Theorem nninfdcinf 7255

Description: The Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO) implies that it is decidable whether an element of ℕ_∞ equals the point at infinity. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Dec-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nninfdcinf.w	|- ( ph -> om e. WOmni )
nninfdcinf.n	|- ( ph -> N e. ℕ∞ )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nninfdcinf	|- ( ph -> DECID N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) )

Distinct variable groups:   i, N   ph, i

Proof of Theorem nninfdcinf

Dummy variables f x are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq1 5569	. . . . . 6 |- ( f = N -> ( f ` x ) = ( N ` x ) )
2	1	eqeq1d 2213	. . . . 5 |- ( f = N -> ( ( f ` x ) = 1o <-> ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
3	2	ralbidv 2505	. . . 4 |- ( f = N -> ( A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o <-> A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
4	3	dcbid 839	. . 3 |- ( f = N -> (DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o <-> DECID A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
5		nninfdcinf.w	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> om e. WOmni )
6	5	elexd 2784	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> om e. _V )
7		iswomnimap 7250	. . . . 5 |- ( om e. _V -> ( om e. WOmni <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m om )DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o ) )
8	6, 7	syl 14	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( om e. WOmni <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m om )DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o ) )
9	5, 8	mpbid 147	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A. f e. ( 2o ^m om )DECID A. x e. om ( f ` x ) = 1o )
10		nninfdcinf.n	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> N e. ℕ∞ )
11		nninff 7206	. . . . 5 |- ( N e. ℕ∞ -> N : om --> 2o )
12	10, 11	syl 14	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> N : om --> 2o )
13		2onn 6597	. . . . . 6 |- 2o e. om
14	13	elexi 2783	. . . . 5 |- 2o e. _V
15		omex 4639	. . . . 5 |- om e. _V
16	14, 15	elmap 6754	. . . 4 |- ( N e. ( 2o ^m om ) <-> N : om --> 2o )
17	12, 16	sylibr 134	. . 3 |- ( ph -> N e. ( 2o ^m om ) )
18	4, 9, 17	rspcdva 2881	. 2 |- ( ph -> DECID A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o )
19	12	ffnd 5420	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> N Fn om )
20		eqidd 2205	. . . 4 |- ( x = i -> 1o = 1o )
21		1onn 6596	. . . . 5 |- 1o e. om
22	21	a1i 9	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. om ) -> 1o e. om )
23	21	a1i 9	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ i e. om ) -> 1o e. om )
24	19, 20, 22, 23	fnmptfvd 5678	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) <-> A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
25	24	dcbid 839	. 2 |- ( ph -> (DECID N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) <-> DECID A. x e. om ( N ` x ) = 1o ) )
26	18, 25	mpbird 167	1 |- ( ph -> DECID N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105  DECID wdc 835   = wceq 1372   e. wcel 2175   A.wral 2483   _Vcvv 2771   |-> cmpt 4104   omcom 4636   -->wf 5264   ` cfv 5268  (class class class)co 5934   1oc1o 6485   2oc2o 6486   ^m cmap 6725  ℕ_∞xnninf 7203  WOmnicwomni 7247

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1469  ax-7 1470  ax-gen 1471  ax-ie1 1515  ax-ie2 1516  ax-8 1526  ax-10 1527  ax-11 1528  ax-i12 1529  ax-bndl 1531  ax-4 1532  ax-17 1548  ax-i9 1552  ax-ial 1556  ax-i5r 1557  ax-13 2177  ax-14 2178  ax-ext 2186  ax-sep 4161  ax-nul 4169  ax-pow 4217  ax-pr 4252  ax-un 4478  ax-setind 4583  ax-iinf 4634

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 836  df-3an 982  df-tru 1375  df-fal 1378  df-nf 1483  df-sb 1785  df-eu 2056  df-mo 2057  df-clab 2191  df-cleq 2197  df-clel 2200  df-nfc 2336  df-ne 2376  df-ral 2488  df-rex 2489  df-rab 2492  df-v 2773  df-sbc 2998  df-csb 3093  df-dif 3167  df-un 3169  df-in 3171  df-ss 3178  df-nul 3460  df-pw 3617  df-sn 3638  df-pr 3639  df-op 3641  df-uni 3850  df-int 3885  df-br 4044  df-opab 4105  df-mpt 4106  df-id 4338  df-suc 4416  df-iom 4637  df-xp 4679  df-rel 4680  df-cnv 4681  df-co 4682  df-dm 4683  df-rn 4684  df-iota 5229  df-fun 5270  df-fn 5271  df-f 5272  df-fv 5276  df-ov 5937  df-oprab 5938  df-mpo 5939  df-1o 6492  df-2o 6493  df-map 6727  df-nninf 7204  df-womni 7248

This theorem is referenced by:  nninfinfwlpo  7264