DECID wdc 835   = wceq 1364   e. wcel 2164   A.wral 2472   _Vcvv 2760   |-> cmpt 4091   omcom 4623   -->wf 5251   ` cfv 5255  (class class class)co 5919   1oc1o 6464   2oc2o 6465   ^m cmap 6704  ℕ_∞xnninf 7180  WOmnicwomni 7224

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-13 2166  ax-14 2167  ax-ext 2175  ax-sep 4148  ax-nul 4156  ax-pow 4204  ax-pr 4239  ax-un 4465  ax-setind 4570  ax-iinf 4621

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 836  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-fal 1370  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2045  df-mo 2046  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ne 2365  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-rab 2481  df-v 2762  df-sbc 2987  df-csb 3082  df-dif 3156  df-un 3158  df-in 3160  df-ss 3167  df-nul 3448  df-pw 3604  df-sn 3625  df-pr 3626  df-op 3628  df-uni 3837  df-int 3872  df-br 4031  df-opab 4092  df-mpt 4093  df-id 4325  df-suc 4403  df-iom 4624  df-xp 4666  df-rel 4667  df-cnv 4668  df-co 4669  df-dm 4670  df-rn 4671  df-iota 5216  df-fun 5257  df-fn 5258  df-f 5259  df-fv 5263  df-ov 5922  df-oprab 5923  df-mpo 5924  df-1o 6471  df-2o 6472  df-map 6706  df-nninf 7181  df-womni 7225

This theorem is referenced by: (None)