Theorem nninfdcinf 7147

Description: The Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO) implies that it is decidable whether an element of ℕ_∞ equals the point at infinity. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Dec-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nninfdcinf.w	|- ( ph -> om e. WOmni )
nninfdcinf.n	|- ( ph -> N e. ℕ∞ )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nninfdcinf	|- ( ph -> DECID N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) )

Distinct variable groups:   i, N   ph, i

Proof of Theorem nninfdcinf

Dummy variables f x are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq1 5495	. . . . . 6 |- ( f = N -> ( f ` x ) = ( N ` x ) )
2	1	eqeq1d 2179	. . . . 5 |- ( f = N -> ( ( f ` x ) = 1o <-> ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
3	2	ralbidv 2470	. . . 4 |- ( f = N -> ( A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o <-> A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
4	3	dcbid 833	. . 3 |- ( f = N -> (DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o <-> DECID A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
5		nninfdcinf.w	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> om e. WOmni )
6	5	elexd 2743	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> om e. _V )
7		iswomnimap 7142	. . . . 5 |- ( om e. _V -> ( om e. WOmni <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m om )DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o ) )
8	6, 7	syl 14	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( om e. WOmni <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m om )DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o ) )
9	5, 8	mpbid 146	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A. f e. ( 2o ^m om )DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o )
10		nninfdcinf.n	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> N e. ℕ∞ )
11		nninff 7099	. . . . 5 |- ( N e. ℕ∞ -> N : om --> 2o )
12	10, 11	syl 14	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> N : om --> 2o )
13		2onn 6500	. . . . . 6 |- 2o e. om
14	13	elexi 2742	. . . . 5 |- 2o e. _V
15		omex 4577	. . . . 5 |- om e. _V
16	14, 15	elmap 6655	. . . 4 |- ( N e. ( 2o ^m om ) <-> N : om --> 2o )
17	12, 16	sylibr 133	. . 3 |- ( ph -> N e. ( 2o ^m om ) )
18	4, 9, 17	rspcdva 2839	. 2 |- ( ph -> DECID A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o )
19	12	ffnd 5348	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> N Fn om )
20		eqidd 2171	. . . 4 |- ( x = i -> 1o = 1o )
21		1onn 6499	. . . . 5 |- 1o e. om
22	21	a1i 9	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. om ) -> 1o e. om )
23	21	a1i 9	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ i e. om ) -> 1o e. om )
24	19, 20, 22, 23	fnmptfvd 5600	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) <-> A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
25	24	dcbid 833	. 2 |- ( ph -> (DECID N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) <-> DECID A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
26	18, 25	mpbird 166	1 |- ( ph -> DECID N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   <-> wb 104  DECID wdc 829   = wceq 1348   e. wcel 2141   A.wral 2448   _Vcvv 2730   |-> cmpt 4050   omcom 4574   -->wf 5194   ` cfv 5198  (class class class)co 5853   1oc1o 6388   2oc2o 6389   ^m cmap 6626  ℕ_∞xnninf 7096  WOmnicwomni 7139

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 609  ax-in2 610  ax-io 704  ax-5 1440  ax-7 1441  ax-gen 1442  ax-ie1 1486  ax-ie2 1487  ax-8 1497  ax-10 1498  ax-11 1499  ax-i12 1500  ax-bndl 1502  ax-4 1503  ax-17 1519  ax-i9 1523  ax-ial 1527  ax-i5r 1528  ax-13 2143  ax-14 2144  ax-ext 2152  ax-sep 4107  ax-nul 4115  ax-pow 4160  ax-pr 4194  ax-un 4418  ax-setind 4521  ax-iinf 4572

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-dc 830  df-3an 975  df-tru 1351  df-fal 1354  df-nf 1454  df-sb 1756  df-eu 2022  df-mo 2023  df-clab 2157  df-cleq 2163  df-clel 2166  df-nfc 2301  df-ne 2341  df-ral 2453  df-rex 2454  df-rab 2457  df-v 2732  df-sbc 2956  df-csb 3050  df-dif 3123  df-un 3125  df-in 3127  df-ss 3134  df-nul 3415  df-pw 3568  df-sn 3589  df-pr 3590  df-op 3592  df-uni 3797  df-int 3832  df-br 3990  df-opab 4051  df-mpt 4052  df-id 4278  df-suc 4356  df-iom 4575  df-xp 4617  df-rel 4618  df-cnv 4619  df-co 4620  df-dm 4621  df-rn 4622  df-iota 5160  df-fun 5200  df-fn 5201  df-f 5202  df-fv 5206  df-ov 5856  df-oprab 5857  df-mpo 5858  df-1o 6395  df-2o 6396  df-map 6628  df-nninf 7097  df-womni 7140

This theorem is referenced by: (None)